AzTrials
AzTrials

Virtual RealityNCT06729918

The Effect of Virtual Reality on Affective Awareness, Empathy, Clinical Decision Making in Nursing Students

A study testing Virtual reality and simulated patient in people with Virtual Reality and Physical Examination of the Thorax and Lungs, run by Esra DOĞAN YILMAZ, PhD at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study was planned to be conducted in a randomized controlled experimental design to determine the effect of virtual reality-based learning tool on nursing students' affective awareness, empathy, self-confidence and anxiety levels in clinical decision making. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Virtual reality and simulated patient
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
90 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
11 Dec 2024to 17 Jan 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Volunteering to participate in the research
  • Not having eye defects that can affect depth perception such as amblyopia (lazy eye), anisometropia (when the refractions of the two eyes are different from each other) and strabismus (strabismus) (The declaration of the person will be taken as basis)
  • Having enrolled in the HEM2005 coded "Health Assessment" course for the first time in the Fall Semester of the 2024-2025 Academic Year.

Who cannot join

  • Participation in the research is voluntary
  • Graduated from high school, associate degree or undergraduate degree in a health-related field,
  • Having taken the HEM2005 coded "Health Assessment" course before were the exclusion criteria.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Kirikkale University

    Kirikkale, 71450

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: The Effect of Virtual Reality-based Learning Tool on Nursing Students' Affective Awareness, Empathy, Self-confidence in Clinical Decision Making and Anxiety Levels

This study was planned to be conducted in a randomized controlled experimental design to determine the effect of virtual reality-based learning tool on nursing students' affective awareness, empathy, self-confidence and anxiety levels in clinical decision making. The population of the study will consist of students taking the Health Assessment course at Kırıkkale University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing. The data of the study will be collected by using descriptive characteristics form, "Affective Awareness Scale for Teaching", "Affective and Cognitive Empathy Scale", "Clinical Decision Making Self-Confidence and Anxiety Scale in Nursing". Students will be divided into virtual reality group, simulated patient group and control (traditional education) group using their academic grade point average. The subject of Health Assessment Thorax and Lung assessment will be taught to the control group with traditional education, to the virtual reality group with a virtual reality-based thorax and lung physical examination learning tool, and to the simulated patient group by performing a physical examination of the thorax and lung. Before the application, at the end of the application and at the end of clinical practices, the Affective Awareness Scale for Teaching", 'Affective and Cognitive Empathy Scale', Clinical Decision Making in Nursing Self-Confidence and Anxiety Scale" will be collected. Frequency distributions, descriptive statistics, chi-square, one-way analysis of variance (OneWay ANOVA), Levene's test, "multiple comparison test" (Bonferroni, Tamhane's T2) and repeated measures analysis of variance will be used to evaluate the data. 0.05 will be used as the significance level and it will be stated that there is a significant difference in case of p<0.05 and there is no significant difference in case of p>0.05.

Read the detailed description

This research will be conducted in a randomized controlled experimental design. This study was planned to determine the effect of virtual reality-based learning tool on nursing students' affective awareness, empathy, self-confidence in clinical decision making and anxiety levels.

Hypothesis 1. Virtual reality-based learning tool affects students' affective awareness Hypothesis 2. Virtual reality-based learning tool affects students' empathy levels.

Hypothesis 3. Virtual reality-based learning tool affects students' self-confidence and anxiety levels in clinical decision making.

The population of the study will consist of 106 student nurses taking the Health Assessment course at Kırıkkale University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing. The sample of the study will consist of students who agree to participate in the study and meet the inclusion criteria.

Randomization in the study; students who meet the sample selection criteria will be randomly divided into 3 groups as virtual reality group, simulated patient group and control (traditional education) group using a computer-based program (www.random.org). Assignment to the virtual reality group, simulated patient group and control (traditional education) groups will be made by an independent researcher to prevent bias and ensure confidentiality.

The data of the study will be collected by using descriptive characteristics form, "Affective Awareness Scale for Teaching", "Affective and Cognitive Empathy Scale", "Self-Confidence and Anxiety Scale for Clinical Decision Making in Nursing".

Descriptive Characteristics Form The "Descriptive Characteristics Form" was developed by the researchers based on the literature.

"Affective Awareness Scale for Teaching" is a scale developed by Yakar and Duman in 2017. The Affective Awareness Scale for Teaching is a 5-point Likert-type scale (1-Not at all suitable for me; 2-Not suitable for me; 3-Suitable for me; 4-Somewhat suitable for me; 5-Completely suitable for me) consisting of five factors: receiving (7 items), reacting (9 items), valuing (8 items), organizing (7 items), and personification (6 items) and a total of 37 items. The Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient for the overall scale is α=0.896.

"Affective and Cognitive Empathy Scale" is a scale developed by Vachon and Lynam in 2015. The Turkish validity and reliability of the Affective and Cognitive Empathy scale was conducted by Yukay Yüksel et al. in 2020. The Affective and Cognitive Empathy Scale is a scale developed to measure the affective and cognitive levels of participants. This scale allows the researcher to determine the empathy levels of individuals more comprehensively by examining three different empathy dimensions. The Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient of the scale is α=0.91.

Self-Confidence and Anxiety Scale for Clinical Decision Making in Nursing was developed by Krista A. White in 2014. Turkish validity and reliability was conducted by Bektaş et al. in 2017. The scale evaluates nursing students' anxiety and self-confidence in clinical decision making. The six-point Likert-type scale has a total of 27 questions. Scores are obtained separately for self-confidence and anxiety. As the scores obtained from the self-confidence section and its sub-dimensions increase, the student's self-confidence level increases, and as the scores obtained from the anxiety section and its sub-dimensions decrease, the anxiety level decreases. The lowest score that can be obtained from the self-confidence and anxiety sections is 27 and the highest score is 162. The total Cronbach alpha of the self-confidence section of the scale is 0.97 and the total Cronbach alpha of the anxiety section is 0.96.

