AzTrials
AzTrials

ArthritisNor-PainNCT06718569

Pain in Inflammatory Joint Diseases

An observational study of Arthritis and Arthritis, Juvenile Idiopathic, run by Diakonhjemmet Hospital at 1 site in Norway.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Our primary objective is to better understand the etiology and consequences of chronic paint by using an explorative approach to identify phenotypes and endotypes of patients with inflammatory joint diseases, with a special focus on central sensitization and cognitive functioning as a key element in chronic pain. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Biological or targeted synthetic DMARD
How many people
350 participants
Where
1 siteNorway
Study dates
11 Nov 2025to Nov 2027
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The study population consists of men and women (>18 years of age at screening) who are enrolled in the Nor-DMARD register and give their consent to also participate in this sub-study. We will not have other inclusion and exclusion criteria than those that are already part of the Nor-DMARD register. This means that all patients who are being enrolled in the Nor-DMARD register will be asked to be part of this sub-study.

Who may be able to join

  • All patients who initiate or switch biological or targeted synthetic DMARDs

Who cannot join

  • None

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Ida K Haugen, MD PhD contact

+47 95859884

ida.k.haugen@gmail.com

Norway1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Diakonhjemmet Hospital

    Oslo

    Recruiting

Other trials in Norway

About this study

Official title: Advancing the Understanding of Pain Mechanisms in Inflammatory Arthritis Towards Precision Pain Management

Our primary objective is to better understand the etiology and consequences of chronic paint by using an explorative approach to identify phenotypes and endotypes of patients with inflammatory joint diseases, with a special focus on central sensitization and cognitive functioning as a key element in chronic pain. We will also examine the risk factors and clinical impact of these factors on pain, disease activity and treatment effects in a longitudinal study of patients with inflammatory joint disesases.

Being tested
Biological or targeted synthetic DMARD
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Arthritis, Juvenile, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Arthritis, Reactive, Arthritis, Psoriatic, Spondylarthritis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Biological or targeted synthetic DMARDDrug

    All biological or targeted synthetic DMARDs that are available for treatment of patients with inflammatory joint diseases

Study groups in NCT06718569
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients who initiate or switch biological or targeted synthetic DMARDAll patients initiate or switch biological or targeted synthetic DMARD
Receives: Drug: Biological or targeted synthetic DMARD

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. PROMIS Pain Interference - Short Form 8a

    PROMIS Pain Interference - Short Form 8a assesses to which extend pain affect various aspects in daily life. This includes 8 items covering social, emotional, physical, and recreational activities [74], such as "How much did pain interfere with your day-to-day activities?" and "How much did pain interfere with your enjoyment of life?". The items have a 7-day time frame. Participants are asked to rate their responses on a three different 5-point Likert response scales. Scores are converted to a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD). Higher scores represent more pain interference.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months

Secondary outcomes (23)
  1. Social network

    Questions about how many close friends the participants have, and whether they have a feeling of loneliness

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Gender role perception

    One question is included regarding which gender the participants identify with, where the participant reports whether they identify with their biological gender, identify as non-binary or gender diverse, or wishes not to answer.

    Measured: Baseline

  3. Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES)

    We have included the pain subscale only. The pain subscale consists of five questions about how certain the respondent is that he/she can do the following tasks regarding their rheumatic pain. The response categories are 10-100 with 10 points increment between each response categories, with "moderately certain" is placed midway between "very uncertain" and "very certain". TA sum score is created based on the average of the five questions (10-100 scale) with higher score representing higher self-efficacy.

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PSC)

    The PCS is a thirteen-item self-report scale to measure pain catastrophizing. The PCS consists of thirteen questions, and the respondents are instructed to reflect on past painful experiences and to indicate whether they have experienced each of the thirteen thoughts or feelings during their past experience of pain. Each question is rated from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("all the time"). A total score and three subscale scores regarding helplessness (item 1-5 and 12), magnification (item 6-7 and 13) and rumination (item 8-11) can be calculated.

    Measured: Baseline

  5. Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4)

    The DN4 questionnaire is a screening tool used to assess neuropathic pain. It consists of ten items. Seven items are related to pain symptoms based on an interview with the participant. The remaining three related to neurological symptoms based on a clinical examination. The examination includes assessment of whether there is reduced sensation (hypoesthesia) to touch or pinprick and whether light brushing increases or causes pain (allodynia) at a painful location. The scores are summarized and score 4 and above indicates neuropathic pain.

    Measured: Baseline and 3 months

  6. Painful joint count (Homunculus)

    The participants mark their painful or aching joints (bilateral shoulders, elbows, wrists, hips, knees, ankles and feet as well as the neck, upper, middle, and lower back) the last 24h and the previous six weeks on a homunculus. The painful or aching hand and foot joints the last 24h or previous six weeks are marked on a hand and foot diagram. All painful hand joints are accumulated and counted as one "hand or foot joint" in a total body painful joint count (range: 0-20).

