Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)CGM2NCT06628453
CGM for Management of Type 2 Diabetes in Pregnancy
A study testing CGM in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and Pregnancy, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham at 7 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if continuous glucose monitoring works better than self-monitoring of blood glucose (fingersticks) to treat type 2 diabetes in pregnancy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), Pregnancy
- What is being tested?
- CGM
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 564 participants
- Where
- 7 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 8 Apr 2025to Jul 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with daily insulin injections or oral hypoglycemic agents diagnosed before pregnancy or at less than 14 weeks gestation with hemoglobin A1c 6.5% or greater
- Pregnant with viable fetus at 6 to less than 23 weeks gestation
- Maternal age 18-50 years old
Who cannot join
- Unable or unwilling to wear CGM due to intolerance to medical-grade adhesives or skin conditions
- Multiple gestation
- Major fetal anomaly or two or more minor fetal anomalies
- Planned delivery outside study consortium
- Participating in another conflicting interventional study
- Participation in this trial in a previous pregnancy
- Patient unable to consent
- Physician refusal for other reasons
Trial locations and contacts
7 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
7 sites in 1 country
United States7 sites, 7 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
Ashley Battarbee, 205-975-2361, anbattarbee@uabmc.edu
- Recruiting
University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
Kim Boggess, MD, 919-966-2131, kim_boggess@med.unc.edu
- Recruiting
Prisma Health Greenville Memorial Hospital
Greenville, South Carolina, 29605
Daniel Pasko, MD, 864-455-7000, daniel.pasko@prismahealth.org
- Recruiting
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Houston, Texas, 77030
Michal Fishel Bartal, MD, 832-325-7133, michal.f.bartal@uth.tmc.edu
- Recruiting
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Celeste Durnwald, MD, 800-789-7366, celeste.durnwald@pennmedicine.upenn.edu
- Recruiting
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97213
Amy Valent, DO, MCR, 503-418-4200, valent@ohsu.edu
- Recruiting
University of California at San Diego
San Diego, California, 92121
Gladys Ramos, MD, 858-657-7200, gramos@health.ucsd.edu
About this study
Official title: Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Management of Type 2 Diabetes in Pregnancy
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if continuous glucose monitoring works better than self-monitoring of blood glucose (fingersticks) to treat type 2 diabetes in pregnancy. It will also learn about all risk factors (biologic, personal, social) for maternal and infant complications in type 2 diabetes pregnancies. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does continuous glucose monitoring improve infant outcomes compared to self-monitoring of blood glucose?
- Does continuous glucose monitoring improve maternal diabetes control and other maternal outcomes compared to self-monitoring of blood glucose?
- What other factors increase the risk of maternal and infant complications?
Read more
Participants will:
- Use continuous glucose monitoring or self-monitoring of blood glucose to monitor blood sugar control from enrollment until delivery
- Have blood drawn at enrollment, 24 weeks, 34 weeks and delivery to measure hemoglobin A1c levels and store blood for future analysis
- Complete surveys about social support, environmental stressors, diabetes distress and glucose monitoring satisfaction at research visits
- Have umbilical cord blood collected at delivery for analysis
Read the detailed description
We will conduct a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial of pregnant individuals with T2DM to test the effectiveness of CGM at improving maternal and neonatal outcomes, compared to SMBG. All pregnant women who have T2DM will be screened for eligibility. If a patient is eligible, the study will be explained to them and if they consent to participate, they will be randomized centrally in a 1:1 ratio to CGM or SMBG.
Participants randomized to CGM will receive a Dexcom G7 CGM and be instructed how to apply it, access the CGM data, and how to interpret and respond to trend arrows and alerts. Participants will replace the CGM device with a new sensor every 10 days for the entire pregnancy. Participants randomized to SMBG will be instructed to perform SMBG at least 4 times daily (fasting and 1-hour or 2-hours postprandial) and share their glucose data with their provider according to standard care. In order to collect comparable assessments of glycemic control between the groups, participants randomized to SMBG will wear a masked CGM for 10 days after randomization (Visit 1) and after Visits 2 (24 weeks) and Visit 3 (34 weeks). All participants will be provided a glucometer if they do not already have one and will have HbA1c and maternal serum collected at enrollment (6-22 weeks) and all study visits (24 weeks, 34 weeks, and delivery).
