Hearing LossDEE-REXNCT06598059
Safety and Efficacy of a Drug Eluting Slim Modiolar Electrode Array
A study testing Cochlear implant and Dexamethasone in people with Hearing Loss, run by Cochlear at 11 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This clinical study will test a new type of cochlear implant known as CI632D. This experimental cochlear implant has been designed to slowly release a drug called dexamethasone. Dexamethasone works to ease inflammation and reduce tissue injury, which is common after any type of surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hearing Loss
- What is being tested?
- Cochlear implant and Dexamethasone
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 56 participants
- Where
- 11 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 3 Jan 2025to Sep 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 years or older, at time of consent.
- Postlinguistic moderately severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss, defined by a four frequency (500, 1000, 2000, 4000 Hz) pure-tone average unaided threshold (PTA4) ≥ 60 decibels hearing level (dB HL), in the ear to be implanted (For this study, moderately severe is defined by a four-frequency, pure-tone average threshold (PTA4) over the range 500 through 4000 Hz of more than 55 dB HL through 70 dB HL, inclusive. Profound is defined by a PTA4 of more than 90 dB HL).
- Pure-tone average unaided threshold (500 through 4000 Hz) ≥ 30 dB HL, in the contralateral ear.
- Preoperative aided word score ≤ 40% correct in the ear to be implanted.
- Evidence of pneumococcal vaccination (e.g., Pneumovax) according to local guidelines.
- Candidate is proficient in the language used to assess speech perception performance.
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Intra-axial (within the brain) lesions or deafness due to lesions of the acoustic nerve affecting the ear to be implanted.
- Middle ear infection (including acute otitis media, chronic otitis media, suppurative otitis media, or serous drainage) in the ear to be implanted either at the time of surgery or within 3 months prior to enrolment.
- Active autoimmune disease or active immunosuppressive therapy.
- Presence of a tympanic membrane perforation or a history of otologic surgery within 3 months prior to enrolment, in the ear to be implanted.
- Previously reported diagnosis of auditory neuropathy, in the ear to be implanted.
- Previously reported diagnosis, in the ear to be implanted, of Large Vestibular Aqueduct Syndrome (LVAS), Meniere's disease, or cochlear hydrops.
Show all 22Show fewer
- Ossification, otosclerosis, malformation or any other cochlear anomaly, such as common cavity, that might prevent complete insertion of the electrode array, in the ear to be implanted.
- Current cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunts or drains, existing perilymph fistula, skull fracture or CSF leaks.
- Previously reported diagnosis of bacterial meningitis.
- Known allergic reaction or contraindication to dexamethasone or corticosteroids.
- Severe, or poorer, bilateral sensorineural hearing loss prior to 5 years of age, as reported by the subject. (For this study, severe is defined by a PTA4 of more than 70 dB HL through 90 dB HL, inclusive).
- Severe, or poorer, sensorineural hearing loss for more than 20 years, as reported by the subject, in the ear to be implanted.
- Prior cochlear implantation in either ear.
- Medical plan for cochlear implantation during the clinical investigation, contralateral to the ear to be implanted.
- Medical or psychological conditions that contraindicate general anaesthesia, surgery, or participation in the clinical investigation as determined by the Investigator.
- Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject regarding the possible benefits, risks, and limitations inherent to the surgical procedure(s) and prosthetic devices, as determined by the Investigator.
- Women who are pregnant.
- Additional disabilities that may affect the subject's participation or safety during the clinical investigation.
- Unable or unwilling to comply with all the requirements of the clinical investigation as determined by the investigator.
- Investigator site personnel directly affiliated with this study and/or their immediate families. Immediate family is defined as spouse, parent, child, or sibling.
- Cochlear employees or employees of Contract Research Organisations or contractors engaged by Cochlear for the purposes of this investigation.
- Current participation, or participation in another interventional clinical study/trial in the past 30 days, involving an investigational drug or device unless Cochlear sponsored and determined by Investigator or Sponsor to not impact this investigation.
Trial locations and contacts
11 sites in 1 country.
11 sites in 1 country
United States11 sites
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
University Hospitals
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Henry Ford Health
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Rocky Mountain Ear Center
Englewood, Colorado, 80113
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
UCLA Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90095
New York Eye and Ear Infirmary
New York, New York, 10010
NYU Langone Health
New York, New York, 10017
Northwell Health Long Island Jewish Medical Center
New York, New York, 11042
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239
Washington University
St Louis, Missouri, 63141
About this study
Official title: A Pivotal, Prospective, Multicentre, Single-arm Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of a Dexamethasone Eluting Slim Modiolar Electrode Array (EA32D).
