Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisNCT06609213
Oral Intake of Enteral Nutrition Formula Preceding Placement and Feeding Via GTube and Its Impact on Formula Intolerance in pALS
A study testing Medical Food in people with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Gastrointestinal Intolerance, run by Andrea Charvet at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The main objective of the proposed study is to evaluate if oral intake of EN formula preceding Gtube placement will impact tolerance upon placement and feeding via Gtube in pALS. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Gastrointestinal Intolerance, Enteral Nutrition Therapy
- What is being tested?
- Medical Food
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 22 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 10 Jan 2025to Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of possible, probable, or definite ALS or motor neuron disease by the treating neurologist (El-Escorial Revisited).
- Planned tube feeding placement within the following 4 to 6 weeks.
Who cannot join
- History of Crohns disease, inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, celiac disease, food allergies and/or sensitivities to any of the formula ingredients, neurodegenerative disease diagnosis outside of ALS, or other concomitant disorder that might contribute to GI symptoms.
- Diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia.
- Nil per oral status.
- Any reason causing the immediate need for a feeding tube placement, including but not limited to severe malnutrition diagnosis.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Nova Southeastern University, Cathy J, Husman ALS Center
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33314
Andrea Charvet, Ph.D., RDN, LDN, 954-262-6901, acharve1@nova.edu
About this study
Official title: Oral Intake of Enteral Nutrition Formula Preceding Placement and Feeding Via G-Tube and Its Impact on Formula Intolerance in pALS
The main objective of the proposed study is to evaluate if oral intake of EN formula preceding Gtube placement will impact tolerance upon placement and feeding via Gtube in pALS. This single arm intervention study all participants will receive the intervention and researchers will utilize validated indicators combined with clinical expertise to assess gastrointestinal symptoms of feeding intolerance before and after the intervention.
The main questions this study aims to answer are:
Read more
- Wil participants meeting a greater percentage of their estimated nutritional needs at baseline present a slower disease progression rate and a lower incidence of GI symptoms of feeding intolerance when feeding via Gtube?
- Will there be significant change in feeding intolerance when oral intake of enteral nutrition formula precedes feeding via Gtube?
This proposed study consists of three stages, as follows:
- Pre-Intervention: The lead in period of one-week preceding intervention phase I will be timed to initiate 3 weeks before the scheduled Gtube placement procedure. Patients will be advised to maintain their usual food and beverage intake. Dietary intake and GI symptoms data will be collected by research personnel.
- Phase I: Dietary intake data collected from the pre-intervention stage will be averaged and used to determine the number of cartons of enteral nutrition formula needed to meet the participants estimated nutritional needs. For two weeks +- 2 days participants will be directed to drink the number of cartons of a pre-selected enteral nutrition formula to meet their estimated nutritional needs when combined to their current oral dietary intake. A plant based EN formula (Kate Farms 1.4 Standard) commonly prescribed for pALS was selected to be provided to all patients in the study to keep this variable constant. Weekly data collection of dietary intake and GI symptoms will be ongoing.
- Phase II: At the end of phase I, patients will undergo a Gtube placement at their selected medical facility. For the following two weeks +- 2 days participants will be directed to feed via Gtube the same number of cartons of the enteral nutrition formula used orally on phase I and make no changes to their current oral intake.
Read the detailed description
Brief Background:
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive and fatal neurodegenerative disease. Over 82% of patients with ALS (pALS), develop dysphagia as disease progresses. Dysphagia leads to a decrease in oral intake associated with the fear of choking and long duration of meals, which results in weight loss and consequently malnutrition. Malnutrition is associated with a shorter survival time in pALS. Feeding via a gastrostomy tube (Gtube) bypasses oral intake and helps individuals maintain adequate nutrition. Research shows that Gtube usage significantly increases survival time in pALS. Despite a low risk for major complications with a Gtube placement, enteral nutrition (EN) intolerance is reported in 27-38% of hospitalized and critically ill patients. Intolerance, frequently defined by the presence of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, contributes to poor adherence with nutritional recommendations, further weight loss and greater risk of malnutrition. Currently, there is no data of the prevalence of EN intolerance among pALS or evidence on the impact of oral intake of EN formula on intolerance. Data from the Cathy J. Husman ALS Center at NSU Health show that 28.6% of the patients who had a Gtube tube placed changed EN formula due to intolerance.
