PregnancyPeriFlexNCT06542744
Comparison of the Flexibility of the Perineum in Primiparous Women Using the Medical Device Emagina During 90 Days of Their Pregnancy Compared to Those Having a Standard Pregnancy Follow-up
A study testing Training with the Emagina device at home until birth in people with Pregnancy and Childbirth, run by Mumming at 15 sites in France.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical investigation is to learn if training with Emagina device can improve flexibility of the perineum during childbirth with the help of a balloon that inflates in the genital area according to a time-limited exercise program specifically developed to optimize results, in adult, pregnant women… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Pregnancy, Childbirth
- What is being tested?
- Training with the Emagina device at home until birth
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 88 participants
- Where
- 15 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 10 Oct 2024to 10 Oct 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Women over 18 years of age
- Singleton (fetus)
- Primiparous subject
- Subject less than 5 months pregnant (between 20 and 24 week of amenorrhea)
- Subject affiliated to a social security plan
- Subject who has given written consent prior to any specific procedure related to the clinical investigation
- Subject able to understand and complete the clinical investigation questionnaires
- Subject having a smartphone and being able to download the Emagina app
Who cannot join
- High-risk pregnancy (subjects presenting pregnancy-related risks will be excluded from participating in this clinical investigation, including risks of premature delivery, cases of symptomatically low-lying placenta and any contraindications to sexual relations)
- Scheduled cesarean section prior to inclusion
- History of vaginal or perineal surgery prior to pregnancy
- Pelvic anomalies
- Threatened preterm delivery prior to inclusion
- Vaginismus
Show all 14Show fewer
- Use of Epi-no prior to inclusion
- Collagenosis or other chronic disorders affecting collagen
- Planned home birth
- Nerve damage and other illnesses that reduce sensitivity to pain in the genital area (i.e. paraplegia, multiple sclerosis, diabetic neuropathy, medication that alters sensitivity in the genital area, vulvar varicose veins).
- Persons deprived of liberty, under guardianship or trusteeship
- Drug or alcohol abuse
- Dementia, mental impairment, or psychiatric pathology that may compromise subject informed consent and/or compliance with the protocol and trial monitoring
- Subject unable to comply with protocol monitoring for psychological, social, family or geographic reasons
Trial locations and contacts
15 sites in 1 country.
15 sites in 1 country
France15 sites
Ornella Ferrari, 1 Bis Rue Castéja
Boulogne-Billancourt, 92100
Annabelle Sallandre, 7 Rue Ambroise Paré
Coutances, 50200
Solène Baradu, 5 Rue des Sports
Grandchamps-des-Fontaines, 44119
Grazia Sabatino, 2 impasse du Gaz
Marseille, 13008
Jennifer Denys, 53 rue de la Méditerranée
Montpellier, 34070
Elsa Molinier, 127 Rue Maurice Béjart
Montpellier, 34080
Alexandra Sasportas, 8 Boulevard de Magenta
Paris, 75010
Alice Rault, 103 Avenue de la République
Paris, 75011
Marion Alglave, 8 Rue Ernest Renan
Paris, 75015
Sobiha Sbai, 370 Avenue Jean Jaurès
Ronchin, 59790
Tiphaine Cartier, 45 Boulevard des Belges
Rouen, 76000
Céline Vauclin, 1 Avenue Jacques Chastellain
Rouen, 76100
Ariane Gasulla, 43 Rue Camille Claudel
Saint-Paul-lès-Dax, 40990
Annabel Buzy, 39 avenue Jean Jaurès
Suresnes, 92150
Karen Methia, 15 Allée du Gros Chêne
Verneuil-sur-Seine, 78480
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Multicentric, Randomized Clinical Investigation Assessing the Impact of Perineal Training With the Emagina Medical Device on Perineal Flexibility During Pregnancy and Childbirth
The goal of this clinical investigation is to learn if training with Emagina device can improve flexibility of the perineum during childbirth with the help of a balloon that inflates in the genital area according to a time-limited exercise program specifically developed to optimize results, in adult, pregnant women with their first child (single fetus) less than 24 weeks of amenorrhea at the time of inclusion (i.e. during the 5th month of pregnancy).
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Read more
- Does the Emagina training program improve perineal flexibility during pregnancy ?
- Does the Emagina training program reduce the proportion and importance of perineal tears, as well as the proportion of sutures and episiotomies during childbirth ?
Researchers will compare Emagina group to a Control group (no intervention) to see if Emagina device works to improve perineum flexibility.
