Rectal CancerACO/ARO/AIO-22NCT06729645
External Beam Radiotherapy Combined With Endorectal High-dose-rate Brachytherapy in Elderly and Frail Patients With Rectal Cancer
A study testing radiotherapy in people with Rectal Cancer, run by University Hospital of Cologne at 4 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
ACO/ARO/AIO-22 - External beam radiotherapy combined with endorectal high-dose-ratebrachytherapy in elderly and frail patients with rectal cancer. A prospective multicentre trial of the German Rectal Cancer Study Group. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 70 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rectal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- radiotherapy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- 30 Sep 2026to 30 Dec 2031
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 70 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Elderly patients (age ≥70 years) with a G8-frailty score ≤ 14 based on the G8 geriatric assessment tool of frailty and/or elderly patients (age ≥70 years) with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA PS) ≥ 3 and/ elderly patients (age ≥70 years) unsuitable to tolerate radical surgery as judged by the surgeon and/or elderly patients (age ≥70 years) that refuse radical surgery
- Life expectancy ≥ 6 months
- Male and female patients with histologically confirmed diagnosis of rectal adenocarcinoma localized 0-16 cm from the anocutaneous line as measured by rigid rectoscopy
- MRI-defined cT1-3d N0/+ M0, mrCRM - / +, </= 2/3 involvement of the rectal wall circumference
- Staging requirements: High-resolution, thin-sliced (i.e. 3mm) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis is the mandatory local staging procedure.
- Spiral-CT of the abdomen and chest to exclude distant metastases.
Who cannot join
- Previous or current drug abuse
- Other concomitant antineoplastic therapy
- Prior or concurrent malignancy ≤ 3 years prior to enrolment in study (Exception: non-melanoma skin cancer or cervical carcinoma FIGO stage 0-
- 1), unless the patient is continuously disease-free
- Psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule (these conditions should be discussed with the patient before registration in the trial).
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Emmanouil Fokas, MD DPhil contact
Germany4 sites
Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Cyberknife und Radioonkologie Universität zu Köln
Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, 50937
Emmanouil E Fokas, Prof. Dr. med. Dr., +49 221 478-84763, emmanouil.fokas@uk-koeln.de
Frankfurt Universitätsklinikum
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60590
Markus M Diefenhardt, PD Dr., +49 60 6301-5130, strahlentherapie@unimedizin-ffm.de
Klinikverbund Allgäu
Kempten, BaBaden-Württembergs, 87439
Florian f Sterzing, Prof. Dr. med.
Leipzig, Universitätsklinikum
Leipzig, Saxony, 04103
Thomas t Kuhnt, Prof. Dr., +49 341 97-16650
About this study
Official title: ACO/ARO/AIO-22 - External Beam Radiotherapy Combined With Endorectal High-dose-ratebrachytherapy in Elderly and Frail Patients With Rectal Cancer. A Prospective Multicentre Trial of the German Rectal Cancer Study Group
ACO/ARO/AIO-22 - External beam radiotherapy combined with endorectal high-dose-ratebrachytherapy in elderly and frail patients with rectal cancer.
A prospective multicentre trial of the German Rectal Cancer Study Group.
Read the detailed description
Epidemiological data indicate that more than 50% of patients with newly-diagnosed rectal cancer are older than 70 years, with rising numbers expected over the next decades. Albeit total mesorectal excision (TME) is considered part of the standard multimodal therapy in rectal cancer, elderly and frail rectal cancer patients are often unable to undergo radical surgery as the risk of surgical complications and postoperative mortality rises with increasing age and comorbidity. In an analysis of the Colorectal Cooperative Group UK (1988-200) in 34.194 patients with colorectal cancer, 21% of those aged over 85 years did not undergo operation, while the rates of no surgical intervention were 11% in the 75-84 years age group. Furthermore, these patients often receive no treatment at all due to frailty and concurrent diseases, resulting in local and/or systemic disease progression with associated symptoms and impaired quality of life (QoL).
Significant advances have been made in modern radiotherapy (RT), which can provide a valuable alternative non-operative treatment strategy for elderly and frail patients. Notably, to achieve clinical complete response (cCR) with RT alone, high doses are needed. Recent data from randomized trials (OPERA, MORPEUS) in young and fit patients with rectal cancer indicate that increased RT doses can be safely delivered following external beam (chemo)radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by endoluminal radiotherapeutic modalities, such as contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) or high-dose rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDR-BT). However, prospective studies testing this therapeutic concept in elderly and frail patients with rectal cancer remain limited. Also, despite the wide availability of brachytherapy, applicability of this concept remains largely unexplored in this challenging age subgroup in Germany.
The ACO/ARO/AIO-22 prospective trial will aim to evaluate the efficacy of EBRT in combination with endorectal HDR-BT to achieve local control (cCR) and maintain QoL in elderly and frail patients with rectal cancer that are considered unfit for radical surgery, but amenable to EBRT in combination with endorectal HDR-BT or CXB.
