Core Exercises TrainingNCT06623695
Investigation of the Effects of Core Exercises Performed on Stable
A study testing Exercise in people with Core Exercises Training, run by Inonu University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The popularity of core stability and strengthening exercise programs in physical rehabilitation and fitness practice, which has become popular since the 20th century, is increasing day by day. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 23 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Core Exercises Training
- What is being tested?
- Exercise
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 31 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2024to 7 May 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 23 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Being healthy,
- Having never done core exercise before,
- Being 18 years old or older,
- Being a volunteer
Who cannot join
- Having any injury,
- Not participating in the core training program regularly in this study,
- Being injured during the training application phase.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Inonu University Faculty of Sports Sciences Sports Hall
Malatya, Battalgazi, 44200
About this study
Official title: Investigation of the Effects of Core Exercises Performed on Stable and Unstable Ground on Selected Skills
The popularity of core stability and strengthening exercise programs in physical rehabilitation and fitness practice, which has become popular since the 20th century, is increasing day by day. The purpose of this research is to reveal the effects of core stability and core strength exercises performed on stable and unstable ground on selected skills.
Read the detailed description
Scientific studies have shown that there is no clear view on the effects of core exercise models applied on different surfaces, and there are very few studies that observe performance increases in sports activities. Based on this, the aim of this study is to understand more clearly the effects of core stability and core strength exercises performed on stable and unstable ground on selected skills and to implement more functional training programs accordingly. Thus, it is assumed that core training will provide strong positive effects on performance in both athletic and daily activities.
Methods A total of 31 young individuals aged between 18-23, studying at Malatya Inonu University Faculty of Sports Sciences and without any health problems, were included in the study. Participants were divided into three groups: Stable Ground Group (SGG), Unstable Ground Group (USGG) and Control Group (CG). SGG and USGG exercise participants participated in a core exercise program for a total of 25-30 minutes, 2 days a week for 5 weeks. SGG participants performed exercises on a stable floor surface, while USGG participants completed the exercise program on a bosuball. . CG did not participate in any exercise program. CG continued their daily routine activities and maintained their current physical activity levels. The testers were blind to the group (control or training) each subject allocated to. At the end of the exercise protocol, the same procedures applied for the pre-test were applied for the post-test measurements. All tests were performed in an indoor sports hall. All data obtained were recorded on a form created specifically for the study.
- Conditions
- Core Exercises Training
- Being tested
- Exercise
- Keywords
- core, unstable ground, exercise
- Medical subject headings
- Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ExerciseOther
SGG performed the exercise program on a fixed ground surface. SGG exercise participants participated in a core exercise program for a total of 25-30 minutes, 2 days a week for 5 weeks.
ExerciseOther
USGG participants completed the exercise program on a bosuball. USGG exercise participants participated in a core exercise program for a total of 25-30 minutes, 2 days a week for 5 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Stable Ground Group (SGG) | Experimental | Stable Ground Group (SGG) participants performed exercises on a stable floor surface Receives: Other: Exercise |
| Unstable Ground Group (USGG) | Experimental | Unstable Ground Group (USGG) participants completed the exercise program on a bosuball. Receives: Other: Exercise |
| Control Group (CG) | No intervention | Control Group (CG) did not participate in any exercise program. CG continued their daily routine activities and maintained their current physical activity levels. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Hand Grip Strength Test
For the measurement, Takei A5401/Japan brand digital hand dynamometer was used. This dynamometer is a digital hand dynamometer with an adjustable grip arm that can measure between 5.0 kg/lb -100.0 kg/lb with a precision of 0.1 kg. Before starting the measurements, the dynamometer was adjusted according to the participants\' hand sizes and during the measurements, the participants were asked to stand in a standing position, with their feet shoulder-width apart, their elbows in full extension and their arms not touching the body and facing forward at a 45-degree angle in abduction. During the test, participants were asked not to hold their breath and not to shake the dynamometer by holding it tightly, and then they were asked to squeeze the grip handle with all their strength for 3 seconds (sec), saying one, two, three. Measurements for both hands were repeated 3 times with at least 15 seconds between each trial, and the best performance was recorded in kilograms (kg).
Measured: 5 weeks
Trunk Lateral Flexion
Participants were in a standing position with their feet slightly apart and parallel to each other, and their arms close to and next to the body. For both hands, after the point where the distal tip of the 3rd finger (middle) comes to the thigh is marked, the individual performs lateral flexion and the point where the distal tip of the 3rd finger (middle) comes to is marked again. The distance between two specified points was measured and recorded in cm. The measurements were taken three times for both hands, and the highest value was recorded as the result.