    Measured: Baseline and 3 months

  7. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)

    The PHQ-9 is the depression module, and contains nine items which scores each of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV criteria on a 4-point Likert scale (0-3). Major depression is diagnosed if 5 or more of the 9 depressive symptom criteria have been present at least "more than half the days" in the past 2 weeks, and 1 of the symptoms is depressed mood or anhedonia. Other depression is diagnosed if 2-4 depressive symptoms have been present at least "more than half the days" in the past 2 weeks, and 1 of the symptoms is depressed mood or anhedonia. The PHQ-9 sum score ranges from 0 to 27.

    Measured: Baseline

  8. General Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7)

    The GAD-7 questionnaire is a seven-item, self-report anxiety questionnaire which assesses the patient's health status the previous 2 weeks [70]. The items enquire about the degree to which the patient has been bothered by feeling nervous, anxious or on edge, not being able to stop or control worrying, worrying too much about different things, having trouble relaxing, being so restless that it is hard to sit still, becoming easily annoyed or irritable and feeling afraid as if something might happen. The GAD-7 uses a 4-point Likert scale (0-3), and the sum score ranges from 0 to 21. Scores of 5, 10 and 15 represent cut-off points for mild, moderate and severe anxiety, respectively.

    Measured: Baseline

  9. Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID)

    The PsAID-9 short form is a patient-derived composite response index for clinical research assessing the effect PsA has on a patient's quality of life. It is based on nine domains assessing pain, fatigue, skin problems, work/leisure activities, functional capacity, discomfort, sleep disturbance, coping and emotional well-being. The total score is the sum of weighted NRS scores, with higher scores representative of poorer status. The questionnaire will be completed by patients with PsA.

    Measured: Baseline and 3 months

  10. MetaCognitions Questionnaire 30* (MCQ-30)

    MCQ-30 consists of five factors that measure the following dimensions on a four-point scale (1-4): (1) positive beliefs about worry (e.g. "worrying helps me cope"); (2) negative beliefs about the uncontrollability and danger of worry (e.g. "when I start worrying I cannot stop"); (3) cognitive confidence (e.g. "my memory can mislead me at times"); (4) beliefs about the need to control thoughts (e.g. "not being able to control my thoughts is a sign of weakness"); and (5) cognitive self-consciousness (e.g. "I pay close attention to the way my mind works"). Likert scale ranging from 1 (do not agree) to 4 (agree very much) is used to rate the responses. Higher scores indicate higher levels of maladaptive metacognitive beliefs. A total score (range 30-120) and subscale scores of the five factors (range 6-24) can be calculated.

    Measured: Baseline

  11. Pain Metacognition Questionnaire (PMQ)

    The Pain Metacognitions Questionnaire (PMQ) is a tool to investigate pain-related metacognition, which is a feature of worry/rumination about pain. The two-dimensional questionnaire includes nine questions measuring positive metacognitions, and twelve questions measuring negative metacognitions. For the positive subscale the sum score ranges from 0 to 27, and for the negative subscale the sum score ranges from 0 to 36. Higher scores reflect more unhelpful metacognitions.

    Measured: Baseline and 3 months

  12. Everyday Memory Questionnaire - revised (EMQ)

    EMQ is a questionnaire that maps the participants´ experience of their own everyday memory. The questionnaire consists of thirteen questions divided into three categories; category 1 assesses retrieval/memory (seven questions), category 2 maps attention and working memory (four questions) and category 3 consists of two questions with no clear interpretation. The answers are reported on a Likert scale from 0 to 4, where 0 is "once or less in the last month" and 4 is "once or more per day". EMQ scores higher than the norm value are suggested to indicate more difficulties with memory, and scores >1 SD above the norm value may indicate a significantly self-perceived reduced memory.

    Measured: Baseline and 3 months

  13. Stanford Expectation of Treatment Scale (SETS)

    SETS is a self-report questionnaire consisting of nine items rated on a 7-point scale, ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree" whilst assessing positive and negative treatment expectancies. The positive and negative expectations are scored separately in subscales.

    Measured: Baseline

  14. Gender Role Expectations of Pain (GREP)

    The GREP questionnaire comprises twelve Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) items. The questions are answered according to the participants own gender and includes the following; whether the participants perceive themselves to be more sensitive to/endurable to/willing to report pain than the typical woman, whether the participants perceive themselves to be more sensitive to/endurable to/willing to report pain than the typical man, whether the participants perceive the typical man to be more sensitive to/endurable to/willing to report pain than the typical woman, and whether the participants perceive the typical woman to be more sensitive to/endurable to/ willing to report pain than the typical man. Each item is scored on a scale (100 mm line) ranging from "much less" on the left side of the scale and "much more" on the right, and a score of 50 suggests no difference between men and women.