The ACO/ARO/AIO-22 incorporates several aspects that make this prospective study important:
- treatment decision making is challenging in elderly/frail patients with rectal cancer, whereas standardized treatment guidelines for this patient cohort are lacking, thus necessitating new clinical trials to establish the best possible treatment in this clinical setting;
- the combination of EBRT and HDR-BT has been shown to result in high rates of tumor response with almost 90% overall response and cCR rates of approximately 50-80%, especially in young and fit patients with early stage tumors, whereas prospective trials in elderly/frail patients remain limited;
- due to its very steep dose gradient, endorectal HDR-BT enables the delivery of a very high radiation dose to the tumor with a very steep decrease in the volume of normal tissue, thus increasing treatment efficacy while keeping toxicity low;
- albeit already tested in different countries such as France, the Netherlands and the UK, the concept of combining EBRT with endorectal HDR-BT has not been widely tested in Germany yet and, thus, a prospective study is needed to evaluate its efficacy and safety in elderly/frail patients with rectal cancer, to develop expertise and to make this modality widely available for this challenging patient cohort.
Altogether, the concept of combining EBRT with endorectal HDR-BT to be tested as part of the ACO/ARO/AIO-22 prospective trial constitutes an attractive option in elderly/frail patients with rectal cancer unfit for radical surgery as it can potentially provide long-term local control of the primary tumor, prevent disease-related morbidity, prolong survival, improve QoL and even lead to cCR with complete cure in selected cases.
- Conditions
- Rectal Cancer
- Being tested
- radiotherapy
- Medical subject headings
- Rectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
radiotherapyOther
External beam radiotherapy and endorectal brachytherapy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with Rectal cancer | Experimental | Patients will be initially treated with EBRT with 13 x 3 Gy to a total dose of 39 Gy to the primary tumor and pelvic lymph node, over a period of 2.5 weeks. Restaging with pelvic MRI and endoscopy will then be performed 6.5 weeks after completion of EBRT and prior to the first endorectal HDR-BT fraction to evaluate initial therapy response and the residual extent of the disease for target outlining. Following that, endorectal HDR-BT will be delivered with 3 x 8 Gy to a total dose of 24 Gy (dose prescription: 5 mm depth for cT1 tumors; 10 mm depth for cT2-3 tumors), with each endorectal brachytherapy application performed once weekly. Receives: Other: radiotherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rate of Clinical Complete Response (cCR) or Near cCR at 12 Months
The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving a clinical complete response (cCR) or near cCR at 12 months after the initiation of treatment, assessed through MRI and endoscopic evaluation.
Quality of Life (QoL) at 12 Months
Assessed using the EORTC QLQ-ELD14 questionnaire, tailored to evaluate the QoL in elderly cancer patients. The primary measure will be the change in the QoL score from baseline to 12 months.
Measured: 12 Months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Quality of Life and Functional Outcomes
EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 for general and colorectal cancer-specific QoL. Wexner-Score for anorectal function assessment. Sustained cCR at 2 Years
Proportion of patients maintaining a cCR for two years post-treatment. Disease-Free Survival (DFS) at 2 Years
Time from treatment initiation to recurrence or death from any cause. Cumulative Incidence of Locoregional Regrowth
Frequency of locoregional tumor regrowth in patients who initially achieved cCR.
Cumulative Incidence of Distant Metastases Occurrence of distant metastases within the two-year follow-up period. Overall Survival (OS) at 2 Years Duration from treatment initiation to death from any cause. Acute and Late Toxicity Evaluation Categorized based on NCI CTCAE v.5.0, focusing on adverse events related to treatment.
G8 Geriatric Assessment Evaluation of frailty and health status using the G8 assessment tool, both at baseline and during follow-ups.
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Dec 2024
- Study start30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Sep 2031 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2031 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital of Cologne
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Prof. Dr. med. Dr. Emmanouil Fokas, University Hospital of Cologne
- Investigators
- Emmanouil Fokas, MD DPhil, Study chair, University Hospital of Cologne
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06729645
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ACO/ARO/AIO-22
- Other IDs
- 70115482
- Acronym
- ACO/ARO/AIO-22
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 27 Nov 2024
- Last updated
- 1 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Publications
Fleischmann M, Diefenhardt M, Nicolas AM, Rodel F, Ghadimi M, Hofheinz RD, Greten FR, Rodel C, Fokas E; German Rectal Cancer Study Group. ACO/ARO/AIO-21 - Capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy in combination with the IL-1 receptor antagonist anakinra for rectal cancer Patients: A phase I trial of the German rectal cancer study group. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2022 Apr 6;34:99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.04.003. eCollection 2022 May.
