Coronary Artery DiseaseDEBSCAN-IVLNCT06657833
DEBSCAN-IVL. Drug Eluting Balloon or Drug Eluting Stent to Treat CAlcified Nodules After IntraVascular Lithotripsy.
A study testing Percutaneous coronary intervention of a calcified nodule with intravascular lithotripsy followed by drug eluting balloon and Percutaneous coronary intervention of a calcified nodule with intravascular lithotripsy followed by drug eluting stent in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Fundación EPIC at 15 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
International, investigator-driven, multicenter, open-label, prospective randomized controlled trial where patients with de novo lesions due to calcified nodules (CN) were randomized to drug eluting balloon (DEB) or drug eluting stents (DES). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease
- What is being tested?
- Percutaneous coronary intervention of a calcified nodule with intravascular lithotripsy followed by drug eluting balloon and Percutaneous coronary intervention of a calcified nodule with intravascular lithotripsy followed by drug eluting stent
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 128 participants
- Where
- 15 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 17 Dec 2024to 30 Oct 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients must meet all inclusion criteria:
- Patients >18 years admitted for stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes and indication for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and
- Severe coronary lesion with calcified nodule, confirmed with intracoronary imaging (optical coherence tomography or intravascular ultrasound) and;
- Lesion to treat in a vessel between 2.5 and 4 mm.
Who cannot join
- Patients must not meet any criteria
- Inability to provide oral and written informed consent or unwillingness to come back for systematic angiographic follow-up.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding patients.
- Cardiogenic Shock or Cardiac arrest at the moment of the index procedure.
- Impossibility to maintain double antiplatelet treatment during at least 1 month.
- Life expectancy <1 year.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Index lesion at left main stem.
- Aorto-ostial lesion.
- Target lesion previously treated with stents or DEB.
- High thrombus burden in the target lesion (TIMI thrombus scale≥3).
Trial locations and contacts
15 sites in 2 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
ALFONSO JURADO ROMAN, MD,PhD contact
15 sites in 2 countries
Spain14 sites, 14 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital Del Mar
Barcelona, 08003
- Recruiting
Hospital Universitario de La Paz
Fuencarral-El Pardo, 28046
- Recruiting
Hospital Universitario de Galdakao-Usansolo
Galdakao, 48960
- Recruiting
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907
- Recruiting
Hospital Universitario de León
León, 24008
- Recruiting
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid, 28041
- Recruiting
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro
Madrid, 28222
- Recruiting
Hospital Clínico San Carlos
Moncloa-Aravaca, 28040
- Recruiting
Hospital Universitario de Navarra
Pamplona, 31008
- Recruiting
Hospital General Universitario de Valencia
Valencia, 46014
- Recruiting
Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe
Valencia, 46026
- Recruiting
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid
Valladolid, 47003
- Recruiting
Hospital Universitario de Vigo
Vigo, 36312
- Recruiting
Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet
Zaragoza, 50009
Netherlands1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden
About this study
International, investigator-driven, multicenter, open-label, prospective randomized controlled trial where patients with de novo lesions due to calcified nodules (CN) were randomized to drug eluting balloon (DEB) or drug eluting stents (DES).
