Decayed TeethNCT06706167
Clinical Comparison Between Stainless-steel Crown, Zirconia Crown and Bioflx Crown in Primary Molars
A study testing stainless steel crown, Zirconia crown and Bioflx crown in people with Decayed Teeth and Carious Lesion, run by Delta University for Science and Technology at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare clinically three different crowns for primary molars; stainless steel crown, zirconia crown and Bioflx crown. the main questions it aims to answer are: is Bioflex crown is an alternative to stainless steel crown and zirconia crown? Seventy-five patients their age range… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 3 to 8 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Decayed Teeth, Carious Lesion
- What is being tested?
- stainless steel crown, Zirconia crown and Bioflx crown
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 75 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2023to 30 Sep 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 3 to 8 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Patient within the age group of 3-8 years old.
- Healthy children free of any systemic disease.
- Pulpotomized or pulpectomized (endodontically treated) lower second primary molars.
- Patients who have the behavioral rating of definitely positive or positive according to the frankl behaviour.
Who cannot join
- • Patient younger than 3 years old or older than 8 years old.
- non-Healthy children or have any systemic disease.
- primary molars with no pulpal treatment
- Patients who have the behavioral rating of definitely negative or negative according to the frankl behaviour.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Egypt1 site
Delta University For Science and Technology
Gamasa, El Dakhleia, 11152
About this study
Official title: Clinical Comparison Between Stainless-steel Crown, Zirconia Crown and Bioflx Crown in Primary Molars: Randomized Control Trial
The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare clinically three different crowns for primary molars; stainless steel crown, zirconia crown and Bioflx crown.
the main questions it aims to answer are: is Bioflex crown is an alternative to stainless steel crown and zirconia crown? Seventy-five patients their age range between 3 and 8 years participated in this study. The participants are divided into three groups representing group A for stainless steel crown (n=25), group B for zirconia crown (n=25) and group C for Bioflx crown (n=25). Plaque index, crown retentivity and gingival index will be evaluated at evaluated at baseline, 6 and 12 months.
- Conditions
- Decayed Teeth, Carious Lesion
- Being tested
- stainless steel crown, Zirconia crown, Bioflx crown
- Keywords
- primary molars, stainless steel crown, zirconia crown, bioflx crown, clinical evaluation
- Medical subject headings
- Dental Caries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
stainless steel crownDevice
Participants in this arm received a stainless steel crown for primary teeth restoration. The crowns were selected based on the clinical assessment of the patient's dental need.
Zirconia crownDevice
Participants in this arm received a zirconia crown for primary teeth restoration. The crowns were selected to provide a more aesthetic and durable option compared to stainless steel.
Bioflx crownDevice
Participants in this arm received a Bioflx crown, which is a flexible, biocompatible material often used for pediatric crowns.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| stainless steel crown | Active comparator | Participants in this arm will receive stainless steel crowns for primary teeth. Receives: Device: stainless steel crown; Device: Zirconia crown; Device: Bioflx crown |
| zirconia crown | Experimental | Participants in this arm will receive zirconia crowns for primary teeth. Receives: Device: stainless steel crown; Device: Zirconia crown; Device: Bioflx crown |
| Bioflx crown | Experimental | Participants in this arm will receive Bioflex crowns for primary teeth. Receives: Device: stainless steel crown; Device: Zirconia crown; Device: Bioflx crown |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Plaque accumulation
Measured using the Löe and Silness index, where each of the four surfaces of the crown (buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal) was scored from 0 to 3 (0 = no plaque, 3 = abundance of soft matter). The scores from the four areas were added and divided by four to obtain the plaque index
Measured: 6 months and 12 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
crown retention
Assessed using the USPHS criteria, where "Alpha" indicated the crown was continuous with the existing anatomic form, "Bravo" indicated a missing part of the crown but not enough to expose the underlying dentin/base, and "Charlie" indicated sufficient loss of crown substance to expose the underlying dentin/base or complete loss of the crown
Measured: 6 months and 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Nov 2024
- Study start1 Sep 2023
- Primary completion1 Sep 2024
- Study completion30 Sep 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Decayed TeethStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This research was designed as a randomized controlled trial conducted by a single operator to minimize operator-induced errors. A total sample of 75 primary molars was determined, allowing for potential dropouts, and was evenly distributed into three groups of 25. Each group recieved different crown, groups A for stianless steel crown, group B for zirconia crown and group C for Bioflx crown. At 6 and 12 months follow up, each crown was evaluated clinically such as plaque index , crown retentivity and gingival index.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Delta University for Science and Technology
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06706167
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DU0240721024
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 23 Nov 2024
- Last updated
- 4 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: We are currently reviewing the potential for sharing individual participant data (IPD) following the completion of the study. Factors such as data privacy, participant consent, and regulatory guidelines are being considered. A final decision on data sharing will be made at the conclusion of the study, and the IPD sharing plan will be updated accordingly
Publications
Ashima G, Sarabjot KB, Gauba K, Mittal HC. Zirconia crowns for rehabilitation of decayed primary incisors: an esthetic alternative. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014 Fall;39(1):18-22. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.39.1.t6725r5566u4330g.
