Acute CholecystitisNCT06601855
Cholecystectomy Could be Performed in Older Adults With Acute Cholecystitis
An observational study of Acute Cholecystitis, run by Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
The goal of this retrospective cohort observational study is to learn about the long-term and short-term effects of cholecystectomy in people aged 80 or over the age of 80, who have mild to moderate acute cholecystitis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 80 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Cholecystitis
- What is being tested?
- Cholecystectomy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 160 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2018to 31 Mar 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 80 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Older adult
Study population: Patients with mild to moderate (grade I and grade II) acute cholecystitis, who were 80 years old or older, were included.
Who may be able to join
- Acute cholecystitis patients aged 80 years or older
Who cannot join
- Grade III acute cholecystitis
- Concurrent cholangitis, common bile duct stones, pancreatitis, gallbladder cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, periampullary cancer
- Received other operations at the same admission other than cholecystectomy
- Discharged against advice of physician
- Received further management at another hospital for acute cholecystitis
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Taiwan1 site
Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital,Ministry of Health and Welfare
New Taipei City, 235041
About this study
Official title: Cholecystectomy Could be Performed in Adults Older Than 80 Years Old With Mild to Moderate Acute Cholecystitis
The goal of this retrospective cohort observational study is to learn about the long-term and short-term effects of cholecystectomy in people aged 80 or over the age of 80, who have mild to moderate acute cholecystitis. The main question it aims to answer is:
Does cholecystectomy bring harm or benefit to people aged 80, or over the age of 80, who have mild to moderate acute cholecystitis? People who received cholecystectomy are compared to those who did not, for short- and long-term outcomes, with a follow up period for 18 months.
Read the detailed description
All data were collected from Shuang-Ho Hospital electronic medical record.
- Conditions
- Acute Cholecystitis
- Being tested
- Cholecystectomy
- Keywords
- acute cholecystitis, aged, cholecystectomy
- Medical subject headings
- Cholecystitis, Acute
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CholecystectomyProcedure or surgery
Cholecystectomy, whether open or laparoscopic
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cholecystectomy group | Patient in this group received cholecystectomy, whether immediately, or delayed Receives: Procedure: Cholecystectomy | |
| Non-operative management group | Patients in this group did not receive cholecystectomy during follow up period |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
In-hospital mortality
Expired during admission
Measured: From admission to discharge, average 8 days, minimal 2 days, maximal 51 days
30-day mortality
Expired within 30 days since discharge
Measured: 30 days since discharge
Hospital return rate
Rate of return to emergency room or readmission after discharge
Measured: 18 months after discharge
Secondary outcomes (5)
Hospital length of stay
Period of hospitalization
Measured: From admission to discharge, average 8 days, minimal 2 days, maximal 51 days
Intensive care unit length of stay
How long has the person been admitted to the intensive care unit
Measured: From admission to discharge, average 8 days, minimal 2 days, maximal 51 days
Intensive care unit admission frequency
How many times have the person been admitted to the intensive care unit
Measured: From admission to discharge, average 8 days, minimal 2 days, maximal 51 days
Outpatient department follow up frequency
How many times has the person visited the outpatient department since discharge due to gallstone related disease or post cholecystectomy
Measured: 18 months after discharge
Outpatient department follow up duration
Period of the last visit to the outpatient department due to gallstone related disease or post cholecystectomy, since discharge
Measured: 18 months after discharge
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Sep 2024
- Study start1 Sep 2018
- Primary completion30 Sep 2022
- Study completion31 Mar 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute CholecystitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Chieh-Ju Liao, MD, Principal investigator, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital,Ministry of Health and WelfareKuei-Yen Tsai, PhD, Principal investigator, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital,Ministry of Health and Welfare
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06601855
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- jessie21211
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 15 Sep 2024
- Last updated
- 19 Sep 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Escartin A, Gonzalez M, Cuello E, Pinillos A, Muriel P, Merichal M, Palacios V, Escoll J, Gas C, Olsina JJ. Acute Cholecystitis in Very Elderly Patients: Disease Management, Outcomes, and Risk Factors for Complications. Surg Res Pract. 2019 Feb 3;2019:9709242. doi: 10.1155/2019/9709242. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 30854417Asbun, Horacio & Shah, Mihir & Ceppa, Eugene & Auyang, Edward. (2020). The SAGES Manual of Biliary Surgery. 10.1007/978-3-030-13276-7
Yetkin G, Uludag M, Oba S, Citgez B, Paksoy I. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients. JSLS. 2009 Oct-Dec;13(4):587-91. doi: 10.4293/108680809X1258998404604.
