Fear of Cancer RecurrenceNCT06554899
CIFeR - A Clinician-led Intervention to Address Fear of Cancer Recurrence
A study testing Clinician-led intervention to address fear of cancer recurrence (CIFeR) in people with Fear of Cancer Recurrence, run by Aarhus University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
The investigators will test a novel Clinician-led Intervention to address Fear of cancer Recurrence in cancer survivors (CIFeR), by 1) adapting the original Australian intervention manual to the Danish oncology context (CIFeR-DK), and 2) developing a brief e-learning program to train oncologists. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Fear of Cancer Recurrence
- What is being tested?
- Clinician-led intervention to address fear of cancer recurrence (CIFeR)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 14 Jun 2024to 1 Jun 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Are ≥ 18 years old
- Have completed their primary treatment, i.e., surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy, for breast, ovarian, prostate, or lung cancer at the participating departments between three weeks and three months previously.
- Score >= 13 on the FCRI-SF
Who cannot join
- -
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Louise Strøm, PhD contact
Denmark1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, 8200
Birgitte Offersen, Professor, +4578454933, birgitte.offersen@auh.rm.dk
About this study
Official title: The Efficacy of a Brief Oncologist-delivered Intervention for Fear of Cancer Recurrence: A Cluster-randomized Controlled Trial
The investigators will test a novel Clinician-led Intervention to address Fear of cancer Recurrence in cancer survivors (CIFeR), by 1) adapting the original Australian intervention manual to the Danish oncology context (CIFeR-DK), and 2) developing a brief e-learning program to train oncologists. The investigators will then 3) compare CIFeR-DK with an active control condition in a cluster-randomized controlled trial with 24 oncologists (the cluster unit) treating a minimum of 300 patients with breast, ovarian, lung and prostate cancer at Danish Oncology Departments at four hospitals in Aarhus, Vejle, Aalborg, and Copenhagen, and 4) explore fidelity, acceptability, feasibility, and perceived barriers and facilitators to use the intervention in routine follow-up care.
Read the detailed description
STUDY DESIGN:
The study is designed as a parallel cluster-randomized controlled trial with oncologists (cluster unit) treating breast, ovarian, and prostate cancer at the oncology departments at Aarhus University Hospital (AUH), Vejle Hospital (VH), Aalborg University Hospital (AAUH), and Copenhagen University Hospital (CUH), and randomized 1:1 to intervention versus active control.
Participants:
All oncologists treating breast, ovarian, and prostate cancer at the participating departments are eligible for the study and will be recruited by our collaborators at the participating departments. Eligible patients score >= 13 on the FCRI-SF and have completed their primary treatment i.e., surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy, for breast, ovarian, lung and prostate cancer at the participating departments between three weeks and three months previously.
Procedure:
Patients scheduled for a follow-up visit with the participating oncologists will receive a secure e-mail invitation to participate in the study and a link to a RedCap questionnaire. Patients willing to participate will provide their informed consent electronically and complete the 9-item FCRI-SF. Patients scoring >= 13 are provided with additional information about the study and asked for their consent to participate.
One week before the planned follow-up consultation, they will be asked to complete a RedCap baseline questionnaire (T1). One week and three months after the consultation, the patients will be asked to complete the RedCap post-intervention (T2) and follow-up questionnaires (T3).
Oncologists will complete a RedCap baseline questionnaire assessing age, gender, years of experience, and self-efficacy in managing patient FCR. Oncologists will then be allocated to the intervention or active control arm using a stratified randomization sequence generated by the Aarhus University clinical trial unit ensuring a balanced allocation of oncologists according to the cancer type treated. Oncologists will then receive a link to online CIFeR training and report their post-training self-efficacy for managing patient FCR. During the consultation, the oncologist will deliver the CIFeR intervention and complete a brief 5-item checklist on whether they delivered all five components and, if not, why. After including all patients, the oncologist is asked to complete a follow-up RedCap questionnaire on self-efficacy in managing patient FCR.
The CIFeR intervention:
The intervention includes five components informed by theoretical models and existing interventions for FCR: 1) FCR normalization: reassurance that FCR is a common and normal phenomenon after treatment for cancer, 2) Providing prognostic information: asking patients whether they would like information about their risk of recurrence and, if yes, providing this information, 3) Providing education and take-home information on red-flag recurrence symptoms, 4) Brief advice on managing worry: distraction, meditation, mindfulness, reassurance, and links to online resources to manage FCR, and 5) referral to a psychologist if FCR is high (FCRI-SF >= 22), or if deemed helpful by the patient or clinician. Access will be provided to ConquerFear-Group delivered online by trained psycho-oncologists.
