AzTrials
AzTrials

StrokeNCT06604143

Stroke Motor Recovery for the Hand and Fingers

A study testing Quality Training and Goal Training in people with Stroke, run by University of Toronto at 5 sites in Canada.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two rehabilitation methods to improve finger movements in people who have had a stroke. The main question it aims to answer is which of these two training methods leads to the most improvement: 1. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Stroke
What is being tested?
Quality Training and Goal Training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
5 sitesCanada
Study dates
7 May 2026to 31 Dec 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Over 18 years of age
  • Diagnosis of first time unilateral ischemic or hemorrhagic
  • Stroke occurrence: > 6 months and < 2 years
  • Able to perform active finger movements (Chedoke-McMaster (CM) Impairment Inventory of the Hand, Stage ≥ 3)

Who cannot join

  • History of developmental, neurological, or major psychiatric disorders
  • Cognitive deficits (< 23/30 Montreal Cognitive Assessment)
  • Apraxia (<2SD mean Waterloo Apraxia test)
  • Neglect (> 40/100, Sunnybrook Neglect Assessment Procedure)
  • Cerebellar stroke
  • Musculoskeletal injury affecting motor performance
  • Inability to sit in a chair and perform exercises for sustained periods
  • Contraindications to MRI

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

5 sites in 1 country

Canada5 sites, 5 recruiting
  • Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital

    Laval, Quebec, H7V 1R2

    Marie-Helene Boudrias, PhD, 514-398-5457, mh.boudrias@mcgill.ca

    Mindy Levin, PhD, 514-398-3994, mindy.levin@mcgill.ca

    Recruiting
  • University Institute for Physical Impairment Rehabilitation of Montreal (IURDPM)

    Montreal, Quebec, H3S 2J4

    Marie-Helene Boudrias, PhD, 514-398-5457, mh.boudrias@mcgill.ca

    Marie-Helene Boudrias, PhD

    Recruiting
  • Lethbridge-Layton-Mackay Rehabilitation Center

    Montreal, Quebec, H4B 1T3

    Marie-Helene Boudrias, PhD, 514-398-5457, mh.boudrias@mcgill.ca

    Marie-Helene Boudrias, PhD

    Recruiting
  • Jewish General Hopsital

    Montreal, Quebec, H7V 1R2

    Alexander Thiel, MD, 514 340 8222 ext. 22094, alexander.thiel@mcgill.ca

    Recruiting
  • University of Toronto

    Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2W6

    Joyce L Chen, PhD, 416-946-5394, JOYCELYNN.CHEN@UTORONTO.CA

    Joyce Chen, PhD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Discovering the Potential for Motor Recovery in People Living With Stroke

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two rehabilitation methods to improve finger movements in people who have had a stroke. The main question it aims to answer is which of these two training methods leads to the most improvement:

  1. Teaching people to reach their movement goals using any strategies they like.
  2. Teaching people to improve their movement technique and avoid compensatory strategies.
Read more

There is no one-size-fits-all approach. The second goal is to find out who might benefit more from each method. Some people with stroke may rely on compensatory strategies due to severe impairment, while others with milder strokes might benefit more from techniques that enhance movement quality.

The third goal is to take pictures of the brain to see how it changes with each method. This will help researchers understand how the brain adapts after a stroke and could lead to treatments that target the brain directly.

Participants will:

  1. Visit the lab for clinical and research assessments on weeks 1, 4, 5, and 15.
  2. Complete 10 days of piano training.
  3. Undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans twice, once in week 1 and once in week 4.
Read the detailed description

Forty participants with sub-acute (6 months - 2 years) stroke will be recruited in this multi-site trial taking place in Toronto and Montreal. Participants will need to be able to perform active finger movements. Each site will recruit and randomize participants into one of two training groups. Training will consist of:

  1. One group will focus on improving the quality of their movements while playing music on a digital piano.
  2. The other group will focus on achieving their movement goals while playing playing music on a digital piano.

Participation in this study will involve 14 visits, each taking place on a separate day.

Piano training consists of 20 hours total, spread over 2 hours per day for 5 days across 2 weeks. Each participant will receive one-on-one and/or group instruction from a Music Therapist with expertise in Neurologic Music Therapy and piano instruction. Exercises will include pressing single keys and multiple keys with different fingers, holding down certain keys while pressing others, and playing melodies and chords with all five fingers, involving various coordination patterns, rhythms, and speeds.

Assessments will be conducted at four timepoints: Baseline, Post-training-1 (day 3), Post-training-2 (day 7), and Follow-up (3 months). Participants will undergo validated clinical assessments to evaluate their ability to move and feel their arm, hand, and fingers, as well as for assessor to understand how the stroke has affected them overall. Some of these tests are routinely used by physical therapists and other rehabilitation professionals who work with people living with stroke. For other types of tests, sensors will be placed on their arm, hand, and fingers. These sensors do not emit anything; they will simply record their movements.