PubMed 20202402Lee SJ, Choi IS, Moon JI, Yoon DS, Lee SE, Sung NS, Kwon SU, Bae IE, Roh SJ, Choi WJ. Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Is Better than Conservative Treatment in Elderly Patients with Acute Cholecystitis After Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage. J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Dec;25(12):3170-3177. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05067-1. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
PubMed 34173163Pisano M, Allievi N, Gurusamy K, Borzellino G, Cimbanassi S, Boerna D, Coccolini F, Tufo A, Di Martino M, Leung J, Sartelli M, Ceresoli M, Maier RV, Poiasina E, De Angelis N, Magnone S, Fugazzola P, Paolillo C, Coimbra R, Di Saverio S, De Simone B, Weber DG, Sakakushev BE, Lucianetti A, Kirkpatrick AW, Fraga GP, Wani I, Biffl WL, Chiara O, Abu-Zidan F, Moore EE, Leppaniemi A, Kluger Y, Catena F, Ansaloni L. 2020 World Society of Emergency Surgery updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute calculus cholecystitis. World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Nov 5;15(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00336-x.
PubMed 33153472Wiggins T, Markar SR, Mackenzie H, Jamel S, Askari A, Faiz O, Karamanakos S, Hanna GB. Evolution in the management of acute cholecystitis in the elderly: population-based cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2018 Oct;32(10):4078-4086. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6092-5. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
PubMed 30046948Lee CE, Lee SJ, Moon JI, Choi IS, Yoon DS, Choi WJ, Lee SE, Sung NS, Kwon SU, Bae IE, Roh SJ, Kim SG. Acute cholecystitis in old adults: the impact of advanced age on the clinical characteristics of the disease and on the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Sep 25;23(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02954-6.
PubMed 37749524Loozen CS, van Santvoort HC, van Duijvendijk P, Besselink MG, Gouma DJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Kelder JC, Donkervoort SC, van Geloven AA, Kruyt PM, Roos D, Kortram K, Kornmann VN, Pronk A, van der Peet DL, Crolla RM, van Ramshorst B, Bollen TL, Boerma D. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients (CHOCOLATE): multicentre randomised clinical trial. BMJ. 2018 Oct 8;363:k3965. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3965.
PubMed 30297544Ramirez-Giraldo C, Venegas-Sanabria LC, Rojas-Lopez S, Avendano-Morales V. Outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients older than 80 years: two-years follow-up. BMC Surg. 2024 Mar 12;24(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02383-6.
PubMed 38475792
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Sep 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cholecystectomy Could be Performed in Adults Older Than 80 Years Old With Mild to Moderate Acute Cholecystitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06601855
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- jessie21211
- Conditions
- Acute Cholecystitis
- Keywords
- acute cholecystitis, aged, cholecystectomy
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this retrospective cohort observational study is to learn about the long-term and short-term effects of cholecystectomy in people aged 80 or over the age of 80, who have mild to moderate acute cholecystitis. The main question it aims to answer is:
Does cholecystectomy bring harm or benefit to people aged 80, or over the age of 80, who have mild to moderate acute cholecystitis? People who received cholecystectomy are compared to those who did not, for short- and long-term outcomes, with a follow up period for 18 months.
Detailed description
All data were collected from Shuang-Ho Hospital electronic medical record.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cholecystectomy group | – | Procedure: CholecystectomyPatient in this group received cholecystectomy, whether immediately, or delayed |
| Non-operative management group | – | –Patients in this group did not receive cholecystectomy during follow up period |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 80 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with mild to moderate (grade I and grade II) acute cholecystitis, who were 80 years old or older, were included.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Acute cholecystitis patients aged 80 years or older
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Grade III acute cholecystitis
- Concurrent cholangitis, common bile duct stones, pancreatitis, gallbladder cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, periampullary cancer
- Received other operations at the same admission other than cholecystectomy
- Discharged against advice of physician
- Received further management at another hospital for acute cholecystitis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CholecystectomyCholecystectomy, whether open or laparoscopic | Procedure or surgery | Cholecystectomy group |
Primary outcome
In-hospital mortality
Time frame: From admission to discharge, average 8 days, minimal 2 days, maximal 51 days
Expired during admission
30-day mortality
Time frame: 30 days since discharge
Expired within 30 days since discharge
Hospital return rate
Time frame: 18 months after discharge
Rate of return to emergency room or readmission after discharge
5 secondary outcomes
Hospital length of stay
Time frame: From admission to discharge, average 8 days, minimal 2 days, maximal 51 days
Intensive care unit length of stay
Time frame: From admission to discharge, average 8 days, minimal 2 days, maximal 51 days
Intensive care unit admission frequency
Time frame: From admission to discharge, average 8 days, minimal 2 days, maximal 51 days
Outpatient department follow up frequency
Time frame: 18 months after discharge
Outpatient department follow up duration
Time frame: 18 months after discharge
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Sep 2024.
