AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Artery DiseaseECONOMYNCT06681584

Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance and Costs of FFRB Vs. Standard Care in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.

An observational study of Coronary Artery Disease and Cardiovascular Diseases, run by National Heart Centre Singapore at 3 sites in Singapore.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Chest pain due to coronary artery disease (CAD) is a main driver of healthcare costs. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement during invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is the gold standard to discriminate ischemia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 to 98 years
What is being tested?
CTCA
How many people
340 participants
Where
3 sitesSingapore
Study dates
1 Oct 2021to 1 May 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 to 98 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Subjects with intermediate likelihood of obstructive CAD and with symptomatic suspected CAD who are scheduled to undergo initial clinically-indicated non-invasive coronary evaluation and have not undergone non-invasive coronary evaluation, including exercise tolerance testing, stress echocardiography, SPECT or MRI, or CTCA within the past 90 days OR ICA at any time.

Who may be able to join

  • Aged 21 to 98
  • Providing written informed consent
  • Subjects with intermediate likelihood of obstructive CAD and with symptomatic suspected CAD who are scheduled to undergo initial clinically-indicated non-invasive coronary evaluation and have not undergone non-invasive coronary evaluation, including exercise tolerance testing, stress echocardiography, SPECT or MRI, or CTCA within the past 90 days OR ICA at any time.

Who cannot join

  • Suspicion of acute coronary syndrome. Subjects experiencing unstable angina are not excluded where clinical documentation has ruled out myocardial infarctions.
  • Prior, clinically documented myocardial infarction
  • PCI prior to first test
  • Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) prior to first test
  • Contraindications for CTCA such as
  • Presence of pacemaker or internal defibrillator leads
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Atrial Fibrillation
  • Known anaphylactic allergy to iodinated contrast
  • Pregnancy or unknown pregnancy status in women of childbearing potential
  • Body mass index> 35kg/m2
  • Contraindication to acute beta blockade

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

Singapore3 sites
  • National University Hospital

    Singapore, 119074

  • National Heart Centre Singapore

    Singapore, 169609

  • Tan Tock Seng Hospital

    Singapore, 308433

Other trials in Singapore

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve for Physiological Assessment in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease (ECONOMY)

Chest pain due to coronary artery disease (CAD) is a main driver of healthcare costs. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement during invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is the gold standard to discriminate ischemia. A rapid simplified method had been developed to determine non-invasive FFR (FFRB) by applying computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation on anatomic models derived from computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA).In this current study, the aims is to compare the diagnostic accuracy, clinical effectiveness, safety outcomes, and quality of life of using FFRB on top of CTCA for CAD diagnosis and treatment planning, versus standard of care in Singapore; and measure health care resource utilization and assess cost-effectiveness of adopting FFRB on top of CTCA to support decision making in managing patients with suspected CAD.

Read the detailed description

Chest pain due to coronary artery disease (CAD) is a main driver of healthcare costs. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement during invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is the gold standard to discriminate ischemia. A rapid simplified method had been developed to determine non-invasive FFR (FFRB) by applying computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation on anatomic models derived from computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA), which compares favorably with invasive FFR and significantly improves diagnostic accuracy than CTCA alone in a previous preliminary study.

In this study, the aim is to compare the diagnostic accuracy, clinical effectiveness, safety outcomes, and quality of life of using FFRB on top of CTCA for CAD diagnosis and treatment planning, versus standard of care in Singapore; and measure health care resource utilization and assess cost-effectiveness of adopting FFRB on top of CTCA to support decision making in managing patients with suspected CAD.

The study protocol for CTCA scan is as follows.

  1. CTCA will be performed with Single- or dual-source CT scanners (Toshiba AquilionOne, Cannon Aquilion One, Philips 256-dector, GE Revolution, Siemens Somatom Force Dual Source 384-detector, Siemens Somatom Drive Dual Source 256-detector) scanners.
  2. CTCA scan will follow local CTCA scanning protocols that meet the quality standards defined by the Society of Cardiac Computed Tomography.
  3. The CTCA image analysis will be performed according to accepted guidelines for reporting.

A total of 400 patients with chest pain will be recruited and randomly assigned into two groups. Both groups of patients will receive CTCA. But only one group of patients will be given the FFRB results. Based on the available medical information, the patients may be referred for additional non-invasive tests or ICA. For the recruited patients, who are referred for ICA subsequently, at least one FFR measurement will be conducted. All recruited patients will receive follow up at the time of 90days, 180 days and 365 days post-CTCA, as well as at the end-of-study, to record the quality of life, medical expenses and MACE events. The recruited patients will also receive follow up (phone or office visit) at the time of 90days (+30/-15 days), 180 days (+/-30 days) and 365 days (+/- 30 days) after enrolment, as well as at the end-of-study when the last recruited patient has completed one-year follow-up. Patient's response to the two questionnaires (SAQ 7 and EQ-5D-5L), their use of medication and the following clinical events will be recorded during the baseline visit and follow ups.