We will utilize ACOG and ADA recommendations for glycemic targets in pregnancy a standardized protocol with graduated goals for glycemic control to ensure consistency across arms and study sites. For pregnant individuals randomized to CGM, the target range will be 63-140mg/dL. For pregnant individuals randomized to SMBG, the targets will be fasting \<95mg/dL, 1-hour postprandial less than 140mg/dL and 2-hour postprandial less than 120mg/dL. CGM reports and glucose logs will be reviewed at least every 1-2 weeks, and therapy adjustments (insulin, metformin, diet and/or lifestyle) will be recommended if less than 70% of glucose values are at target, regardless of the method of glucose monitoring. Additional therapy adjustments will be encouraged to achieve greater than 70% glucose values at target so long as there is not significant hypoglycemia (i.e. greater than 4%).
Telehealth visits may be utilized in addition to outpatient in person visits at the discretion of the provider, but should be used similarly for the CGM and SMBG groups. This protocol for glycemic management will be followed at all times including both at outpatient visits and during inpatient antepartum hospitalization. Intrapartum glycemic control, fetal testing and timing and route of delivery will be determined by the clinical provider in accordance with ACOG recommendations. After birth, umbilical cord blood will be collected for metabolic analyses, and neonates will have a heelstick performed to measure capillary blood glucose as part of usual care given maternal T2DM. Additional care including NICU admission and treatment of hypoglycemia will be at the discretion of the neonatal provider.
Validated screening tools to assess different SDoH domains will be administered at the first 2 study visits. At enrollment, each participant will be administered the Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patient Assets, Risks and Experiences (PRAPARE) survey, a validated screening tool designed to identify SDoH including personal factors, family and housing, money and resources, and social and emotional health and safety. The home address provided will be used to calculate SVI and area deprivation index (ADI), a measure created to assess socioeconomic disadvantage at a neighborhood level based on income, education, employment and housing quality. Participants will complete the U.S. Adult Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM), a 10-item self-report questionnaire aimed at assessing food security over the prior 12 months as food insecurity may be associated with adverse outcomes. Participants will also complete the Type 2 Diabetes Distress Assessment System (T2-DDAS), a 29-item survey designed to identify the overall amount of DM-related distress as well as the sources of stress including hypoglycemia, long-term health, healthcare provider, interpersonal issues, shame or stigma, healthcare access, and management demands. At visit 2, participants will complete the Short Assessment of Health Literacy (SAHL) and the Diabetes Numeracy Test 15 (DNT15) given association between lower educational attainment and health literacy and numeracy with worse outcomes. Participants will also complete the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), the only self-reported measure in a study of psychosocial stress associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes and the Experiences of Discrimination (EOD) scale, a 9-item self-report about lifetime experiences of discrimination attributed to race, ethnicity or skin color. At delivery, participants will repeat the T2-DDAS to assess if CGM impacted DM distress and complete a Glucose Monitoring Satisfaction Survey (GMSS), a validated tool to assess satisfaction with the assigned method of glucose monitoring.
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), Pregnancy
- Being tested
- CGM
- Keywords
- Diabetes, Pregnancy, CGM
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetes Mellitus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CGMDevice
Real-time continuous glucose monitoring
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous Glucose Monitoring | Experimental | Real-time continuous glucose monitoring Receives: Device: CGM |
| Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose | No intervention | Self-monitoring of blood glucose (standard of care) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time in Range (TIR) at 34 weeks gestation
Percentage of time spent within target range (63-140mg/dL) on Continuous Glucose Monitoring at 34 weeks gestation
Measured: 33 to 35 weeks gestation
Composite Neonatal Morbidity
Composite morbidity of the neonate including one or more of preterm birth (delivery less than 37 weeks for any indication), birth trauma (shoulder dystocia with nerve injury, clavicular or humeral fracture or 3 or more maneuvers to resolve), hypoglycemia (requiring treatment with dextrose gel or IV within 24 hours of birth), hyperbilirubinemia (requiring phototherapy within 72 hours of birth), large-for-gestational-age infant (birthweight greater than the 90th percentile for gestational age), and miscarriage, stillbirth or neonatal death prior to hospital discharge.