Outcome measures:
Patients:
The primary outcome is the change in FCR, assessed with the 9-item Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory Short Form (FCRI-SF). Secondary outcomes include a) anxiety and depression assessed with the The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), b) patient reported intervention usefulness assessed with the Patient Centered Communication Scale (PCC), c) metacognition assessed with the metacognitions questionnaire (MCQ-30), d) unmet needs assessed with Subscale of the Survivors Unmet Need Survey (SUNS-8), e) rumination assessed with the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), and f) General Quality of Life (QoL) assessed with the EQ-5D for later use in cost-effectiveness analysis. All measures will be completed at all three time-points (T1-T3).
At six months, the investigators will ask a subset of 15-20 patients to participate in a semi-structured phone interview about their experience with the intervention.
Oncologists:
Oncologists complete a general item on self-efficacy in managing patient FCR together with the 27-item Self-efficacy in Patient-Centeredness Questionnaire (SEPCQ-27) at baseline, post-training (only oncologists in the intervention group), and after completed inclusion. Based on a suggested framework for implementation outcomes, the investigators will assess with 11-point scales: 1) acceptability, 2) appropriateness, 3) feasibility, together with 4) fidelity, measured as the average number of components oncologists report having delivered to patients, and 5) sustainability measured as the proportion of oncologists in the intervention group who report having used CIFeR at least once within the last three months, measured six months after completed inclusion. Six months after the inclusion of their last patient, all oncologists will be asked to participate in a semi-structured interview and provide feedback on the CIFeR-training and their experiences with the intervention, including perceived utility and the perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing CIFeR in routine care. The investigators will also examine CIFeR e-training analytics regarding access and time spent on the various parts.
- Conditions
- Fear of Cancer Recurrence
- Being tested
- Clinician-led intervention to address fear of cancer recurrence (CIFeR)
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Clinician-led intervention to address fear of cancer recurrence (CIFeR)Other
The intervention includes five components informed by theoretical models and existing interventions for FCR: 1) FCR normalization: reassurance that FCR is a common and normal phenomenon after treatment for cancer, 2) Providing prognostic information: asking patients whether they would like information about their risk of recurrence and, if yes,providing this information, 3) Providing education and take-home information on red-flag recurrence symptoms, 4) Brief advice on managing worry: distraction, meditation, mindfulness, reassurance, and links to online resources to manage FCR, and 5) referral to a psychologist if FCR is high (FCRI-SF >= 22), or if deemed helpful by the patient or clinician. Access will be provided to ConquerFear-Group delivered online by trained psychologists.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention (delivering CIFeR) | Experimental | At the patient's first follow-up appointment after anti-cancer treatment, oncologists will, in addition to the usual follow-up procedure, deliver a brief psychological intervention (CIFeR) Receives: Other: Clinician-led intervention to address fear of cancer recurrence (CIFeR) |
| Control (treatment as usual) | No intervention | At the patients first follow-up appointment after anti-cancer treatment, oncologists will deliver treatment as usual (the usual follow-up procedure) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Fear of cancer recurrence
Assessed with the 9-item Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory Short Form (FCRI-SF), range 0-36. Higher scores indicate worse outcome
Measured: T1 (2 weeks prior to intervention), T2 (one week post intervention), T3 (three months post intervention)
Secondary outcomes (6)
Anxiety and depression
Assessed with the The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), range 0-21. Higher scores indicate worse outcome
Measured: T1 (2 weeks prior to intervention), T2 (one week post intervention), T3 (three months post intervention)
Patient reported intervention usefulness
Assessed with the Patient Centered Communication Scale (PCC), range 7-28. Lower scores indicate worse outcome.
Measured: T1 (2 weeks prior to intervention), T2 (one week post intervention), T3 (three months post intervention)
Metacognition
Assessed with the metacognitions questionnaire (MCQ-30). The MCQ-30 assesses various aspects of metacognition, including subscales: cognitive confidence, positive beliefs, cognitive self-consciousness, uncontrollability and danger, and the need to control thoughts. Subscale scores range from 6 to 24. Higher scores indicate greater conviction in metacognitive beliefs.
Measured: T1 (2 weeks prior to intervention), T2 (one week post intervention), T3 (three months post intervention)
Unmet needs
Assessed with Subscale of the Survivors Unmet Need Survey (SUNS-8), range 0-32. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Measured: T1 (2 weeks prior to intervention), T2 (one week post intervention), T3 (three months post intervention)
Rumination
Assessed with the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), range 5-25. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Measured: T1 (2 weeks prior to intervention), T2 (one week post intervention), T3 (three months post intervention)
General Quality of Life (QoL)
Assessed with the EuroQol Group Association EQ-5D-L5, representing five domains (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression) with each five severity levels. Higher levels indicate worse outcome.