Kinetic and kinematic measures will assess finger forces, grip strength, and pinch strength. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans at Baseline and Post-training-1 will be taken to quantify structure and function of the brain.

Conditions
Stroke
Being tested
Quality Training, Goal Training
Keywords
Motor system, Stroke rehabilitation, Magnetic resonance imaging, Kinematics, Music
Medical subject headings
Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Quality TrainingBehavioural

    Participants will engage in piano playing tasks using their affected hand and fingers. The training focuses on specific aspects of finger movement, and participants will receive feedback related to their playing. They will wear a wrist brace for support, and their hand and arm positions will be monitored to ensure proper technique.

  • Goal TrainingBehavioural

    Participants will engage in piano playing tasks using their affected hand and fingers. The training emphasizes learning to play and producing music. Feedback will be provided on various aspects of performance such as speed and accuracy, but specific details about finger movement or technique will not be given. The use of a wrist brace and monitoring of hand and arm positions will be consistent with standard practice.

Study groups in NCT06604143
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Quality Training GroupActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Quality Training
Goal Training GroupActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Goal Training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Finger Individuation: Force

    The Finger Individuation - Force is a measure of how well a finger is able to exert force without the other fingers exerting force. This measure has been used to study finger movements in healthy individuals, pianists, and stroke survivors. This task will use a custom device to measure finger movements in all digits of both hands. The forearm will be placed on a table with the wrist in a neutral position and secured to prevent other movements. The device will support the palm and measure the force each finger produces using sensors under each fingertip. The investigators will determine participants' maximum finger force. Then, participants will practice producing forces at 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80% of this maximum for each finger while keeping the others still. They will see a visual target for the required force and get feedback on their performance.

    Measured: Pre-training (baseline), Post-training-1 (day 3), Post-training-2 (day 7), and Follow-up (3 months)

  2. Finger Individuation: Joint Angular Excursion

    The Finger Individuation - Joint Angular Excursion is a measure of how well a finger is able to bend or straighten while the other fingers remain stationary. The angle being measured in this task is the degree of flexion and extension at the finger joints. Specifically, it tracks the movement at the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint (i.e., the joint where the finger meets the hand), and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint (i.e., joint between the first and second finger bones). Infrared markers will be placed on the metacarpal MCP and PIP joints to track finger movement using two 3-camera Optotrak Certus motion capture systems.

    Measured: Pre-training (baseline), Post-training-1 (day 3), Post-training-2 (day 7), and Follow-up (3 months).

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Fugl Meyer Upper Limb assessment (FM-UL)

    The FM-UL assessment assesses the sensorimotor impairment in individuals who have had stroke. It assesses movements, coordination, and reflexes.

    Measured: Pre-training (baseline), Post-training-1 (day 3), Post-training-2 (day 7), and Follow-up (3 months).

  2. Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)

    The ARAT is a 19-item assessment designed to evaluate upper extremity motor activity. It measures how well individuals can perform specific arm and hand tasks, focusing on four main areas: grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement.

    Measured: Pre-training (baseline), Post-training-1 (day 3), Post-training-2 (day 7), and Follow-up (3 months).

  3. Nine-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT)

    The 9-HPT is a standardized, quantitative assessment designed to evaluate finger dexterity. In this test, participants are required to pick up pegs from a container one at a time and place them into holes on a pegboard as quickly as possible.

    Measured: Pre-training (baseline), Post-training-1 (day 3), Post-training-2 (day 7), and Follow-up (3 months).

  4. MRI: Neural activation and connectivity in ipsilesional and contralesional motor cortex

    The investigators will examine how various areas of the brain function and interact, with a focus on the regions that control movement. They will specifically assess both the injured side of the brain (ipsilesional) and the uninjured side (contralesional) to observe how each responds during tasks.

    Measured: Baseline and Post-training-1 (day 3)

  5. MRI: White matter integrity in corticospinal, reticulospinal and rubrospinal tracts

    The investigators will evaluate the condition of specific brain pathways involved in transmitting signals to participants' muscles, including the corticospinal, reticulospinal, and rubrospinal tracts.

    Measured: Baseline and Post-training-1 (day 3)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Sep 2024
  2. Study start7 May 2026
  3. Primary completionAug 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06604143
Sponsor's protocol ID
46065
Other IDs
G-23-0034937
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
17 Sep 2024
Last updated
8 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: IPD used in the results publication

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Quality Training and Goal Training in people with Stroke, run by University of Toronto at 5 sites in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Joyce L Chen, PhD (416-946-5394, JOYCELYNN.CHEN@UTORONTO.CA), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Finger Individuation: Force (time frame: Pre-training (baseline), Post-training-1 (day 3), Post-training-2 (day 7), and Follow-up (3 months)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in