Measured: From the date of delivery to the date of neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 12 months of life
Secondary outcomes (30)
Preterm birth
Delivery less than 37 weeks gestation
Measured: Delivery
Birth trauma
Shoulder dystocia with nerve injury, clavicular or humeral fracture or 3 or more maneuvers to relieve
Measured: Delivery
Neonatal hypoglycemia
Low neonatal glucose requiring treatment with dextrose gel or IV within 24 hours of life
Measured: Delivery to 24 hours of life
Hyperbilirubinemia
Elevated bilirubin requiring phototherapy within 72 hours of life
Measured: Delivery to 72 hours of life
Large-for-gestational-age (LGA) neonate
Birthweight greater than the 90th percentile for gestational age
Measured: Delivery
Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonate
Birthweight less than the 10th percentile for gestational age
Measured: Delivery
Fetal glucose
Concentration of umbilical cord blood glucose (mg/dL)
Measured: Delivery
Fetal insulin
Concentration of umbilical cord blood insulin (uU/mL)
Measured: Delivery
Fetal C-peptide
Concentration of umbilical cord blood C-peptide (ng/mL)
Measured: Delivery
Fetal leptin
Concentration of umbilical cord blood leptin (ng/mL)
Measured: Delivery
Fetal ghrelin
Concentration of umbilical cord blood ghrelin (uU/L)
Measured: Delivery
Fetal surfactant protein D
Concentration of umbilical cord blood surfactant protein D (ng/mL)
Measured: Delivery
Time Above Range (TAR) at 34 weeks
Percentage of time spent above range greater than 140mg/dL on Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) at 34 weeks
Measured: 33 to 35 weeks
Time Below Range (TBR) at 34 weeks
Percentage of time spent below range less than 63mg/dL on Continuous Glucose Monitoring at 34 weeks
Measured: 33 to 35 weeks
Mean glucose at 34 weeks
Average glucose in mg/dL using Continuous Glucose Monitoring data at 34 weeks
Measured: 33 to 35 weeks
Glucose Management Indicator (GMI)
Glucose management indicator as an estimate of hemoglobin A1c calculated using mean glucose on CGM at 34 weeks
Measured: 33 to 35 weeks
Glucose variability at 34 weeks
Coefficient of variation calculated as the mean glucose divided by standard deviation using Continuous Glucose Monitoring data at 34 weeks
Measured: 33 to 35 weeks
Mean fasting glucose at 34 weeks
Average glucose at 6-7am on Continuous Glucose Monitoring at 34 weeks
Measured: 33 to 35 weeks
Hemoglobin A1c at Delivery
Hemoglobin A1c (%) at delivery
Measured: Delivery
Insulin total daily dose at delivery
Total number of units of insulin taken per day at time of delivery
Measured: Delivery
Cesarean delivery
First cesarean delivery or cesarean delivery after a history of prior cesarean
Measured: Delivery
Glucose Monitoring Satisfaction
Score on glucose monitoring satisfaction survey at delivery
Measured: Delivery
Fetal or neonatal death
Miscarriage (pregnancy loss less than 20 weeks), stillbirth (fetal death at 20 weeks or more), or neonatal death (death after birth up to 28 days of life)
Measured: From the date of randomization to the date of neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 12 months of life
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Admission
Admission to the neonatal intensive care unit with length of stay greater than 24 hours
Measured: From the date of delivery to the date of neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 12 months of life
Neonatal length of stay
Duration of neonatal hospitalization after delivery
Measured: From the date of delivery to the date of neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 12 months of life
Neonatal mechanical ventilation
Neonate requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation for respiratory support
Measured: From the date of delivery to the date of neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 12 months of life
Insulin increase during pregnancy
Percentage change in total daily dose of insulin at delivery compared to enrollment
Measured: From the date of randomization to the date of delivery, assessed up to 9 months
Preeclampsia
Elevated blood pressure greater than 140/90 mmHg after 20 weeks gestation with proteinuria or other severe features by ACOG criteria (may be superimposed on chronic hypertension or not)
Measured: From the date of randomization to the date of maternal hospital discharge after delivery, assessed up to 9 months
Postpartum infection
Developing one or more of endometritis, wound infection or other wound complication such as seroma, hematoma or dehiscence)
Measured: From the date of delivery through 6 weeks' postpartum
Glucose Monitoring Adherence
Defined as percentage of expected self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) values completed based on recommended 4 values per day for participants in the SMBG arm and percentage of time Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) in use in the CGM arm
