Virtual RealityNCT06729918
The Effect of Virtual Reality on Affective Awareness, Empathy, Clinical Decision Making in Nursing Students
A study testing Virtual reality and simulated patient in people with Virtual Reality and Physical Examination of the Thorax and Lungs, run by Esra DOĞAN YILMAZ, PhD at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This study was planned to be conducted in a randomized controlled experimental design to determine the effect of virtual reality-based learning tool on nursing students' affective awareness, empathy, self-confidence and anxiety levels in clinical decision making. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Virtual Reality, Physical Examination of the Thorax and Lungs, Emotional Awareness
- What is being tested?
- Virtual reality and simulated patient
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 11 Dec 2024to 17 Jan 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Volunteering to participate in the research
- Not having eye defects that can affect depth perception such as amblyopia (lazy eye), anisometropia (when the refractions of the two eyes are different from each other) and strabismus (strabismus) (The declaration of the person will be taken as basis)
- Having enrolled in the HEM2005 coded "Health Assessment" course for the first time in the Fall Semester of the 2024-2025 Academic Year.
Who cannot join
- Participation in the research is voluntary
- Graduated from high school, associate degree or undergraduate degree in a health-related field,
- Having taken the HEM2005 coded "Health Assessment" course before were the exclusion criteria.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Virtual Reality-based Learning Tool on Nursing Students' Affective Awareness, Empathy, Self-confidence in Clinical Decision Making and Anxiety Levels
This study was planned to be conducted in a randomized controlled experimental design to determine the effect of virtual reality-based learning tool on nursing students' affective awareness, empathy, self-confidence and anxiety levels in clinical decision making. The population of the study will consist of students taking the Health Assessment course at Kırıkkale University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing. The data of the study will be collected by using descriptive characteristics form, "Affective Awareness Scale for Teaching", "Affective and Cognitive Empathy Scale", "Clinical Decision Making Self-Confidence and Anxiety Scale in Nursing". Students will be divided into virtual reality group, simulated patient group and control (traditional education) group using their academic grade point average. The subject of Health Assessment Thorax and Lung assessment will be taught to the control group with traditional education, to the virtual reality group with a virtual reality-based thorax and lung physical examination learning tool, and to the simulated patient group by performing a physical examination of the thorax and lung. Before the application, at the end of the application and at the end of clinical practices, the Affective Awareness Scale for Teaching", 'Affective and Cognitive Empathy Scale', Clinical Decision Making in Nursing Self-Confidence and Anxiety Scale" will be collected. Frequency distributions, descriptive statistics, chi-square, one-way analysis of variance (OneWay ANOVA), Levene's test, "multiple comparison test" (Bonferroni, Tamhane's T2) and repeated measures analysis of variance will be used to evaluate the data. 0.05 will be used as the significance level and it will be stated that there is a significant difference in case of p<0.05 and there is no significant difference in case of p>0.05.
Read the detailed description
This research will be conducted in a randomized controlled experimental design. This study was planned to determine the effect of virtual reality-based learning tool on nursing students' affective awareness, empathy, self-confidence in clinical decision making and anxiety levels.
Hypothesis 1. Virtual reality-based learning tool affects students' affective awareness Hypothesis 2. Virtual reality-based learning tool affects students' empathy levels.
Hypothesis 3. Virtual reality-based learning tool affects students' self-confidence and anxiety levels in clinical decision making.
The population of the study will consist of 106 student nurses taking the Health Assessment course at Kırıkkale University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing. The sample of the study will consist of students who agree to participate in the study and meet the inclusion criteria.
Randomization in the study; students who meet the sample selection criteria will be randomly divided into 3 groups as virtual reality group, simulated patient group and control (traditional education) group using a computer-based program (www.random.org). Assignment to the virtual reality group, simulated patient group and control (traditional education) groups will be made by an independent researcher to prevent bias and ensure confidentiality.
The data of the study will be collected by using descriptive characteristics form, "Affective Awareness Scale for Teaching", "Affective and Cognitive Empathy Scale", "Self-Confidence and Anxiety Scale for Clinical Decision Making in Nursing".
Descriptive Characteristics Form The "Descriptive Characteristics Form" was developed by the researchers based on the literature.
"Affective Awareness Scale for Teaching" is a scale developed by Yakar and Duman in 2017. The Affective Awareness Scale for Teaching is a 5-point Likert-type scale (1-Not at all suitable for me; 2-Not suitable for me; 3-Suitable for me; 4-Somewhat suitable for me; 5-Completely suitable for me) consisting of five factors: receiving (7 items), reacting (9 items), valuing (8 items), organizing (7 items), and personification (6 items) and a total of 37 items. The Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient for the overall scale is α=0.896.
