Health BehaviorNCT06722027
CCSH (Compassion-Centered Spiritual Health) for Teams
A study testing Compassion Centered Spiritual Health Team Intervention (CCSH-TI) and Treatment as Usual in people with Health Behavior, run by Emory University at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Emory Spiritual Health has developed a Compassion-Centered Spiritual Health group-based intervention, called CCSH Interventions for Teams, and are enrolling staff and providers into the groups in this randomized study design. The groups will meet once every other week for 60 minutes for 8 weeks (4 sessions total). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Health Behavior
- What is being tested?
- Compassion Centered Spiritual Health Team Intervention (CCSH-TI) and Treatment as Usual
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 24 Sep 2025to 30 Nov 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Full-time employees working in oncology teams at Winship Cancer Institute;
- Employees working in intensive care at Emory University St. Joseph hospital.
Who cannot join
- Less than 18 years old
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Emory Winship Cancer Institute
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
- Recruiting
Emory University St. Joseph hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
About this study
Official title: Compassion-Centered Spiritual Health Interventions for Teams (CCSH-TI) With Faculty and Staff
Emory Spiritual Health has developed a Compassion-Centered Spiritual Health group-based intervention, called CCSH Interventions for Teams, and are enrolling staff and providers into the groups in this randomized study design. The groups will meet once every other week for 60 minutes for 8 weeks (4 sessions total).
The investigators will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of this novel team-based intervention that includes mindfulness and compassion-based approaches with mixed-role oncology teams. Employees (n = 80; nurses, advanced practice providers (APPs), physicians, staff) working at an NCI- designated Comprehensive Cancer Center will be randomized by team (8-12 employees/group) to Compassion Centered Spiritual Health Team Intervention (CCSH-TI) or TAU (Treatment as Usual) group. The research objective is to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of CCSH-TI, and to develop and validate a novel, low-burden ambulatory assessment "toolkit" to improve the measurement of psychological safety and burnout.
Read the detailed description
Current interventions to reduce provider burnout are only minimally effective. To overcome the barriers to achieving success in burnout prevention interventions, the investigators propose Compassion Centered Spiritual Health Team Intervention (CCSH-TI), a 4-session intervention delivered by healthcare chaplains to mixed-role interprofessional teams that includes mindfulness and compassion-based approaches to bolster resilience, compassion for self and others, and psychological safety. The research team will conduct a mixed-method feasibility and acceptability study of CCSH-TI with mixed-role oncology teams. Employees (n = 80; nurses, advanced practice providers (APPs), physicians, staff) working at an NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center will be randomized by team (8-12 employees/group) to CCSH-TI or to TAU (Treatment as Usual) group, who has access to all well-being resources and activities available to them as employees. Self-report surveys and focus group discussions will be used to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of CCSH-TI. The investigators will also collect self-report surveys, ecological momentary assessments (EMA), and the electronically activated recorder (EAR) data at 3 timepoints (before CCSH-TI (T1), immediately after completion of CCSH-TI (T2), and 12-weeks after completion (LT), and characterize data completion to evaluate the feasibility of data collection methods for a future randomized control trial. Informed consent will be obtained from study participants in-person. The duration of the study will be 22-23 weeks (from consent to completion of data collection).
- Conditions
- Health Behavior
- Being tested
- Compassion Centered Spiritual Health Team Intervention (CCSH-TI), Treatment as Usual
- Keywords
- Behavioral Intervention, Healthcare provider burnout
- Medical subject headings
- Health Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Compassion Centered Spiritual Health Team Intervention (CCSH-TI)Behavioural
Also called CCSH-TI
Delivered to healthcare teams by spiritual health clinicians proficient in group facilitation. It is composed of 4 sessions delivered every other week and lasting 60 minutes each.
CCSH-TI sessions teach participants to attune to their interpersonal relationships; acknowledge and allow difficult emotions; and access compassion. It also provides psychoeducation about skillful coping strategies. Each session consists of didactic material about team norms and safety, a feeling check-in, facilitated group discussions about social connection and professional team building, and meditations to promote mindfulness, to cultivate a feeling of being nurtured, and to access compassion for self and others. CCSH-TI is delivered to healthcare teams by spiritual health clinicians proficient in group facilitation.