Measured: From the date of randomization to the date of delivery, assessed up to 9 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Oct 2024
- Study start8 Apr 2025
- Primary completionFeb 2029 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Alabama at BirminghamThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 564 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institutes of Health (NIH), Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ashley N. Battarbee, University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Investigators
- Ashley Battarbee, MD, MSCR, Principal investigator, University of Alabama at Birmingham
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06628453
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB-300013640
- Other IDs
- 1R01HD113612
- Acronym
- CGM2
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 25 Sep 2024
- Last updated
- 29 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: All data produced in the course of the project will be preserved and shared including: 1. Recruitment rates, reasons for refusal, adherence, loss to follow up 2. Demographics and clinical data 3. Glucose and laboratory values 4. Satisfaction and survey responses
Publications
Padgett CE, Ye Y, Champion ML, Fleenor RE, Orfanakos VB, Casey BM, Battarbee AN. Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Management of Type 2 Diabetes and Perinatal Outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Nov 1;144(5):677-683. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005609. Epub 2024 May 23.
PubMed 38781595
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Management of Type 2 Diabetes in Pregnancy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06628453
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CGM2 / IRB-300013640
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), Pregnancy
- Keywords
- Diabetes, Pregnancy, CGM
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 564 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alabama at BirminghamUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institutes of Health (NIH), Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Study start
- 8 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if continuous glucose monitoring works better than self-monitoring of blood glucose (fingersticks) to treat type 2 diabetes in pregnancy. It will also learn about all risk factors (biologic, personal, social) for maternal and infant complications in type 2 diabetes pregnancies. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does continuous glucose monitoring improve infant outcomes compared to self-monitoring of blood glucose?
- Does continuous glucose monitoring improve maternal diabetes control and other maternal outcomes compared to self-monitoring of blood glucose?
- What other factors increase the risk of maternal and infant complications?
Participants will:
- Use continuous glucose monitoring or self-monitoring of blood glucose to monitor blood sugar control from enrollment until delivery
- Have blood drawn at enrollment, 24 weeks, 34 weeks and delivery to measure hemoglobin A1c levels and store blood for future analysis
- Complete surveys about social support, environmental stressors, diabetes distress and glucose monitoring satisfaction at research visits
- Have umbilical cord blood collected at delivery for analysis
Detailed description
We will conduct a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial of pregnant individuals with T2DM to test the effectiveness of CGM at improving maternal and neonatal outcomes, compared to SMBG. All pregnant women who have T2DM will be screened for eligibility. If a patient is eligible, the study will be explained to them and if they consent to participate, they will be randomized centrally in a 1:1 ratio to CGM or SMBG.
Participants randomized to CGM will receive a Dexcom G7 CGM and be instructed how to apply it, access the CGM data, and how to interpret and respond to trend arrows and alerts. Participants will replace the CGM device with a new sensor every 10 days for the entire pregnancy. Participants randomized to SMBG will be instructed to perform SMBG at least 4 times daily (fasting and 1-hour or 2-hours postprandial) and share their glucose data with their provider according to standard care. In order to collect comparable assessments of glycemic control between the groups, participants randomized to SMBG will wear a masked CGM for 10 days after randomization (Visit 1) and after Visits 2 (24 weeks) and Visit 3 (34 weeks). All participants will be provided a glucometer if they do not already have one and will have HbA1c and maternal serum collected at enrollment (6-22 weeks) and all study visits (24 weeks, 34 weeks, and delivery).
