Blood Loss, SurgicalEarly Phase 1NCT06725732
Assessment of Nebulized Tranexamic Acid in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Using Modena Bleeding Score
A Early Phase 1 study testing Tranexamic Acid (TXA) and Tranexamic Acid in people with Blood Loss, Surgical, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of preoperative administration of intravenous or nebulized tranexamic acid on surgical field, blood loss, anesthetic consumption and hemodynamics of patients undergoing FESS. Primary outcome Modena Bleeding Score (MBS) assessing surgical field Secondary outcome 1. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Blood Loss, Surgical
- What is being tested?
- Tranexamic Acid (TXA) and Tranexamic Acid
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 29 Jan 2025to 1 Jan 2026
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Either sex
- age 18-65 years
- ASA I-II who are listed for elective functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) under general anesthesia
- normal accepted coagulation profile and hematocrit value ≥30
Who cannot join
- • chronic renal failure
- liver cirrhosis
- bleeding disorders
- current anticoagulant therapy
- pregnancy or breastfeeding
- impaired color vision
Show all 11Show fewer
- severe vascular ischemia
- history of venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism
- long term treatment with acetylsalicylic acid or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs not discontinued before surgery
- hemoglobin (HB) concentration <10 mg/dl _allergy to TXA.
- BMI > 35 kg/ m2
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Main building, Assiut University Hospitals
Asyut
Asmaa Shabaan, +201029505921, asmaa10557@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Assessment of Nebulized Tranexamic Acid in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Using Modena Bleeding Score. A Randomized Double Blinded Controlled Trial.
The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of preoperative administration of intravenous or nebulized tranexamic acid on surgical field, blood loss, anesthetic consumption and hemodynamics of patients undergoing FESS.
Primary outcome Modena Bleeding Score (MBS) assessing surgical field Secondary outcome
- Patient hemodynamics.
- Anesthetic consumption, Extra doses of fentanyl and propofol and sevoflurane>2
- Postoperative complications: including any adverse effects to TXA e.g.nausea, vomiting, any visual disturbances, fits, and any thrombotic manifestation.
Read the detailed description
Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is the current standard treatment for a variety of conditions affecting the nasal cavity and the paranasal sinuses, such as chronic rhinosinusitis, benign and malignant tumors or cerebrospinal fluid leaks .Being mostly a one-handed technique, FESS does not allow simultaneous use of operative instruments and blood suction, thus endonasal bleeding control represents a challenging issue for the operating surgeon. Such narrow and highly vascularized cavities like the nasal fossae and paranasal spaces can be entirely filled with blood within few seconds, especially if the mucosa is severely inflamed as a consequence of rhinosinusitis. Bleeding is possibly the most relevant factor that could impair the quality of the surgical field during endoscopic procedures. It has been proven that uncontrolled bleeding during endoscopic sinus surgical procedures determines poor visualization of the anatomical landmarks, prolongs surgical time and carries a higher rate of complications .Several techniques to control intraoperative bleeding and improve surgical view during sinus surgery (e.g. topical vasoconstrictors, total intravenous anesthesia, controlled hypotension) have been described and analyzed to determine their efficacy .These types of studies, however, are complex and prone to bias, partially because standardized and validated methods of quantifying bleeding or grading the surgical field in endoscopic view are lacking.
Tranexamic acid functions as the competitive antagonist at the lysine site on plasminogen . During all surgical procedures, the tissue plasminogen activator is released due to tissue damage during surgery, which can convert tissue plasminogen to plasmin, promote fibrinolysis and activate the fibrinolytic system. Thus, tranexamic acid functions as an anti-fibrinolytic agent by inhibiting the tissue plasminogen activator. It can be applied topically or systemically with this mechanism in the coagulation cascade to reduce intraoperative bleeding .The results of several recent studies on endoscopic sinus surgery through topical administration of tranexamic acid are encouraging in terms of the efficacy of tranexamic acid for intraoperative bleeding and other pathological conditions .The purpose of this study is to analyze the efficacy of nebulized tranexamic acid and compare it with intravenous tranexamic acid to improve the surgeon and patient experiences of sinus surgery.
- Conditions
- Blood Loss, Surgical
- Being tested
- Tranexamic Acid (TXA), Tranexamic Acid
- Medical subject headings
- Blood Loss, Surgical
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Tranexamic Acid (TXA)Drug
To see if nebulised TXA is better to control blood loss in functional Endoscopic sinus surgery
Tranexamic AcidDrug
To see if intravenous TXA is better to control blood loss in functional Endoscopic sinus surgery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intravenous | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Tranexamic Acid |
| Nebulized | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Tranexamic Acid (TXA) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Modena Bleeding Score- assessing surgical field
- No bleeding ->1.
- Bleeding easily controlled by suctioning, washing, or packing without any significant modification or slowing of surgical procedure->2.
- Bleeding slowing surgical procedure->3.
- Most of the maneuvers dedicated to bleeding control ->4.