This clinical study will test a new type of cochlear implant known as CI632D. This experimental cochlear implant has been designed to slowly release a drug called dexamethasone. Dexamethasone works to ease inflammation and reduce tissue injury, which is common after any type of surgery. The goal is to learn if the dexamethasone in the CI632D implant lessens these reactions inside the ear following surgery and if this makes the implant work as well, or even better, in improving hearing than what would be expected with a standard cochlear implant. The study will be conducted in adults with sensorineural hearing loss, a type of hearing loss caused by damage to the inner ear or auditory nerve (the nerve that carries sound signals from the ear to the brain). The study participants will receive the CI632D experimental implant and will complete tests to see how well they are hearing and how well the implant is working.
- Conditions
- Hearing Loss
- Being tested
- Cochlear implant, Dexamethasone
- Keywords
- cochlear implant, dexamethasone, fibrosis
- Medical subject headings
- Hearing Loss, Fibrosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cochlear implantDevice
Also called CI632D, Slim modiolar dexamethasone-eluting electrode array
CI632D cochlear implant
DexamethasoneDrug
Also called CI632D, Slim modiolar dexamethasone-eluting electrode array
CI632D, dexamethasone-eluting cochlear implant
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Drug-eluting electrode array (CI632D) | Experimental | Participants will be implanted with the slim modiolar dexamethasone-eluting electrode array. Receives: Device: Cochlear implant; Drug: Dexamethasone |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Coprimary endpoint 1: Mean monopolar 1 plus 2 (MP1+2) impedances (kOhms) at 3 months postactivation
Impedance will be measured across the active electrodes of the implant for each participant.
Measured: On day of implantation and at 1- and 3-months postactivation
Coprimary endpoint 2: Mean change in word recognition score in the best unilateral listening mode in quiet from preimplantation to 3 months postactivation
Within-subject change in consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) words in quiet (% correct) calculated as the average across 2 runs of the test conducted on each participant. CNC word score ranges from 0-100%, higher the score the better the outcome.
Measured: Preoperative baseline and 3-months postactivation
Secondary outcomes (3)
Mean within-subject change in the global score of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of hearing scale (SSQ12) from preimplantation to postimplantation
Within-subject change in Global SSQ12 scores at 6-months postactivation compared with preoperative baseline. The global SSQ12 score ranges from 0-10, higher the score the better the outcome.
Measured: Preoperative baseline and 6-months postactivation
Mean within-subject change in sentence recognition score in the best unilateral listening mode in noise from preimplantation to postimplantation
Within-subject change in AzBio sentence in noise score at a +10 dB Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) at 6-months postactivation compared with preoperative baseline. AzBio score ranges from 0-100%, higher the score the better the outcome.
Measured: Preoperative baseline and 6-months postactivation
Mean within-subject change in sentence recognition score in the best bilateral listening mode in noise from preimplantation to postimplantation
Within-subject change in AzBio sentence in noise score at a +10 dB Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) at 6-months postactivation compared with preoperative baseline. AzBio score ranges from 0-100%, higher the score the better the outcome.
Measured: Preoperative baseline and 6-months postactivation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Sep 2024
- Study start3 Jan 2025
- Primary completion2 Feb 2026
- Study completionSep 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Hearing LossStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by CochlearThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cochlear
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- University of Iowa, LWB Consulting, Althea Anagnostopoulos Harrington, MV Clinical Research, LLC
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Aaron Parkinson, PhD, Study director, Cochlear
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06598059
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CLTD5849
- Acronym
- DEE-REX
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 12 Sep 2024
- Last updated
- 2 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Pivotal, Prospective, Multicentre, Single-arm Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of a Dexamethasone Eluting Slim Modiolar Electrode Array (EA32D).
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06598059
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DEE-REX / CLTD5849
- Conditions
- Hearing Loss
- Keywords
- cochlear implant, dexamethasone, fibrosis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- CochlearIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- University of Iowa, LWB Consulting, Althea Anagnostopoulos Harrington, MV Clinical Research, LLC
- Study start
- 3 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 2 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This clinical study will test a new type of cochlear implant known as CI632D. This experimental cochlear implant has been designed to slowly release a drug called dexamethasone. Dexamethasone works to ease inflammation and reduce tissue injury, which is common after any type of surgery. The goal is to learn if the dexamethasone in the CI632D implant lessens these reactions inside the ear following surgery and if this makes the implant work as well, or even better, in improving hearing than what would be expected with a standard cochlear implant. The study will be conducted in adults with sensorineural hearing loss, a type of hearing loss caused by damage to the inner ear or auditory nerve (the nerve that carries sound signals from the ear to the brain). The study participants will receive the CI632D experimental implant and will complete tests to see how well they are hearing and how well the implant is working.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Drug-eluting electrode array (CI632D) | Experimental | Device: Cochlear implant, Drug: DexamethasoneParticipants will be implanted with the slim modiolar dexamethasone-eluting electrode array. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- 18 years or older, at time of consent.