- Background: PubMed 30854417Escartin A, Gonzalez M, Cuello E, Pinillos A, Muriel P, Merichal M, Palacios V, Escoll J, Gas C, Olsina JJ. Acute Cholecystitis in Very Elderly Patients: Disease Management, Outcomes, and Risk Factors for Complications. Surg Res Pract. 2019 Feb 3;2019:9709242. doi: 10.1155/2019/9709242. eCollection 2019.
- BackgroundAsbun, Horacio & Shah, Mihir & Ceppa, Eugene & Auyang, Edward. (2020). The SAGES Manual of Biliary Surgery. 10.1007/978-3-030-13276-7
- Background: PubMed 20202402Yetkin G, Uludag M, Oba S, Citgez B, Paksoy I. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients. JSLS. 2009 Oct-Dec;13(4):587-91. doi: 10.4293/108680809X1258998404604.
- Background: PubMed 34173163Lee SJ, Choi IS, Moon JI, Yoon DS, Lee SE, Sung NS, Kwon SU, Bae IE, Roh SJ, Choi WJ. Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Is Better than Conservative Treatment in Elderly Patients with Acute Cholecystitis After Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage. J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Dec;25(12):3170-3177. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05067-1. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
- Results publication: PubMed 33153472Pisano M, Allievi N, Gurusamy K, Borzellino G, Cimbanassi S, Boerna D, Coccolini F, Tufo A, Di Martino M, Leung J, Sartelli M, Ceresoli M, Maier RV, Poiasina E, De Angelis N, Magnone S, Fugazzola P, Paolillo C, Coimbra R, Di Saverio S, De Simone B, Weber DG, Sakakushev BE, Lucianetti A, Kirkpatrick AW, Fraga GP, Wani I, Biffl WL, Chiara O, Abu-Zidan F, Moore EE, Leppaniemi A, Kluger Y, Catena F, Ansaloni L. 2020 World Society of Emergency Surgery updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute calculus cholecystitis. World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Nov 5;15(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00336-x.
- Results publication: PubMed 30046948Wiggins T, Markar SR, Mackenzie H, Jamel S, Askari A, Faiz O, Karamanakos S, Hanna GB. Evolution in the management of acute cholecystitis in the elderly: population-based cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2018 Oct;32(10):4078-4086. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6092-5. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
- Results publication: PubMed 37749524Lee CE, Lee SJ, Moon JI, Choi IS, Yoon DS, Choi WJ, Lee SE, Sung NS, Kwon SU, Bae IE, Roh SJ, Kim SG. Acute cholecystitis in old adults: the impact of advanced age on the clinical characteristics of the disease and on the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Sep 25;23(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02954-6.
- Results publication: PubMed 30297544Loozen CS, van Santvoort HC, van Duijvendijk P, Besselink MG, Gouma DJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Kelder JC, Donkervoort SC, van Geloven AA, Kruyt PM, Roos D, Kortram K, Kornmann VN, Pronk A, van der Peet DL, Crolla RM, van Ramshorst B, Bollen TL, Boerma D. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients (CHOCOLATE): multicentre randomised clinical trial. BMJ. 2018 Oct 8;363:k3965. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3965.
- Results publication: PubMed 38475792Ramirez-Giraldo C, Venegas-Sanabria LC, Rojas-Lopez S, Avendano-Morales V. Outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients older than 80 years: two-years follow-up. BMC Surg. 2024 Mar 12;24(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02383-6.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Acute Cholecystitis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
SnapChole: An International, Time-Bound Prospective Platform Study of Management Strategies and Outcomes in Acute Calculous Cholecystitis
Cholecystitis, Acute
Not yet recruiting
Percutaneous Drainage Versus EUS-guided Gallbladder Drainage in Poor Surgical Patients With Cholecystitis
Cholecystitis, Acute
RecruitingObservational study
Influence of Gut Microbiome in Gallstone Disease
Gall Stone, Gall Stones, Common Bile Duct
Recruiting
Repeat Biliary Point of Care Ultrasound for Detecting Early Acute Cholecystitis
Cholecystitis, Acute, Biliary Diseases
Not yet recruiting
Implementation of RICA (ERAS) Guidelines in Grade II Acute Cholecystitis Undergoing Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Cholecystitis, Acute, Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Chieh-Ju Liao, MD principal investigator
Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital,Ministry of Health and Welfare
Kuei-Yen Tsai, PhD principal investigator
Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital,Ministry of Health and Welfare
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Acute Cholecystitis, run by Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
In-hospital mortality (time frame: From admission to discharge, average 8 days, minimal 2 days, maximal 51 days). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06601855, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2024.