"Affective and Cognitive Empathy Scale" is a scale developed by Vachon and Lynam in 2015. The Turkish validity and reliability of the Affective and Cognitive Empathy scale was conducted by Yukay Yüksel et al. in 2020. The Affective and Cognitive Empathy Scale is a scale developed to measure the affective and cognitive levels of participants. This scale allows the researcher to determine the empathy levels of individuals more comprehensively by examining three different empathy dimensions. The Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient of the scale is α=0.91.
Self-Confidence and Anxiety Scale for Clinical Decision Making in Nursing was developed by Krista A. White in 2014. Turkish validity and reliability was conducted by Bektaş et al. in 2017. The scale evaluates nursing students' anxiety and self-confidence in clinical decision making. The six-point Likert-type scale has a total of 27 questions. Scores are obtained separately for self-confidence and anxiety. As the scores obtained from the self-confidence section and its sub-dimensions increase, the student's self-confidence level increases, and as the scores obtained from the anxiety section and its sub-dimensions decrease, the anxiety level decreases. The lowest score that can be obtained from the self-confidence and anxiety sections is 27 and the highest score is 162. The total Cronbach alpha of the self-confidence section of the scale is 0.97 and the total Cronbach alpha of the anxiety section is 0.96.
Research Implementation The theoretical content of the subject will be explained to all students by the researcher using lecture and question and answer techniques. The students will be administered a descriptive characteristics form, Affective Awareness Scale for Teaching", "Affective and Cognitive Empathy Scale and Self-Confidence and Anxiety Scale for Clinical Decision Making in Nursing (pre-test). Then, students will be randomized into groups according to their academic grade point average.
The virtual reality-based thorax and lung physical examination learning tool was prepared by Aslı Yılmaz and Nurcan Çalışkan. Yılmaz and Çalışkan prepared voice-over content and sound effects to be used in the simulation. After these processes were completed, the algorithm required for the software was created. The researcher planned how the users would move in the simulation, how the menus and controls would work, and how the simulation would respond to the user's actions, and delivered them to the software team. The simulation was developed by the software team using the free and open source "Unity" program to be compatible with the "Oculus" platform.
The simulated patient who will take part in the application was determined. The simulated patient is adult and male. An informative meeting about the process will be held with the simulated patient one week before and on the day of the implementation. Expectations from the simulated patient will be explained at the meeting. Rehearsals will be made regarding the functionality of the application steps and the performance of the simulated patient.
All students in the control group will practice thorax and lung examination on a classmate.
In the health assessment course, three groups will be directed to the laboratories simultaneously. An instructor will be in charge of each group and will ensure coordination. Students in the simulated patient group will work with the simulated patient, students in the virtual reality group will work with virtual reality, and students in the active control group will work on the thorax and lung examination on a classmate who is not in the sample group. While the students are working on the steps of the thorax and lung examination, the instructors will be with them as facilitators. After the practice, the Affective Awareness Scale for Teaching, Affective and Cognitive Empathy Scale, and the Self-Confidence and Anxiety Scale for Clinical Decision Making in Nursing (post-test) will be administered.
During the fall semester of the academic year, students rotate to different clinics (internal and surgical clinics) 2 days a week. At the end of the 15-week fall semester, students will be administered the Affective Awareness Scale for Teaching, Affective and Cognitive Empathy Scale, and the Self-Confidence and Anxiety Scale for Clinical Decision Making in Nursing (follow-up test).
Frequency distributions, descriptive statistics, chi-square, one-way analysis of variance (OneWay ANOVA), Levene's test, "multiple comparison test" (Bonferroni, Tamhane's T2) and repeated measures analysis of variance will be used to evaluate the data. 0.05 will be used as the significance level and it will be stated that there is a significant difference in case of p<0.05 and there is no significant difference in case of p>0.05.
- Conditions
- Virtual Reality, Physical Examination of the Thorax and Lungs, Emotional Awareness, Empathy, Self-confidence in Clinical Decision Making and Anxiety
- Being tested
- Virtual reality, simulated patient
- Keywords
- virtual reality, physical examination, affective awareness, empathy, self-confidence in clinical decision making and anxiety
- Medical subject headings
- Anxiety Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Virtual realityOther
Also called Virtual reality based training
Thoracic lung physical examination will be studied using a virtual reality-based thoracic and lung physical examination learning tool.
simulated patientOther
Also called simulated patient group
Thoracic lung physical examination will be studied using a simulated patient.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| virtual reality group | Experimental | Thoracic lung physical examination will be studied using a virtual reality-based thoracic and lung physical examination learning tool. Receives: Other: Virtual reality |
| simulated patient group | Experimental | Thoracic lung physical examination will be studied using a simulated patient. Receives: Other: simulated patient |
| control (traditional education) group | No intervention | No applicationwas madeto the control group. He/she will practice the thoracic lung physical examination on a classmate who is not in the sample group. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Affective Awareness Level
Scores from sub-dimensions and the scale total are evaluated according to the minimum and maximum scores that can be obtained.