    Measured: Baseline

  15. American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for fibromyalgia

    The questionnaire consists of 31 items based on the Widespread Pain Index (WPI), which divides the body into 19 regions and scores how many regions are reported as painful, and a symptom severity score which assesses severity of fatigue, unrefreshing sleep, and cognitive symptoms the previous week. Symptom severity of fibromyalgia related symptoms such as headaches, pain or cramps in lower abdomen and depression during the previous 6 months is also assessed.

    Measured: Baseline

  16. Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB)

    Cognitive functioning will be assessed with CANTAB. The tests are digital with simple standardized voice-over instructions. All sessions are thus objective. The executive component of flexibility will be measured using the Intra-Extra Dimensional Shift (IED) task. The executive component of inhibitory control will be measured with the Stop Signal Task (SST).

    Measured: Baseline

  17. Height and weight

    The height of the participants is measured in centimetres (one decimal) with the participants in standing position. The weight is measured with the participants wearing light indoor clothing and without shoes (kilogram, one decimal).

    Measured: Baseline

  18. Hand preference

    Participants are asked if left or right is their dominant hand.

    Measured: Baseline

  19. Quantitative sensory testing (QST)

    • Pressure pain thresholds (PPT): The point at which a sensation from pressure first gets painful.
    • Conditioned pain modulation (CPM): The concept of higher pain thresholds after a conditioning stimulus due to endogenous pain inhibition. An inflated blood pressure cuff around the arm will used as the conditioning stimulus before repeating the pressure pain threshold.
    • Temporal summation: An increase in pain intensity during the repetition of identical noxious stimuli (i.e., ascending nociceptive facilitation).

    These concepts are tested by simple equipment such as a hand-held algometer to assess pain thresholds and weighted probes to assess temporal summation.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months

  20. Biobank

    We will collect three extra tubes of blood (one for EDTA tube for whole blood, one EDTA tube for plasma and one for serum- each tube with 2 ml of blood), that will be used in this sub-study. The samples will be stored in a certified biobank in a freezer at -70° C. They will be used for research purposes only and may include analysis of potential new biomarkers of disease activity or outcomes including deoxyribonucleic and ribonucleic acid analyses (genomics and transcriptomics), proteins, enzymes, signalling molecules and metabolites in the blood. Only genetic markers and sequences that are prevalent in the population or that have been associated with disease, disease-related symptoms or risk factors will be tested. Since these diseases are complex diseases with an interplay of several genes (each with only small effects) and other risk factors, patients will not be informed about the results.

    Measured: Baseline

  21. Ultrasound of joints and tendons

    To assess synovitis, a trained examiner will perform ultrasound examination of the bilateral elbows, wrists (radioulnar, radiocarpal and midcarpal joints), 1st to 5th metacarpophalangeal joints, 2nd to 5th proximal interphalangeal joints, knees, talocrulal joints, and 1st to 5th metatarsophalangeal joints. The bilateral extensor carpi radialis and tibialis posterior tendons will also be assessed. Grey-scale synovitis and power doppler activity will be scored on 0-3 scales. We will use validated atlases in order to increase reliability. The examination will be done at baseline for all participants. In patients with SpA and history of axial involvement only, ultrasound examination at follow-up will not be performed unless there are signs of arthritis / tenosynovitis at baseline (grey scale grade ≥ 2 or power Doppler grade ≥1). Other participants will also undergo an ultrasound examination at follow-up.

    Measured: Baseline and 3 months

  22. MRI

    We will not perform MRI as part of the study. However, if the participant has recently (last 6 months) performed an MRI, we will record the date, which joints, signs of inflammation (yes/no), and a description of main findings. This is especially relevant for patients with SpA, who may have solely axial affection.

    Measured: Baseline

  23. Treatments

    At baseline, we will record current and previous use of DMARDs, the reasons for discontinuation (lack of efficacy, side effects, or anti-drug antibodies). Current dose of corticosteroids and any intraarticular corticosteroid injections previous 3 months will be recorded at both visits. If systemic corticosteroids have been initiated or the dose has been increased due to an on-going disease flare, the date of the treatment change will be recorded. Treatments are also recorded in Nor-DMARD, but we will perform own recording to secure complete data regarding reasons for discontinuation of previous treatments, which is of relevance if we want to define patients refractory to treatments. Furthermore, it is important to record any newly started drugs, since they may affect the degree of pain and inflammation at the study visit.

    Measured: Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Dec 2024
  2. Study start11 Nov 2025
  3. Primary completionNov 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionNov 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
350 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06718569
Sponsor's protocol ID
DS-00850
Other IDs
708967
Acronym
Nor-Pain
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
2 Dec 2024
Last updated
13 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Arthritis and Arthritis, Juvenile Idiopathic, run by Diakonhjemmet Hospital at 1 site in Norway.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Ida K Haugen, MD PhD (+47 95859884, ida.k.haugen@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

PROMIS Pain Interference - Short Form 8a (time frame: Baseline, 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Apr 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in