Urinary Tract Infection (Diagnosis)NCT06625268
Rapid Point-of-care Bacteriuria and Microbial Susceptibility for Women With Suspected Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections: Diagnostic Accuracy in General Practice.
An observational study of Urinary Tract Infection (Diagnosis), run by Wuerzburg University Hospital at 2 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
In this study, adult women presenting at their general practitioner with a likely bladder infection (with symptoms like a burning sensation when urinating, pain in the lower abdomen, and frequent or urgent need to urinate) will be invited. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Urinary Tract Infection (Diagnosis)
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2024to 30 Apr 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Consecutively enrolled adult non-pregnant women with a suspected uncomplicated UTI (uncomplicated is defined according to German guidelines/usual care as having no symptoms or signs of systemic illness, such as fever).
Who may be able to join
- Female sex
- Age 18 or older
- Clinically suspected UTI according to the general practitioner
Who cannot join
- Urinary catheter
- Severe urinary tract abnormality (such as cancer or strictures)
- Immunosuppression (such as chronic immunosuppressant use or AIDS)
- Dementia or any other condition (including insufficient knowledge of the German language) that could affect informed consent
- Known pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Kathrin Lasher, Nurse contact
Germany2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
University Hospital Jena
Jena, Thuringia, 07743
Robby Markwart, Dr, 004936419395820, robby.markwart@med.uni-jena.de
Jutta Bleidorn, MD,Professor, 004936419395820, Jutta.Bleidorn@med.uni-jena.de
- Recruiting
University Hospital Wurzburg, Department of General Practice
Würzburg, Bavaria, 97080
Peter K. Kurotschka, MD, +49(0)17670882259, kurotschka_p@ukw.de
Kathrin Lasher, lasher_k@ukw.de
About this study
Official title: Machbarkeit Und Explorative Validierung Des PA-100-AST-Systems Bei Frauen Mit Verdacht Auf Eine Unkomplizierte Harnwergsinfektion in Der Hausarztpraxis - Eine Pilotstudie
In this study, adult women presenting at their general practitioner with a likely bladder infection (with symptoms like a burning sensation when urinating, pain in the lower abdomen, and frequent or urgent need to urinate) will be invited. After informed consent, women provide a urine sample, which is tested using a new system called the PA-100-AST (from the manufacturer Sysmex). This point-of-care test showed first evidence to be able to quickly detect the presence of bacteria commonly responsible for bladder infections. If bacteria are found, the test also checks which antibiotics may work best to treat the infection. Additionally, a sample of the urine is sent to a lab for a traditional culture test, which is considered the most accurate method. The goal of this study is to compare the accuracy of the PA-100-AST system to the lab-based test to see how well it works in general practice.
Read the detailed description
The PA-100-AST urine analyzer from Sysmex is a rapid point-of-care test currently registered as a medicinal product. The system identifies bacteriuria (≥ 50,000 CFU/mL) and reports antibiotic susceptibility results as susceptible (S), susceptible with increased exposure (I), resistant (R), or not applicable (NA) for amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ciprofloxacin, fosfomycin, nitrofurantoin, and trimethoprim, based on EUCAST standards. Although the system detects bacteriuria, it does not inform the user of the specific bacterial species involved, providing only a positive or negative result.
The PA-100 cartridge is designed to detect common uropathogens: Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Enterococcus faecalis, and Staphylococcus saprophyticus. A proprietary internal algorithm classifies bacteria into one of three groups (Enterobacterales, Staphylococcus, or Enterococcus) and applies appropriate EUCAST breakpoints.
This product is authorized and CE-marked in the European Union for point-of-care use in women with suspected uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs).
However, the PA-100-AST system has not yet been evaluated in a general practice setting. The goal of this study is to compare the results of the Sysmex PA-100-AST with laboratory-based urine culture in a consecutive sample of adult women recruited from general practices.
Recruitment. Adult, non-pregnant women with symptoms suggestive of uncomplicated UTI will be recruited consecutively and prospectively during routine consultations in at least four general practices across two German practice-based research networks (Bavaria and Thuringia). Informed consent will be obtained from all participants.