Measured: 5 weeks
Trunk Extansion
Participants stood facing the wall, with their pelvis and entire body touching the wall. For the measurement, the participant performed trunk extension by moving his/her head back from the wall without breaking contact with the wall. Thus, the distance between the sternal prominence and the wall was measured with a tape measure and recorded. Then, the participant was supported by supporting the pelvic area and asked to push his/her trunk backwards from the waist area as far as possible. At the last point, the distance between the sternal notch and the wall was measured again. The difference between the first and last values obtained was written on the form in cm. The measurements were made three times and the highest value was recorded as the result.
Measured: 5 weeks
Sit and Reach
Flexibility was measured using a sit-and-reach test, using a sit-and-reach box (Baselıne/ Fabrication Enterprises, Inc., PO Box 1500, White Plains, NewYork). The subjects sat with their feet approximately hip-wide against the testing box (height 30.5 cm.). For the test performance, the subjects was placed seated on the floor with the legs stretched, barefooted and with the soles of the foot attached to the Seat and Reach case. They kept their knees extended and placed the right hand over the left, and slowly reached forward as far as they could by sliding their hands along the measuring board. Participants held this position for approximately 2 sec. and were told that lowering their heads to the lowest point, looking down at the floor, would increase the distance reached. A tape measure on top of the measuring board indicated in centimeters how far beyond the toes each individual reached. The score [in centimeters (cm)]is the greatest distance contacted by the fingertips past the toes
Measured: 5 weeks
Standing Long Jump Forward Test
In the standing long jump test, which is considered a general indicator of muscle condition, participants waited with their feet just behind the starting line before the test began. Then, for the measurement, the participants were instructed to jump as far as possible from the starting line by swinging their arms. They performed 3 trials with 2-minute rest intervals. The distance from the starting line to the farthest point she/he could jump to the landing point at heel contact was measured with a tape measure and the highest distance was recorded in cm.
Measured: 5 weeks
Bent Arm Hanging
The test participants stood in front of a barre apparatus, a platform that could be adjusted according to their height. Participants demonstrated appropriate and comfortable bar grip (prone-supine) style after being informed about the test protocol. During the measurement, the participants were asked to stand on the bar machine for as long as possible with their arms at maximum elbow flexion and their chins hanging above the bar level, and the test was ended when the participants\' chins dropped below the bar. The time spent in this position was determined using a stopwatch and recorded as a score in seconds. The test was administered once.
Measured: 5 weeks
Biering Sorenson Test
In the Biering Sorensen test, also known as the trunk extension test, participants were informed about the test protocol. For the measurement, participants were asked to lie face down on the stretcher. Participants were instructed to hang their upper body (hands, arms, head, trunk) down from the stretcher to the level of their anterior superior iliac heads, and lie face down on the stretcher with their lower limbs immobilized (with straps or people). Participants were allowed to place their hands on the chair in front of them before starting the test to avoid getting tired in this position. For the measurement, participants were instructed to remove their hands from the chair, cross their arms in front of their chest, and then lift their upper body until their torso was horizontal to the floor and in line with the stretcher. The time was started when the subject reached the starting position. Participants were instructed to maintain a horizontal body position for as long as possible.
Measured: 5 weeks
Hexagonal Agility Test
A hexagonal shape consisting of six side edges, each side 66 cm long, was drawn on a non-slip surface. Participants were informed about the test protocol. The participant was then asked to move to the center point within the hexagon and take a position facing side A. It was also asked to face point A throughout the test period. The stopwatch starts with the start command and the participant is asked to jump off the line with both feet, starting from line A, over each side line (B, C, D, E, F) and return to the center. The horizontal jumps in and out starting from side A and ending at side A were accepted as 1 round and 3 rounds were performed in this way. If the participant jumps or steps on the wrong line, the test is repeated. At the end of 3 correctly performed laps, the stopwatch was stopped and the elapsed time was recorded. Participants were given two trials after the adaptation phase. The best score was recorded in sec.
Measured: 5 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Oct 2024
- Study start1 Apr 2024
- Primary completion2 Apr 2024
- Study completion7 May 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Core Exercises TrainingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Inonu UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants were divided into three groups: Stable Ground Group (SGG), Unstable Ground Group (USGG) and Control Group (CG). SGG and USGG exercise participants participated in a core exercise program for a total of 25-30 minutes, 2 days a week for 5 weeks. SGG participants performed exercises on a stable floor surface, while USGG participants completed the exercise program on a bosuball. CG did not participate in any exercise program. CG continued their daily routine activities and maintained their current physical activity levels.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Inonu University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Nurkan Yılmaz, Inonu University
- Investigators
- Nurkan Yilmaz, Assoc. Prof., Principal investigator, Inonu University Faculty of Sports Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06623695
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IU-SBF-NY-ETK6431-01
- Status last verified
- Oct 2024
- First submitted
- 30 Sep 2024
- Last updated
- 4 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Investigation of the Effects of Core Exercises Performed on Stable and Unstable Ground on Selected Skills
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06623695
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IU-SBF-NY-ETK6431-01
- Conditions
- Core Exercises Training
- Keywords
- core, unstable ground, exercise
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Inonu UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 2 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 May 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The popularity of core stability and strengthening exercise programs in physical rehabilitation and fitness practice, which has become popular since the 20th century, is increasing day by day. The purpose of this research is to reveal the effects of core stability and core strength exercises performed on stable and unstable ground on selected skills.
