Hypertensive Intracerebral HemorrhageNCT06635707
Efficacy and Safety Study of Urapidil Alone or With Esmolol in Treating Acute Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage
An observational study of Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage, run by Qianfoshan Hospital.
Trial summary
The objective of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of urapidil monotherapy versus the combination of esmolol in treating participants with acute hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage through a prospective, open-label, observational, multicenter clinical trial, aiming to provide guidance for… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage
- What is being tested?
- Urapidil and Urapidil and Esmolol
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- How many people
- 600 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2024to 1 Dec 2026
- How long will I take part?
- 3 Months
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Sample collection will be conducted for participants in the study of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. Recruitment Locations: The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Qianfoshan Hospital), along with various other sub-centers.
Who may be able to join
- Participants in the study of acute hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage aged between 18 and 80 years old;
- Participants with acute intracerebral hemorrhage (basal ganglia hemorrhage < 50ml) confirmed by imaging within 6 hours of onset;
- Participants with systolic blood pressure > 140mmHg upon admission;
- Participants who have signed the informed consent form.
Who cannot join
- Participants in the cerebral hemorrhage study who decline to have their disease management information collected and used and/or refuse to undergo subsequent follow-ups;
- Participants with allergies to the medication in question;
- Participants in the study of secondary cerebral hemorrhage resulting from tumors, vascular malformations, aneurysms, trauma, post-thrombolytic therapy, or cerebral arteriovenous thrombosis;
- Participants undergoing anticoagulant therapy or with coagulation disorders;
- Pregnant women;
- Participants with multiple organ failure;
- Participants deemed unsuitable for enrollment by the research staff due to other factors.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: The Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Using Urapidil Alone or in Combination With Esmolol for the Treatment of Acute Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Prospective, Open-label, Observational, Multicenter Research
The objective of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of urapidil monotherapy versus the combination of esmolol in treating participants with acute hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage through a prospective, open-label, observational, multicenter clinical trial, aiming to provide guidance for clinicians in formulating rational treatment plans.
Read the detailed description
Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH) is a prevalent and severe condition that poses significant challenges to the medical community due to its harmful nature and complexity. Over the past few decades, there has been considerable controversy surrounding blood pressure management strategies for patients with acute HICH. Both hypertension and hypotension following cerebral hemorrhage are associated with adverse outcomes. Multiple trials aimed at reducing blood pressure in patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage have been conducted, and among patients recruited within six hours of symptom onset, blood pressure reduction has been linked to decreased hematoma expansion. Current international guidelines from the European Stroke Organization, the American Heart Association (AHA)/American Stroke Association, and the Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations support the prompt reduction of systolic blood pressure to 140 mmHg after symptom onset, aiming to maintain systolic blood pressure between 130 and 150 mmHg. However, for certain patients, such as those with extremely high blood pressure after ICH (systolic blood pressure >220 mmHg), a more individualized approach is necessary. Notably, patients with very high blood pressure (systolic blood pressure >220 mmHg) were not included in these trials, and reducing systolic blood pressure to 140 mmHg in this population may be harmful, associated with higher rates of neurological deterioration and adverse renal events.
Elevated blood pressure (BP) is common in patients with acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and is closely related to hematoma growth, which is a crucial independent predictor of clinical deterioration and outcomes in ICH patients. Previous studies have shown that hematoma growth primarily occurs within the first six hours after spontaneous cerebral hemorrhage. Consequently, early blood pressure reduction may be beneficial in preventing hematoma growth. Research indicates that ICH patients who achieve target blood pressure more quickly are less likely to experience hematoma growth. Specifically, patients who reach a target systolic blood pressure (SBP) of <140 mmHg within the first hour after randomization exhibit a lower absolute hematoma growth rate. Studies have supported the benefit of shortening the time to achieve target blood pressure in ICH patients, corroborating these findings. Hematoma growth is primarily attributed to ongoing bleeding and secondary vascular rupture, occurring predominantly within the first six hours after ICH onset, particularly during the initial 2-3 hours, with a gradual decline in frequency over time.
Changes in the autonomic nervous system (ANS) have been previously observed in acute stroke patients, characterized by impaired cardiovascular regulation and altered balance between sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves. Clinically significantly, autonomic dysfunction is associated with poor prognosis, increased mortality, or sudden death after stroke. Variations in heart rate variability (HRV) and baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS) have traditionally been considered surrogate markers of cardiovascular ANS modulation. Previous studies on HRV in acute brain injury have primarily focused on ischemic cerebral infarction or traumatic brain injury (TBI). In both TBI and ischemic cerebral infarction, HRV parameters have shown independent associations with outcomes.