Outcomes. The primary outcome measure is diagnostic accuracy compared with urine culture. Urine culture positivity is defined as a bacterial count of at least 50,000 CFU/ml (per the instructions for use) of one of the species detected by the PA-100-AST (index test). Additionally, the diagnostic accuracy of the index test will be assessed against varying thresholds for urine culture positivity (from 1,000 to 100,000 CFU/ml or greater).
Another key outcome is the agreement between the susceptibility test results from the index test and the reference laboratory-based susceptibility test. Exploratory subgroup analyses will include assessments based on age, dipstick test results, and symptom severity at presentation.
Data Collection. The index test will be conducted immediately after enrolment on fresh urine (within 30 minutes of collection). A pragmatic approach will be followed, with microbiological analysis carried out by the laboratories that typically serve the participating practices. These laboratories adhere to common quality standards according to the German laboratory guidelines (Harnwegsinfektionen: Qualitätsstandards in der mikrobiologisch-infektiologischen Diagnostik, MIQ-02) and apply EUCAST criteria for susceptibility testing. According to STARD recommendations, clinicians performing the index test, as well as laboratory technicians and microbiologists conducting the urine culture, are blinded to the results of each other´s tests. Clinical data are collected using a validated patient questionnaire at the initial presentation, and management decisions are recorded during routine consultation. Dipstick test results are measured through Combur test stripes (Roche Diagnostics).
Data Analysis. Descriptive statistics will be presented using appropriate summary measures such as mean (SD), median (IQR), and absolute and relative frequencies.
Diagnostic accuracy measures (sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios) will be reported with corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
Kappa coefficients and corresponding statistical tests will be used to assess agreement between categorical variables (with statistical significance set at p less than 0.05) for susceptibility test results.
Sample Size. The initial sample size calculation assumed a sensitivity of 98.8% and specificity of 98.4% based on manufacturer data. Given a prevalence of 70%, we estimated that 101 patients would be required to estimate specificity, and 51 patients to estimate sensitivity, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) width of 0.1. However, after the protocol was approved, a clinical evaluation in a hospital setting (PMID: 38825624) was published, reporting a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 99.4% for the PA-100-AST, using a threshold of 50,000 CFU/ml as per the instructions for use. Given the more realistic estimates from this study, the sample size was recalculated. Based on the revised sensitivity and specificity estimates, and a 50,000 CFU/ml culture positivity threshold for which a decreased prevalence from 0.70 to 0.60 can be expected, the required sample size increased from 101 to 345 participants. Due to no project-specific funding, and in agreement with the sponsor, this was deemed unfeasible. Therefore, the aim to recruit 200 participants, which, under the assumption outlined above, will result in a 95%CI width of 0.13 instead of the initially planned width of 0.1.
Role of manufacturer. This study is investigator-initiated. Sysmex has provided the urine analyzer free of charge but has no involvement in the study design, implementation (aside from supplying detailed instructions for use as well as technical assistance), data preparation, analysis, interpretation, or publication of results. None of the investigators receive any funding or benefits from Sysmex or other device manufacturers.