Objectives:
The primary aim of this single-arm study is to evaluate whether oral intake of EN formula preceding Gtube placement will impact tolerance upon placement and feeding via Gtube in pALS. GI symptoms and dietary intake will be assessed before and after the intervention in a proposed sample of 22 pALS. This study involves a multidisciplinary collaboration of professionals in our clinic. It was designed with the teams expertise and includes pertinent indicators to assess EN intolerance in a population with great needs and insufficient research. Potential therapeutic strategies learned from this study can be incorporated into clinical practice guidelines much needed in the management of Gtube usage to minimize malnutrition, increase survival time, and improve quality of life in pALS.
Specific Aims:
Aim 1: Analyze dietary intake before and after placement and feeding via Gtube and determine its relationship with disease progression and GI symptoms of feeding intolerance.
Aim 2: Evaluate GI symptoms of feeding intolerance at baseline, during oral intake of EN formula, and after placement and feeding via Gtube.
Study Design:
In this single arm intervention study participants will be recruited during their routine multidisciplinary visit at the NSU Health ALS Center. The intervention will take place as part of the daily feeding routine of the patients, at their desired location. This proposed study consists of three stages: pre-intervention, phase I, and phase II. Assessments will be completed by the patients and/or their caregivers at home and collected weekly by research personnel via phone calls and email. The primary outcome measure will be gastrointestinal symptoms of EN intolerance. Secondary outcome measures include dietary intake, body mass index (BMI), and ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R). Treatment fidelity will be assessed at the end of the study.
Experimental Procedures and Outcome Measures
This proposed study consists of three stages, as follows:
- Pre-Intervention: The lead in period of one-week preceding intervention phase I will be timed to initiate 3 weeks before the scheduled Gtube placement procedure. Patients will be advised to maintain their usual food and beverage intake. Dietary intake and GI symptoms data will be collected as described below.
- Phase I: Dietary intake data collected from the pre-intervention stage will be averaged and used to determine the number of cartons of enteral nutrition formula needed to meet the participants estimated nutritional needs. For two weeks +- 2 days participants will be directed to drink the number of cartons of a pre-selected enteral nutrition formula to meet their estimated nutritional needs when combined to their current oral dietary intake. Nutritional needs will be estimated using the predictive equation researched and developed by Kasarskis and colleagues to estimate energy requirements of ALS patients. A plant based EN formula (Kate Farms 1.4 Standard) commonly prescribed for pALS was selected to be provided to all patients in the study to keep this variable constant. Weekly data collection of dietary intake and GI symptoms will be ongoing as described below.
- Phase II: At the end of phase I, patients will undergo a Gtube placement at their selected medical facility. For the following two weeks +- 2 days participants will be directed to feed via Gtube the same number of cartons of the enteral nutrition formula used orally on phase I and make no changes to their current oral intake. Weekly data collection of dietary intake and GI symptoms will be ongoing as described below.
Demographics:
At baseline, the following demographic and clinical information will be obtained: age, biological sex, race, ethnicity, ALS disease onset type and duration (months), height, weight, body mass index (BMI), malnutrition risk (change in BMI from first appointment to current), overall disease severity as indexed by the validated the ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS) score, and disease progression rate (change in ALSFRS from first appointment to current).
Dietary Intake:
To determine dietary intake of each participant, a food diary will be completed by the participant, with or without the aid of a caregiver, for the duration of the study. Patients and caregivers will be provided instructions on how to complete the food diary and will be directed to record intake at the time of consumption. For each week, the food diary must be completed for a minimum of 3 days and a maximum of 7 days. The weekly intake of selected nutrients will be averaged. A diet analysis software will be utilized to analyze the dietary intake information obtained. Nutritionist Pro, by Axxya Systems, is a software application for nutrition technology and data that uses the Nutrition Raw Database of Foods and Beverages to calculate nutrition values, a system compliant with USA requirements.
Gastrointestinal Symptoms:
Gastrointestinal symptoms of feeding intolerance will be monitored weekly using a clinician-administered survey. The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) is a 15-item scale that combines each item into five symptom clusters including reflux, abdominal pain, indigestion, diarrhea, and constipation. Patients rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (from no discomfort at all to very severe discomfort). The recall period is seven days, and it is estimated to take about 3 to 5 minutes to complete. The clinical team will also be monitoring study participants for any significant gastrointestinal event that requires medical attention at any point in time during the study. These will be recorded when the patient contacts the clinic for medical attention, or patient-reported if medical attention is sought elsewhere.