  1. noninvasive or invasive coronary diagnostic tests;
  2. planned clinic or hospital visits for evaluation or treatment of CAD;
  3. unplanned hospitalization due to persisting or increasing complaints of chest pain with or without ST-T changes leading to urgent revascularization performed within the same hospitalization;
  4. vascular events related to invasive diagnostic or therapeutic coronary procedures occurring within 14 days of invasive procedure;
  5. nonfatal myocardial infarction;
  6. Cardiovascular death defined as any death due to immediate cardiac or vascular cause or non- cardiovascular death, defined as any death not covered by the above definition. Un-witnessed death and death of unknown cause will be classified as cardiovascular death.

Through this study, investigation can be done on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of adding FFRB in the management of patients with suspected CAD. This new non-invasive method, FFRB, may help reduce the need for ICA in patients with suspected CAD and enhance the cost-effectiveness and clinical outcome of CAD diagnosis and treatment.

Once enrolled into the study, patient's medical records and medical bill/cost will also be reviewed for data collection.

For the recruited patients, who are referred for ICA subsequently (within 6 month post-CTCA) and don't have coronary revascularization or myocardial infarction event between the CTCA and ICA tests, at least one FFR measurement during ICA will be conducted.

The study protocol for ICA and FFR measurement is as follows:

  1. ICA will be performed by certified interventional cardiologists following the guidelines set forth by the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions.
  2. FFR will be performed in vessels having diameter stenosis between 30-90%, and deemed clinically indicated for evaluation.
  3. Following administration of intracoronary nitroglycerin, invasive FFR will be performed using either the pressure monitoring guidewire (St Jude Medical Aeris®, Philips Volcano VerrataTM pressure wire or Boston® guidewire), or fibreoptic pressure catheter (Medtronic ACIST®) advanced distal to the stenosis.

II. Hyperemia is induced by administration of one of the following:

  1. Intravenous adenosine at a rate of at least 140 mcg/kg/min; or
  2. Intracoronary adenosine of at least 200 mcg into left coronary artery, and at least 100 mcg into right coronary artery;or
  3. Intracoronary Papaverine of at least 20mg for the left coronary artery, and at least 15mg for the right coronary artery.
Being tested
CTCA
Keywords
CT angiogram, Fractional flow reserve, Coronary disease, Coronary stenosis, Coronary plaque
Medical subject headings
Coronary Artery Disease, Cardiovascular Diseases, Constriction, Pathologic, Coronary Occlusion, Coronary Stenosis, Heart Diseases, Vascular Diseases, Pathological Conditions, Anatomical

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CTCADiagnostic test

    CTCA is a non-invasive test for diagnosis of anatomic coronary stenosis. Additionally, the diagnostic performance of FFRB (derived from in house calculation) with CCTA data in patients with intermediate coronary artery disease (CAD), as compared to an invasive FFR reference standard (FFR<=0.80)

Study groups in NCT06681584
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group ABoth groups of patients will receive CT scan for calcium score and Coronary angiogram, viz CTCA scan. Non-invasive FFRb will be calculated for all the patients with acceptable CTCA image quality. Based on the medical history and CTCA results, the patients may be referred for additional non-invasive tests or ICA and treated with medical therapy, PCI or CABG
Receives: Diagnostic Test: CTCA
Group BBoth groups of patients will receive CT scan for calcium score and Coronary angiogram, viz CTCA scan. Non-invasive FFRb will be calculated for all the patients with acceptable CTCA image quality. However the FFRb results will only be given to the doctors who are taking care of the patients in Group B. Based on the medical history and CTCA with FFRb results (Group B), the patients may be referred for additional non-invasive tests or ICA and treated with medical therapy, PCI or CABG
Receives: Diagnostic Test: CTCA

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Compare the diagnostic performance of FFRB vs. standard care in suspected coronary artery disease.

    The outcome is the rate of invasive coronary angiography.

    Measured: 1 year for each enrolled subject

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Compare the total costs based on FFRB compared with standard care in suspected coronary artery disease.

    The outcome is total costs (SGD $) during 1 year follow up.

    Measured: 1 year for each enrolled subject

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Nov 2024
  2. Study start1 Oct 2021
  3. Primary completion31 May 2024
  4. Study completion1 May 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
340 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06681584
Sponsor's protocol ID
ECONOMY
Other IDs
2020/2092
Acronym
ECONOMY
Status last verified
Oct 2024
First submitted
18 Aug 2022
Last updated
8 Nov 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Coronary Artery Disease and Cardiovascular Diseases, run by National Heart Centre Singapore at 3 sites in Singapore.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in Singapore. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Compare the diagnostic performance of FFRB vs. standard care in suspected coronary artery disease. (time frame: 1 year for each enrolled subject). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Nov 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in