Detailed description
Scientific studies have shown that there is no clear view on the effects of core exercise models applied on different surfaces, and there are very few studies that observe performance increases in sports activities. Based on this, the aim of this study is to understand more clearly the effects of core stability and core strength exercises performed on stable and unstable ground on selected skills and to implement more functional training programs accordingly. Thus, it is assumed that core training will provide strong positive effects on performance in both athletic and daily activities.
Methods A total of 31 young individuals aged between 18-23, studying at Malatya Inonu University Faculty of Sports Sciences and without any health problems, were included in the study. Participants were divided into three groups: Stable Ground Group (SGG), Unstable Ground Group (USGG) and Control Group (CG). SGG and USGG exercise participants participated in a core exercise program for a total of 25-30 minutes, 2 days a week for 5 weeks. SGG participants performed exercises on a stable floor surface, while USGG participants completed the exercise program on a bosuball. . CG did not participate in any exercise program. CG continued their daily routine activities and maintained their current physical activity levels. The testers were blind to the group (control or training) each subject allocated to. At the end of the exercise protocol, the same procedures applied for the pre-test were applied for the post-test measurements. All tests were performed in an indoor sports hall. All data obtained were recorded on a form created specifically for the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Participants were divided into three groups: Stable Ground Group (SGG), Unstable Ground Group (USGG) and Control Group (CG). SGG and USGG exercise participants participated in a core exercise program for a total of 25-30 minutes, 2 days a week for 5 weeks. SGG participants performed exercises on a stable floor surface, while USGG participants completed the exercise program on a bosuball. CG did not participate in any exercise program. CG continued their daily routine activities and maintained their current physical activity levels.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Stable Ground Group (SGG) | Experimental | Other: ExerciseStable Ground Group (SGG) participants performed exercises on a stable floor surface |
| Unstable Ground Group (USGG) | Experimental | Other: ExerciseUnstable Ground Group (USGG) participants completed the exercise program on a bosuball. |
| Control Group (CG) | No intervention | –Control Group (CG) did not participate in any exercise program. CG continued their daily routine activities and maintained their current physical activity levels. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 23 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Being healthy,
- Having never done core exercise before,
- Being 18 years old or older,
- Being a volunteer
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Having any injury,
- Not participating in the core training program regularly in this study,
- Being injured during the training application phase.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ExerciseSGG performed the exercise program on a fixed ground surface. SGG exercise participants participated in a core exercise program for a total of 25-30 minutes, 2 days a week for 5 weeks. | Other | Stable Ground Group (SGG) |
| ExerciseUSGG participants completed the exercise program on a bosuball. USGG exercise participants participated in a core exercise program for a total of 25-30 minutes, 2 days a week for 5 weeks. | Other | Unstable Ground Group (USGG) |
Primary outcome
Hand Grip Strength Test
Time frame: 5 weeks
For the measurement, Takei A5401/Japan brand digital hand dynamometer was used. This dynamometer is a digital hand dynamometer with an adjustable grip arm that can measure between 5.0 kg/lb -100.0 kg/lb with a precision of 0.1 kg. Before starting the measurements, the dynamometer was adjusted according to the participants\' hand sizes and during the measurements, the participants were asked to stand in a standing position, with their feet shoulder-width apart, their elbows in full extension and their arms not touching the body and facing forward at a 45-degree angle in abduction. During the test, participants were asked not to hold their breath and not to shake the dynamometer by holding it tightly, and then they were asked to squeeze the grip handle with all their strength for 3 seconds (sec), saying one, two, three. Measurements for both hands were repeated 3 times with at least 15 seconds between each trial, and the best performance was recorded in kilograms (kg).
Trunk Lateral Flexion
Time frame: 5 weeks
Participants were in a standing position with their feet slightly apart and parallel to each other, and their arms close to and next to the body. For both hands, after the point where the distal tip of the 3rd finger (middle) comes to the thigh is marked, the individual performs lateral flexion and the point where the distal tip of the 3rd finger (middle) comes to is marked again. The distance between two specified points was measured and recorded in cm. The measurements were taken three times for both hands, and the highest value was recorded as the result.