Urapidil (URA) is a selective α1-adrenoceptor antagonist that also acts as a central 5-HT1A receptor agonist, exerting both peripheral and central hypotensive effects. The hypotensive effect of URA is dose-dependent and may vary among individuals. URA demonstrates a self-limiting hypotensive effect, even at high doses, without causing severe hypotension. It reduces cardiac preload and afterload, decreases myocardial oxygen consumption, and increases cardiac output without causing reflex tachycardia or affecting heart rate. Additionally, URA does not increase intracranial pressure, does not impair hemodynamics in the middle cerebral artery, and is conducive to maintaining cerebral perfusion pressure. Furthermore, URA enhances renal blood flow, reduces renal vascular resistance, does not increase shunt fraction, and does not decrease arterial oxygen partial pressure.
Esmolol is an ultra-short-acting, highly selective β1-blocker that competitively antagonizes β1 receptors in myocardial cells. It exerts its pharmacological effects by blocking the activity of adrenaline and noradrenaline. At high doses, it may also block β2 receptors in airway and vascular smooth muscle. At therapeutic doses, esmolol has no intrinsic sympathomimetic activity or membrane-stabilizing effects. When administered intravenously, it takes effect within 60 seconds and its pharmacological effects disappear within 10 to 30 minutes after infusion cessation. Electrophysiological studies suggest that esmolol exhibits typical β1-blocker effects, including reduced heart rate, prolonged sinus cycle length, prolonged sinus node recovery time, prolonged AH interval and antegrade Wenckebach period, slowed conduction in atrial and ventricular myocardium and cardiac conduction system, and prolonged refractoriness. By blocking sympathetic excitation, esmolol lowers the threshold for ventricular fibrillation (VF).
Patients with acute HICH often experience increased heart rate and uncontrolled blood pressure. Previous studies have shown that the time taken to normalize blood pressure and heart rate variability are correlated with adverse outcomes in patients. The present study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of urapidil alone and in combination with esmolol in reducing blood pressure and controlling heart rate in patients with acute.
- Conditions
- Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage
- Being tested
- Urapidil, Urapidil and Esmolol
- Medical subject headings
- Intracranial Hemorrhage, Hypertensive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
UrapidilDrug
Also called Ebrantil(34661-75-1)
- Control systolic blood pressure within 130-140mmHg using urapidil and maintain this level for 7 days;
- Reduce intracranial pressure through dehydration therapy with mannitol, positioning of the body, and other means to prevent cerebral hernia. Surgical interventions such as decompressive craniectomy may be performed if necessary;
- Aim for a body temperature control target of ≤37.5°C;
- The anticoagulation reversal target is INR < 1.5, with correction methods including the use of vitamin K, prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC), or fresh frozen plasma (FFP);
- The blood glucose control targets are 6.1-7.8mmol/L for non-diabetic study participants and 7.8-10.0mmol/L for diabetic study participants.
Urapidil and EsmololDrug
Also called 34661-75-1 and 81147-92-4
- Utilize both urapidil and esmolol to control systolic blood pressure within 130-140mmHg and maintain this level for 7 days;
- Reduce intracranial pressure through dehydration therapy with mannitol, strategic positioning of the body, and other measures to prevent cerebral hernia. Surgical interventions such as decompressive craniectomy may be performed if necessary;
- Aim for a body temperature control target of ≤37.5°C;
- The anticoagulation reversal target is INR < 1.5, with correction methods including the administration of vitamin K, prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC), or fresh frozen plasma (FFP);
- The blood glucose control targets are 6.1-7.8mmol/L for non-diabetic study participants and 7.8-10.0mmol/L for diabetic study participants.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Urapidil Group | Urapidil Injection (Shijiazhuang Sipharm Co., Ltd., National Medical Products Administration Approval No. H20233626): Initially, administer a loading dose of 10mg via slow intravenous injection, observe for 5 minutes, and then adjust the infusion rate based on the patient's blood pressure, generally not exceeding 2mg/min. Receives: Drug: Urapidil | |
| Combination Group of Urapidil and Esmolol | Urapidil Injection (Shijiazhuang Sipharm Co., Ltd., National Medical Products Administration Approval No. H20233626): Initially, administer a loading dose of 10mg via slow intravenous injection, observe for 5 minutes, and then adjust the infusion rate based on the patient's blood pressure, generally not exceeding 2mg/min.