We will utilize ACOG and ADA recommendations for glycemic targets in pregnancy a standardized protocol with graduated goals for glycemic control to ensure consistency across arms and study sites. For pregnant individuals randomized to CGM, the target range will be 63-140mg/dL. For pregnant individuals randomized to SMBG, the targets will be fasting \<95mg/dL, 1-hour postprandial less than 140mg/dL and 2-hour postprandial less than 120mg/dL. CGM reports and glucose logs will be reviewed at least every 1-2 weeks, and therapy adjustments (insulin, metformin, diet and/or lifestyle) will be recommended if less than 70% of glucose values are at target, regardless of the method of glucose monitoring. Additional therapy adjustments will be encouraged to achieve greater than 70% glucose values at target so long as there is not significant hypoglycemia (i.e. greater than 4%).
Telehealth visits may be utilized in addition to outpatient in person visits at the discretion of the provider, but should be used similarly for the CGM and SMBG groups. This protocol for glycemic management will be followed at all times including both at outpatient visits and during inpatient antepartum hospitalization. Intrapartum glycemic control, fetal testing and timing and route of delivery will be determined by the clinical provider in accordance with ACOG recommendations. After birth, umbilical cord blood will be collected for metabolic analyses, and neonates will have a heelstick performed to measure capillary blood glucose as part of usual care given maternal T2DM. Additional care including NICU admission and treatment of hypoglycemia will be at the discretion of the neonatal provider.
Validated screening tools to assess different SDoH domains will be administered at the first 2 study visits. At enrollment, each participant will be administered the Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patient Assets, Risks and Experiences (PRAPARE) survey, a validated screening tool designed to identify SDoH including personal factors, family and housing, money and resources, and social and emotional health and safety. The home address provided will be used to calculate SVI and area deprivation index (ADI), a measure created to assess socioeconomic disadvantage at a neighborhood level based on income, education, employment and housing quality. Participants will complete the U.S. Adult Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM), a 10-item self-report questionnaire aimed at assessing food security over the prior 12 months as food insecurity may be associated with adverse outcomes. Participants will also complete the Type 2 Diabetes Distress Assessment System (T2-DDAS), a 29-item survey designed to identify the overall amount of DM-related distress as well as the sources of stress including hypoglycemia, long-term health, healthcare provider, interpersonal issues, shame or stigma, healthcare access, and management demands. At visit 2, participants will complete the Short Assessment of Health Literacy (SAHL) and the Diabetes Numeracy Test 15 (DNT15) given association between lower educational attainment and health literacy and numeracy with worse outcomes. Participants will also complete the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), the only self-reported measure in a study of psychosocial stress associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes and the Experiences of Discrimination (EOD) scale, a 9-item self-report about lifetime experiences of discrimination attributed to race, ethnicity or skin color. At delivery, participants will repeat the T2-DDAS to assess if CGM impacted DM distress and complete a Glucose Monitoring Satisfaction Survey (GMSS), a validated tool to assess satisfaction with the assigned method of glucose monitoring.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous Glucose Monitoring | Experimental | Device: CGMReal-time continuous glucose monitoring |
| Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose | No intervention | –Self-monitoring of blood glucose (standard of care) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with daily insulin injections or oral hypoglycemic agents diagnosed before pregnancy or at less than 14 weeks gestation with hemoglobin A1c 6.5% or greater
- Pregnant with viable fetus at 6 to less than 23 weeks gestation
- Maternal age 18-50 years old
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Unable or unwilling to wear CGM due to intolerance to medical-grade adhesives or skin conditions
- Multiple gestation
- Major fetal anomaly or two or more minor fetal anomalies
- Planned delivery outside study consortium
- Participating in another conflicting interventional study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CGMReal-time continuous glucose monitoring | Device | Continuous Glucose Monitoring |
Primary outcome
Time in Range (TIR) at 34 weeks gestation
Time frame: 33 to 35 weeks gestation
Percentage of time spent within target range (63-140mg/dL) on Continuous Glucose Monitoring at 34 weeks gestation
Composite Neonatal Morbidity
Time frame: From the date of delivery to the date of neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 12 months of life
Composite morbidity of the neonate including one or more of preterm birth (delivery less than 37 weeks for any indication), birth trauma (shoulder dystocia with nerve injury, clavicular or humeral fracture or 3 or more maneuvers to resolve), hypoglycemia (requiring treatment with dextrose gel or IV within 24 hours of birth), hyperbilirubinemia (requiring phototherapy within 72 hours of birth), large-for-gestational-age infant (birthweight greater than the 90th percentile for gestational age), and miscarriage, stillbirth or neonatal death prior to hospital discharge.