Treatment as UsualBehavioural
Also called TAU, Standard of Care
TAU refers to the current buffet of wellness and professional development activities that are available to employees at the Winship Cancer Institute.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CCSH-TI Group | Experimental | 4-session intervention of 60- minutes each delivered every other week by healthcare chaplains to mixed-role inter-professional teams that includes mindfulness and compassion-based approaches to bolster resilience, compassion for self and others, and psychological safety. Receives: Behavioral: Compassion Centered Spiritual Health Team Intervention (CCSH-TI) |
| TAU (treatment as usual) group | Active comparator | Participants in this group will have access to all well-being resources and activities available to them as employees. Receives: Behavioral: Treatment as Usual |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of eligible employees who enroll and are willing to be randomized
Proportion of eligible employees (all, and according to license, sex/gender, race/ethnicity) who enroll and are willing to be randomized.
Measured: BaselineI (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
Number of participants that attended and completed the three assessment timepoints
Number of participants that attended and completed the three assessment timepoints
Measured: BaselineI (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
Retention rates at three assessment timepoints
Retention rates will be assessed at three assessment timepoints
Measured: BaselineI (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
Satisfaction score
The investigators will administer a satisfaction questionnaire that includes 5 questions. Total possible score ranges from 5-25. With higher score correlating with better study outcome.
Measured: Immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
Perceived credibility score
The investigators will assess perceived credibility with a questionnaire that includes 5 questions. Each question is scores from 1 to 8 with a total possible score range of 5-40. Higher score correlates with better study outcome.
Measured: Immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
Perceived intervention benefit
The investigators will assess perceived benefit with a questionnaire that includes 18 questions, to be answered with a 7-point scale. Total possible score ranges from 18 to 126. Higher score correlates with better study outcome.
Measured: Immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
Acceptability of wearing the Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR)
After the T1, T2, and LT assessments, participants will complete the EAR Experiential Questionnaire, a self-report measure that assesses the acceptability of wearing the EAR. Questions focus on participants' comfort with wearing the EAR, whether the EAR impeded daily activities, whether the EAR changed their behaviors or others' behaviors, and how typical were the days that the EAR was worn. Each question is rated on a Likert scale (1 "not at all" - 5 "a great deal"). Higher score correlates with better outcome.
Measured: BaselineI (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
Number of EMA dropouts
Number of EMA dropouts will be collected
Measured: BaselineI (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
Percentage (%) of items completed using EMA
Percentage of items completed using EMA will be assessed.
Measured: BaselineI (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
Secondary outcomes (4)
Change in Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's TeamSTEPPS ® Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) score
Measures perceptions of team function with the administration of the Team Structure and Mutual Support subscales (14 items total). Total possible score ranges from 1-14 with higher scores indicating better outcome.
Measured: BaselineI (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
Change in Psychological safety scale score
Includes subscales measuring psychological safety with leaders, peers, and within the team (19 items). Total possible score ranges from 1-19 with higher scores indicating better outcome.
Measured: BaselineI (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
Change in Professional Fulfillment Index Score
Measures Professional fulfillment and burnout, and has demonstrated sensitivity to change in intervention studies (16 items). Total possible score ranges from 1-16 with higher scores indicating better outcome.
Measured: BaselineI (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
EMA (ecological momentary assessment) questionnaire score
The 3-day ambulatory questionnaire asks participants whether the ecological momentary assessment (EMA) impeded daily activities or changed their behaviors, rated on a Likert scale (1 "not at all" - 5 "a great deal"). Higher score correlates with better outcome.
Measured: BaselineI (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Dec 2024
- Study start24 Sep 2025
- Primary completion30 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Nov 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Health BehaviorStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Emory UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This is a longitudinal, randomized pilot study of 80 employees working in inter-professional oncologic teams. Employees will be randomized by team (using a random number generator in Microsoft Excel) to receive CCSH-TI or to a TAU "treatment as usual" (TAU) group.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Emory University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jennifer Mascaro, Emory University
- Investigators
- Jennifer Mascaro, PhD, Principal investigator, Emory University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06722027
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY00006109
- Other IDs
- 1R34AT012509-01A1
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 3 Dec 2024
- Last updated
- 5 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The research team will share the molar and behavioral codebooks by uploading them to the Open Science Framework (OSF) EAR Repository, a publicly asses-sable collaborative repository of EAR, a resource co-maintained by a member of the research team (Kaplan). The investigator will share summarized rates of accrual, retention, intervention attendance, and self-reported data (mean, standard deviation, and range) at all 3 time-points. Access will not be controlled or monitored; it will be made available by the data repository based on approval guidelines maintained by the repository itself. Privacy and confidentiality will be protected using de-identification of all individual-level data. Audio recordings and transcripts will not be shared so as to maintain participant privacy.
