Abdominal InjuryNCT06574607
Effects of a Contextual Decision-making Materials on Junior Nurses in Traumatic Learning Performance
A study testing Interactive Educational Material for Decision-Making and Interactive Educational Material in people with Abdominal Injury and Pelvic Injury, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
Trauma leading to severe bleeding is one of the reasons for the high mortality rate in trauma patients, resulting in multiple and complex injuries from various accidental mechanisms. However, patients with abdominal-pelvic trauma accidents rank among the top three common accidents in the emergency department. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Abdominal Injury, Pelvic Injury
- What is being tested?
- Interactive Educational Material for Decision-Making and Interactive Educational Material
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 56 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 21 Dec 2023to 1 Aug 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Holding a nursing license, employed, and having job registration in the same institution.
- Those who are willing to participate in this study, are informed, and have provided consent by signing the informed consent form
Who cannot join
- Those who have completed a service period of more than two years
- Those who refuse to participate in this study.
- Non-Surgical Department ward nurses
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effects of a Contextual Decision-making Learning Materials on Nurses in Two Years Learning Performance for Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding Care
Trauma leading to severe bleeding is one of the reasons for the high mortality rate in trauma patients, resulting in multiple and complex injuries from various accidental mechanisms. However, patients with abdominal-pelvic trauma accidents rank among the top three common accidents in the emergency department. There is a potential for both trauma and severe internal bleeding, making the care of such patients even more challenging. Currently, trauma nursing education focuses on emergency medical care, and teaching on the care of abdominal-pelvic trauma occupies only a small part of the entire nursing curriculum.
In addition to insufficient knowledge teaching in emergency trauma medical care, learning relies heavily on the arrangement of clinical internships, and obtaining practical experience in the care of abdominal-pelvic trauma is often difficult. In the current era of thriving digital learning, allowing learning to be more diverse and unrestricted by time and location, it is essential to integrate appropriate guiding strategies alongside digital technology to make learning more efficient and promote meaningful learning.
Read more
Therefore, this study introduces decision trees into an interactive scenario-based learning environment for the care of severe bleeding due to abdominal-pelvic trauma. The decision tree is coupled with a decision-making strategy, utilizing the relationships between leaf nodes to guide learners in clarifying their misconceptions, ultimately leading them to make appropriate decisions to reach the final nodes and solve problems.
To understand the effectiveness of this study, a real experimental research design is adopted to investigate the impact of introducing decision tree-based interactive teaching materials on the care of severe bleeding in abdominal-pelvic trauma situations on the professional knowledge, self-efficacy, clinical reasoning assessment ability, and technology acceptance of surgical nursing students over a two-year period. It is hoped that this interactive teaching material for the care of severe bleeding in abdominal-pelvic trauma scenarios will enhance learners' professional knowledge, self-efficacy, clinical reasoning assessment, and technology acceptanc.
- Conditions
- Abdominal Injury, Pelvic Injury
- Being tested
- Interactive Educational Material for Decision-Making, Interactive Educational Material
- Keywords
- Decision Guidance, Care of Severe Bleeding in Abdominal-Pelvic Trauma, Scenario-Based Learning, Two-Year Registered Nursing, Clinical Reasoning Assessment, Abdominal injury, Pelvic Injury
- Medical subject headings
- Abdominal Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Interactive Educational Material for Decision-MakingDevice
Using severe bleeding from abdominal-pelvic trauma as a scenario case, implementing decision-making teaching strategies to guide learners, and examining the intervention through this research
Interactive Educational MaterialDevice
Teaching with scenario-based interactive materials without incorporating any teaching strategies
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| experimental group | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: Interactive Educational Material for Decision-Making |
| control group | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Device: Interactive Educational Material |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The effect of "Interactive Educational Material for Decision-Making"intervention program on Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding care knowledge learning outcome
TThe changes of Questionnaire score of Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding care knowledge, Questionnaire including:
Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding knowledge Scores range from 0 to 15, with higher scores representing higher knowledge of Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding care
Measured: up to 1 month
The effect of "Interactive Educational Material for Decision-Making"intervention program on Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding care Technology Acceptance learning outcome
The changes of Questionnaire score of Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding care Technology Acceptance, Questionnaire including:
Technology Acceptance Scale:Scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores representing better Technology Acceptance.
Measured: up to 1 month
The effect of "Interactive Educational Material for Decision-Making"intervention program on Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding care Clinical Reasoning Evaluation Simulation learning outcome
The changes of Questionnaire score of Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding care Clinical Reasoning Evaluation Simulation , Questionnaire including:
Clinical Reasoning Evaluation Simulation Tool(CREST): Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing more positive Clinical Reasoning Evaluation beliefs.
Measured: up to 1 month
The effect of "Interactive Educational Material for Decision-Making"intervention program on Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding care self-efficacy learning outcome
The changes of Questionnaire score of Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding care self-efficacy will be measured, Questionnaire including:
Self-Efficacy Scale:Scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores representing better self-efficacy.
