AzTrials
AzTrials

Eye MovementsNCT06587113

An Investigation of Attentional and Inhibitory Processes During Active Visual Search in Humans

A study testing Contour Search Task, Stop signal Task and Useful field of View in people with Eye Movements and Attention, run by University of Colorado, Denver at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this study is to investigate the finding that there are large individual differences in how participants move their eyes during active visual search. For example, some individuals tend to fixate, that is point their eyes steadily at a single location, for longer than other individuals before moving to… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Eye Movements, Attention, Executive Function
What is being tested?
Contour Search Task, Stop signal Task and Useful field of View
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
225 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
15 Sep 2024to 15 May 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18-65 years old

Who cannot join

  • Self-reported history of neurological illness
  • Uncorrected vision problems

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Carly J Principal Investigator, PhD contact

303-315-7068

carly.leonard@ucdenver.edu

Ryan V Postdoctoral Fellow, PhD contact

303-315-7065

ryan.ringer@ucdenver.edu

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • University of Colorado Denver

    Denver, Colorado, 80123

    Associate Professor, PhD, 303-315-7068, carly.leonard@ucdenver.edu

    Ryan V Ringer, PhD, ryan.ringer@ucdenver.edu

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Contributions of Attentional and Inhibitory Functioning to Saccadic Decisions

The goal of this study is to investigate the finding that there are large individual differences in how participants move their eyes during active visual search. For example, some individuals tend to fixate, that is point their eyes steadily at a single location, for longer than other individuals before moving to another location. This experiment will use behavioral tasks to measure an individual's attentional and inhibitory functioning, and then see how each of these contributes to between-participant variability in eye movement behavior during visual search.

Read the detailed description

To accomplish the goal of understanding the source of individual variability in eye movement patterns, each participant will complete three separate tasks. The first task will require participants to find a target and eye movements will be measured to assess individual differences in fixation duration and other types of eye movement behavior. A second task will evaluate attentional functioning over the visual field by requiring participants to detect briefly-presented targets using their peripheral vision. Finally, a third task will assess inhibitory functioning by having participants attempt to stop eye movements after they have been programmed.

Being tested
Contour Search Task, Stop signal Task, Useful field of View, Attentional capture search task
Keywords
Individual differences, Eye movements, Perception, Attention, Inhibition
Medical subject headings
Inhibition, Psychological

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Contour Search TaskOther

    In this task, participants sit in front of a computer screen with their head in a chinrest to control for distance from the monitor and eye-tracking equipment. For the visual search task, participants will search for a visual target among distractors and make a response regarding its orientation. The target is defined by a contour formed through oriented Gabor patches.

  • Stop signal TaskBehavioural

    Also called SST, SSRT

    In this task, participants sit in front of a computer screen with their head in a chinrest to control for distance from the monitor and eye-tracking equipment. For the stop-signal task, participants will make an eye movement to a target that appears on the screen, except on trials where a visual signal appears indicating they should cancel this behavior.

  • Useful field of ViewBehavioural

    In this task, participants sit in front of a computer screen with their head in a chinrest to control for distance from the monitor and eye-tracking equipment. In the useful field of view task, participants will report the location of a briefly-presented and masked target, while also responding to the identify of a central target in some blocks.

  • Attentional capture search taskBehavioural

    In this task, participants sit in front of a computer screen with their head in a chinrest to control for distance from the monitor and eye-tracking equipment. For this visual search task, participants will search for a visual target among distractors and make a response regarding its orientation. The target is defined as a unique shape, and is sometimes shown with a salient distractor.

Study groups in NCT06587113
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Study Group Contour SearchExperimentalThis study examines eye movement behavior using eye-tracking technology. Healthy participants perform three different tasks, including a visual search task, a stop-signal task, and a useful field of view task. Behavioral performance and eye movements are recorded for all tasks.
Receives: Other: Contour Search Task; Behavioral: Stop signal Task; Behavioral: Useful field of View
Study Group Attentional CaptureExperimentalThis study examines eye movement behavior using eye-tracking technology. Healthy participants perform three different tasks, including a visual search task emphasizing distraction, a stop-signal task, and a useful field of view task. Behavioral performance and eye movements are recorded for all tasks.
Receives: Behavioral: Stop signal Task; Behavioral: Useful field of View; Behavioral: Attentional capture search task

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. First fixation duration during visual search

    This measure is the average first fixation duration during the visual search task. Possible scores are a minimum of 50 ms with an undeterminable positive number of ms as a maximum. This measure indicates the duration of processing before the first eye movement decision.

    Measured: During visual search task

  2. Fixation count during visual search

    This measure is the count the average number of eye movements participants made per trial during the visual search task. Possible scores range from a minimum of 0 to approximately 40 eye movements, given the time available. This measure indicates the amount of active exploration of the display during search.

    Measured: During visual search task

  3. Stop signal reaction time

    Stop signal reaction time is a quantitative estimate of how long participants take to successfully inhibit a planned eye movement. Possible scores range from a minimum of 0 ms to a maximum of about 600 ms. Low scores indicate strong inhibitory ability and high scores indicate weak inhibitory ability.

    Measured: During inhibitory task

  4. Useful field of view thresholding

    Performance in a thresholding task indicates participants ability to detect a briefly presented target among distractors with 80% accuracy. Contrast of the displays varies until performance meets achieved level. Possible scores range from 0 to 100% contrast. Lower contrast indicates better information accrual, while higher contrast indicates worse.

    Measured: During attention task

  5. Useful field of view dual task performance

    Performance in a dual task indicates participants ability to spread attention across the visual field. Possible scores range from 0 to 100% accuracy. Higher performance indicates better information accrual, while lower performance indicates worse.

    Measured: During attention task

  6. Oculomotor capture by salient distractor

    in the attentional capture search task, a measure of how often participants look at the salient yet irrelevant distractor will be calculated.

    Measured: During visual search task

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Average fixation duration during visual search

    This measure is the average fixation duration across all fixations in a trial during the visual search task. Possible scores range from a minimum of 50 ms to approximately 500 ms. This measure indicates the average duration of processing before a saccadic decision is made.

    Measured: During the visual search task

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Sep 2024
  2. Study start15 Sep 2024
  3. Primary completion15 May 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion15 May 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Basic Experimental Studies Involving Humans (BESH)
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
225 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06587113
Sponsor's protocol ID
22-1148
Other IDs
R15EY035056-01
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
4 Sep 2024
Last updated
20 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Individual data and analysis code will be shared through the Open Science Foundation (OSF) website.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Contour Search Task, Stop signal Task and Useful field of View in people with Eye Movements and Attention, run by University of Colorado, Denver at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Carly J Principal Investigator, PhD (303-315-7068, carly.leonard@ucdenver.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

First fixation duration during visual search (time frame: During visual search task). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Feb 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in