PubMed 35449546Dapper H, Fleischmann M, Tselis N, Diefenhardt M, Hofheinz RD, Weiss C, Grabenbauer GG, Merten R, Grosu AL, Kirste S, Rieken S, Classen J, Langer C, Kuhnt T, Schmidberger H, Ghadimi M, Giordano F, Nestle U, Koerber SA, Bock F, Geiger M, Polat B, Bruns CJ, Dieplinger G, Popp F, Zander T, Brunner T, Tribius S, Arnold D, Wurschi G, Piso P, Friede T, Horner-Rieber J, Gkika E, Rodel C, Fokas E; German Rectal Cancer Study Group. ACO/ARO/AIO-22 - External beam radiotherapy combined with endorectal high-dose-rate brachytherapy in elderly and frail patients with rectal cancer: A prospective multicentre trial of the German Rectal Cancer Study Group. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2025 Apr 13;53:100958. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2025.100958. eCollection 2025 Jul.
PubMed 40276115
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- ACO/ARO/AIO-22 - External Beam Radiotherapy Combined With Endorectal High-dose-ratebrachytherapy in Elderly and Frail Patients With Rectal Cancer. A Prospective Multicentre Trial of the German Rectal Cancer Study Group
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06729645
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ACO/ARO/AIO-22 / ACO/ARO/AIO-22
- Conditions
- Rectal Cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital of CologneUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2031 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2031 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
ACO/ARO/AIO-22 - External beam radiotherapy combined with endorectal high-dose-ratebrachytherapy in elderly and frail patients with rectal cancer.
A prospective multicentre trial of the German Rectal Cancer Study Group.
Detailed description
Epidemiological data indicate that more than 50% of patients with newly-diagnosed rectal cancer are older than 70 years, with rising numbers expected over the next decades. Albeit total mesorectal excision (TME) is considered part of the standard multimodal therapy in rectal cancer, elderly and frail rectal cancer patients are often unable to undergo radical surgery as the risk of surgical complications and postoperative mortality rises with increasing age and comorbidity. In an analysis of the Colorectal Cooperative Group UK (1988-200) in 34.194 patients with colorectal cancer, 21% of those aged over 85 years did not undergo operation, while the rates of no surgical intervention were 11% in the 75-84 years age group. Furthermore, these patients often receive no treatment at all due to frailty and concurrent diseases, resulting in local and/or systemic disease progression with associated symptoms and impaired quality of life (QoL).
Significant advances have been made in modern radiotherapy (RT), which can provide a valuable alternative non-operative treatment strategy for elderly and frail patients. Notably, to achieve clinical complete response (cCR) with RT alone, high doses are needed. Recent data from randomized trials (OPERA, MORPEUS) in young and fit patients with rectal cancer indicate that increased RT doses can be safely delivered following external beam (chemo)radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by endoluminal radiotherapeutic modalities, such as contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) or high-dose rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDR-BT). However, prospective studies testing this therapeutic concept in elderly and frail patients with rectal cancer remain limited. Also, despite the wide availability of brachytherapy, applicability of this concept remains largely unexplored in this challenging age subgroup in Germany.
The ACO/ARO/AIO-22 prospective trial will aim to evaluate the efficacy of EBRT in combination with endorectal HDR-BT to achieve local control (cCR) and maintain QoL in elderly and frail patients with rectal cancer that are considered unfit for radical surgery, but amenable to EBRT in combination with endorectal HDR-BT or CXB.
The ACO/ARO/AIO-22 incorporates several aspects that make this prospective study important:
- treatment decision making is challenging in elderly/frail patients with rectal cancer, whereas standardized treatment guidelines for this patient cohort are lacking, thus necessitating new clinical trials to establish the best possible treatment in this clinical setting;
- the combination of EBRT and HDR-BT has been shown to result in high rates of tumor response with almost 90% overall response and cCR rates of approximately 50-80%, especially in young and fit patients with early stage tumors, whereas prospective trials in elderly/frail patients remain limited;
- due to its very steep dose gradient, endorectal HDR-BT enables the delivery of a very high radiation dose to the tumor with a very steep decrease in the volume of normal tissue, thus increasing treatment efficacy while keeping toxicity low;
- albeit already tested in different countries such as France, the Netherlands and the UK, the concept of combining EBRT with endorectal HDR-BT has not been widely tested in Germany yet and, thus, a prospective study is needed to evaluate its efficacy and safety in elderly/frail patients with rectal cancer, to develop expertise and to make this modality widely available for this challenging patient cohort.