Participants will :
- measure the flexibility of their perineum on 2 occasions 90 days apart, with or without perineal training
- perform perineal training with the Emagina medical device or follow current practice
- fill out e-questionnaires regarding quality of life, lifestyle, pelvic static disorders, sexual activity and urinary incontinence
- Conditions
- Pregnancy, Childbirth
- Being tested
- Training with the Emagina device at home until birth, No intervention
- Keywords
- Pregnancy, Perineum, Perineal training, Perineal flexibility, Perineal trauma prevention, Pelvic floor disorder prevention, Delivery trauma, Episiotomies reduction, Perineal tearing prevention, Pelvic muscle injury, Vaginal delivery
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Training with the Emagina device at home until birthDevice
The subjects will use the device at home according to a series of 3 exercises, 2 sessions per week, followed by a series of 4 exercises, 3 sessions per week starting from D75.
No interventionOther
The subjects will follow usual care instructions. Subjects are not trained in the use of Emagina.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Subjects using the Emagina Medical device | Experimental | Emagina Medical device Receives: Device: Training with the Emagina device at home until birth |
| Control group | Other | Standard of Care (SOC) Receives: Other: No intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Maximum diameter of balloon expelled at D90
To compare the flexibility of the perineum in primiparous subject having followed, during the pregnancy, the program of perineal training of the medical device Emagina during 90 days versus those having had a standard pregnancy follow-up
Measured: Day 90
Secondary outcomes (17)
Comparison of the expulsive phase
Expulsive phase will be defined with: the duration of the expulsive phase, the % of instrumental extraction (forceps, spatulas or vacuum-assisted delivery), the % of epidural anesthesia
Measured: At Birth
Comparison of perineal injuries
Perineal injuries will be defined with: the degree of perineal tears (according to the classification of perineal trauma), the % of grades 1, 2, 3, 4, the % of episiotomies, the % of perineal suture
Measured: At birth
APGAR score of the baby at birth
APGAR score at 1 minute, 5 minutes and 10 minutes after birth
Measured: At Birth
Height of the baby at birth
Height measured in cm
Measured: At birth
Weight of the baby at birth
Weight measured in g
Measured: At birth
Head size of the baby at birth
Head circumference measured in cm
Measured: At birth
Sex of the baby
Gender of the baby determined at birth
Measured: At birth
Quality of life (SF-12)
Quality of life assessed by the SF-12 and lifestyle assessed by a short survey
Measured: Baseline and 2 months after birth
Subject's satisfaction during delivery
Subject's satisfaction during delivery assessed by the QACE questionnaire
Measured: 2 months after birth
Postnatal pelvic statics disorders
Pelvic statics disorders assessed by the PFIQ-7 questionnaire
Measured: At baseline and 2 months postpartum
Postnatal return to normal sexual activity
The % of subjects with return to normal sexual activity 2 months after delivery assessed by FSFI questionnaire (Yes/No),
Measured: At baseline and 2 months postpartum
Postnatal urinary leakage
the % of subjects with urinary leakage 2 months after delivery assessed by ICIQ-UI questionnaire
Measured: At baseline and 2 months postpartum
Postnatal perineal rehabilitation session
Number of perineal rehabilitation session prescribed by investigator
Measured: 2 months after birth
Variation of pressure exerted by the perineum during the flexibility measurement
The variation of pressure exerted by the perineum during the flexibility measurement will be defined with following parameters: The pressure exerted while the balloon is fully inflated inside the vagina " IN ", The maximum pressure exerted during the expulsion of the balloon " EXP ", The pressure exerted when the balloon is outside " OUT ", Variation between IN and EXP defined as IN-EXP, Variation between EXP and OUT defined as EXP-OUT
Measured: At Day 0 and Day 90 visits
Usability of the device
Usability of Emagina assessed by the subjects through a questionnaire developed by the sponsor (i.e. ease of use of Emagina device, absence of technical issues while using Emagina device)
Measured: 2 months after birth
Percentage of Compliance with the device
Percentage of Compliance assessed by the Emagina App and defined as the number of days of use divided on the theoretical days of use
Measured: From baseline to birth
Adverse events
Adverse events recorded from ICF (Informed Consent Form) signature until final visit including the rate of unscheduled cesarean sections
Measured: From baseline through study completion, an average of 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Aug 2024
- Study start10 Oct 2024
- Primary completion12 Dec 2025
- Study completion10 Oct 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for PregnancyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 88 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mumming
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- David Desseauve, MD, Principal investigator, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble Alpes
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06542744
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PeriFlex
- Other IDs
- 2023-A01980-45
- Acronym
- PeriFlex
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 30 Jul 2024
- Last updated
- 5 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Multicentric, Randomized Clinical Investigation Assessing the Impact of Perineal Training With the Emagina Medical Device on Perineal Flexibility During Pregnancy and Childbirth
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06542744
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PeriFlex / PeriFlex
- Conditions
- Pregnancy, Childbirth
- Keywords
- Pregnancy, Perineum, Perineal training, Perineal flexibility, Perineal trauma prevention, Pelvic floor disorder prevention, Delivery trauma, Episiotomies reduction
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 88 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- MummingIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 10 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical investigation is to learn if training with Emagina device can improve flexibility of the perineum during childbirth with the help of a balloon that inflates in the genital area according to a time-limited exercise program specifically developed to optimize results, in adult, pregnant women with their first child (single fetus) less than 24 weeks of amenorrhea at the time of inclusion (i.e. during the 5th month of pregnancy).