As the score increases, the level of affective awareness towards teaching also increases.
Receiving sub-dimension: min: 7, max: 35 Reacting: min: 9, max: 45 Valuing: min: 8, max: 40 Organizing: min: 7, max: 35 Personalizing: min: 6, max: 30 Scale Total Score: min: 37, max: 185
Measured: From the pre-test before the training applications to the post-test after the training applications, approximately one month.
Affective and Cognitive Empathy Level
As the score increases, the level of affective and cognitive empathy also increases.
Measured: From the pre-test before the training applications to the post-test after the training applications, approximately one month.
Clinical Decision Making Self-Confidence and Anxiety Level
As the score obtained from the self-confidence section and its sub-dimensions increases, the student's self-confidence level increases, and as the score obtained from the anxiety section and its sub-dimensions decreases, the anxiety level decreases.
Measured: As the score increases, the level of affective and cognitive empathy also increases. From the pre-test before the training applications to the post-test after the training applications, approximately one month.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Dec 2024
- Study start11 Dec 2024
- Primary completion17 Dec 2024
- Study completion17 Jan 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Virtual RealityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- A randomized controlled trial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Esra DOĞAN YILMAZ, PhD
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Esra DOĞAN YILMAZ, PhD, Kırıkkale University
- Investigators
- Emel GÜLNAR, Assoc. Prof., Principal investigator, Kırıkkale UniversityAslı YILMAZ, MSc, Study chair, Gazi University graduate studentEsra DOĞAN YILMAZ, Asst. Prof., Study chair, Kırıkkale UniversityKamile KIRCA, Asst. Prof., Study chair, Kırıkkale UniversityŞule BIYIK BAYRAM, Assoc. Prof., Study chair, Black Sea Technical UniversityNurcan ÇALIŞKAN, Prof. Dr., Study chair, Gazi University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06729918
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- virtual reality-2024
- Status last verified
- Jul 2025
- First submitted
- 7 Dec 2024
- Last updated
- 28 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: The confidentiality of the data used in the study will be protected.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Virtual Reality-based Learning Tool on Nursing Students' Affective Awareness, Empathy, Self-confidence in Clinical Decision Making and Anxiety Levels
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06729918
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- virtual reality-2024
- Conditions
- Virtual Reality, Physical Examination of the Thorax and Lungs, Emotional Awareness, Empathy, Self-confidence in Clinical Decision Making and Anxiety
- Keywords
- virtual reality, physical examination, affective awareness, empathy, self-confidence in clinical decision making and anxiety
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Esra DOĞAN YILMAZ, PhDUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 11 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 17 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 17 Jan 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study was planned to be conducted in a randomized controlled experimental design to determine the effect of virtual reality-based learning tool on nursing students' affective awareness, empathy, self-confidence and anxiety levels in clinical decision making. The population of the study will consist of students taking the Health Assessment course at Kırıkkale University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing. The data of the study will be collected by using descriptive characteristics form, "Affective Awareness Scale for Teaching", "Affective and Cognitive Empathy Scale", "Clinical Decision Making Self-Confidence and Anxiety Scale in Nursing". Students will be divided into virtual reality group, simulated patient group and control (traditional education) group using their academic grade point average. The subject of Health Assessment Thorax and Lung assessment will be taught to the control group with traditional education, to the virtual reality group with a virtual reality-based thorax and lung physical examination learning tool, and to the simulated patient group by performing a physical examination of the thorax and lung. Before the application, at the end of the application and at the end of clinical practices, the Affective Awareness Scale for Teaching", 'Affective and Cognitive Empathy Scale', Clinical Decision Making in Nursing Self-Confidence and Anxiety Scale" will be collected. Frequency distributions, descriptive statistics, chi-square, one-way analysis of variance (OneWay ANOVA), Levene's test, "multiple comparison test" (Bonferroni, Tamhane's T2) and repeated measures analysis of variance will be used to evaluate the data. 0.05 will be used as the significance level and it will be stated that there is a significant difference in case of p<0.05 and there is no significant difference in case of p>0.05.
Detailed description
This research will be conducted in a randomized controlled experimental design. This study was planned to determine the effect of virtual reality-based learning tool on nursing students' affective awareness, empathy, self-confidence in clinical decision making and anxiety levels.
