AzTrials
AzTrials

Internet AddictionNCT06681883

Implementation of the Care Bag Theory for Healthy Internet Use in Adolescents (CHIA)

A study testing A nursing care program based on the Care Bag Theory for Healthy Internet Use in Adolescents (CHIA) in people with Internet Addiction and Problematic Internet Use, run by Akdeniz University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study aimed to investigate the effect of a nursing care program based on the Care Bag Theory for Healthy Internet Use in Adolescents (CHIA) on adolescents' problematic internet use, self-regulation, family relationships, and coping skills. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 to 18 years
What is being tested?
A nursing care program based on the Care Bag Theory for Healthy Internet Use in Adolescents (CHIA)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
10 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
1 Jul 2024to 1 Jan 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Voluntarily agreeing to participate in the study,
  • Being between the ages of 12-18,
  • Receiving outpatient follow-up at the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Clinic,
  • Having a Problematic Internet Use (PIU) issue (PIU is assessed according to the criteria by the doctors at the clinic. The doctors refer adolescents who meet the criteria. These criteria are as follows: a) using the internet for longer than planned, b) experiencing withdrawal symptoms when unable to access the internet, c) failing to control internet usage, d) being excessively preoccupied with the internet, e) losing interest in offline hobbies, f) a desire to use the internet more, g) continuing excessive internet use despite knowing it negatively affects their life, h) using the internet to escape problems, i) lying about internet use).

Who cannot join

  • Having a speech, hearing, or self-expression impairment,
  • Having received or currently receiving professional support related to PIU.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Akdeniz University

    Antalya, Kepez, 07058

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness of a Nursing Care Program Based on the Care Bag Theory for Healthy Internet Use in Adolescents: An Action Research Study

The study aimed to investigate the effect of a nursing care program based on the Care Bag Theory for Healthy Internet Use in Adolescents (CHIA) on adolescents' problematic internet use, self-regulation, family relationships, and coping skills.

Read the detailed description

This study constitutes a part of the doctoral thesis titled "Development of a Nursing Intervention Model Specific to Problematic Internet Use in Adolescents"

Being tested
A nursing care program based on the Care Bag Theory for Healthy Internet Use in Adolescents (CHIA)
Keywords
adolescent, problematic internet use, nursing, model, healthy internet use
Medical subject headings
Internet Addiction Disorder

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • A nursing care program based on the Care Bag Theory for Healthy Internet Use in Adolescents (CHIA)Behavioural

    A nursing care program based on the Care Bag Theory for Healthy Internet Use in Adolescents (CHIA)

    The nursing care program based on the CHIA model is designed for adolescents with problematic internet use. The program is grounded in the concepts of the draft model. It consists of eight sessions, each expected to last 40-50 minutes. One session will be held per week. The first session includes introductions and an overview of the program, the second session aims to strengthen the adolescent's motivation for change, the third session focuses on improving the adolescent's self-control skills, the fourth session aims to enhance family functionality, the fifth session helps develop offline activities to replace internet use, the sixth and seventh sessions work on developing coping skills, and the eighth session includes the evaluation and termination of the program.

Study groups in NCT06681883
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Action groupExperimentalNot described
Receives: Behavioral: A nursing care program based on the Care Bag Theory for Healthy Internet Use in Adolescents (CHIA)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Problematic Internet Use Scale-Adolescent (PIUS-A)

    The scale consists of 27 items and is of a five-point Likert type. The lowest possible score on the scale is 27, and the highest score is 135. Higher scores on the scale indicate that adolescents' problematic internet use has increased and become unhealthy. The PIUS-A scale has three subscales: negative consequences of internet use, excessive use, and social benefit/social comfort.

    Measured: Data will be collected two times: pre-intervention and immediately post-intervention.

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. The Adolescent Self Regulatory Inventory (ASRI)

    The scale consists of 32 items and has two subscales: 'self-control success' and 'self-control failure.' The self-control success subscale contains 18 items, while the self-control failure subscale contains 14 items. The scale uses a four-point Likert-type rating. The scale is used to calculate the total score. The lowest possible score on the ASRI is 32, and the highest score is 128. A higher score on the scale indicates that the adolescent's self-control skills are good.

    Measured: Data will be collected two times: pre-intervention and immediately post-intervention.