Data Analysis Descriptive statistics will be used to explore dietary intake and the prevalence of GI symptoms of feeding intolerance in pALS. Dietary intake and prevalence of GI symptoms of feeding intolerance before and after placement and feeding via Gtube will be compared within subjects using paired t-test. To assess the relationships between the percentage of estimated nutritional needs met at baseline and disease progression indicators, as well as the incidence of GI symptoms of feeding intolerance after placement and feeding via Gtube, Pearson\'s correlation will be used (Aim 1). To determine the change in GI symptoms of feeding intolerance at baseline, during oral intake of enteral nutrition formula, and after placement and feeding via Gtube, a one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) will be conducted (Aim2). Statistical analysis will be conducted using SPSS (SPSS Statistics V29, IBM) with statistical significance at p-value less than 0.05.
- Being tested
- Medical Food
- Keywords
- amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, ALS, Gtube, enteral nutrition, feeding intolerance, EN intolerance, enteral nutrition intolerance, gastrointestinal symptoms, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, PEG
- Medical subject headings
- Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Medical FoodOther
Enteral nutrition formula will be used both by mouth and via feeding tube. This product is considered a medical food.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | This is a single arm study in which all participants receive the intervention. Receives: Other: Medical Food |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Gastrointestinal Symptoms
Gastrointestinal symptoms of feeding intolerance will be monitored weekly using a clinician-administered survey in-person or via phone interview. The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) is a 15-item scale that combines each item into five symptom clusters including reflux, abdominal pain, indigestion, diarrhea, and constipation (Svedlund et al., 1988). Patients rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (from no discomfort at all to very severe discomfort).
Measured: 5 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
Dietary Intake
To determine dietary intake of each participant, a food diary will be completed by the participant, with or without the aid of a caregiver, for the duration of the study. Patients and caregivers will be provided instructions on how to complete the food diary and will be directed to record intake at the time of consumption. For each week, the food diary must be completed for a minimum of 3 days and a maximum of 7 days. The weekly intake of selected nutrients will be averaged. A diet analysis software will be utilized to analyze the dietary intake information obtained. Nutritionist Pro, by Axxya Systems, is a software application for nutrition technology and data that uses the Nutrition Raw Database of Foods and Beverages to calculate nutrition values, a system compliant with USA requirements.
Measured: 5 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Sep 2024
- Study start10 Jan 2025
- Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- This single arm intervention study will utilize validated indicators combined with clinical expertise to assess GI symptoms of feeding intolerance before and after the intervention in a way that each patient serves as their own control.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Andrea Charvet
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Nova Southeastern University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Andrea Charvet, Nova Southeastern University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06609213
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2024-464-NSU
- Other IDs
- 334957
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 20 Sep 2024
- Last updated
- 4 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: The study protocol does not include a plan to share IPD.
Publications
Li J, Wang L, Zhang H, Zou T, Kang Y, He W, Xu Y, Yin W. Different definitions of feeding intolerance and their associations with outcomes of critically ill adults receiving enteral nutrition: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Intensive Care. 2023 Jul 5;11(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40560-023-00674-3.
PubMed 37408020Marin B, Desport JC, Kajeu P, Jesus P, Nicolaud B, Nicol M, Preux PM, Couratier P. Alteration of nutritional status at diagnosis is a prognostic factor for survival of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011 Jun;82(6):628-34. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2010.211474. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
PubMed 21097551Svedlund J, Sjodin I, Dotevall G. GSRS--a clinical rating scale for gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and peptic ulcer disease. Dig Dis Sci. 1988 Feb;33(2):129-34. doi: 10.1007/BF01535722.
PubMed 3123181Jenkins B, Calder PC, Marino LV. A systematic review of the definitions and prevalence of feeding intolerance in critically ill adults. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2022 Jun;49:92-102. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.04.014. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
PubMed 35623881Gungabissoon U, Hacquoil K, Bains C, Irizarry M, Dukes G, Williamson R, Deane AM, Heyland DK. Prevalence, risk factors, clinical consequences, and treatment of enteral feed intolerance during critical illness. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2015 May;39(4):441-8. doi: 10.1177/0148607114526450. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
PubMed 24637246Bond L, Ganguly P, Khamankar N, Mallet N, Bowen G, Green B, Mitchell CS. A Comprehensive Examination of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy and Its Association with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Patient Outcomes. Brain Sci. 2019 Sep 4;9(9):223. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9090223.