Hypothesis 1. Virtual reality-based learning tool affects students' affective awareness Hypothesis 2. Virtual reality-based learning tool affects students' empathy levels.
Hypothesis 3. Virtual reality-based learning tool affects students' self-confidence and anxiety levels in clinical decision making.
The population of the study will consist of 106 student nurses taking the Health Assessment course at Kırıkkale University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing. The sample of the study will consist of students who agree to participate in the study and meet the inclusion criteria.
Randomization in the study; students who meet the sample selection criteria will be randomly divided into 3 groups as virtual reality group, simulated patient group and control (traditional education) group using a computer-based program (www.random.org). Assignment to the virtual reality group, simulated patient group and control (traditional education) groups will be made by an independent researcher to prevent bias and ensure confidentiality.
The data of the study will be collected by using descriptive characteristics form, "Affective Awareness Scale for Teaching", "Affective and Cognitive Empathy Scale", "Self-Confidence and Anxiety Scale for Clinical Decision Making in Nursing".
Descriptive Characteristics Form The "Descriptive Characteristics Form" was developed by the researchers based on the literature.
"Affective Awareness Scale for Teaching" is a scale developed by Yakar and Duman in 2017. The Affective Awareness Scale for Teaching is a 5-point Likert-type scale (1-Not at all suitable for me; 2-Not suitable for me; 3-Suitable for me; 4-Somewhat suitable for me; 5-Completely suitable for me) consisting of five factors: receiving (7 items), reacting (9 items), valuing (8 items), organizing (7 items), and personification (6 items) and a total of 37 items. The Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient for the overall scale is α=0.896.
"Affective and Cognitive Empathy Scale" is a scale developed by Vachon and Lynam in 2015. The Turkish validity and reliability of the Affective and Cognitive Empathy scale was conducted by Yukay Yüksel et al. in 2020. The Affective and Cognitive Empathy Scale is a scale developed to measure the affective and cognitive levels of participants. This scale allows the researcher to determine the empathy levels of individuals more comprehensively by examining three different empathy dimensions. The Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient of the scale is α=0.91.
Self-Confidence and Anxiety Scale for Clinical Decision Making in Nursing was developed by Krista A. White in 2014. Turkish validity and reliability was conducted by Bektaş et al. in 2017. The scale evaluates nursing students' anxiety and self-confidence in clinical decision making. The six-point Likert-type scale has a total of 27 questions. Scores are obtained separately for self-confidence and anxiety. As the scores obtained from the self-confidence section and its sub-dimensions increase, the student's self-confidence level increases, and as the scores obtained from the anxiety section and its sub-dimensions decrease, the anxiety level decreases. The lowest score that can be obtained from the self-confidence and anxiety sections is 27 and the highest score is 162. The total Cronbach alpha of the self-confidence section of the scale is 0.97 and the total Cronbach alpha of the anxiety section is 0.96.
Research Implementation The theoretical content of the subject will be explained to all students by the researcher using lecture and question and answer techniques. The students will be administered a descriptive characteristics form, Affective Awareness Scale for Teaching", "Affective and Cognitive Empathy Scale and Self-Confidence and Anxiety Scale for Clinical Decision Making in Nursing (pre-test). Then, students will be randomized into groups according to their academic grade point average.
The virtual reality-based thorax and lung physical examination learning tool was prepared by Aslı Yılmaz and Nurcan Çalışkan. Yılmaz and Çalışkan prepared voice-over content and sound effects to be used in the simulation. After these processes were completed, the algorithm required for the software was created. The researcher planned how the users would move in the simulation, how the menus and controls would work, and how the simulation would respond to the user's actions, and delivered them to the software team. The simulation was developed by the software team using the free and open source "Unity" program to be compatible with the "Oculus" platform.
The simulated patient who will take part in the application was determined. The simulated patient is adult and male. An informative meeting about the process will be held with the simulated patient one week before and on the day of the implementation. Expectations from the simulated patient will be explained at the meeting. Rehearsals will be made regarding the functionality of the application steps and the performance of the simulated patient.
All students in the control group will practice thorax and lung examination on a classmate.
In the health assessment course, three groups will be directed to the laboratories simultaneously. An instructor will be in charge of each group and will ensure coordination. Students in the simulated patient group will work with the simulated patient, students in the virtual reality group will work with virtual reality, and students in the active control group will work on the thorax and lung examination on a classmate who is not in the sample group. While the students are working on the steps of the thorax and lung examination, the instructors will be with them as facilitators. After the practice, the Affective Awareness Scale for Teaching, Affective and Cognitive Empathy Scale, and the Self-Confidence and Anxiety Scale for Clinical Decision Making in Nursing (post-test) will be administered.