- Conditions
- Urinary Tract Infection (Diagnosis)
- Keywords
- urinary tract infection, women, general practice, diagnosis, primary care, point-of-care test
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Tract Infections, Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Women with suspected UTI | Adult women with suspected uncomplicated urinary tract infections |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sensitivity
Sensitivity of point-of-care urinalysis through Sysmex PA-100-AST vs. laboratory-based urine culture (gold standard) of point-of-care urinalysis through Sysmex PA-100-AST vs. laboratory-based urine culture (gold standard)
Measured: On the 1 day of inclusion
Specificity
Specificity of point-of-care urinalysis through Sysmex PA-100-AST vs. laboratory-based urine culture (gold standard) of point-of-care urinalysis through Sysmex PA-100-AST vs. laboratory-based urine culture (gold standard)
Measured: On the 1 day of inclusion
Positive predictive value
Positive predictive value of point-of-care urinalysis through Sysmex PA-100-AST vs. laboratory-based urine culture (gold standard) of point-of-care urinalysis through Sysmex PA-100-AST vs. laboratory-based urine culture (gold standard)
Measured: On the 1 day of inclusion
Negative predictive value
Negative predictive value of point-of-care urinalysis through Sysmex PA-100-AST vs. laboratory-based urine culture (gold standard) of point-of-care urinalysis through Sysmex PA-100-AST vs. laboratory-based urine culture (gold standard)
Measured: On the 1 day of inclusion
Positive likelihood ratio
Positive likelihood ratio of point-of-care urinalysis through Sysmex PA-100-AST vs. laboratory-based urine culture (gold standard) of point-of-care urinalysis through Sysmex PA-100-AST vs. laboratory-based urine culture (gold standard)
Measured: On the 1 day of inclusion
Negative likelihood ratio
Negative likelihood ratio of point-of-care urinalysis through Sysmex PA-100-AST vs. laboratory-based urine culture (gold standard) of point-of-care urinalysis through Sysmex PA-100-AST vs. laboratory-based urine culture (gold standard)
Measured: On the 1 day of inclusion
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Oct 2024
- Study start1 Aug 2024
- Primary completion30 Apr 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Apr 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Urinary Tract Infection (Diagnosis)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Wuerzburg University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Jena University Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ildikó Gágyor, MD,Professor, Principal investigator, Wuerzburg University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06625268
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2024-3379-BO
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 23 Sep 2024
- Last updated
- 17 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Data sharing of fully anonymized individual participant data can be granted under reasonable request.
Publications
Gagyor I, Rentzsch K, Strube-Plaschke S, Himmel W. Psychometric properties of a self-assessment questionnaire concerning symptoms and impairment in urinary tract infections: the UTI-SIQ-8. BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 15;11(2):e043328. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043328.
PubMed 33589460Alonso-Tarres C, Benjumea Moreno C, Navarro F, Habison AC, Gonzalez-Bertran E, Blanco F, Borras J, Garrigo M, Saker J. Bacteriuria and phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing in 45 min by point-of-care Sysmex PA-100 System: first clinical evaluation. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Aug;43(8):1533-1543. doi: 10.1007/s10096-024-04862-3. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
PubMed 38825624
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Machbarkeit Und Explorative Validierung Des PA-100-AST-Systems Bei Frauen Mit Verdacht Auf Eine Unkomplizierte Harnwergsinfektion in Der Hausarztpraxis - Eine Pilotstudie
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06625268
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2024-3379-BO
- Conditions
- Urinary Tract Infection (Diagnosis)
- Keywords
- urinary tract infection, women, general practice, diagnosis, primary care, point-of-care test
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Wuerzburg University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Jena University Hospital
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Apr 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In this study, adult women presenting at their general practitioner with a likely bladder infection (with symptoms like a burning sensation when urinating, pain in the lower abdomen, and frequent or urgent need to urinate) will be invited. After informed consent, women provide a urine sample, which is tested using a new system called the PA-100-AST (from the manufacturer Sysmex). This point-of-care test showed first evidence to be able to quickly detect the presence of bacteria commonly responsible for bladder infections. If bacteria are found, the test also checks which antibiotics may work best to treat the infection. Additionally, a sample of the urine is sent to a lab for a traditional culture test, which is considered the most accurate method. The goal of this study is to compare the accuracy of the PA-100-AST system to the lab-based test to see how well it works in general practice.
Detailed description
The PA-100-AST urine analyzer from Sysmex is a rapid point-of-care test currently registered as a medicinal product. The system identifies bacteriuria (≥ 50,000 CFU/mL) and reports antibiotic susceptibility results as susceptible (S), susceptible with increased exposure (I), resistant (R), or not applicable (NA) for amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ciprofloxacin, fosfomycin, nitrofurantoin, and trimethoprim, based on EUCAST standards. Although the system detects bacteriuria, it does not inform the user of the specific bacterial species involved, providing only a positive or negative result.
The PA-100 cartridge is designed to detect common uropathogens: Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Enterococcus faecalis, and Staphylococcus saprophyticus. A proprietary internal algorithm classifies bacteria into one of three groups (Enterobacterales, Staphylococcus, or Enterococcus) and applies appropriate EUCAST breakpoints.