PubMed 31487846Blaser AR, Starkopf J, Kirsimagi U, Deane AM. Definition, prevalence, and outcome of feeding intolerance in intensive care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Sep;58(8):914-22. doi: 10.1111/aas.12302. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
PubMed 24611520
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Oral Intake of Enteral Nutrition Formula Preceding Placement and Feeding Via G-Tube and Its Impact on Formula Intolerance in pALS
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06609213
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2024-464-NSU
- Keywords
- amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, ALS, Gtube, enteral nutrition, feeding intolerance, EN intolerance, enteral nutrition intolerance, gastrointestinal symptoms
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Andrea CharvetUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Nova Southeastern University
- Study start
- 10 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main objective of the proposed study is to evaluate if oral intake of EN formula preceding Gtube placement will impact tolerance upon placement and feeding via Gtube in pALS. This single arm intervention study all participants will receive the intervention and researchers will utilize validated indicators combined with clinical expertise to assess gastrointestinal symptoms of feeding intolerance before and after the intervention.
The main questions this study aims to answer are:
- Wil participants meeting a greater percentage of their estimated nutritional needs at baseline present a slower disease progression rate and a lower incidence of GI symptoms of feeding intolerance when feeding via Gtube?
- Will there be significant change in feeding intolerance when oral intake of enteral nutrition formula precedes feeding via Gtube?
This proposed study consists of three stages, as follows:
- Pre-Intervention: The lead in period of one-week preceding intervention phase I will be timed to initiate 3 weeks before the scheduled Gtube placement procedure. Patients will be advised to maintain their usual food and beverage intake. Dietary intake and GI symptoms data will be collected by research personnel.
- Phase I: Dietary intake data collected from the pre-intervention stage will be averaged and used to determine the number of cartons of enteral nutrition formula needed to meet the participants estimated nutritional needs. For two weeks +- 2 days participants will be directed to drink the number of cartons of a pre-selected enteral nutrition formula to meet their estimated nutritional needs when combined to their current oral dietary intake. A plant based EN formula (Kate Farms 1.4 Standard) commonly prescribed for pALS was selected to be provided to all patients in the study to keep this variable constant. Weekly data collection of dietary intake and GI symptoms will be ongoing.
- Phase II: At the end of phase I, patients will undergo a Gtube placement at their selected medical facility. For the following two weeks +- 2 days participants will be directed to feed via Gtube the same number of cartons of the enteral nutrition formula used orally on phase I and make no changes to their current oral intake.
Detailed description
Brief Background:
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive and fatal neurodegenerative disease. Over 82% of patients with ALS (pALS), develop dysphagia as disease progresses. Dysphagia leads to a decrease in oral intake associated with the fear of choking and long duration of meals, which results in weight loss and consequently malnutrition. Malnutrition is associated with a shorter survival time in pALS. Feeding via a gastrostomy tube (Gtube) bypasses oral intake and helps individuals maintain adequate nutrition. Research shows that Gtube usage significantly increases survival time in pALS. Despite a low risk for major complications with a Gtube placement, enteral nutrition (EN) intolerance is reported in 27-38% of hospitalized and critically ill patients. Intolerance, frequently defined by the presence of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, contributes to poor adherence with nutritional recommendations, further weight loss and greater risk of malnutrition. Currently, there is no data of the prevalence of EN intolerance among pALS or evidence on the impact of oral intake of EN formula on intolerance. Data from the Cathy J. Husman ALS Center at NSU Health show that 28.6% of the patients who had a Gtube tube placed changed EN formula due to intolerance.
Objectives:
The primary aim of this single-arm study is to evaluate whether oral intake of EN formula preceding Gtube placement will impact tolerance upon placement and feeding via Gtube in pALS. GI symptoms and dietary intake will be assessed before and after the intervention in a proposed sample of 22 pALS. This study involves a multidisciplinary collaboration of professionals in our clinic. It was designed with the teams expertise and includes pertinent indicators to assess EN intolerance in a population with great needs and insufficient research. Potential therapeutic strategies learned from this study can be incorporated into clinical practice guidelines much needed in the management of Gtube usage to minimize malnutrition, increase survival time, and improve quality of life in pALS.