Read the detailed description
Regardless some observational data of DEB performance in calcified lesions, there is a lack of data about the safety and efficacy in the setting of calcified nodules. However, a "leave-nothing-behind" PCI strategy is attractive in this scenario in which the probability of non-optimal stent expansion and apposition is higher, hypothesis is, that following optimal plaque modification with IVL, the utilization of a DEB is either non-inferior or possibly superior to DES in terms of late lumen loss and net luminal gain at 6 months follow up.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Being tested
- Percutaneous coronary intervention of a calcified nodule with intravascular lithotripsy followed by drug eluting balloon, Percutaneous coronary intervention of a calcified nodule with intravascular lithotripsy followed by drug eluting stent
- Keywords
- Calcified Nodules, Calcified lesions, Drug eluting balloon, Drug eluting stent
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Percutaneous coronary intervention of a calcified nodule with intravascular lithotripsy followed by drug eluting balloonDevice
Percutaneous coronary intervention of a calcified nodule with intravascular lithotripsy followed by drug eluting balloon
Percutaneous coronary intervention of a calcified nodule with intravascular lithotripsy followed by drug eluting stentDevice
Percutaneous coronary intervention of a calcified nodule with intravascular lithotripsy followed by drug eluting stent
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Drug Eluting Balloon (DEB) | Other | Not described Receives: Device: Percutaneous coronary intervention of a calcified nodule with intravascular lithotripsy followed by drug eluting balloon |
| Drug Eluting Stent (DES) | Other | Not described Receives: Device: Percutaneous coronary intervention of a calcified nodule with intravascular lithotripsy followed by drug eluting stent |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
EFFICACY: Late Lumen Loss (LLL)
Late lumen loss (LLL, expressed in mm) measured within the treated segment by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) as the difference between minimal luminal diameter (MLD) at the end of the interventional procedure and MLD at 9-month follow-up
Measured: 9 Month
EFFICACY: Net Lumen Gain (NLG)
Net lumen gain (NLG, expressed in mm) measured by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) as the difference between minimal luminal diameter within the treated segment (MLD) at 9-month follow-up and MLD at the lesion site at baseline
Measured: 9 Month
Secondary outcomes (28)
SAFETY: Dissection
Freedom from dissection
Measured: During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)
SAFETY: Perforation
Freedom from perforation
Measured: During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)
SAFETY: Abrupt vessel closure
Freedom from abrupt vessel closure
Measured: During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)
SAFETY: Slow Flow
Freedom from slow flow
Measured: During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)
SAFETY: No Reflow
Freedom from no reflow
Measured: During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)
SAFETY: Thrombosis
Freedom from thrombosis
Measured: During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)
SAFETY: MACE
Freedom of The composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target lesion revascularization.
Measured: Up to 30 days
SAFETY: Stent Thrombosis
Freedom Stent thrombosis
Measured: During hospitalization
SAFETY: Major bleeding event
Freedom from Mayor bleeding event according to ≥ (BARC 3 criteria )
Measured: During hospitalization
SAFETY: Stent Thrombosis
Freedom from stent thrombosis
Measured: During hospitalization
SAFETY: Hemodynamic stability
Freedom for need for unplanned vasopressors/inotropes or ventricular support devices
Measured: During hospitalization
EFFICACY: Minimal Lumen Diameter (MLD)
Change in MLD Immediately before procedure, immediately after procedure
Measured: Day 0
EFFICACY: Diameter Stenosis
Percentaje of Diammeter Stenosis after PCI
Measured: Day 0
EFFICACY: Minimal Lumen Diameter (MLD)
Change in MLD during follow-up
Measured: 9 Months
EFFICACY: Minimal Lumen Diammeter (MLD)
Change in MLD during follow-up
Measured: 12 Months
EFFICACY: Binary reestenosis
Freedom from reestenosis by angiography during follow-up
Measured: 9 Months
EFFICACY: Crossover rate
Rate of stent change ( DEB to DES or DES to DEB) during follow-up
Measured: Day 0
SAFETY: MACE
Freedom of The composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target lesion revascularization.
Measured: 9 Months
SAFETY: MACE
Freedom of The composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target lesion revascularization.
Measured: 12 Months
SAFETY: MACE
Freedom of The composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target lesion revascularization.
Measured: 24 Months
SAFETY: Myocardial Infarction
Freedom from myocardial infarction
Measured: 9 Months
SAFETY: Myocardial Infarction
Freedom from myocardial infarction
Measured: 12 Months
SAFETY: Myocardial Infarction
Freedom from myocardial infarction
Measured: 24 Months
SAFETY: Cardiac death
Freedom from cardiac death
Measured: 12 Months
SAFETY: Cardiac death
Freedom from cardiac death
Measured: 24 Months
SAFETY: Target Lesion Revascularization.
Freedom from TLR
Measured: 9 Months
SAFETY: Target Lesion Revascularization.
Freedom from TLR
Measured: 12 Months
SAFETY: Target Lesion Revascularization.