Measured: T1 (2 weeks prior to intervention), T2 (one week post intervention), T3 (three months post intervention)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Aug 2024
- Study start14 Jun 2024
- Primary completion1 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Fear of Cancer RecurrenceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Aarhus University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Aarhus University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Prof. Robert (Bobby) Zachariae, Aarhus University Hospital
- Investigators
- Robert Zachariae, Professsor, Principal investigator, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06554899
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KB: R344-A19722
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 14 Jun 2024
- Last updated
- 21 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Data will be available upon request an in accordance with the GDPR regulations
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Efficacy of a Brief Oncologist-delivered Intervention for Fear of Cancer Recurrence: A Cluster-randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06554899
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KB: R344-A19722
- Conditions
- Fear of Cancer Recurrence
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Aarhus University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 14 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators will test a novel Clinician-led Intervention to address Fear of cancer Recurrence in cancer survivors (CIFeR), by 1) adapting the original Australian intervention manual to the Danish oncology context (CIFeR-DK), and 2) developing a brief e-learning program to train oncologists. The investigators will then 3) compare CIFeR-DK with an active control condition in a cluster-randomized controlled trial with 24 oncologists (the cluster unit) treating a minimum of 300 patients with breast, ovarian, lung and prostate cancer at Danish Oncology Departments at four hospitals in Aarhus, Vejle, Aalborg, and Copenhagen, and 4) explore fidelity, acceptability, feasibility, and perceived barriers and facilitators to use the intervention in routine follow-up care.
Detailed description
STUDY DESIGN:
The study is designed as a parallel cluster-randomized controlled trial with oncologists (cluster unit) treating breast, ovarian, and prostate cancer at the oncology departments at Aarhus University Hospital (AUH), Vejle Hospital (VH), Aalborg University Hospital (AAUH), and Copenhagen University Hospital (CUH), and randomized 1:1 to intervention versus active control.
Participants:
All oncologists treating breast, ovarian, and prostate cancer at the participating departments are eligible for the study and will be recruited by our collaborators at the participating departments. Eligible patients score >= 13 on the FCRI-SF and have completed their primary treatment i.e., surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy, for breast, ovarian, lung and prostate cancer at the participating departments between three weeks and three months previously.
Procedure:
Patients scheduled for a follow-up visit with the participating oncologists will receive a secure e-mail invitation to participate in the study and a link to a RedCap questionnaire. Patients willing to participate will provide their informed consent electronically and complete the 9-item FCRI-SF. Patients scoring >= 13 are provided with additional information about the study and asked for their consent to participate.
One week before the planned follow-up consultation, they will be asked to complete a RedCap baseline questionnaire (T1). One week and three months after the consultation, the patients will be asked to complete the RedCap post-intervention (T2) and follow-up questionnaires (T3).
Oncologists will complete a RedCap baseline questionnaire assessing age, gender, years of experience, and self-efficacy in managing patient FCR. Oncologists will then be allocated to the intervention or active control arm using a stratified randomization sequence generated by the Aarhus University clinical trial unit ensuring a balanced allocation of oncologists according to the cancer type treated. Oncologists will then receive a link to online CIFeR training and report their post-training self-efficacy for managing patient FCR. During the consultation, the oncologist will deliver the CIFeR intervention and complete a brief 5-item checklist on whether they delivered all five components and, if not, why. After including all patients, the oncologist is asked to complete a follow-up RedCap questionnaire on self-efficacy in managing patient FCR.
The CIFeR intervention:
The intervention includes five components informed by theoretical models and existing interventions for FCR: 1) FCR normalization: reassurance that FCR is a common and normal phenomenon after treatment for cancer, 2) Providing prognostic information: asking patients whether they would like information about their risk of recurrence and, if yes, providing this information, 3) Providing education and take-home information on red-flag recurrence symptoms, 4) Brief advice on managing worry: distraction, meditation, mindfulness, reassurance, and links to online resources to manage FCR, and 5) referral to a psychologist if FCR is high (FCRI-SF >= 22), or if deemed helpful by the patient or clinician. Access will be provided to ConquerFear-Group delivered online by trained psycho-oncologists.
Outcome measures:
Patients:
The primary outcome is the change in FCR, assessed with the 9-item Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory Short Form (FCRI-SF). Secondary outcomes include a) anxiety and depression assessed with the The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), b) patient reported intervention usefulness assessed with the Patient Centered Communication Scale (PCC), c) metacognition assessed with the metacognitions questionnaire (MCQ-30), d) unmet needs assessed with Subscale of the Survivors Unmet Need Survey (SUNS-8), e) rumination assessed with the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), and f) General Quality of Life (QoL) assessed with the EQ-5D for later use in cost-effectiveness analysis. All measures will be completed at all three time-points (T1-T3).
At six months, the investigators will ask a subset of 15-20 patients to participate in a semi-structured phone interview about their experience with the intervention.