Trunk Extansion
Time frame: 5 weeks
Participants stood facing the wall, with their pelvis and entire body touching the wall. For the measurement, the participant performed trunk extension by moving his/her head back from the wall without breaking contact with the wall. Thus, the distance between the sternal prominence and the wall was measured with a tape measure and recorded. Then, the participant was supported by supporting the pelvic area and asked to push his/her trunk backwards from the waist area as far as possible. At the last point, the distance between the sternal notch and the wall was measured again. The difference between the first and last values obtained was written on the form in cm. The measurements were made three times and the highest value was recorded as the result.
Sit and Reach
Time frame: 5 weeks
Flexibility was measured using a sit-and-reach test, using a sit-and-reach box (Baselıne/ Fabrication Enterprises, Inc., PO Box 1500, White Plains, NewYork). The subjects sat with their feet approximately hip-wide against the testing box (height 30.5 cm.). For the test performance, the subjects was placed seated on the floor with the legs stretched, barefooted and with the soles of the foot attached to the Seat and Reach case. They kept their knees extended and placed the right hand over the left, and slowly reached forward as far as they could by sliding their hands along the measuring board. Participants held this position for approximately 2 sec. and were told that lowering their heads to the lowest point, looking down at the floor, would increase the distance reached. A tape measure on top of the measuring board indicated in centimeters how far beyond the toes each individual reached. The score [in centimeters (cm)]is the greatest distance contacted by the fingertips past the toes
Standing Long Jump Forward Test
Time frame: 5 weeks
In the standing long jump test, which is considered a general indicator of muscle condition, participants waited with their feet just behind the starting line before the test began. Then, for the measurement, the participants were instructed to jump as far as possible from the starting line by swinging their arms. They performed 3 trials with 2-minute rest intervals. The distance from the starting line to the farthest point she/he could jump to the landing point at heel contact was measured with a tape measure and the highest distance was recorded in cm.
Bent Arm Hanging
Time frame: 5 weeks
The test participants stood in front of a barre apparatus, a platform that could be adjusted according to their height. Participants demonstrated appropriate and comfortable bar grip (prone-supine) style after being informed about the test protocol. During the measurement, the participants were asked to stand on the bar machine for as long as possible with their arms at maximum elbow flexion and their chins hanging above the bar level, and the test was ended when the participants\' chins dropped below the bar. The time spent in this position was determined using a stopwatch and recorded as a score in seconds. The test was administered once.
Biering Sorenson Test
Time frame: 5 weeks
In the Biering Sorensen test, also known as the trunk extension test, participants were informed about the test protocol. For the measurement, participants were asked to lie face down on the stretcher. Participants were instructed to hang their upper body (hands, arms, head, trunk) down from the stretcher to the level of their anterior superior iliac heads, and lie face down on the stretcher with their lower limbs immobilized (with straps or people). Participants were allowed to place their hands on the chair in front of them before starting the test to avoid getting tired in this position. For the measurement, participants were instructed to remove their hands from the chair, cross their arms in front of their chest, and then lift their upper body until their torso was horizontal to the floor and in line with the stretcher. The time was started when the subject reached the starting position. Participants were instructed to maintain a horizontal body position for as long as possible.
Hexagonal Agility Test
Time frame: 5 weeks
A hexagonal shape consisting of six side edges, each side 66 cm long, was drawn on a non-slip surface. Participants were informed about the test protocol. The participant was then asked to move to the center point within the hexagon and take a position facing side A. It was also asked to face point A throughout the test period. The stopwatch starts with the start command and the participant is asked to jump off the line with both feet, starting from line A, over each side line (B, C, D, E, F) and return to the center. The horizontal jumps in and out starting from side A and ending at side A were accepted as 1 round and 3 rounds were performed in this way. If the participant jumps or steps on the wrong line, the test is repeated. At the end of 3 correctly performed laps, the stopwatch was stopped and the elapsed time was recorded. Participants were given two trials after the adaptation phase. The best score was recorded in sec.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Oct 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Core Exercises Training
Not yet recruiting
Dual-Task Core Stabilization Training in Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Radiofrequency and Pelvic Floor-Core Exercise for Chronic Low Back Pain in Women With Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
Chronic Low Back Pain, Urinary Incontinence
Not yet recruiting
"CORE Training for Musculoskeletal Health: A Study on Adaptive Exercise Protocols"
Core Muscle Weakness, Postural Control Deficit
Not yet recruiting
Gamified Home-Based Core Neuromuscular Training for Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Core Muscles
Recruiting
Effects Of Core Canister Training in Pregnant Women With History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Antenatal Care Model, Gestatiaonl Diabetes Mellitus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nurkan Yilmaz, Assoc. Prof. principal investigator
Inonu University Faculty of Sports Sciences
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Exercise in people with Core Exercises Training, run by Inonu University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Hand Grip Strength Test (time frame: 5 weeks). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Oct 2024.