Esmolol Injection (Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., National Medical Products Administration Approval No. H19991058): Administer an intravenous bolus of 1mg/kg within 30 seconds, followed by a maintenance infusion rate not exceeding 300μg/kg/min, adjusted according to blood pressure readings. Receives: Drug: Urapidil and Esmolol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)
Evaluate the beneficial effect of blood pressure management with combined urapidil and esmolol on study participants by assessing the poor outcome rate, as indicated by the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores (poor outcome: 4-6 points), three months after the onset of the disease.
Measured: Three months after the onset of the disease
Secondary outcomes (9)
Changes in the volume of acute intracranial hematoma
Change in hematoma volume per follow-up CT
Measured: First seven days of hospitalization
Heart rate variability
Measures of cardiac autonomic nervous system activity
Measured: First seven days of hospitalization
Time taken for blood pressure to reach target levels after administering antihypertensive medications
Comparing the blood pressure-lowering ability of the two groups
Measured: First 24 hours after hospitalization
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score
Evaluate the beneficial effect of blood pressure management with combined urapidil and esmolol on study participants by assessing the poor outcome rate, as indicated by the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores (poor outcome: 4-6 points)
Measured: Seventh day after the onset of the disease
In-hospital mortality rate
Evaluation of efficacy
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 3 months
Mortality rate within 3 months of onset
Response prognosis
Measured: Three months after the onset of the disease
Adverse events
e.g., nosocomial infections, pressure ulcers, falls, automatic discharge from hospital
Measured: During hospitalization(up to 8 weeks)
Incidence of seizures
Cerebral hemorrhage complication rate
Measured: During hospitalization(up to 8 weeks)
length of hospital stay
Evaluation of efficacy
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of discharge from hospital for any reason, assessed up to 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Oct 2024
- Study start1 Nov 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Hypertensive Intracerebral HemorrhageStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Qianfoshan HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 3 Months
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Qianfoshan Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jianjun Wang, Qianfoshan Hospital
- Investigators
- Jianjun Wang, Ph.D., Study director, Qianfoshan HospitalXueyan Cui, Ph.D., Study director, Qianfoshan Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06635707
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- YXLL-KY-2024(066)
- Status last verified
- Oct 2024
- First submitted
- 14 Sep 2024
- Last updated
- 10 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Using Urapidil Alone or in Combination With Esmolol for the Treatment of Acute Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Prospective, Open-label, Observational, Multicenter Research
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06635707
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- YXLL-KY-2024(066)
- Conditions
- Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Qianfoshan HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of urapidil monotherapy versus the combination of esmolol in treating participants with acute hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage through a prospective, open-label, observational, multicenter clinical trial, aiming to provide guidance for clinicians in formulating rational treatment plans.
Detailed description
Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH) is a prevalent and severe condition that poses significant challenges to the medical community due to its harmful nature and complexity. Over the past few decades, there has been considerable controversy surrounding blood pressure management strategies for patients with acute HICH. Both hypertension and hypotension following cerebral hemorrhage are associated with adverse outcomes. Multiple trials aimed at reducing blood pressure in patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage have been conducted, and among patients recruited within six hours of symptom onset, blood pressure reduction has been linked to decreased hematoma expansion. Current international guidelines from the European Stroke Organization, the American Heart Association (AHA)/American Stroke Association, and the Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations support the prompt reduction of systolic blood pressure to 140 mmHg after symptom onset, aiming to maintain systolic blood pressure between 130 and 150 mmHg. However, for certain patients, such as those with extremely high blood pressure after ICH (systolic blood pressure >220 mmHg), a more individualized approach is necessary. Notably, patients with very high blood pressure (systolic blood pressure >220 mmHg) were not included in these trials, and reducing systolic blood pressure to 140 mmHg in this population may be harmful, associated with higher rates of neurological deterioration and adverse renal events.
