AzTrials
AzTrials

Peritoneal InfectionNCT06536673

Intervention to Reduce Infectious Complications of Peritoneal Dialysis

A study testing Intervention to reduce infectious complications of peritoneal dialysis and Data collection from the patient's clinical history in people with Peritoneal Infection, run by Universitat de Lleida.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Peritonitis is a common and serious complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and is one of the main causes of peritoneal dialysis technique failure and long-term hemodialysis conversion. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Peritoneal Infection
What is being tested?
Intervention to reduce infectious complications of peritoneal dialysis and Data collection from the patient's clinical history
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
15 Sep 2024to 1 Sep 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients >18 years of age
  • Medically stable
  • Who can perform dialysis themselves or with the help of a caregiver willing to participate in the study and sign the informed consent will be included

Who cannot join

  • Patients with psychiatric, psychological disorders and social (language barrier included)
  • Who do not have a formal/informal caregiver
  • Those who due to medical needs cannot continue with the standard schedule, pregnant women, participants who suffered peritonitis before receiving the educational intervention

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Elena Fernàndez Labadía, PhD student contact

+34626-321-345

elena.fernandez@udl.cat

About this study

Official title: Educational Intervention Aimed At Reducing Infectious Complications Related to Peritoneal Dialysis

Peritonitis is a common and serious complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and is one of the main causes of peritoneal dialysis technique failure and long-term hemodialysis conversion.

Read the detailed description

Peritoneal infections (PI) have been a very relevant representative of peritoneal dialysis (PD) for decades. PI is a very serious complication of PD and is a source of concern because of its high incidence. Each episode carries clinical consequences for the patient, increases in treatment costs, hospital admissions, technical failures and risk of death, especially in the 30 days following an episode.

The risk of peritonitis depends on non-modifiable factors (such as age, sex, diabetes) and modifiable factors (such as anti-infective prophylaxis, catheter care, and training).

It is important to accurately analyze the effect of modifiable factors, as they are the most relevant in reducing the rate of peritonitis.

Patient education is very important and can affect the success of the technique and clinical results. Therapeutic education has been considered a key factor in PD outcomes.

The PD nurse is responsible for training the patient and/or caregiver to be self-sufficient and autonomous in care, reinforce and highlight the importance of adherence to treatment, and promote safe actions to prevent technique-related infections when this one is made at home.

This is a pragmatic, retrospective-prospective (ambispective) study of educational intervention for patients with stage V advanced chronic kidney disease and those with cardiorenal syndrome starting a peritoneal dialysis program.

A retrospective control group with patients starting PD before January 2020 will be included and compared with an intervention group that will systematically include all patients starting DP since the start of the study and they will be implemented a new educational intervention based on a systematic review that has been carried out with the most recent evidence.

Being tested
Intervention to reduce infectious complications of peritoneal dialysis, Data collection from the patient's clinical history
Keywords
Educational intervention, Peritoneal dialysis, Peritonitis
Medical subject headings
Peritonitis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Intervention to reduce infectious complications of peritoneal dialysisBehavioural

    Also called Prospective study group

    • Before catheter placement: The nurse and doctor provide the patient and/or caregiver with a PD simulation.
    • Initial training: from the placement of the catheter to the beginning of the technique at home, approximately 4 weeks, 6 and 7 sessions, duration 1-2 hours per session. Individualized learning taking into account learning abilities and education. It includes the explanation of the PD and the display of informational pictograms/capsules.
    • Step-by-step teaching: peritoneal exchange, peritoneal orifice care, administration of intraperitoneal medication, recording of constants, detection of complications and risk behaviors.
    • Nutritional education and water intake.
    • Administration of the Objective Structured Assessment (OSA) checklist.
    • Retraining: between the 1st and 3rd month of the start, after an episode of peritonitis and/or hospitalization, risk behaviors, functional/cognitive impairment, passivity/demotivation behaviors, and regularly once the year.
  • Data collection from the patient's clinical historyBehavioural

    Also called Retrospective control group

    Data collection from the patient's clinical history because this new standardized educational intervention was not used.

Study groups in NCT06536673
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Retrospective control groupOtherThis is the PD population sample from before January 2020.
Receives: Behavioral: Data collection from the patient's clinical history
Prospective study groupExperimentalIt will be the incident patients in PD who will receive the educational intervention contained in this project and whose results will be compared with the control group.
Receives: Behavioral: Intervention to reduce infectious complications of peritoneal dialysis

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of peritonitis

    It is calculated as the number of episodes of peritonitis per patient and year at risk.

    Measured: 1 year after educational intervention.

Secondary outcomes (43)
  1. Age

    In years

    Measured: Day 1 of peritoneal technique training.

  2. Gender

    Male or female

    Measured: Day 1 of peritoneal technique training.

  3. Language barrier

    Yes or not

    Measured: Day 1 of peritoneal technique training.

  4. Marital status

    Single, married, coupled, separated - divorced, widowed

    Measured: Day 1 of peritoneal technique training.

  5. Educational level

    Not finished primary studies, primary schools, secondary, middle/higher grade cycle, high school, university studies, doctorate

    Measured: Day 1 of peritoneal technique training.

  6. Caregiver disposition

    Yes or not

    Measured: Day 1 of peritoneal technique training.