PubMed 25631720Uhlen MM, Tseveenjav B, Wuollet E, Furuholm J, Ansteinsson V, Mulic A, Valen H. Stainless-steel crowns in children: Norwegian and Finnish dentists' knowledge, practice and challenges. BMC Oral Health. 2021 Apr 12;21(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01556-6.
PubMed 33845821Schuler IM, Hiller M, Roloff T, Kuhnisch J, Heinrich-Weltzien R. Clinical success of stainless steel crowns placed under general anaesthesia in primary molars: an observational follow up study. J Dent. 2014 Nov;42(11):1396-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.06.009. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
PubMed 24994618Seale NS, Randall R. The use of stainless steel crowns: a systematic literature review. Pediatr Dent. 2015 Mar-Apr;37(2):145-60.
PubMed 25905656Dimitrov E, Georgieva M, Andreeva RJM. Indications for use of performed crowns in pediatric dentistry. 2016;2:439-45.
Katz CR, de Andrade Mdo R, Lira SS, Ramos Vieira EL, Heimer MV. The concepts of minimally invasive dentistry and its impact on clinical practice: a survey with a group of Brazilian professionals. Int Dent J. 2013 Apr;63(2):85-90. doi: 10.1111/idj.12018. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
PubMed 23550521Aggarwal P, Goyel V, Mathur S, Sachdev V. Effect of Stainless-Steel Crown and Preformed Zirconia Crown on the Periodontal Health of Endodontically Treated Primary Molars Correlating with IL-1beta: An In Vivo Study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 May 1;46(3):199-203. doi: 10.17796/1053-4625-46.3.5.
PubMed 35830632Kaptan A, Korkmaz E. Evaluation of success of stainless steel crowns placed using the hall technique in children with high caries risk: A randomized clinical trial. Niger J Clin Pract. 2021 Mar;24(3):425-434. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_112_20.
PubMed 33723119Smail-Faugeron V, Porot A, Muller-Bolla M, Courson F. Indirect pulp capping versus pulpotomy for treating deep carious lesions approaching the pulp in primary teeth: a systematic review. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2016 Jun;17(2):107-12.
PubMed 27377108Kopczynski K, Meyer BD. Examining Parental Treatment Decisions Within a Contemporary Pediatric Dentistry Private Practice. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Mar 25;15:645-652. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S300684. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 33790544Abdelhafez A, Dhar V. Comparative clinical performance of stainless steel, zirconia, and Bioflx crowns in primary molars: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 18;25(1):585. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05869-8.
PubMed 40251538
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Comparison Between Stainless-steel Crown, Zirconia Crown and Bioflx Crown in Primary Molars: Randomized Control Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06706167
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DU0240721024
- Conditions
- Decayed Teeth, Carious Lesion
- Keywords
- primary molars, stainless steel crown, zirconia crown, bioflx crown, clinical evaluation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Delta University for Science and TechnologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare clinically three different crowns for primary molars; stainless steel crown, zirconia crown and Bioflx crown.
the main questions it aims to answer are: is Bioflex crown is an alternative to stainless steel crown and zirconia crown? Seventy-five patients their age range between 3 and 8 years participated in this study. The participants are divided into three groups representing group A for stainless steel crown (n=25), group B for zirconia crown (n=25) and group C for Bioflx crown (n=25). Plaque index, crown retentivity and gingival index will be evaluated at evaluated at baseline, 6 and 12 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- This research was designed as a randomized controlled trial conducted by a single operator to minimize operator-induced errors. A total sample of 75 primary molars was determined, allowing for potential dropouts, and was evenly distributed into three groups of 25. Each group recieved different crown, groups A for stianless steel crown, group B for zirconia crown and group C for Bioflx crown. At 6 and 12 months follow up, each crown was evaluated clinically such as plaque index , crown retentivity and gingival index.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| stainless steel crown | Active comparator | Device: stainless steel crown, Device: Zirconia crown, Device: Bioflx crownParticipants in this arm will receive stainless steel crowns for primary teeth. |
| zirconia crown | Experimental | Device: stainless steel crown, Device: Zirconia crown, Device: Bioflx crownParticipants in this arm will receive zirconia crowns for primary teeth. |
| Bioflx crown | Experimental | Device: stainless steel crown, Device: Zirconia crown, Device: Bioflx crownParticipants in this arm will receive Bioflex crowns for primary teeth. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 3 to 8 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patient within the age group of 3-8 years old.
- Healthy children free of any systemic disease.
- Pulpotomized or pulpectomized (endodontically treated) lower second primary molars.