Oncologists:
Oncologists complete a general item on self-efficacy in managing patient FCR together with the 27-item Self-efficacy in Patient-Centeredness Questionnaire (SEPCQ-27) at baseline, post-training (only oncologists in the intervention group), and after completed inclusion. Based on a suggested framework for implementation outcomes, the investigators will assess with 11-point scales: 1) acceptability, 2) appropriateness, 3) feasibility, together with 4) fidelity, measured as the average number of components oncologists report having delivered to patients, and 5) sustainability measured as the proportion of oncologists in the intervention group who report having used CIFeR at least once within the last three months, measured six months after completed inclusion. Six months after the inclusion of their last patient, all oncologists will be asked to participate in a semi-structured interview and provide feedback on the CIFeR-training and their experiences with the intervention, including perceived utility and the perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing CIFeR in routine care. The investigators will also examine CIFeR e-training analytics regarding access and time spent on the various parts.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention (delivering CIFeR) | Experimental | Other: Clinician-led intervention to address fear of cancer recurrence (CIFeR)At the patient's first follow-up appointment after anti-cancer treatment, oncologists will, in addition to the usual follow-up procedure, deliver a brief psychological intervention (CIFeR) |
| Control (treatment as usual) | No intervention | –At the patients first follow-up appointment after anti-cancer treatment, oncologists will deliver treatment as usual (the usual follow-up procedure) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Are ≥ 18 years old
- Have completed their primary treatment, i.e., surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy, for breast, ovarian, prostate, or lung cancer at the participating departments between three weeks and three months previously.
- Score >= 13 on the FCRI-SF
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Clinician-led intervention to address fear of cancer recurrence (CIFeR)The intervention includes five components informed by theoretical models and existing interventions for FCR: 1) FCR normalization: reassurance that FCR is a common and normal phenomenon after treatment for cancer, 2) Providing prognostic information: asking patients whether they would like information about their risk of recurrence and, if yes,providing this information, 3) Providing education and take-home information on red-flag recurrence symptoms, 4) Brief advice on managing worry: distraction, meditation, mindfulness, reassurance, and links to online resources to manage FCR, and 5) referral to a psychologist if FCR is high (FCRI-SF >= 22), or if deemed helpful by the patient or clinician. Access will be provided to ConquerFear-Group delivered online by trained psychologists. | Other | Intervention (delivering CIFeR) |
Primary outcome
Fear of cancer recurrence
Time frame: T1 (2 weeks prior to intervention), T2 (one week post intervention), T3 (three months post intervention)
Assessed with the 9-item Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory Short Form (FCRI-SF), range 0-36. Higher scores indicate worse outcome
6 secondary outcomes
Anxiety and depression
Time frame: T1 (2 weeks prior to intervention), T2 (one week post intervention), T3 (three months post intervention)
Patient reported intervention usefulness
Time frame: T1 (2 weeks prior to intervention), T2 (one week post intervention), T3 (three months post intervention)
Metacognition
Time frame: T1 (2 weeks prior to intervention), T2 (one week post intervention), T3 (three months post intervention)
Unmet needs
Time frame: T1 (2 weeks prior to intervention), T2 (one week post intervention), T3 (three months post intervention)
Rumination
Time frame: T1 (2 weeks prior to intervention), T2 (one week post intervention), T3 (three months post intervention)
General Quality of Life (QoL)
Time frame: T1 (2 weeks prior to intervention), T2 (one week post intervention), T3 (three months post intervention)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Aug 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Data will be available upon request an in accordance with the GDPR regulations
Related trials for Fear of Cancer Recurrence
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Psilocybin FCR Early-Stage Breast Cancer
Early-stage Breast Cancer, Fear of Cancer Recurrence
RecruitingPhase 1
Study of Psilocybin Assisted Psychotherapy to Address Fear of Recurrence
Breast Cancer, Ovarian Cancer
Recruiting
The Effect of a Stepped-care Metacognition-based Intervention on Managing Fear of Cancer Recurrence
Cancer, Fear of Cancer Recurrence
Recruiting
Implementation and Evaluation of a Fear of Cancer Recurrence Screening, Referral and Management Program
Fear of Cancer Recurrence, Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) Versus Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) for Fear of Cancer Recurrence (FCR) in Cancer Survivors and Their Spouses
Fear of Cancer Recurrence, Cancer Survivorship
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Louise Strøm, PhD contact
Robert Zachariae, Professsor principal investigator
Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Clinician-led intervention to address fear of cancer recurrence (CIFeR) in people with Fear of Cancer Recurrence, run by Aarhus University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Eva Rames Nissen, PhD (+4587162674, enissen@oncology.au.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Fear of cancer recurrence (time frame: T1 (2 weeks prior to intervention), T2 (one week post intervention), T3 (three months post intervention)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Aug 2024.