  2. Kidcope

    The scale consists of 11 items. The Kidcope has three subscales: Active Coping (Items 3, 6, 8, 10), Negative Coping (Items 4, 5, 7), and Avoidant Coping (Items 1, 2, 9, 11). Each subscale score is obtained by summing the relevant items in order. The possible scores range from 0 to 12 for both the Active Coping and Avoidant Coping subscales, and from 0 to 9 for the Negative Coping subscale. As the score increases, it indicates a higher use of the corresponding coping strategy.

    Measured: Data will be collected two times: pre-intervention and immediately post-intervention.

  3. The Family Relationship Scale for Children

    The scale consists of 20 items and was developed to measure how children perceive their relationships with their families. Participants respond to each item with "never" (1), "sometimes" (2), or "always" (3). The scale has two subscales: Restrictive Family Relationships and Supportive Family Relationships. Items 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 14, 16, 18, and 19 form the Restrictive Family Relationships subscale. A higher score in this subscale indicates that the child perceives the relationships within the family as restrictive. Items 1, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 17, and 20 form the Supportive Family Relationships subscale. A higher score in this subscale indicates that the child perceives the relationships within the family as supportive.

    Measured: Data will be collected two times: pre-intervention and immediately post-intervention.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Nov 2024
  2. Study start1 Jul 2024
  3. Primary completion1 Aug 2024
  4. Study completion1 Jan 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
10 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06681883
Sponsor's protocol ID
KAEK-152
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
7 Nov 2024
Last updated
23 Jan 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Wang W, Ye J, Zhu Y, Huang D, Zhao X. Longitudinal relationship between internet self-control and problematic internet use among Chinese adolescents: mediating role of meaning in life. Front Psychiatry. 2023 Dec 7;14:1258673. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1258673. eCollection 2023.

    PubMed 38144476
  • Shek DT, Yu L, Leung H, Wu FK, Law MY. Development, implementation, and evaluation of a multi-addiction prevention program for primary school students in Hong Kong: the B.E.S.T. Teen Program. Asian J Gambl Issues Public Health. 2016;6(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40405-016-0014-z. Epub 2016 Jul 8.

    PubMed 27630812
  • Peterson SJ. Introduction to the nature of nursing knowledge. In S. J. Peterson and T. S. Bredow (Eds.), Middle range theories: Application to nursing research (3rd ed., pp. 3-41). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.

  • Rakhmawati W, Kosasih CE, Widiasih R, Suryani S, Arifin H. Internet Addiction Among Male Adolescents in Indonesia: A Qualitative Study. Am J Mens Health. 2021 May-Jun;15(3):15579883211029459. doi: 10.1177/15579883211029459.

    PubMed 34189970
  • Paulus FW, Ohmann S, von Gontard A, Popow C. Internet gaming disorder in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018 Jul;60(7):645-659. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13754. Epub 2018 Apr 6.

    PubMed 29633243
  • Park E, Kwon M. Health-Related Internet Use by Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Apr 3;20(4):e120. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7731.

    PubMed 29615385
  • Ozparlak A, Karakaya D, Onder A, Gunbayi I. Problematic internet use in adolescents: A phenomenological study. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2023 Aug;30(4):731-742. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12900. Epub 2023 Jan 31.

    PubMed 36662598
  • Marchant A, Hawton K, Stewart A, Montgomery P, Singaravelu V, Lloyd K, Purdy N, Daine K, John A. A systematic review of the relationship between internet use, self-harm and suicidal behaviour in young people: The good, the bad and the unknown. PLoS One. 2017 Aug 16;12(8):e0181722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181722. eCollection 2017.

    PubMed 28813437
  • Lyons J. Reflective education for professional practice: discovering knowledge from experience. Nurse Educ Today. 1999 Jan;19(1):29-34. doi: 10.1054/nedt.1999.0607.

    PubMed 10222968
  • Lukavska K, Hrabec O, Lukavsky J, Demetrovics Z, Kiraly O. The associations of adolescent problematic internet use with parenting: A meta-analysis. Addict Behav. 2022 Dec;135:107423. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107423. Epub 2022 Jul 6.

    PubMed 35933287

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing A nursing care program based on the Care Bag Theory for Healthy Internet Use in Adolescents (CHIA) in people with Internet Addiction and Problematic Internet Use, run by Akdeniz University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Problematic Internet Use Scale-Adolescent (PIUS-A) (time frame: Data will be collected two times: pre-intervention and immediately post-intervention.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06681883, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jan 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in