- Patients who have the behavioral rating of definitely positive or positive according to the frankl behaviour.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- • Patient younger than 3 years old or older than 8 years old.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| stainless steel crownParticipants in this arm received a stainless steel crown for primary teeth restoration. The crowns were selected based on the clinical assessment of the patient's dental need. | Device | Bioflx crown, stainless steel crown, zirconia crown |
| Zirconia crownParticipants in this arm received a zirconia crown for primary teeth restoration. The crowns were selected to provide a more aesthetic and durable option compared to stainless steel. | Device | Bioflx crown, stainless steel crown, zirconia crown |
| Bioflx crownParticipants in this arm received a Bioflx crown, which is a flexible, biocompatible material often used for pediatric crowns. | Device | Bioflx crown, stainless steel crown, zirconia crown |
Primary outcome
Plaque accumulation
Time frame: 6 months and 12 months
Measured using the Löe and Silness index, where each of the four surfaces of the crown (buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal) was scored from 0 to 3 (0 = no plaque, 3 = abundance of soft matter). The scores from the four areas were added and divided by four to obtain the plaque index
1 secondary outcome
crown retention
Time frame: 6 months and 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Dec 2024.
- Results publication: PubMed 25631720Ashima G, Sarabjot KB, Gauba K, Mittal HC. Zirconia crowns for rehabilitation of decayed primary incisors: an esthetic alternative. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014 Fall;39(1):18-22. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.39.1.t6725r5566u4330g.
- Results publication: PubMed 33845821Uhlen MM, Tseveenjav B, Wuollet E, Furuholm J, Ansteinsson V, Mulic A, Valen H. Stainless-steel crowns in children: Norwegian and Finnish dentists' knowledge, practice and challenges. BMC Oral Health. 2021 Apr 12;21(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01556-6.
- Results publication: PubMed 24994618Schuler IM, Hiller M, Roloff T, Kuhnisch J, Heinrich-Weltzien R. Clinical success of stainless steel crowns placed under general anaesthesia in primary molars: an observational follow up study. J Dent. 2014 Nov;42(11):1396-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.06.009. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
- Results publication: PubMed 25905656Seale NS, Randall R. The use of stainless steel crowns: a systematic literature review. Pediatr Dent. 2015 Mar-Apr;37(2):145-60.
- Results publicationDimitrov E, Georgieva M, Andreeva RJM. Indications for use of performed crowns in pediatric dentistry. 2016;2:439-45.
- Results publication: PubMed 23550521Katz CR, de Andrade Mdo R, Lira SS, Ramos Vieira EL, Heimer MV. The concepts of minimally invasive dentistry and its impact on clinical practice: a survey with a group of Brazilian professionals. Int Dent J. 2013 Apr;63(2):85-90. doi: 10.1111/idj.12018. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
- Results publication: PubMed 35830632Aggarwal P, Goyel V, Mathur S, Sachdev V. Effect of Stainless-Steel Crown and Preformed Zirconia Crown on the Periodontal Health of Endodontically Treated Primary Molars Correlating with IL-1beta: An In Vivo Study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 May 1;46(3):199-203. doi: 10.17796/1053-4625-46.3.5.
- Results publication: PubMed 33723119Kaptan A, Korkmaz E. Evaluation of success of stainless steel crowns placed using the hall technique in children with high caries risk: A randomized clinical trial. Niger J Clin Pract. 2021 Mar;24(3):425-434. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_112_20.
- Results publication: PubMed 27377108Smail-Faugeron V, Porot A, Muller-Bolla M, Courson F. Indirect pulp capping versus pulpotomy for treating deep carious lesions approaching the pulp in primary teeth: a systematic review. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2016 Jun;17(2):107-12.
- Results publication: PubMed 33790544Kopczynski K, Meyer BD. Examining Parental Treatment Decisions Within a Contemporary Pediatric Dentistry Private Practice. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Mar 25;15:645-652. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S300684. eCollection 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40251538Abdelhafez A, Dhar V. Comparative clinical performance of stainless steel, zirconia, and Bioflx crowns in primary molars: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 18;25(1):585. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05869-8.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. We are currently reviewing the potential for sharing individual participant data (IPD) following the completion of the study. Factors such as data privacy, participant consent, and regulatory guidelines are being considered. A final decision on data sharing will be made at the conclusion of the study, and the IPD sharing plan will be updated accordingly
Related trials for Decayed Teeth
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Evaluation of a New Dual-cure Universal Adhesive
Class I Dental Restorations, Class II Dental Restorations
Not yet recruiting
Safety of Intraosseous Anaesthesia in Children With Haemophilia
Haemophilia A, Haemophilia B
Not yet recruiting
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Silver Diamine Fluoride Versus Light-Cured Silver Diamine Fluoride in Carious Primary Molars
Dental Caries
Not yet recruiting
Clinical Performance of CAD/CAM Hard Hybrid Ceramic Inlays Versus Resin Composite Inlays in Vital Molars With Extensive Occluso-Proximal Cavities
Dental Caries, Cavity, Dental
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Xylitol- Versus Erythritol-Sweetened Mints on Plaque ATP-Bioluminescence Readings
Dental Caries, Dental Plaque
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing stainless steel crown, Zirconia crown and Bioflx crown in people with Decayed Teeth and Carious Lesion, run by Delta University for Science and Technology at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Plaque accumulation (time frame: 6 months and 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06706167, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Dec 2024.