Specific Aims:
Aim 1: Analyze dietary intake before and after placement and feeding via Gtube and determine its relationship with disease progression and GI symptoms of feeding intolerance.
Aim 2: Evaluate GI symptoms of feeding intolerance at baseline, during oral intake of EN formula, and after placement and feeding via Gtube.
Study Design:
In this single arm intervention study participants will be recruited during their routine multidisciplinary visit at the NSU Health ALS Center. The intervention will take place as part of the daily feeding routine of the patients, at their desired location. This proposed study consists of three stages: pre-intervention, phase I, and phase II. Assessments will be completed by the patients and/or their caregivers at home and collected weekly by research personnel via phone calls and email. The primary outcome measure will be gastrointestinal symptoms of EN intolerance. Secondary outcome measures include dietary intake, body mass index (BMI), and ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R). Treatment fidelity will be assessed at the end of the study.
Experimental Procedures and Outcome Measures
This proposed study consists of three stages, as follows:
- Pre-Intervention: The lead in period of one-week preceding intervention phase I will be timed to initiate 3 weeks before the scheduled Gtube placement procedure. Patients will be advised to maintain their usual food and beverage intake. Dietary intake and GI symptoms data will be collected as described below.
- Phase I: Dietary intake data collected from the pre-intervention stage will be averaged and used to determine the number of cartons of enteral nutrition formula needed to meet the participants estimated nutritional needs. For two weeks +- 2 days participants will be directed to drink the number of cartons of a pre-selected enteral nutrition formula to meet their estimated nutritional needs when combined to their current oral dietary intake. Nutritional needs will be estimated using the predictive equation researched and developed by Kasarskis and colleagues to estimate energy requirements of ALS patients. A plant based EN formula (Kate Farms 1.4 Standard) commonly prescribed for pALS was selected to be provided to all patients in the study to keep this variable constant. Weekly data collection of dietary intake and GI symptoms will be ongoing as described below.
- Phase II: At the end of phase I, patients will undergo a Gtube placement at their selected medical facility. For the following two weeks +- 2 days participants will be directed to feed via Gtube the same number of cartons of the enteral nutrition formula used orally on phase I and make no changes to their current oral intake. Weekly data collection of dietary intake and GI symptoms will be ongoing as described below.
Demographics:
At baseline, the following demographic and clinical information will be obtained: age, biological sex, race, ethnicity, ALS disease onset type and duration (months), height, weight, body mass index (BMI), malnutrition risk (change in BMI from first appointment to current), overall disease severity as indexed by the validated the ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS) score, and disease progression rate (change in ALSFRS from first appointment to current).
Dietary Intake:
To determine dietary intake of each participant, a food diary will be completed by the participant, with or without the aid of a caregiver, for the duration of the study. Patients and caregivers will be provided instructions on how to complete the food diary and will be directed to record intake at the time of consumption. For each week, the food diary must be completed for a minimum of 3 days and a maximum of 7 days. The weekly intake of selected nutrients will be averaged. A diet analysis software will be utilized to analyze the dietary intake information obtained. Nutritionist Pro, by Axxya Systems, is a software application for nutrition technology and data that uses the Nutrition Raw Database of Foods and Beverages to calculate nutrition values, a system compliant with USA requirements.
Gastrointestinal Symptoms:
Gastrointestinal symptoms of feeding intolerance will be monitored weekly using a clinician-administered survey. The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) is a 15-item scale that combines each item into five symptom clusters including reflux, abdominal pain, indigestion, diarrhea, and constipation. Patients rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (from no discomfort at all to very severe discomfort). The recall period is seven days, and it is estimated to take about 3 to 5 minutes to complete. The clinical team will also be monitoring study participants for any significant gastrointestinal event that requires medical attention at any point in time during the study. These will be recorded when the patient contacts the clinic for medical attention, or patient-reported if medical attention is sought elsewhere.
Data Analysis Descriptive statistics will be used to explore dietary intake and the prevalence of GI symptoms of feeding intolerance in pALS. Dietary intake and prevalence of GI symptoms of feeding intolerance before and after placement and feeding via Gtube will be compared within subjects using paired t-test. To assess the relationships between the percentage of estimated nutritional needs met at baseline and disease progression indicators, as well as the incidence of GI symptoms of feeding intolerance after placement and feeding via Gtube, Pearson\'s correlation will be used (Aim 1). To determine the change in GI symptoms of feeding intolerance at baseline, during oral intake of enteral nutrition formula, and after placement and feeding via Gtube, a one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) will be conducted (Aim2). Statistical analysis will be conducted using SPSS (SPSS Statistics V29, IBM) with statistical significance at p-value less than 0.05.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- This single arm intervention study will utilize validated indicators combined with clinical expertise to assess GI symptoms of feeding intolerance before and after the intervention in a way that each patient serves as their own control.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Other: Medical FoodThis is a single arm study in which all participants receive the intervention. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Diagnosis of possible, probable, or definite ALS or motor neuron disease by the treating neurologist (El-Escorial Revisited).