Altogether, the concept of combining EBRT with endorectal HDR-BT to be tested as part of the ACO/ARO/AIO-22 prospective trial constitutes an attractive option in elderly/frail patients with rectal cancer unfit for radical surgery as it can potentially provide long-term local control of the primary tumor, prevent disease-related morbidity, prolong survival, improve QoL and even lead to cCR with complete cure in selected cases.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with Rectal cancer | Experimental | Other: radiotherapyPatients will be initially treated with EBRT with 13 x 3 Gy to a total dose of 39 Gy to the primary tumor and pelvic lymph node, over a period of 2.5 weeks. Restaging with pelvic MRI and endoscopy will then be performed 6.5 weeks after completion of EBRT and prior to the first endorectal HDR-BT fraction to evaluate initial therapy response and the residual extent of the disease for target outlining. Following that, endorectal HDR-BT will be delivered with 3 x 8 Gy to a total dose of 24 Gy (dose prescription: 5 mm depth for cT1 tumors; 10 mm depth for cT2-3 tumors), with each endorectal brachytherapy application performed once weekly. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 70 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Elderly patients (age ≥70 years) with a G8-frailty score ≤ 14 based on the G8 geriatric assessment tool of frailty and/or elderly patients (age ≥70 years) with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA PS) ≥ 3 and/ elderly patients (age ≥70 years) unsuitable to tolerate radical surgery as judged by the surgeon and/or elderly patients (age ≥70 years) that refuse radical surgery
- Life expectancy ≥ 6 months
- Male and female patients with histologically confirmed diagnosis of rectal adenocarcinoma localized 0-16 cm from the anocutaneous line as measured by rigid rectoscopy
- MRI-defined cT1-3d N0/+ M0, mrCRM - / +, </= 2/3 involvement of the rectal wall circumference
- Staging requirements: High-resolution, thin-sliced (i.e. 3mm) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis is the mandatory local staging procedure.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Previous or current drug abuse
- Other concomitant antineoplastic therapy
- Prior or concurrent malignancy ≤ 3 years prior to enrolment in study (Exception: non-melanoma skin cancer or cervical carcinoma FIGO stage 0-
- 1), unless the patient is continuously disease-free
- Psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule (these conditions should be discussed with the patient before registration in the trial).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| radiotherapyExternal beam radiotherapy and endorectal brachytherapy | Other | Patients with Rectal cancer |
Primary outcome
Rate of Clinical Complete Response (cCR) or Near cCR at 12 Months
Time frame: 12 Months
The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving a clinical complete response (cCR) or near cCR at 12 months after the initiation of treatment, assessed through MRI and endoscopic evaluation. Quality of Life (QoL) at 12 Months Assessed using the EORTC QLQ-ELD14 questionnaire, tailored to evaluate the QoL in elderly cancer patients. The primary measure will be the change in the QoL score from baseline to 12 months.
1 secondary outcome
Quality of Life and Functional Outcomes
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 May 2026.
- Background: PubMed 35449546Fleischmann M, Diefenhardt M, Nicolas AM, Rodel F, Ghadimi M, Hofheinz RD, Greten FR, Rodel C, Fokas E; German Rectal Cancer Study Group. ACO/ARO/AIO-21 - Capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy in combination with the IL-1 receptor antagonist anakinra for rectal cancer Patients: A phase I trial of the German rectal cancer study group. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2022 Apr 6;34:99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.04.003. eCollection 2022 May.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40276115Dapper H, Fleischmann M, Tselis N, Diefenhardt M, Hofheinz RD, Weiss C, Grabenbauer GG, Merten R, Grosu AL, Kirste S, Rieken S, Classen J, Langer C, Kuhnt T, Schmidberger H, Ghadimi M, Giordano F, Nestle U, Koerber SA, Bock F, Geiger M, Polat B, Bruns CJ, Dieplinger G, Popp F, Zander T, Brunner T, Tribius S, Arnold D, Wurschi G, Piso P, Friede T, Horner-Rieber J, Gkika E, Rodel C, Fokas E; German Rectal Cancer Study Group. ACO/ARO/AIO-22 - External beam radiotherapy combined with endorectal high-dose-rate brachytherapy in elderly and frail patients with rectal cancer: A prospective multicentre trial of the German Rectal Cancer Study Group. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2025 Apr 13;53:100958. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2025.100958. eCollection 2025 Jul.
- Fleischmann, M., Dapper, H., Diefenhardt, M. et al. Perkutane Strahlentherapie kombiniert mit endorektaler Brachytherapie zum Organerhalt bei älteren/gebrechlichen Patienten mit Rektumkarzinom - die ACO/ARO/AIO-22-Studie. Onkologie 30, 129-132 (2024). htLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Rectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Emmanouil Fokas, MD DPhil contact
Emmanouil Fokas, MD DPhil study chair
University Hospital of Cologne
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing radiotherapy in people with Rectal Cancer, run by University Hospital of Cologne at 4 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Emmanouil Fokas, MD DPhil (+49 22147898710, emmanouil.fokas@uk-koeln.de), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rate of Clinical Complete Response (cCR) or Near cCR at 12 Months (time frame: 12 Months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06729645, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 May 2026.