Elevated blood pressure (BP) is common in patients with acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and is closely related to hematoma growth, which is a crucial independent predictor of clinical deterioration and outcomes in ICH patients. Previous studies have shown that hematoma growth primarily occurs within the first six hours after spontaneous cerebral hemorrhage. Consequently, early blood pressure reduction may be beneficial in preventing hematoma growth. Research indicates that ICH patients who achieve target blood pressure more quickly are less likely to experience hematoma growth. Specifically, patients who reach a target systolic blood pressure (SBP) of <140 mmHg within the first hour after randomization exhibit a lower absolute hematoma growth rate. Studies have supported the benefit of shortening the time to achieve target blood pressure in ICH patients, corroborating these findings. Hematoma growth is primarily attributed to ongoing bleeding and secondary vascular rupture, occurring predominantly within the first six hours after ICH onset, particularly during the initial 2-3 hours, with a gradual decline in frequency over time.
Changes in the autonomic nervous system (ANS) have been previously observed in acute stroke patients, characterized by impaired cardiovascular regulation and altered balance between sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves. Clinically significantly, autonomic dysfunction is associated with poor prognosis, increased mortality, or sudden death after stroke. Variations in heart rate variability (HRV) and baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS) have traditionally been considered surrogate markers of cardiovascular ANS modulation. Previous studies on HRV in acute brain injury have primarily focused on ischemic cerebral infarction or traumatic brain injury (TBI). In both TBI and ischemic cerebral infarction, HRV parameters have shown independent associations with outcomes.
Urapidil (URA) is a selective α1-adrenoceptor antagonist that also acts as a central 5-HT1A receptor agonist, exerting both peripheral and central hypotensive effects. The hypotensive effect of URA is dose-dependent and may vary among individuals. URA demonstrates a self-limiting hypotensive effect, even at high doses, without causing severe hypotension. It reduces cardiac preload and afterload, decreases myocardial oxygen consumption, and increases cardiac output without causing reflex tachycardia or affecting heart rate. Additionally, URA does not increase intracranial pressure, does not impair hemodynamics in the middle cerebral artery, and is conducive to maintaining cerebral perfusion pressure. Furthermore, URA enhances renal blood flow, reduces renal vascular resistance, does not increase shunt fraction, and does not decrease arterial oxygen partial pressure.
Esmolol is an ultra-short-acting, highly selective β1-blocker that competitively antagonizes β1 receptors in myocardial cells. It exerts its pharmacological effects by blocking the activity of adrenaline and noradrenaline. At high doses, it may also block β2 receptors in airway and vascular smooth muscle. At therapeutic doses, esmolol has no intrinsic sympathomimetic activity or membrane-stabilizing effects. When administered intravenously, it takes effect within 60 seconds and its pharmacological effects disappear within 10 to 30 minutes after infusion cessation. Electrophysiological studies suggest that esmolol exhibits typical β1-blocker effects, including reduced heart rate, prolonged sinus cycle length, prolonged sinus node recovery time, prolonged AH interval and antegrade Wenckebach period, slowed conduction in atrial and ventricular myocardium and cardiac conduction system, and prolonged refractoriness. By blocking sympathetic excitation, esmolol lowers the threshold for ventricular fibrillation (VF).
Patients with acute HICH often experience increased heart rate and uncontrolled blood pressure. Previous studies have shown that the time taken to normalize blood pressure and heart rate variability are correlated with adverse outcomes in patients. The present study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of urapidil alone and in combination with esmolol in reducing blood pressure and controlling heart rate in patients with acute.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 3 Months
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Urapidil Group | – | Drug: UrapidilUrapidil Injection (Shijiazhuang Sipharm Co., Ltd., National Medical Products Administration Approval No. H20233626): Initially, administer a loading dose of 10mg via slow intravenous injection, observe for 5 minutes, and then adjust the infusion rate based on the patient's blood pressure, generally not exceeding 2mg/min. |
| Combination Group of Urapidil and Esmolol | – | Drug: Urapidil and EsmololUrapidil Injection (Shijiazhuang Sipharm Co., Ltd., National Medical Products Administration Approval No. H20233626): Initially, administer a loading dose of 10mg via slow intravenous injection, observe for 5 minutes, and then adjust the infusion rate based on the patient's blood pressure, generally not exceeding 2mg/min. Esmolol Injection (Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., National Medical Products Administration Approval No. H19991058): Administer an intravenous bolus of 1mg/kg within 30 seconds, followed by a maintenance infusion rate not exceeding 300μg/kg/min, adjusted according to blood pressure readings. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Sample collection will be conducted for participants in the study of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. Recruitment Locations: The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Qianfoshan Hospital), along with various other sub-centers.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Participants in the study of acute hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage aged between 18 and 80 years old;