Publications
Giordano NA, Kaplan DM, Peacock C, Vyas I, Pozzo N, Shelton M, Escoffery C, Rana S, Raison CL, Grant GH, Mascaro JS. Protocol to examine the feasibility and acceptability of a randomized controlled trial of a chaplain-delivered compassion intervention to improve psychological safety among interprofessional healthcare teams. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 Nov 13;11(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01712-7.
PubMed 41258216
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Compassion-Centered Spiritual Health Interventions for Teams (CCSH-TI) With Faculty and Staff
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06722027
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STUDY00006109
- Conditions
- Health Behavior
- Keywords
- Behavioral Intervention, Healthcare provider burnout
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Emory UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
- Study start
- 24 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Emory Spiritual Health has developed a Compassion-Centered Spiritual Health group-based intervention, called CCSH Interventions for Teams, and are enrolling staff and providers into the groups in this randomized study design. The groups will meet once every other week for 60 minutes for 8 weeks (4 sessions total).
The investigators will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of this novel team-based intervention that includes mindfulness and compassion-based approaches with mixed-role oncology teams. Employees (n = 80; nurses, advanced practice providers (APPs), physicians, staff) working at an NCI- designated Comprehensive Cancer Center will be randomized by team (8-12 employees/group) to Compassion Centered Spiritual Health Team Intervention (CCSH-TI) or TAU (Treatment as Usual) group. The research objective is to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of CCSH-TI, and to develop and validate a novel, low-burden ambulatory assessment "toolkit" to improve the measurement of psychological safety and burnout.
Detailed description
Current interventions to reduce provider burnout are only minimally effective. To overcome the barriers to achieving success in burnout prevention interventions, the investigators propose Compassion Centered Spiritual Health Team Intervention (CCSH-TI), a 4-session intervention delivered by healthcare chaplains to mixed-role interprofessional teams that includes mindfulness and compassion-based approaches to bolster resilience, compassion for self and others, and psychological safety. The research team will conduct a mixed-method feasibility and acceptability study of CCSH-TI with mixed-role oncology teams. Employees (n = 80; nurses, advanced practice providers (APPs), physicians, staff) working at an NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center will be randomized by team (8-12 employees/group) to CCSH-TI or to TAU (Treatment as Usual) group, who has access to all well-being resources and activities available to them as employees. Self-report surveys and focus group discussions will be used to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of CCSH-TI. The investigators will also collect self-report surveys, ecological momentary assessments (EMA), and the electronically activated recorder (EAR) data at 3 timepoints (before CCSH-TI (T1), immediately after completion of CCSH-TI (T2), and 12-weeks after completion (LT), and characterize data completion to evaluate the feasibility of data collection methods for a future randomized control trial. Informed consent will be obtained from study participants in-person. The duration of the study will be 22-23 weeks (from consent to completion of data collection).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This is a longitudinal, randomized pilot study of 80 employees working in inter-professional oncologic teams. Employees will be randomized by team (using a random number generator in Microsoft Excel) to receive CCSH-TI or to a TAU "treatment as usual" (TAU) group.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CCSH-TI Group | Experimental | Behavioral: Compassion Centered Spiritual Health Team Intervention (CCSH-TI)4-session intervention of 60- minutes each delivered every other week by healthcare chaplains to mixed-role inter-professional teams that includes mindfulness and compassion-based approaches to bolster resilience, compassion for self and others, and psychological safety. |
| TAU (treatment as usual) group | Active comparator | Behavioral: Treatment as UsualParticipants in this group will have access to all well-being resources and activities available to them as employees. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Full-time employees working in oncology teams at Winship Cancer Institute;
- Employees working in intensive care at Emory University St. Joseph hospital.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Less than 18 years old
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Compassion Centered Spiritual Health Team Intervention (CCSH-TI)Also: CCSH-TIDelivered to healthcare teams by spiritual health clinicians proficient in group facilitation. It is composed of 4 sessions delivered every other week and lasting 60 minutes each. CCSH-TI sessions teach participants to attune to their interpersonal relationships; acknowledge and allow difficult emotions; and access compassion. It also provides psychoeducation about skillful coping strategies. Each session consists of didactic material about team norms and safety, a feeling check-in, facilitated group discussions about social connection and professional team building, and meditations to promote mindfulness, to cultivate a feeling of being nurtured, and to access compassion for self and others. CCSH-TI is delivered to healthcare teams by spiritual health clinicians proficient in group facilitation. | Behavioural | CCSH-TI Group |
| Treatment as UsualAlso: TAU, Standard of CareTAU refers to the current buffet of wellness and professional development activities that are available to employees at the Winship Cancer Institute. | Behavioural | TAU (treatment as usual) group |
Primary outcome
Proportion of eligible employees who enroll and are willing to be randomized
Time frame: BaselineI (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
Proportion of eligible employees (all, and according to license, sex/gender, race/ethnicity) who enroll and are willing to be randomized.