Research Implementation The theoretical content of the subject will be explained to all students by the researcher using lecture and question and answer techniques. The students will be administered a descriptive characteristics form, Affective Awareness Scale for Teaching", "Affective and Cognitive Empathy Scale and Self-Confidence and Anxiety Scale for Clinical Decision Making in Nursing (pre-test). Then, students will be randomized into groups according to their academic grade point average.

The virtual reality-based thorax and lung physical examination learning tool was prepared by Aslı Yılmaz and Nurcan Çalışkan. Yılmaz and Çalışkan prepared voice-over content and sound effects to be used in the simulation. After these processes were completed, the algorithm required for the software was created. The researcher planned how the users would move in the simulation, how the menus and controls would work, and how the simulation would respond to the user's actions, and delivered them to the software team. The simulation was developed by the software team using the free and open source "Unity" program to be compatible with the "Oculus" platform.

The simulated patient who will take part in the application was determined. The simulated patient is adult and male. An informative meeting about the process will be held with the simulated patient one week before and on the day of the implementation. Expectations from the simulated patient will be explained at the meeting. Rehearsals will be made regarding the functionality of the application steps and the performance of the simulated patient.

All students in the control group will practice thorax and lung examination on a classmate.

In the health assessment course, three groups will be directed to the laboratories simultaneously. An instructor will be in charge of each group and will ensure coordination. Students in the simulated patient group will work with the simulated patient, students in the virtual reality group will work with virtual reality, and students in the active control group will work on the thorax and lung examination on a classmate who is not in the sample group. While the students are working on the steps of the thorax and lung examination, the instructors will be with them as facilitators. After the practice, the Affective Awareness Scale for Teaching, Affective and Cognitive Empathy Scale, and the Self-Confidence and Anxiety Scale for Clinical Decision Making in Nursing (post-test) will be administered.

During the fall semester of the academic year, students rotate to different clinics (internal and surgical clinics) 2 days a week. At the end of the 15-week fall semester, students will be administered the Affective Awareness Scale for Teaching, Affective and Cognitive Empathy Scale, and the Self-Confidence and Anxiety Scale for Clinical Decision Making in Nursing (follow-up test).

Frequency distributions, descriptive statistics, chi-square, one-way analysis of variance (OneWay ANOVA), Levene's test, "multiple comparison test" (Bonferroni, Tamhane's T2) and repeated measures analysis of variance will be used to evaluate the data. 0.05 will be used as the significance level and it will be stated that there is a significant difference in case of p<0.05 and there is no significant difference in case of p>0.05.

Being tested
Virtual reality, simulated patient
Keywords
virtual reality, physical examination, affective awareness, empathy, self-confidence in clinical decision making and anxiety
Medical subject headings
Anxiety Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Virtual realityOther

    Also called Virtual reality based training

    Thoracic lung physical examination will be studied using a virtual reality-based thoracic and lung physical examination learning tool.

  • simulated patientOther

    Also called simulated patient group

    Thoracic lung physical examination will be studied using a simulated patient.

Study groups in NCT06729918
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
virtual reality groupExperimentalThoracic lung physical examination will be studied using a virtual reality-based thoracic and lung physical examination learning tool.
Receives: Other: Virtual reality
simulated patient groupExperimentalThoracic lung physical examination will be studied using a simulated patient.
Receives: Other: simulated patient
control (traditional education) groupNo interventionNo applicationwas madeto the control group. He/she will practice the thoracic lung physical examination on a classmate who is not in the sample group.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Affective Awareness Level

    Scores from sub-dimensions and the scale total are evaluated according to the minimum and maximum scores that can be obtained.

    As the score increases, the level of affective awareness towards teaching also increases.

    Receiving sub-dimension: min: 7, max: 35 Reacting: min: 9, max: 45 Valuing: min: 8, max: 40 Organizing: min: 7, max: 35 Personalizing: min: 6, max: 30 Scale Total Score: min: 37, max: 185

    Measured: From the pre-test before the training applications to the post-test after the training applications, approximately one month.

  2. Affective and Cognitive Empathy Level

    As the score increases, the level of affective and cognitive empathy also increases.

    Measured: From the pre-test before the training applications to the post-test after the training applications, approximately one month.

  3. Clinical Decision Making Self-Confidence and Anxiety Level

    As the score obtained from the self-confidence section and its sub-dimensions increases, the student's self-confidence level increases, and as the score obtained from the anxiety section and its sub-dimensions decreases, the anxiety level decreases.

    Measured: As the score increases, the level of affective and cognitive empathy also increases. From the pre-test before the training applications to the post-test after the training applications, approximately one month.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Dec 2024
  2. Study start11 Dec 2024
  3. Primary completion17 Dec 2024
  4. Study completion17 Jan 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
A randomized controlled trial
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
90 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06729918
Sponsor's protocol ID
virtual reality-2024
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
7 Dec 2024
Last updated
28 Jul 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: The confidentiality of the data used in the study will be protected.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Virtual reality and simulated patient in people with Virtual Reality and Physical Examination of the Thorax and Lungs, run by Esra DOĞAN YILMAZ, PhD at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Affective Awareness Level (time frame: From the pre-test before the training applications to the post-test after the training applications, approximately one month.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jul 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in