This product is authorized and CE-marked in the European Union for point-of-care use in women with suspected uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs).
However, the PA-100-AST system has not yet been evaluated in a general practice setting. The goal of this study is to compare the results of the Sysmex PA-100-AST with laboratory-based urine culture in a consecutive sample of adult women recruited from general practices.
Recruitment. Adult, non-pregnant women with symptoms suggestive of uncomplicated UTI will be recruited consecutively and prospectively during routine consultations in at least four general practices across two German practice-based research networks (Bavaria and Thuringia). Informed consent will be obtained from all participants.
Outcomes. The primary outcome measure is diagnostic accuracy compared with urine culture. Urine culture positivity is defined as a bacterial count of at least 50,000 CFU/ml (per the instructions for use) of one of the species detected by the PA-100-AST (index test). Additionally, the diagnostic accuracy of the index test will be assessed against varying thresholds for urine culture positivity (from 1,000 to 100,000 CFU/ml or greater).
Another key outcome is the agreement between the susceptibility test results from the index test and the reference laboratory-based susceptibility test. Exploratory subgroup analyses will include assessments based on age, dipstick test results, and symptom severity at presentation.
Data Collection. The index test will be conducted immediately after enrolment on fresh urine (within 30 minutes of collection). A pragmatic approach will be followed, with microbiological analysis carried out by the laboratories that typically serve the participating practices. These laboratories adhere to common quality standards according to the German laboratory guidelines (Harnwegsinfektionen: Qualitätsstandards in der mikrobiologisch-infektiologischen Diagnostik, MIQ-02) and apply EUCAST criteria for susceptibility testing. According to STARD recommendations, clinicians performing the index test, as well as laboratory technicians and microbiologists conducting the urine culture, are blinded to the results of each other´s tests. Clinical data are collected using a validated patient questionnaire at the initial presentation, and management decisions are recorded during routine consultation. Dipstick test results are measured through Combur test stripes (Roche Diagnostics).
Data Analysis. Descriptive statistics will be presented using appropriate summary measures such as mean (SD), median (IQR), and absolute and relative frequencies.
Diagnostic accuracy measures (sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios) will be reported with corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
Kappa coefficients and corresponding statistical tests will be used to assess agreement between categorical variables (with statistical significance set at p less than 0.05) for susceptibility test results.
Sample Size. The initial sample size calculation assumed a sensitivity of 98.8% and specificity of 98.4% based on manufacturer data. Given a prevalence of 70%, we estimated that 101 patients would be required to estimate specificity, and 51 patients to estimate sensitivity, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) width of 0.1. However, after the protocol was approved, a clinical evaluation in a hospital setting (PMID: 38825624) was published, reporting a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 99.4% for the PA-100-AST, using a threshold of 50,000 CFU/ml as per the instructions for use. Given the more realistic estimates from this study, the sample size was recalculated. Based on the revised sensitivity and specificity estimates, and a 50,000 CFU/ml culture positivity threshold for which a decreased prevalence from 0.70 to 0.60 can be expected, the required sample size increased from 101 to 345 participants. Due to no project-specific funding, and in agreement with the sponsor, this was deemed unfeasible. Therefore, the aim to recruit 200 participants, which, under the assumption outlined above, will result in a 95%CI width of 0.13 instead of the initially planned width of 0.1.
Role of manufacturer. This study is investigator-initiated. Sysmex has provided the urine analyzer free of charge but has no involvement in the study design, implementation (aside from supplying detailed instructions for use as well as technical assistance), data preparation, analysis, interpretation, or publication of results. None of the investigators receive any funding or benefits from Sysmex or other device manufacturers.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Women with suspected UTI | – | –Adult women with suspected uncomplicated urinary tract infections |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Consecutively enrolled adult non-pregnant women with a suspected uncomplicated UTI (uncomplicated is defined according to German guidelines/usual care as having no symptoms or signs of systemic illness, such as fever).