30 secondary outcomes
Preterm birth
Time frame: Delivery
Birth trauma
Time frame: Delivery
Neonatal hypoglycemia
Time frame: Delivery to 24 hours of life
Hyperbilirubinemia
Time frame: Delivery to 72 hours of life
Large-for-gestational-age (LGA) neonate
Time frame: Delivery
Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonate
Time frame: Delivery
Fetal glucose
Time frame: Delivery
Fetal insulin
Time frame: Delivery
Fetal C-peptide
Time frame: Delivery
Fetal leptin
Time frame: Delivery
Fetal ghrelin
Time frame: Delivery
Fetal surfactant protein D
Time frame: Delivery
Time Above Range (TAR) at 34 weeks
Time frame: 33 to 35 weeks
Time Below Range (TBR) at 34 weeks
Time frame: 33 to 35 weeks
Mean glucose at 34 weeks
Time frame: 33 to 35 weeks
Glucose Management Indicator (GMI)
Time frame: 33 to 35 weeks
Glucose variability at 34 weeks
Time frame: 33 to 35 weeks
Mean fasting glucose at 34 weeks
Time frame: 33 to 35 weeks
Hemoglobin A1c at Delivery
Time frame: Delivery
Insulin total daily dose at delivery
Time frame: Delivery
Cesarean delivery
Time frame: Delivery
Glucose Monitoring Satisfaction
Time frame: Delivery
Fetal or neonatal death
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 12 months of life
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Admission
Time frame: From the date of delivery to the date of neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 12 months of life
Neonatal length of stay
Time frame: From the date of delivery to the date of neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 12 months of life
Neonatal mechanical ventilation
Time frame: From the date of delivery to the date of neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 12 months of life
Insulin increase during pregnancy
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of delivery, assessed up to 9 months
Preeclampsia
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of maternal hospital discharge after delivery, assessed up to 9 months
Postpartum infection
Time frame: From the date of delivery through 6 weeks' postpartum
Glucose Monitoring Adherence
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of delivery, assessed up to 9 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jun 2026.
- Background: PubMed 38781595Padgett CE, Ye Y, Champion ML, Fleenor RE, Orfanakos VB, Casey BM, Battarbee AN. Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Management of Type 2 Diabetes and Perinatal Outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Nov 1;144(5):677-683. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005609. Epub 2024 May 23.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. All data produced in the course of the project will be preserved and shared including: 1. Recruitment rates, reasons for refusal, adherence, loss to follow up 2. Demographics and clinical data 3. Glucose and laboratory values 4. Satisfaction and survey responses
Related trials for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of SAL0150 Tablets in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), Type 2 Diabetes
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effects of Enicepatide in Participants With Obesity or Overweight, With or Without Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
RecruitingObservational study
Chiglitazar Added to SGLT-2 Inhibitors for Type 2 Diabetes
T2DM (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
An Observational Study to Learn More About How Safe Finerenone is and How Well it Works in Indian People With Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes in Routine Medical Practice
Chronic Kidney Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Ashley Battarbee, MD, MSCR principal investigator
University of Alabama at Birmingham
7 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CGM in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and Pregnancy, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham at 7 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 7 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ashley Battarbee, MD, MSCR (205-975-2361, anbattarbee@uabmc.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time in Range (TIR) at 34 weeks gestation (time frame: 33 to 35 weeks gestation). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06628453, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jun 2026.