- Bleeding that prevents every surgical procedure except those dedicated to bleeding control->5.
Measured: Baseline
Secondary outcomes (12)
Measuring patient's Blood Pressure-> mmhg (unit of measure)
Measured: Baseline
Measuring patient's Respiratory Rate-> breath per minute(unit of measure)
Measured: Baseline
Measuring patient's Temperature-> Celsius(unit of measure)
Measured: Baseline
Measuring patient's Pulse->Beat per minute(unit of measure)
Measured: Baseline
Measuring End-tidal Co2 by Capnogram
Unit of measure-> mmhg
Measured: Baseline
Measuring O2 saturation by the pulse-oximeter
Measured: Baseline
Measuring amount of intraoperative bleeding through blood volume in suction jar
Measured: Baseline
Measuring the amount of intraoperative bleeding by counting gauze used in the operation.
Measured: Baseline
2. Anesthetic consumption, Extra doses of fentanyl and propofol and sevoflurane>2
Measured: Baseline
Presence or absence of nausea as a Postoperative complication
Measured: Baseline
Presence or absence of vomiting as a Postoperative complication
Measured: Baseline
Presence or absence of any form of visual disturbance as a Postoperative complication
Measured: Baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Dec 2024
- Study start29 Jan 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jan 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Blood Loss, SurgicalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assiut UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Asmaa Zanaty, Assiut University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06725732
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IV & Nebulized TXA in FESS
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 26 Nov 2024
- Last updated
- 29 Jan 2025
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Kang H, Hwang SH. Does topical application of tranexamic acid reduce intraoperative bleeding in sinus surgery during general anesthesia? Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Jan-Feb;86(1):111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2019.08.006. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
PubMed 31653606Khosla AJ, Pernas FG, Maeso PA. Meta-analysis and literature review of techniques to achieve hemostasis in endoscopic sinus surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013 Jun;3(6):482-7. doi: 10.1002/alr.21126. Epub 2012 Dec 16.
PubMed 23255493Kim DH, Kim S, Kang H, Jin HJ, Hwang SH. Efficacy of tranexamic acid on operative bleeding in endoscopic sinus surgery: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Laryngoscope. 2019 Apr;129(4):800-807. doi: 10.1002/lary.27766. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
PubMed 30593688Alicandri-Ciufelli M, Pingani L, Mariano D, Anschuetz L, Molinari G, Marchioni D, Bonali M, Galeazzi GM, Presutti L. Rating surgical field quality in endoscopic ear surgery: proposal and validation of the "Modena Bleeding Score". Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Feb;276(2):383-388. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-05268-6. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
PubMed 30604058
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jan 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessment of Nebulized Tranexamic Acid in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Using Modena Bleeding Score. A Randomized Double Blinded Controlled Trial.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06725732
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IV & Nebulized TXA in FESS
- Conditions
- Blood Loss, Surgical
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 29 Jan 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of preoperative administration of intravenous or nebulized tranexamic acid on surgical field, blood loss, anesthetic consumption and hemodynamics of patients undergoing FESS.
Primary outcome Modena Bleeding Score (MBS) assessing surgical field Secondary outcome
- Patient hemodynamics.
- Anesthetic consumption, Extra doses of fentanyl and propofol and sevoflurane>2
- Postoperative complications: including any adverse effects to TXA e.g.nausea, vomiting, any visual disturbances, fits, and any thrombotic manifestation.
Detailed description
Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is the current standard treatment for a variety of conditions affecting the nasal cavity and the paranasal sinuses, such as chronic rhinosinusitis, benign and malignant tumors or cerebrospinal fluid leaks .Being mostly a one-handed technique, FESS does not allow simultaneous use of operative instruments and blood suction, thus endonasal bleeding control represents a challenging issue for the operating surgeon. Such narrow and highly vascularized cavities like the nasal fossae and paranasal spaces can be entirely filled with blood within few seconds, especially if the mucosa is severely inflamed as a consequence of rhinosinusitis. Bleeding is possibly the most relevant factor that could impair the quality of the surgical field during endoscopic procedures. It has been proven that uncontrolled bleeding during endoscopic sinus surgical procedures determines poor visualization of the anatomical landmarks, prolongs surgical time and carries a higher rate of complications .Several techniques to control intraoperative bleeding and improve surgical view during sinus surgery (e.g. topical vasoconstrictors, total intravenous anesthesia, controlled hypotension) have been described and analyzed to determine their efficacy .These types of studies, however, are complex and prone to bias, partially because standardized and validated methods of quantifying bleeding or grading the surgical field in endoscopic view are lacking.