- Postlinguistic moderately severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss, defined by a four frequency (500, 1000, 2000, 4000 Hz) pure-tone average unaided threshold (PTA4) ≥ 60 decibels hearing level (dB HL), in the ear to be implanted (For this study, moderately severe is defined by a four-frequency, pure-tone average threshold (PTA4) over the range 500 through 4000 Hz of more than 55 dB HL through 70 dB HL, inclusive. Profound is defined by a PTA4 of more than 90 dB HL).
- Pure-tone average unaided threshold (500 through 4000 Hz) ≥ 30 dB HL, in the contralateral ear.
- Preoperative aided word score ≤ 40% correct in the ear to be implanted.
- Evidence of pneumococcal vaccination (e.g., Pneumovax) according to local guidelines.
Key exclusion criteria (22 listed)
- Intra-axial (within the brain) lesions or deafness due to lesions of the acoustic nerve affecting the ear to be implanted.
- Middle ear infection (including acute otitis media, chronic otitis media, suppurative otitis media, or serous drainage) in the ear to be implanted either at the time of surgery or within 3 months prior to enrolment.
- Active autoimmune disease or active immunosuppressive therapy.
- Presence of a tympanic membrane perforation or a history of otologic surgery within 3 months prior to enrolment, in the ear to be implanted.
- Previously reported diagnosis of auditory neuropathy, in the ear to be implanted.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cochlear implantAlso: CI632D, Slim modiolar dexamethasone-eluting electrode arrayCI632D cochlear implant | Device | Drug-eluting electrode array (CI632D) |
| DexamethasoneAlso: CI632D, Slim modiolar dexamethasone-eluting electrode arrayCI632D, dexamethasone-eluting cochlear implant | Drug | Drug-eluting electrode array (CI632D) |
Primary outcome
Coprimary endpoint 1: Mean monopolar 1 plus 2 (MP1+2) impedances (kOhms) at 3 months postactivation
Time frame: On day of implantation and at 1- and 3-months postactivation
Impedance will be measured across the active electrodes of the implant for each participant.
Coprimary endpoint 2: Mean change in word recognition score in the best unilateral listening mode in quiet from preimplantation to 3 months postactivation
Time frame: Preoperative baseline and 3-months postactivation
Within-subject change in consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) words in quiet (% correct) calculated as the average across 2 runs of the test conducted on each participant. CNC word score ranges from 0-100%, higher the score the better the outcome.
3 secondary outcomes
Mean within-subject change in the global score of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of hearing scale (SSQ12) from preimplantation to postimplantation
Time frame: Preoperative baseline and 6-months postactivation
Mean within-subject change in sentence recognition score in the best unilateral listening mode in noise from preimplantation to postimplantation
Time frame: Preoperative baseline and 6-months postactivation
Mean within-subject change in sentence recognition score in the best bilateral listening mode in noise from preimplantation to postimplantation
Time frame: Preoperative baseline and 6-months postactivation
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Mar 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hearing Loss
RecruitingObservational study
Impact of Vestibular Function on Deaf Infants' Activities of Daily Living
Vestibular Dysfunction, Hearing Loss
Recruiting
HEARS-NPS: Addressing Hearing Loss as a Common Unmet Contributor of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms
Alzheimer Disease, Dementia
Not yet recruiting
Hearing Intervention Effects on Brain and Language Development in Children With Bilateral Mild Hearing Loss
Hearing Loss, Bilateral
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History of Autosomal Dominant Hearing Loss
Hearing Loss
RecruitingObservational study
Retrospective Analysis of Speech Performance Using the HiRes Ultra and HiRes Ultra 3D Cochlear Implant
Cochlear Hearing Loss
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Aaron Parkinson, PhD study director
Cochlear
11 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cochlear implant and Dexamethasone in people with Hearing Loss, run by Cochlear at 11 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 11 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Coprimary endpoint 1: Mean monopolar 1 plus 2 (MP1+2) impedances (kOhms) at 3 months postactivation (time frame: On day of implantation and at 1- and 3-months postactivation). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Mar 2026.