AzTrials
AzTrials

Autoimmune / Connective Tissue DiseasesNCT06542783

Realistic in Generation of HEp-2 Cell Images Using Latent Diffusion Models: a Multi-center Visual Turing Test

An observational study of Autoimmune / Connective Tissue Diseases and Anti-Nuclear Antibody, run by Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine at 1 site in China.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this prospective observational study is to rigorously examine the feasibility and efficacy of utilizing latent diffusion models for data augmentation in anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) Hep-2 cell immunofluorescence images. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
referring to the results of AI model output
How many people
300 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
10 May 2025to 30 Jan 2029
How long will I take part?
6 Months
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: We are recruiting cytopathologists from clinical laboratories in multiple medical institutions worldwide who specialize in interpreting anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) patterns to participate in a visual Turing test.

Who may be able to join

  • Originating from reputable medical institutions
  • Possessing relevant certification and qualifications
  • Having over one year of experience in interpreting anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) patterns within a laboratory setting

Who cannot join

  • Lacking relevant professional certification and qualifications
  • Without experience in interpreting ANA patterns
  • Unwilling to accept the rules and informed consent of the visual Turing test

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Department of Clinical Laboratory, Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200092

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Evaluating the Realism of ANA HEp-2 Cell Images Synthesized Using Latent Diffusion Models: A Multi-center Visual Turing Test

The objective of this prospective observational study is to rigorously examine the feasibility and efficacy of utilizing latent diffusion models for data augmentation in anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) Hep-2 cell immunofluorescence images. The main question it aims to answer is:

Can the application of such models potentially enhance the data quality, increase sample diversity, or improve the accuracy and efficiency of subsequent analytical processes (like disease diagnosis and classification) when utilized with ANA-related images?

Read the detailed description

A fundamental problem in biomedical research is the low number of observations available, mostly due to a lack of available biosamples, prohibitive costs, or ethical reasons. Augmenting few real observations with generated in silico samples could lead to more robust analysis results and a higher reproducibility rate. Here, The investigators propose to use unsupervised learning with latent diffusion models for the realistic generation of ANA-IIF image data.

The investigators hypothesize that the the generation of ANA-IIF image will be realistic if it is hard to differentiate them (fake) from real (true) . To test this hypothesis, the investigators present a Multi-center Visual Turing tests (https://turing.rednoble.net/) in order to evaluate the quality of the generated (fake) images.

This experimental setup allows the investigators to validate the overall quality of the generated ANA-IIF images, which can then be used to (1) train cytopathologists for educational purposes, and (2) generate realistic samples to train deep networks with big data.

Being tested
referring to the results of AI model output
Keywords
anti-nuclear antibody, latent diffusion models, Visual Turing tests
Medical subject headings
Connective Tissue Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • referring to the results of AI model outputBehavioural

    determining the ANA pattern type with or without referring to the results of AI model output.

Study groups in NCT06542783
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
expertswith over 20 years of experience in ANA-IIF reading
Receives: Behavioral: referring to the results of AI model output
junior cytopathologistsless than 5 years of academic medical experience
Receives: Behavioral: referring to the results of AI model output

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The realistic of images synthesized by diffusion models

    The investigators conducted a study using the visual Turing test method, measuring through a questionnaire format, and assessed the measurement results using a 5-point Likert Scale.

    The 5-point Likert Scale assesses participants' opinions on the quality of images through five response options: Real, Much like, Uncertain, Not quite like, Fake. It calculates scores by assigning numbers (e.g., 5 to 1) to these options, summing up scores for each participant. Results are evaluated by analyzing the distribution of scores, including mean scores, and assessing their reliability and validity.

    Additionally, the investigator calculated a range of parameters utilized for internal model assessment, including: including precision, recall, F1 score, and mean average precision (mAP).

    Measured: Baseline

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. The impact of the AI model's output on the participants

    The investigator evaluated the change in the accuracy rate of participants' interpretations before and after being assisted by AI model, investigators will conduct a comparative analysis. Additionally, the investigator calculate the Kappa coefficient of agreement between human interpretations and the model, and evaluate whether there are differences in accuracy among cytopathologists with varying levels of experience when assisted by AI.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. The time taken of ANA pattern interpretation

    The investigator compare the time taken of participant to complete interpretations before and after the AI model's intervention, assessing whether there is a reduction in average interpretation time per case, from X minutes pre-AI assistance to Y minutes post-AI.

    Measured: Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Aug 2024
  2. Study start10 May 2025
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jan 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
300 participants (estimated)
Target duration
6 Months
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06542783
Sponsor's protocol ID
XH-24-007
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
23 Jul 2024
Last updated
10 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Zeng J, Gao X, Gao L, Yu Y, Shen L, Pan X. Recognition of rare antinuclear antibody patterns based on a novel attention-based enhancement framework. Brief Bioinform. 2024 Jan 22;25(2):bbad531. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbad531.

    PubMed 38279651
  • Rahman S, Wang L, Sun C, Zhou L. Deep learning based HEp-2 image classification: A comprehensive review. Med Image Anal. 2020 Oct;65:101764. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2020.101764. Epub 2020 Jul 7.

    PubMed 32745976
  • Hobson P, Lovell BC, Percannella G, Vento M, Wiliem A. Benchmarking human epithelial type 2 interphase cells classification methods on a very large dataset. Artif Intell Med. 2015 Nov;65(3):239-50. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Aug 13.

    PubMed 26303104
  • Niehues JM, Muller-Franzes G, Schirris Y, Wagner SJ, Jendrusch M, Kloor M, Pearson AT, Muti HS, Hewitt KJ, Veldhuizen GP, Zigutyte L, Truhn D, Kather JN. Using histopathology latent diffusion models as privacy-preserving dataset augmenters improves downstream classification performance. Comput Biol Med. 2024 Jun;175:108410. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108410. Epub 2024 Apr 4.

    PubMed 38678938
  • Selim M, Zhang J, Brooks MA, Wang G, Chen J. DiffusionCT: Latent Diffusion Model for CT Image Standardization. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2024 Jan 11;2023:624-633. eCollection 2023.

    PubMed 38222387
  • Marouf M, Machart P, Bansal V, Kilian C, Magruder DS, Krebs CF, Bonn S. Realistic in silico generation and augmentation of single-cell RNA-seq data using generative adversarial networks. Nat Commun. 2020 Jan 9;11(1):166. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14018-z.

    PubMed 31919373

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Autoimmune / Connective Tissue Diseases and Anti-Nuclear Antibody, run by Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The realistic of images synthesized by diffusion models (time frame: Baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06542783, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in