Tranexamic acid functions as the competitive antagonist at the lysine site on plasminogen . During all surgical procedures, the tissue plasminogen activator is released due to tissue damage during surgery, which can convert tissue plasminogen to plasmin, promote fibrinolysis and activate the fibrinolytic system. Thus, tranexamic acid functions as an anti-fibrinolytic agent by inhibiting the tissue plasminogen activator. It can be applied topically or systemically with this mechanism in the coagulation cascade to reduce intraoperative bleeding .The results of several recent studies on endoscopic sinus surgery through topical administration of tranexamic acid are encouraging in terms of the efficacy of tranexamic acid for intraoperative bleeding and other pathological conditions .The purpose of this study is to analyze the efficacy of nebulized tranexamic acid and compare it with intravenous tranexamic acid to improve the surgeon and patient experiences of sinus surgery.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intravenous | Experimental | Drug: Tranexamic Acid |
| Nebulized | Experimental | Drug: Tranexamic Acid (TXA) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Either sex
- age 18-65 years
- ASA I-II who are listed for elective functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) under general anesthesia
- normal accepted coagulation profile and hematocrit value ≥30
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- • chronic renal failure
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tranexamic Acid (TXA)To see if nebulised TXA is better to control blood loss in functional Endoscopic sinus surgery | Drug | Nebulized |
| Tranexamic AcidTo see if intravenous TXA is better to control blood loss in functional Endoscopic sinus surgery | Drug | Intravenous |
Primary outcome
Modena Bleeding Score- assessing surgical field
Time frame: Baseline
* No bleeding ->1. * Bleeding easily controlled by suctioning, washing, or packing without any significant modification or slowing of surgical procedure->2. * Bleeding slowing surgical procedure->3. * Most of the maneuvers dedicated to bleeding control ->4. * Bleeding that prevents every surgical procedure except those dedicated to bleeding control->5.
12 secondary outcomes
Measuring patient's Blood Pressure-> mmhg (unit of measure)
Time frame: Baseline
Measuring patient's Respiratory Rate-> breath per minute(unit of measure)
Time frame: Baseline
Measuring patient's Temperature-> Celsius(unit of measure)
Time frame: Baseline
Measuring patient's Pulse->Beat per minute(unit of measure)
Time frame: Baseline
Measuring End-tidal Co2 by Capnogram
Time frame: Baseline
Measuring O2 saturation by the pulse-oximeter
Time frame: Baseline
Measuring amount of intraoperative bleeding through blood volume in suction jar
Time frame: Baseline
Measuring the amount of intraoperative bleeding by counting gauze used in the operation.
Time frame: Baseline
2. Anesthetic consumption, Extra doses of fentanyl and propofol and sevoflurane>2
Time frame: Baseline
Presence or absence of nausea as a Postoperative complication
Time frame: Baseline
Presence or absence of vomiting as a Postoperative complication
Time frame: Baseline
Presence or absence of any form of visual disturbance as a Postoperative complication
Time frame: Baseline
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jan 2025.
- Background: PubMed 31653606Kang H, Hwang SH. Does topical application of tranexamic acid reduce intraoperative bleeding in sinus surgery during general anesthesia? Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Jan-Feb;86(1):111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2019.08.006. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
- Background: PubMed 23255493Khosla AJ, Pernas FG, Maeso PA. Meta-analysis and literature review of techniques to achieve hemostasis in endoscopic sinus surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013 Jun;3(6):482-7. doi: 10.1002/alr.21126. Epub 2012 Dec 16.
- Background: PubMed 30593688Kim DH, Kim S, Kang H, Jin HJ, Hwang SH. Efficacy of tranexamic acid on operative bleeding in endoscopic sinus surgery: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Laryngoscope. 2019 Apr;129(4):800-807. doi: 10.1002/lary.27766. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
- Results publication: PubMed 30604058Alicandri-Ciufelli M, Pingani L, Mariano D, Anschuetz L, Molinari G, Marchioni D, Bonali M, Galeazzi GM, Presutti L. Rating surgical field quality in endoscopic ear surgery: proposal and validation of the "Modena Bleeding Score". Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Feb;276(2):383-388. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-05268-6. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
Related trials for Blood Loss, Surgical
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Systematic Intraoperative Cell Salvage in On-Pump Cardiac Surgery Within a Mature Patient Blood Management Programme
Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Blood Transfusion
Recruiting
Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Phase III Trial of Biological Mesh for Alimentary Tract Reconstruction in Digestive Surgery
Digestive System Surgical Procedures, Anastomosis, Surgical
Recruiting
Middle Meningeal Artery Embolisation in Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Chronic Subdural Hematoma
RecruitingObservational study
Impact of Long-term Dutasteride Use on Perioperative Outcomes of HoLEP
Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign
Active, not recruiting
Comparison of Intraoperative Outcomes of Microdebrider-Assisted Versus Conventional Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Patients With Sinonasal Polyposis
Nasal Polyps
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Early Phase 1 study testing Tranexamic Acid (TXA) and Tranexamic Acid in people with Blood Loss, Surgical, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Asmaa Shabaan Zanaty, Doctor (+201029505921, asmaa10557@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Modena Bleeding Score- assessing surgical field (time frame: Baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06725732, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jan 2025.