Number of participants that attended and completed the three assessment timepoints
Time frame: BaselineI (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
Number of participants that attended and completed the three assessment timepoints
Retention rates at three assessment timepoints
Time frame: BaselineI (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
Retention rates will be assessed at three assessment timepoints
Satisfaction score
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
The investigators will administer a satisfaction questionnaire that includes 5 questions. Total possible score ranges from 5-25. With higher score correlating with better study outcome.
Perceived credibility score
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
The investigators will assess perceived credibility with a questionnaire that includes 5 questions. Each question is scores from 1 to 8 with a total possible score range of 5-40. Higher score correlates with better study outcome.
Perceived intervention benefit
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
The investigators will assess perceived benefit with a questionnaire that includes 18 questions, to be answered with a 7-point scale. Total possible score ranges from 18 to 126. Higher score correlates with better study outcome.
Acceptability of wearing the Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR)
Time frame: BaselineI (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
After the T1, T2, and LT assessments, participants will complete the EAR Experiential Questionnaire, a self-report measure that assesses the acceptability of wearing the EAR. Questions focus on participants' comfort with wearing the EAR, whether the EAR impeded daily activities, whether the EAR changed their behaviors or others' behaviors, and how typical were the days that the EAR was worn. Each question is rated on a Likert scale (1 "not at all" - 5 "a great deal"). Higher score correlates with better outcome.
Number of EMA dropouts
Time frame: BaselineI (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
Number of EMA dropouts will be collected
Percentage (%) of items completed using EMA
Time frame: BaselineI (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
Percentage of items completed using EMA will be assessed.
4 secondary outcomes
Change in Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's TeamSTEPPS ® Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) score
Time frame: BaselineI (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
Change in Psychological safety scale score
Time frame: BaselineI (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
Change in Professional Fulfillment Index Score
Time frame: BaselineI (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
EMA (ecological momentary assessment) questionnaire score
Time frame: BaselineI (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 May 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41258216Giordano NA, Kaplan DM, Peacock C, Vyas I, Pozzo N, Shelton M, Escoffery C, Rana S, Raison CL, Grant GH, Mascaro JS. Protocol to examine the feasibility and acceptability of a randomized controlled trial of a chaplain-delivered compassion intervention to improve psychological safety among interprofessional healthcare teams. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 Nov 13;11(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01712-7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The research team will share the molar and behavioral codebooks by uploading them to the Open Science Framework (OSF) EAR Repository, a publicly asses-sable collaborative repository of EAR, a resource co-maintained by a member of the research team (Kaplan). The investigator will share summarized rates of accrual, retention, intervention attendance, and self-reported data (mean, standard deviation, and range) at all 3 time-points. Access will not be controlled or monitored; it will be made available by the data repository based on approval guidelines maintained by the repository itself. Privacy and confidentiality will be protected using de-identification of all individual-level data. Audio recordings and transcripts will not be shared so as to maintain participant privacy.
Related trials for Health Behavior
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Validation of the Healthcare Relationship Assessment Scale (ERA) in Health Sciences Students.
Health Adult Subjects, Communication
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Not yet recruiting
Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adverse Childhood Experience, Depression / Major Depressive Disorder
Recruiting
Effect of a Brief Daily Digital Meditation on Well-Being in US Young Adults (BEGIN II)
Mental Health and General Well-being
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Jennifer Mascaro, PhD principal investigator
Emory University
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Compassion Centered Spiritual Health Team Intervention (CCSH-TI) and Treatment as Usual in people with Health Behavior, run by Emory University at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jennifer Mascaro, PhD (404-558-4461, jmascar@emory.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of eligible employees who enroll and are willing to be randomized (time frame: BaselineI (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06722027, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 May 2026.