- Participants with acute intracerebral hemorrhage (basal ganglia hemorrhage < 50ml) confirmed by imaging within 6 hours of onset;
- Participants with systolic blood pressure > 140mmHg upon admission;
- Participants who have signed the informed consent form.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Participants in the cerebral hemorrhage study who decline to have their disease management information collected and used and/or refuse to undergo subsequent follow-ups;
- Participants with allergies to the medication in question;
- Participants in the study of secondary cerebral hemorrhage resulting from tumors, vascular malformations, aneurysms, trauma, post-thrombolytic therapy, or cerebral arteriovenous thrombosis;
- Participants undergoing anticoagulant therapy or with coagulation disorders;
- Pregnant women;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| UrapidilAlso: Ebrantil(34661-75-1)1. Control systolic blood pressure within 130-140mmHg using urapidil and maintain this level for 7 days; 2. Reduce intracranial pressure through dehydration therapy with mannitol, positioning of the body, and other means to prevent cerebral hernia. Surgical interventions such as decompressive craniectomy may be performed if necessary; 3. Aim for a body temperature control target of ≤37.5°C; 4. The anticoagulation reversal target is INR < 1.5, with correction methods including the use of vitamin K, prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC), or fresh frozen plasma (FFP); 5. The blood glucose control targets are 6.1-7.8mmol/L for non-diabetic study participants and 7.8-10.0mmol/L for diabetic study participants. | Drug | Urapidil Group |
| Urapidil and EsmololAlso: 34661-75-1 and 81147-92-41. Utilize both urapidil and esmolol to control systolic blood pressure within 130-140mmHg and maintain this level for 7 days; 2. Reduce intracranial pressure through dehydration therapy with mannitol, strategic positioning of the body, and other measures to prevent cerebral hernia. Surgical interventions such as decompressive craniectomy may be performed if necessary; 3. Aim for a body temperature control target of ≤37.5°C; 4. The anticoagulation reversal target is INR < 1.5, with correction methods including the administration of vitamin K, prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC), or fresh frozen plasma (FFP); 5. The blood glucose control targets are 6.1-7.8mmol/L for non-diabetic study participants and 7.8-10.0mmol/L for diabetic study participants. | Drug | Combination Group of Urapidil and Esmolol |
Primary outcome
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)
Time frame: Three months after the onset of the disease
Evaluate the beneficial effect of blood pressure management with combined urapidil and esmolol on study participants by assessing the poor outcome rate, as indicated by the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores (poor outcome: 4-6 points), three months after the onset of the disease.
9 secondary outcomes
Changes in the volume of acute intracranial hematoma
Time frame: First seven days of hospitalization
Heart rate variability
Time frame: First seven days of hospitalization
Time taken for blood pressure to reach target levels after administering antihypertensive medications
Time frame: First 24 hours after hospitalization
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score
Time frame: Seventh day after the onset of the disease
In-hospital mortality rate
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 3 months
Mortality rate within 3 months of onset
Time frame: Three months after the onset of the disease
Adverse events
Time frame: During hospitalization(up to 8 weeks)
Incidence of seizures
Time frame: During hospitalization(up to 8 weeks)
length of hospital stay
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of discharge from hospital for any reason, assessed up to 3 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Oct 2024.
Related trials for Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Huayu Jiedu Formula (FTFY-919) Granules Versus Traditional Decoction for Acute Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Hypertension
Not yet recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Antihypertensive Treatment With Mobile Stroke Units in Ultra-Early Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Nervous System Diseases, Cerebrovascular Disorders
Not yet recruiting
Yiqi Huayu Jiedu Therapy for Non-Surgical Supratentorial Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Intracranial Hemorrhage, Hypertensive
Recruiting
Timing of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Patients With Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Venous Thromboembolism, Pulmonary Embolism
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial on the Treatment of Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage With Naoxuekang Dropping Pills
Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Cerebral Small Vessel Diseases
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Jianjun Wang, Ph.D. study director
Qianfoshan Hospital
Xueyan Cui, Ph.D. study director
Qianfoshan Hospital
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage, run by Qianfoshan Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Shaofeng Yan, postdoc (15662793799, 2415@sdhospital.com.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) (time frame: Three months after the onset of the disease). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Oct 2024.