Freedom from TLR
Measured: 24 Months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Oct 2024
- Study start17 Dec 2024
- Primary completion30 Oct 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Oct 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 128 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fundación EPIC
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06657833
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EPIC40-DEBSCAN-IVL
- Acronym
- DEBSCAN-IVL
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 21 Oct 2024
- Last updated
- 30 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Jurado-Román A, Gómez-Menchero A, Gonzalo N, et al. Plaque modification techniques to treat calcified coronary lesions. Position paper from the ACI-SEC. REC Interv Cardiol Engl Ed. Published online February 7, 2023:9672. doi:10.24875/RECICE.M22000345
Morofuji T, Kuramitsu S, Shinozaki T, Jinnouchi H, Sonoda S, Domei T, Hyodo M, Shirai S, Ando K. Clinical impact of calcified nodule in patients with heavily calcified lesions requiring rotational atherectomy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jan 1;97(1):10-19. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28896. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
PubMed 32259392Lee T, Mintz GS, Matsumura M, Zhang W, Cao Y, Usui E, Kanaji Y, Murai T, Yonetsu T, Kakuta T, Maehara A. Prevalence, Predictors, and Clinical Presentation of a Calcified Nodule as Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Aug;10(8):883-891. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.05.013.
PubMed 28797410Sato T, Matsumura M, Yamamoto K, Shlofmitz E, Moses JW, Khalique OK, Thomas SV, Tsoulios A, Cohen DJ, Mintz GS, Shlofmitz RA, Jeremias A, Ali ZA, Maehara A. Impact of Eruptive vs Noneruptive Calcified Nodule Morphology on Acute and Long-Term Outcomes After Stenting. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 May 8;16(9):1024-1035. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.03.009.
PubMed 37164599Ali ZA, Nef H, Escaned J, Werner N, Banning AP, Hill JM, De Bruyne B, Montorfano M, Lefevre T, Stone GW, Crowley A, Matsumura M, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, Fajadet J, Di Mario C. Safety and Effectiveness of Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy for Treatment of Severely Calcified Coronary Stenoses: The Disrupt CAD II Study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Oct;12(10):e008434. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008434. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
PubMed 31553205Ho HH, Lee JH, Khoo DZL, Hpone KKS, Li KFC. Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy and drug-coated balloon angioplasty in calcified coronary arteries: preliminary experience in two cases. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2021 Aug 28;18(8):689-691. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2021.08.009. No abstract available.
PubMed 34527034Iwasaki Y, Koike J, Ko T, Funatsu A, Kobayashi T, Ikeda T, Nakamura S. Comparison of drug-eluting stents vs. drug-coated balloon after rotational atherectomy for severely calcified lesions of nonsmall vessels. Heart Vessels. 2021 Feb;36(2):189-199. doi: 10.1007/s00380-020-01684-z. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
PubMed 32857188Jurado-Roman A, Basile M, Montero-Cabezas JM, Rivero-Santana B, Zubiaur J, Garcia-Tejada J, Galeote G, Jimenez-Valero S, Perez de Prado A, Garcia-Tuchard A, Tebar D, Rumoroso JR, Gonzalvez A, Amat-Santos IJ, Jimenez-Diaz VA, Rumiz E, Sanz-Sanchez J, Vaquerizo B, Alfonso F, Moreno R. DEB or DES for the treatment of calcified nodules after intravascular lithotripsy: the DEBSCAN-IVL trial design. REC Interv Cardiol. 2025 Nov 12;8(2):100-106. doi: 10.24875/RECICE.M25000551. eCollection 2026 Apr-Jun.
PubMed 42745725
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- DEBSCAN-IVL. Drug Eluting Balloon or Drug Eluting Stent to Treat CAlcified Nodules After IntraVascular Lithotripsy.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06657833
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DEBSCAN-IVL / EPIC40-DEBSCAN-IVL
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Keywords
- Calcified Nodules, Calcified lesions, Drug eluting balloon, Drug eluting stent
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 128 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Fundación EPICUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 17 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Oct 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Oct 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
International, investigator-driven, multicenter, open-label, prospective randomized controlled trial where patients with de novo lesions due to calcified nodules (CN) were randomized to drug eluting balloon (DEB) or drug eluting stents (DES).