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Female sex
- Age 18 or older
- Clinically suspected UTI according to the general practitioner
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Urinary catheter
- Severe urinary tract abnormality (such as cancer or strictures)
- Immunosuppression (such as chronic immunosuppressant use or AIDS)
- Dementia or any other condition (including insufficient knowledge of the German language) that could affect informed consent
- Known pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Sensitivity
Time frame: On the 1 day of inclusion
Sensitivity of point-of-care urinalysis through Sysmex PA-100-AST vs. laboratory-based urine culture (gold standard) of point-of-care urinalysis through Sysmex PA-100-AST vs. laboratory-based urine culture (gold standard)
Specificity
Time frame: On the 1 day of inclusion
Specificity of point-of-care urinalysis through Sysmex PA-100-AST vs. laboratory-based urine culture (gold standard) of point-of-care urinalysis through Sysmex PA-100-AST vs. laboratory-based urine culture (gold standard)
Positive predictive value
Time frame: On the 1 day of inclusion
Positive predictive value of point-of-care urinalysis through Sysmex PA-100-AST vs. laboratory-based urine culture (gold standard) of point-of-care urinalysis through Sysmex PA-100-AST vs. laboratory-based urine culture (gold standard)
Negative predictive value
Time frame: On the 1 day of inclusion
Negative predictive value of point-of-care urinalysis through Sysmex PA-100-AST vs. laboratory-based urine culture (gold standard) of point-of-care urinalysis through Sysmex PA-100-AST vs. laboratory-based urine culture (gold standard)
Positive likelihood ratio
Time frame: On the 1 day of inclusion
Positive likelihood ratio of point-of-care urinalysis through Sysmex PA-100-AST vs. laboratory-based urine culture (gold standard) of point-of-care urinalysis through Sysmex PA-100-AST vs. laboratory-based urine culture (gold standard)
Negative likelihood ratio
Time frame: On the 1 day of inclusion
Negative likelihood ratio of point-of-care urinalysis through Sysmex PA-100-AST vs. laboratory-based urine culture (gold standard) of point-of-care urinalysis through Sysmex PA-100-AST vs. laboratory-based urine culture (gold standard)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Feb 2025.
- Background: PubMed 33589460Gagyor I, Rentzsch K, Strube-Plaschke S, Himmel W. Psychometric properties of a self-assessment questionnaire concerning symptoms and impairment in urinary tract infections: the UTI-SIQ-8. BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 15;11(2):e043328. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043328.
- Background: PubMed 38825624Alonso-Tarres C, Benjumea Moreno C, Navarro F, Habison AC, Gonzalez-Bertran E, Blanco F, Borras J, Garrigo M, Saker J. Bacteriuria and phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing in 45 min by point-of-care Sysmex PA-100 System: first clinical evaluation. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Aug;43(8):1533-1543. doi: 10.1007/s10096-024-04862-3. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Data sharing of fully anonymized individual participant data can be granted under reasonable request.
Related trials for Urinary Tract Infection (Diagnosis)
Recruiting
Diagnosis and Treatment of Urinary Tract Infection Using DNA Polymerase Chain Reaction Versus Urine Culture
Urinary Tract Infections
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Beta-only IL-2 ImmunoTherapY Study
Advanced Solid Tumor, Unresectable Solid Tumor
Recruiting
INterest of the Negative Predictive Value of Integrons in the reduCtion of Large Broad-spectrum anTibiotics Consumption for Urinary Tract infectionS
Drug Resistance, Microbial, Biomarkers
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparative Study of the Genomic Characteristics of Uropathogenic Escherichia Coli According to the Severity of Community-Acquired Urinary Tract Infections in Guadeloupe (COLIGENURI)
Urinary Tract Infections
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Characterization of Vaginal, Urinary and Fecal Microbiomes in Women With Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections
Urinary Tract Infections, Menopause
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Kathrin Lasher, Nurse contact
Ildikó Gágyor, MD,Professor principal investigator
Wuerzburg University Hospital
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Urinary Tract Infection (Diagnosis), run by Wuerzburg University Hospital at 2 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Peter K. Kurotschka, MD (0049017670882259, kurotschka_p@ukw.de), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sensitivity (time frame: On the 1 day of inclusion). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06625268, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Feb 2025.