- Planned tube feeding placement within the following 4 to 6 weeks.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- History of Crohns disease, inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, celiac disease, food allergies and/or sensitivities to any of the formula ingredients, neurodegenerative disease diagnosis outside of ALS, or other concomitant disorder that might contribute to GI symptoms.
- Diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia.
- Nil per oral status.
- Any reason causing the immediate need for a feeding tube placement, including but not limited to severe malnutrition diagnosis.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Medical FoodEnteral nutrition formula will be used both by mouth and via feeding tube. This product is considered a medical food. | Other | Intervention |
Primary outcome
Gastrointestinal Symptoms
Time frame: 5 weeks
Gastrointestinal symptoms of feeding intolerance will be monitored weekly using a clinician-administered survey in-person or via phone interview. The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) is a 15-item scale that combines each item into five symptom clusters including reflux, abdominal pain, indigestion, diarrhea, and constipation (Svedlund et al., 1988). Patients rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (from no discomfort at all to very severe discomfort).
1 secondary outcome
Dietary Intake
Time frame: 5 weeks
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Aug 2026.
- Background: PubMed 37408020Li J, Wang L, Zhang H, Zou T, Kang Y, He W, Xu Y, Yin W. Different definitions of feeding intolerance and their associations with outcomes of critically ill adults receiving enteral nutrition: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Intensive Care. 2023 Jul 5;11(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40560-023-00674-3.
- Background: PubMed 21097551Marin B, Desport JC, Kajeu P, Jesus P, Nicolaud B, Nicol M, Preux PM, Couratier P. Alteration of nutritional status at diagnosis is a prognostic factor for survival of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011 Jun;82(6):628-34. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2010.211474. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
- Background: PubMed 3123181Svedlund J, Sjodin I, Dotevall G. GSRS--a clinical rating scale for gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and peptic ulcer disease. Dig Dis Sci. 1988 Feb;33(2):129-34. doi: 10.1007/BF01535722.
- Background: PubMed 35623881Jenkins B, Calder PC, Marino LV. A systematic review of the definitions and prevalence of feeding intolerance in critically ill adults. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2022 Jun;49:92-102. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.04.014. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
- Background: PubMed 24637246Gungabissoon U, Hacquoil K, Bains C, Irizarry M, Dukes G, Williamson R, Deane AM, Heyland DK. Prevalence, risk factors, clinical consequences, and treatment of enteral feed intolerance during critical illness. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2015 May;39(4):441-8. doi: 10.1177/0148607114526450. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
- Background: PubMed 31487846Bond L, Ganguly P, Khamankar N, Mallet N, Bowen G, Green B, Mitchell CS. A Comprehensive Examination of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy and Its Association with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Patient Outcomes. Brain Sci. 2019 Sep 4;9(9):223. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9090223.
- Background: PubMed 24611520Blaser AR, Starkopf J, Kirsimagi U, Deane AM. Definition, prevalence, and outcome of feeding intolerance in intensive care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Sep;58(8):914-22. doi: 10.1111/aas.12302. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. The study protocol does not include a plan to share IPD.
Related trials for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study is to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of VTx-002 in Participants With ALS
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Not yet recruiting
A Study on the Addition of Alsum30 for the Treatment of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), Bacillus Coagulans
Active, not recruiting
Functional Outcomes and Control Using Synchron BCI - Australia
Neurologic Disorder, Neurologic Diseases
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacodynamic Exploration of Orelabrutinib in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)
Recruiting
Clinical Outcome Assessment for AT & BCI
Spinal Cord Injury, ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Medical Food in people with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Gastrointestinal Intolerance, run by Andrea Charvet at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Andrea Charvet, PhD, RDN, LDN (954-262-6901, acharve1@nova.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Gastrointestinal Symptoms (time frame: 5 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06609213, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Aug 2026.