During the fall semester of the academic year, students rotate to different clinics (internal and surgical clinics) 2 days a week. At the end of the 15-week fall semester, students will be administered the Affective Awareness Scale for Teaching, Affective and Cognitive Empathy Scale, and the Self-Confidence and Anxiety Scale for Clinical Decision Making in Nursing (follow-up test).
Frequency distributions, descriptive statistics, chi-square, one-way analysis of variance (OneWay ANOVA), Levene's test, "multiple comparison test" (Bonferroni, Tamhane's T2) and repeated measures analysis of variance will be used to evaluate the data. 0.05 will be used as the significance level and it will be stated that there is a significant difference in case of p<0.05 and there is no significant difference in case of p>0.05.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- A randomized controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| virtual reality group | Experimental | Other: Virtual realityThoracic lung physical examination will be studied using a virtual reality-based thoracic and lung physical examination learning tool. |
| simulated patient group | Experimental | Other: simulated patientThoracic lung physical examination will be studied using a simulated patient. |
| control (traditional education) group | No intervention | –No applicationwas madeto the control group. He/she will practice the thoracic lung physical examination on a classmate who is not in the sample group. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Volunteering to participate in the research
- Not having eye defects that can affect depth perception such as amblyopia (lazy eye), anisometropia (when the refractions of the two eyes are different from each other) and strabismus (strabismus) (The declaration of the person will be taken as basis)
- Having enrolled in the HEM2005 coded "Health Assessment" course for the first time in the Fall Semester of the 2024-2025 Academic Year.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Participation in the research is voluntary
- Graduated from high school, associate degree or undergraduate degree in a health-related field,
- Having taken the HEM2005 coded "Health Assessment" course before were the exclusion criteria.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual realityAlso: Virtual reality based trainingThoracic lung physical examination will be studied using a virtual reality-based thoracic and lung physical examination learning tool. | Other | virtual reality group |
| simulated patientAlso: simulated patient groupThoracic lung physical examination will be studied using a simulated patient. | Other | simulated patient group |
Primary outcome
Affective Awareness Level
Time frame: From the pre-test before the training applications to the post-test after the training applications, approximately one month.
Scores from sub-dimensions and the scale total are evaluated according to the minimum and maximum scores that can be obtained. As the score increases, the level of affective awareness towards teaching also increases. Receiving sub-dimension: min: 7, max: 35 Reacting: min: 9, max: 45 Valuing: min: 8, max: 40 Organizing: min: 7, max: 35 Personalizing: min: 6, max: 30 Scale Total Score: min: 37, max: 185
Affective and Cognitive Empathy Level
Time frame: From the pre-test before the training applications to the post-test after the training applications, approximately one month.
As the score increases, the level of affective and cognitive empathy also increases.
Clinical Decision Making Self-Confidence and Anxiety Level
Time frame: As the score increases, the level of affective and cognitive empathy also increases. From the pre-test before the training applications to the post-test after the training applications, approximately one month.
As the score obtained from the self-confidence section and its sub-dimensions increases, the student's self-confidence level increases, and as the score obtained from the anxiety section and its sub-dimensions decreases, the anxiety level decreases.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jul 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. The confidentiality of the data used in the study will be protected.
Related trials for Virtual Reality
Recruiting
THE EFFECTS OF GAME-BASED EXERCISE PROGRAMS
Physical Activity, Body Image
Not yet recruiting
Virtual Reality Multidomain Training for Older Adults With Cognitive Frailty
Cognitive Frailty
Not yet recruiting
Virtual Reality Training Dose for Arm Recovery After Stroke: Clinical and Blood Biomarker Responses
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
Recruiting
Virtual Reality in Rehabilitation of Executive Functions in Children With Mild or Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury
Traumatic Brain Injury
Not yet recruiting
Advancing Cardiovascular Health Among Adolescents With Intellectual Disabilities: Co-Development of Technology Interventions to Enhance Physical Activity
Physical Activity, Intellectual Disabilities
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Emel GÜLNAR, Assoc. Prof. principal investigator
Kırıkkale University
Aslı YILMAZ, MSc study chair
Gazi University graduate student
Esra DOĞAN YILMAZ, Asst. Prof. study chair
Kırıkkale University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Virtual reality and simulated patient in people with Virtual Reality and Physical Examination of the Thorax and Lungs, run by Esra DOĞAN YILMAZ, PhD at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Affective Awareness Level (time frame: From the pre-test before the training applications to the post-test after the training applications, approximately one month.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jul 2025.