Measured: up to 1 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Aug 2024
- Study start21 Dec 2023
- Primary completion1 Aug 2024
- Study completion1 Aug 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Abdominal InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Taiwan University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Taiwan University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06574607
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 202304128RIND
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 26 Nov 2023
- Last updated
- 31 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of a Contextual Decision-making Learning Materials on Nurses in Two Years Learning Performance for Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding Care
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06574607
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 202304128RIND
- Conditions
- Abdominal Injury, Pelvic Injury
- Keywords
- Decision Guidance, Care of Severe Bleeding in Abdominal-Pelvic Trauma, Scenario-Based Learning, Two-Year Registered Nursing, Clinical Reasoning Assessment, Abdominal injury, Pelvic Injury
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Taiwan University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 21 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Aug 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Trauma leading to severe bleeding is one of the reasons for the high mortality rate in trauma patients, resulting in multiple and complex injuries from various accidental mechanisms. However, patients with abdominal-pelvic trauma accidents rank among the top three common accidents in the emergency department. There is a potential for both trauma and severe internal bleeding, making the care of such patients even more challenging. Currently, trauma nursing education focuses on emergency medical care, and teaching on the care of abdominal-pelvic trauma occupies only a small part of the entire nursing curriculum.
In addition to insufficient knowledge teaching in emergency trauma medical care, learning relies heavily on the arrangement of clinical internships, and obtaining practical experience in the care of abdominal-pelvic trauma is often difficult. In the current era of thriving digital learning, allowing learning to be more diverse and unrestricted by time and location, it is essential to integrate appropriate guiding strategies alongside digital technology to make learning more efficient and promote meaningful learning.
Therefore, this study introduces decision trees into an interactive scenario-based learning environment for the care of severe bleeding due to abdominal-pelvic trauma. The decision tree is coupled with a decision-making strategy, utilizing the relationships between leaf nodes to guide learners in clarifying their misconceptions, ultimately leading them to make appropriate decisions to reach the final nodes and solve problems.
To understand the effectiveness of this study, a real experimental research design is adopted to investigate the impact of introducing decision tree-based interactive teaching materials on the care of severe bleeding in abdominal-pelvic trauma situations on the professional knowledge, self-efficacy, clinical reasoning assessment ability, and technology acceptance of surgical nursing students over a two-year period. It is hoped that this interactive teaching material for the care of severe bleeding in abdominal-pelvic trauma scenarios will enhance learners' professional knowledge, self-efficacy, clinical reasoning assessment, and technology acceptanc.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| experimental group | Experimental | Device: Interactive Educational Material for Decision-Making |
| control group | Active comparator | Device: Interactive Educational Material |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Holding a nursing license, employed, and having job registration in the same institution.
- Those who are willing to participate in this study, are informed, and have provided consent by signing the informed consent form
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Those who have completed a service period of more than two years
- Those who refuse to participate in this study.
- Non-Surgical Department ward nurses
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Interactive Educational Material for Decision-MakingUsing severe bleeding from abdominal-pelvic trauma as a scenario case, implementing decision-making teaching strategies to guide learners, and examining the intervention through this research | Device | experimental group |
| Interactive Educational MaterialTeaching with scenario-based interactive materials without incorporating any teaching strategies | Device | control group |
Primary outcome
The effect of "Interactive Educational Material for Decision-Making"intervention program on Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding care knowledge learning outcome
Time frame: up to 1 month
TThe changes of Questionnaire score of Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding care knowledge, Questionnaire including: Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding knowledge Scores range from 0 to 15, with higher scores representing higher knowledge of Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding care
The effect of "Interactive Educational Material for Decision-Making"intervention program on Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding care Technology Acceptance learning outcome
Time frame: up to 1 month
The changes of Questionnaire score of Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding care Technology Acceptance, Questionnaire including: Technology Acceptance Scale:Scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores representing better Technology Acceptance.
The effect of "Interactive Educational Material for Decision-Making"intervention program on Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding care Clinical Reasoning Evaluation Simulation learning outcome
Time frame: up to 1 month
The changes of Questionnaire score of Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding care Clinical Reasoning Evaluation Simulation , Questionnaire including: Clinical Reasoning Evaluation Simulation Tool(CREST): Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing more positive Clinical Reasoning Evaluation beliefs.
The effect of "Interactive Educational Material for Decision-Making"intervention program on Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding care self-efficacy learning outcome
Time frame: up to 1 month
The changes of Questionnaire score of Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding care self-efficacy will be measured, Questionnaire including: Self-Efficacy Scale:Scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores representing better self-efficacy.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Aug 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Abdominal Injury
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Medical,Nursing Record,PE, Blood Test and Radiological Examination ,Morality and Mobility of Multiple Trauma Patient
Trauma Centers/Statistics & Numerical Data, Trauma Blunt
Not yet recruitingObservational study
From Blast Injury to Multicompartment Dysfunction:
Compartment Syndrome, Compartment Syndrome Nontraumatic Lower Extremity
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Arterial Stiffness During Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Abdominal Wall Wounds
Postoperative Abdominal Wall Wound Complications, Surgical Wound Infection
Recruiting
Management of Abdominal Post-surgical Scar With Ozoaqua Versus Standard Care
Wound Healing, Abdominal Surgery
Recruiting
Processed Electroencephalography-guided General Anesthesia and Outcomes in Major Abdominal Surgery
Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Interactive Educational Material for Decision-Making and Interactive Educational Material in people with Abdominal Injury and Pelvic Injury, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The effect of "Interactive Educational Material for Decision-Making"intervention program on Abdominal and Pelvic Traumatic Severe Bleeding care knowledge learning outcome (time frame: up to 1 month). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Aug 2026.