AzTrials
AzTrials

Colon PolypsNCT06676930

Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Trainee Polyp Miss Rates

A study testing Colonoscopy With Computer-Aided Detection and Colonoscopy without Computer-Aided Detection in people with Colon Polyps and Colonoscopy, run by Northwestern University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Based on prior studies, trainee and practicing gastroenterologists miss pre-cancerous polyps (adenomas and serrated polyps) during colonoscopy. The use of computer-aided detection (CADe) systems, a form of artificial intelligence (AI) has been shown to help identify colorectal lesions for practicing… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Colonoscopy With Computer-Aided Detection and Colonoscopy without Computer-Aided Detection
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
180 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
10 Sep 2024to 1 Sep 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients referred for screening or surveillance colonoscopy

Who cannot join

  • Patients referred for polypectomy or diagnostic colonoscopy
  • Patients with prior right colon surgery
  • Prolonged insertion time (>20 minutes)
  • Poor bowel preparation (Boston Bowel Preparation Score less than or equal to 6)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Northwestern Memorial Hospital

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Impact of Computer Aided Detection on Trainee Polyp Miss Rates Using a Tandem Colonoscopy Design

Based on prior studies, trainee and practicing gastroenterologists miss pre-cancerous polyps (adenomas and serrated polyps) during colonoscopy. The use of computer-aided detection (CADe) systems, a form of artificial intelligence (AI) has been shown to help identify colorectal lesions for practicing gastroenterologists. However, less is known how AI impacts polyp detection for trainees.

The investigators are conducting a tandem colonoscopy study wherein a portion of the colon is examined first by the trainee and then the attending physician. For each procedure, randomization will occur which will determine whether or not the trainee will utilize AI for their examination of the colon. At the end of the study, the investigators will determine whether AI helps trainees miss fewer polyps during colonoscopy. The investigators will also conduct interviews with trainees to understand how AI impacts colonoscopy training.

Read the detailed description

Quality metrics in colonoscopy are useful in determining endoscopist performance. The adenoma detection rate (ADR) has historically been the primary colonoscopy quality indicator of interest, whereby those with a higher ADR have lower rates of interval colon cancers. Other important parameters include the adenoma miss rate (AMR) and the sessile serrated polyp miss rate (SMR).

The AMR among practicing gastroenterologists is estimated at around 25% based on tandem-colonoscopy studies, while the SMR may be even higher. Prior tandem colonoscopy studies have also shown that gastroenterology trainees have an AMR between 30-41% and an SMR between 56-86%. As missed polyps may grow into colorectal cancers over time, efforts must be dedicated to reducing AMR and SMR.

In 2021, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first computer-aided detection (CADe) system, (GI-Genius; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) for identifying colorectal lesions in the United States. An initial tandem colonoscopy study among experienced endoscopists using this CADe system showed a reduction in AMR from 32.4% to 15.5%. However, it is unknown whether trainees would have a similar reduction in polyp miss rates.

CADe has been introduced into gastroenterology trainee education in a largely unstructured fashion and trainees' perception of CADe's impact on training is largely unknown. Presently, trainees and attendings complete colonoscopies with and without CADe. It is at the discretion of attendings whether CADe is used for a procedure regardless of whether or not a trainee is involved.

In this single center study, all Northwestern gastroenterology trainees will be invited to participate in the trial. First year gastroenterology trainees will initiate participation after 6 months of endoscopic training (approximately 100 colonoscopies completed). Trainees will be complete an hour-long meeting with the study team. The study protocol will be explained in detail and written informed consent will be obtained from the trainees.

The medical records of patients scheduled for ambulatory screening or surveillance colonoscopy during select endoscopy blocks will be screened in advance for inclusion in the study. Participants will be prospectively enrolled.

On the day of the patient's scheduled colonoscopy, a member of the study team will obtain written informed consent for both the colonoscopy and participation in the research study in a private bay in the pre-endoscopy area. The patient will then be transported to the procedure room and sedated. Sedation method (monitored anesthesia care or moderate sedation) will be determined prior to the scheduled appointment. If the patient is to receive moderate sedation, fentanyl and midazolam will be administered in incremental doses per the standard of care. Once the patient is sedated, the fellow and attending will perform the insertion as is standard for a colonoscopy in which a fellow is participating. Once the cecum is reached, the patient will then be randomized to whether the initial inspection of the right colon by the fellow is performed with or without the assistance of CADe in a 1:1 randomization. The fellow withdrawal (pass #1) will start. The fellow, with or without the use of CADe based on randomization, will identify polyps independently of the attending and remove them with attending assistance as appropriate until they feel that they have performed a complete examination of colonic mucosa from the cecum to the splenic flexure. During pass #1, the supervising attending will not provide verbal cues regarding the identification of colon polyps as would typically occur during colonoscopies performed by a fellow, however, the fellow can request attending assistance at any time. Additionally, the attending will provide standard assistance with insertion and polypectomy techniques. While gastroenterology fellow participation in colonoscopy with attending supervision is standard at an academic medical center, pass #1 will be considered "research" for the purposes of this study as the attending will not be providing verbal cues regarding polyp detection as the purpose of this study is to quantify trainee miss rates independent of attending input.

Once the fellow completes pass #1, the attending physician will reinsert the colonoscope to the cecum and perform a second withdrawal (pass #2) with the assistance of the CADe system. A second proximal withdrawal time for pass #2 will be recorded until the splenic flexure is again reached and the attending feels that the colonic mucosa has been fully examined. Any polyps identified and resected by the attending physician during pass #2 will be considered "missed polyps."

The fellow and attending will then complete the exam from the splenic flexure to the rectum with the assistance of CADe, both providers identifying and resecting polyps as necessary, as is standard when a fellow performs colonoscopy with attending supervision.

Being tested
Colonoscopy With Computer-Aided Detection, Colonoscopy without Computer-Aided Detection
Keywords
tandem colonoscopy, randomized controlled trial, adenoma miss rate
Medical subject headings
Colonic Polyps

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Colonoscopy With Computer-Aided DetectionDevice

    Use of Computer-Aided Detection During Colonoscopy

  • Colonoscopy without Computer-Aided DetectionProcedure or surgery

    Colonoscopy without Computer-Aided Detection (AI)

Study groups in NCT06676930
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Colonoscopy with AIActive comparatorTrainee using AI during colonoscopy inspection
Receives: Device: Colonoscopy With Computer-Aided Detection
Colonoscopy without AIActive comparatorTrainee not using AI during colonoscopy inspection
Receives: Procedure: Colonoscopy without Computer-Aided Detection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Neoplastic polyp miss rate

    Proportion of neoplastic (adenomas or serrated polyps) missed during trainee inspection

    Measured: 1 week

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Adenoma miss rate

    Proportion of adenomas missed during trainee inspection

    Measured: 1 week

  2. Serrated polyp miss rate

    Proportion of serrated polyps missed during trainee inspection

    Measured: 1 week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Nov 2024
  2. Study start10 Sep 2024
  3. Primary completion25 Aug 2026
  4. Study completion1 Sep 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
180 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06676930
Sponsor's protocol ID
STU00221977
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
30 Oct 2024
Last updated
28 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No: No clear benefit in sharing this data

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Colonoscopy With Computer-Aided Detection and Colonoscopy without Computer-Aided Detection in people with Colon Polyps and Colonoscopy, run by Northwestern University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Neoplastic polyp miss rate (time frame: 1 week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Sep 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in