Detailed description
Regardless some observational data of DEB performance in calcified lesions, there is a lack of data about the safety and efficacy in the setting of calcified nodules. However, a "leave-nothing-behind" PCI strategy is attractive in this scenario in which the probability of non-optimal stent expansion and apposition is higher, hypothesis is, that following optimal plaque modification with IVL, the utilization of a DEB is either non-inferior or possibly superior to DES in terms of late lumen loss and net luminal gain at 6 months follow up.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Drug Eluting Balloon (DEB) | Other | Device: Percutaneous coronary intervention of a calcified nodule with intravascular lithotripsy followed by drug eluting balloon |
| Drug Eluting Stent (DES) | Other | Device: Percutaneous coronary intervention of a calcified nodule with intravascular lithotripsy followed by drug eluting stent |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients >18 years admitted for stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes and indication for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and
- Severe coronary lesion with calcified nodule, confirmed with intracoronary imaging (optical coherence tomography or intravascular ultrasound) and;
- Lesion to treat in a vessel between 2.5 and 4 mm.
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Patients must not meet any criteria
- Inability to provide oral and written informed consent or unwillingness to come back for systematic angiographic follow-up.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding patients.
- Cardiogenic Shock or Cardiac arrest at the moment of the index procedure.
- Impossibility to maintain double antiplatelet treatment during at least 1 month.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Percutaneous coronary intervention of a calcified nodule with intravascular lithotripsy followed by drug eluting balloonPercutaneous coronary intervention of a calcified nodule with intravascular lithotripsy followed by drug eluting balloon | Device | Drug Eluting Balloon (DEB) |
| Percutaneous coronary intervention of a calcified nodule with intravascular lithotripsy followed by drug eluting stentPercutaneous coronary intervention of a calcified nodule with intravascular lithotripsy followed by drug eluting stent | Device | Drug Eluting Stent (DES) |
Primary outcome
EFFICACY: Late Lumen Loss (LLL)
Time frame: 9 Month
Late lumen loss (LLL, expressed in mm) measured within the treated segment by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) as the difference between minimal luminal diameter (MLD) at the end of the interventional procedure and MLD at 9-month follow-up
EFFICACY: Net Lumen Gain (NLG)
Time frame: 9 Month
Net lumen gain (NLG, expressed in mm) measured by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) as the difference between minimal luminal diameter within the treated segment (MLD) at 9-month follow-up and MLD at the lesion site at baseline
28 secondary outcomes
SAFETY: Dissection
Time frame: During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)
SAFETY: Perforation
Time frame: During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)
SAFETY: Abrupt vessel closure
Time frame: During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)
SAFETY: Slow Flow
Time frame: During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)
SAFETY: No Reflow
Time frame: During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)
SAFETY: Thrombosis
Time frame: During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)
SAFETY: MACE
Time frame: Up to 30 days
SAFETY: Stent Thrombosis
Time frame: During hospitalization
SAFETY: Major bleeding event
Time frame: During hospitalization
SAFETY: Stent Thrombosis
Time frame: During hospitalization
SAFETY: Hemodynamic stability
Time frame: During hospitalization
EFFICACY: Minimal Lumen Diameter (MLD)
Time frame: Day 0
EFFICACY: Diameter Stenosis
Time frame: Day 0
EFFICACY: Minimal Lumen Diameter (MLD)
Time frame: 9 Months
EFFICACY: Minimal Lumen Diammeter (MLD)
Time frame: 12 Months
EFFICACY: Binary reestenosis
Time frame: 9 Months
EFFICACY: Crossover rate
Time frame: Day 0
SAFETY: MACE
Time frame: 9 Months
SAFETY: MACE
Time frame: 12 Months
SAFETY: MACE
Time frame: 24 Months
SAFETY: Myocardial Infarction
Time frame: 9 Months
SAFETY: Myocardial Infarction
Time frame: 12 Months
SAFETY: Myocardial Infarction
Time frame: 24 Months
SAFETY: Cardiac death
Time frame: 12 Months
SAFETY: Cardiac death
Time frame: 24 Months
SAFETY: Target Lesion Revascularization.