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does the Emagina training program improve perineal flexibility during pregnancy ?
- Does the Emagina training program reduce the proportion and importance of perineal tears, as well as the proportion of sutures and episiotomies during childbirth ?
Researchers will compare Emagina group to a Control group (no intervention) to see if Emagina device works to improve perineum flexibility.
Participants will :
- measure the flexibility of their perineum on 2 occasions 90 days apart, with or without perineal training
- perform perineal training with the Emagina medical device or follow current practice
- fill out e-questionnaires regarding quality of life, lifestyle, pelvic static disorders, sexual activity and urinary incontinence
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Subjects using the Emagina Medical device | Experimental | Device: Training with the Emagina device at home until birthEmagina Medical device |
| Control group | Other | Other: No interventionStandard of Care (SOC) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Women over 18 years of age
- Singleton (fetus)
- Primiparous subject
- Subject less than 5 months pregnant (between 20 and 24 week of amenorrhea)
- Subject affiliated to a social security plan
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- High-risk pregnancy (subjects presenting pregnancy-related risks will be excluded from participating in this clinical investigation, including risks of premature delivery, cases of symptomatically low-lying placenta and any contraindications to sexual relations)
- Scheduled cesarean section prior to inclusion
- History of vaginal or perineal surgery prior to pregnancy
- Pelvic anomalies
- Threatened preterm delivery prior to inclusion
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Training with the Emagina device at home until birthThe subjects will use the device at home according to a series of 3 exercises, 2 sessions per week, followed by a series of 4 exercises, 3 sessions per week starting from D75. | Device | Subjects using the Emagina Medical device |
| No interventionThe subjects will follow usual care instructions. Subjects are not trained in the use of Emagina. | Other | Control group |
Primary outcome
Maximum diameter of balloon expelled at D90
Time frame: Day 90
To compare the flexibility of the perineum in primiparous subject having followed, during the pregnancy, the program of perineal training of the medical device Emagina during 90 days versus those having had a standard pregnancy follow-up
17 secondary outcomes
Comparison of the expulsive phase
Time frame: At Birth
Comparison of perineal injuries
Time frame: At birth
APGAR score of the baby at birth
Time frame: At Birth
Height of the baby at birth
Time frame: At birth
Weight of the baby at birth
Time frame: At birth
Head size of the baby at birth
Time frame: At birth
Sex of the baby
Time frame: At birth
Quality of life (SF-12)
Time frame: Baseline and 2 months after birth
Subject's satisfaction during delivery
Time frame: 2 months after birth
Postnatal pelvic statics disorders
Time frame: At baseline and 2 months postpartum
Postnatal return to normal sexual activity
Time frame: At baseline and 2 months postpartum
Postnatal urinary leakage
Time frame: At baseline and 2 months postpartum
Postnatal perineal rehabilitation session
Time frame: 2 months after birth
Variation of pressure exerted by the perineum during the flexibility measurement
Time frame: At Day 0 and Day 90 visits
Usability of the device
Time frame: 2 months after birth
Percentage of Compliance with the device
Time frame: From baseline to birth
Adverse events
Time frame: From baseline through study completion, an average of 6 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 May 2026.
Related trials for Pregnancy
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Population Pharmacokinetics of Temocillin in Acute Enterobacterial Pyelonephritis in Children
Pyelonephritis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Belzutifan (MK-6482) in Combination With Lenvatinib Versus Cabozantinib for Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma (MK-6482-011)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
Recruiting
Safety and Performance of UCon Patch Electrode
Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence, Urge
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
David Desseauve, MD principal investigator
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble Alpes
15 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Training with the Emagina device at home until birth in people with Pregnancy and Childbirth, run by Mumming at 15 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 15 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Maximum diameter of balloon expelled at D90 (time frame: Day 90). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 May 2026.