Time frame: 9 Months
SAFETY: Target Lesion Revascularization.
Time frame: 12 Months
SAFETY: Target Lesion Revascularization.
Time frame: 24 Months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Sep 2026.
- BackgroundJurado-Román A, Gómez-Menchero A, Gonzalo N, et al. Plaque modification techniques to treat calcified coronary lesions. Position paper from the ACI-SEC. REC Interv Cardiol Engl Ed. Published online February 7, 2023:9672. doi:10.24875/RECICE.M22000345
- Background: PubMed 32259392Morofuji T, Kuramitsu S, Shinozaki T, Jinnouchi H, Sonoda S, Domei T, Hyodo M, Shirai S, Ando K. Clinical impact of calcified nodule in patients with heavily calcified lesions requiring rotational atherectomy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jan 1;97(1):10-19. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28896. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
- Background: PubMed 28797410Lee T, Mintz GS, Matsumura M, Zhang W, Cao Y, Usui E, Kanaji Y, Murai T, Yonetsu T, Kakuta T, Maehara A. Prevalence, Predictors, and Clinical Presentation of a Calcified Nodule as Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Aug;10(8):883-891. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.05.013.
- Background: PubMed 37164599Sato T, Matsumura M, Yamamoto K, Shlofmitz E, Moses JW, Khalique OK, Thomas SV, Tsoulios A, Cohen DJ, Mintz GS, Shlofmitz RA, Jeremias A, Ali ZA, Maehara A. Impact of Eruptive vs Noneruptive Calcified Nodule Morphology on Acute and Long-Term Outcomes After Stenting. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 May 8;16(9):1024-1035. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.03.009.
- Background: PubMed 31553205Ali ZA, Nef H, Escaned J, Werner N, Banning AP, Hill JM, De Bruyne B, Montorfano M, Lefevre T, Stone GW, Crowley A, Matsumura M, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, Fajadet J, Di Mario C. Safety and Effectiveness of Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy for Treatment of Severely Calcified Coronary Stenoses: The Disrupt CAD II Study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Oct;12(10):e008434. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008434. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
- Background: PubMed 34527034Ho HH, Lee JH, Khoo DZL, Hpone KKS, Li KFC. Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy and drug-coated balloon angioplasty in calcified coronary arteries: preliminary experience in two cases. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2021 Aug 28;18(8):689-691. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2021.08.009. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 32857188Iwasaki Y, Koike J, Ko T, Funatsu A, Kobayashi T, Ikeda T, Nakamura S. Comparison of drug-eluting stents vs. drug-coated balloon after rotational atherectomy for severely calcified lesions of nonsmall vessels. Heart Vessels. 2021 Feb;36(2):189-199. doi: 10.1007/s00380-020-01684-z. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42745725Jurado-Roman A, Basile M, Montero-Cabezas JM, Rivero-Santana B, Zubiaur J, Garcia-Tejada J, Galeote G, Jimenez-Valero S, Perez de Prado A, Garcia-Tuchard A, Tebar D, Rumoroso JR, Gonzalvez A, Amat-Santos IJ, Jimenez-Diaz VA, Rumiz E, Sanz-Sanchez J, Vaquerizo B, Alfonso F, Moreno R. DEB or DES for the treatment of calcified nodules after intravascular lithotripsy: the DEBSCAN-IVL trial design. REC Interv Cardiol. 2025 Nov 12;8(2):100-106. doi: 10.24875/RECICE.M25000551. eCollection 2026 Apr-Jun.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
The OCTOBER Trial - European Trial on Optical Coherence Tomography Optimized Bifurcation Event Reduction (OCTOBER)
Ischaemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
ALFONSO JURADO ROMAN, MD,PhD contact
15 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Percutaneous coronary intervention of a calcified nodule with intravascular lithotripsy followed by drug eluting balloon and Percutaneous coronary intervention of a calcified nodule with intravascular lithotripsy followed by drug eluting stent in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Fundación EPIC at 15 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 15 sites in Spain, Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact FUNDACION EPIC (0034987225638, iepic@fundacionepic.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
EFFICACY: Late Lumen Loss (LLL) (time frame: 9 Month). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06657833, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Sep 2026.