  7. Drinking water supply

    Yes or not

    Measured: Day 1 of peritoneal technique training.

  8. Weight

    In kilograms

    Measured: Day 1 of peritoneal technique training.

  9. Height

    In meters

    Measured: Day 1 of peritoneal technique training.

  10. Body Mass Index (BMI)

    BMI= Current weight (kg) ÷ height (m) x height (m)= kg/m2. Low weight: Less than 18.4 Normal weight: 18.5 to 24.9 Overweight: 25 to 29.9 Grade I Obesity: 30 to 34.9 Grade II Obesity: 35 to 39.9 Grade III Obesity: Equal to or greater than 40.

    Measured: Day 1 of peritoneal technique training.

  11. Diabetes

    Yes or not

    Measured: Day 1 of peritoneal technique training.

  12. Cardiovascular disease

    Yes or not

    Measured: Day 1 of peritoneal technique training.

  13. Cerebrovascular disease

    Yes or not

    Measured: Day 1 of peritoneal technique training.

  14. Hypertension

    Yes or not

    Measured: Day 1 of peritoneal technique training.

  15. Cancer

    Yes or not

    Measured: Day 1 of peritoneal technique training.

  16. The primary cause of kidney disease

    Glomerular disease, tubulointerstitial disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, other systemic diseases, familial/hereditary nephropathy, various renal disorders

    Measured: Day 1 of peritoneal technique training.

  17. Barthel index

    Scores of 100 imply total independence. Scores between 100 and 60 indicate the existence of a slight dependency or need for help, between 55 and 40 a moderate dependency, from 35 to 20 we would speak of severe dependency and scores below 20 points would indicate that the subject has a total dependence

    Measured: Day 1 of peritoneal technique training.

  18. Lawton and Brody scale

    The 8 points indicate total independence to carry out the instrumental activities of daily life.- A lower result indicates functional deterioration.

    Measured: Day 1 of peritoneal technique training.

  19. Assessment of quality of life with the questionnaire EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D)

    They are coded as 1 if the response option is "I have no problems"; with a 2 if the response option is "some or moderate problems"; and with a 3 if the answer option is "many problems." In such a way that the higher the value reflected, the worse the assessment that the subject makes of his or her state.

    Measured: Day 1 of peritoneal technique training.

  20. Cognitive impairment -PFEIFFER Test

    From 0 to 2 errors: The patient is considered to have no cognitive impairment. 3 to 4 errors: The patient is considered to have mild cognitive impairment. From 5 to 7 errors: The patient is considered to have moderate cognitive impairment

    Measured: Day 1 of peritoneal technique training.

  21. Fragility detection - Q-Scale FRAIL

    Between 1-2 affirmative answers: pre-fragile. >2 fragile

    Measured: Day 1 of peritoneal technique training.

  22. The origin before arriving at peritoneal dialysis

    Pre-dialysis, hemodialysis, transplantation, cardiorenal syndrome

    Measured: Day 1 of peritoneal technique training.

  23. Residual renal function

    Yes or not

    Measured: Day 1 of peritoneal technique training.

  24. Type of peritoneal catheter

    Self-positioning catheter/Tenckhoff straight

    Measured: Day 1 of peritoneal technique training.

  25. Hemoglobin

    12.0 - 16.0 gr/dl

    Measured: First month of the start of the technique at home.

  26. Serum albumin

    3.4 - 5.2 g/dL

    Measured: First month of the start of the technique at home.

  27. Serum potassium

    3.50 - 5.50 mmol/L

    Measured: First month of the start of the technique at home.

  28. Serum sodium

    135.0 - 150.0 mmol/L

    Measured: First month of the start of the technique at home.

  29. Serum bicarbonate

    23.0 - 27.0 mmol/L

    Measured: First month of the start of the technique at home.

  30. Serum calcium

    8.80 - 10.60 mg/dL

    Measured: First month of the start of the technique at home.

  31. Serum phosphorus

    2.70 - 4.50 mg/dL

    Measured: First month of the start of the technique at home.

  32. Blood urea nitrogen

    10 - 50 mg/dL

    Measured: First month of the start of the technique at home.

  33. Serum creatinine

    0.50 - 0.90 mg/dL

    Measured: First month of the start of the technique at home.

  34. Peritonitis

    Yes or not

    Measured: Follow-up during the first year after educational intervention.

  35. Time to first peritonitis

    In months without peritonitis

    Measured: Follow-up during the first year after educational intervention.

  36. Orifice infection

    Yes or not

    Measured: Follow-up during the first year after educational intervention.

  37. Peritoneal orifice tunnelitis

    Yes or not

    Measured: Follow-up during the first year after educational intervention.

  38. Result of peritoneal fluid culture

    positive, negative

    Measured: Follow-up during the first year after educational intervention.

  39. Type of peritoneal infection

    Germ, fungus, biofilm

    Measured: Follow-up during the first year after educational intervention.

  40. Reinfection

    Yes or not

    Measured: Follow-up during the first year after educational intervention.

  41. Relapse

    Yes or not

    Measured: Follow-up during the first year after educational intervention.

  42. Complicated peritonitis

    change of technique/death

    Measured: Follow-up during the first year after educational intervention.

  43. Antibiotic administered

    Type of antibiotic administered, the dosage.

    Measured: Follow-up during the first year after educational intervention.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Aug 2024
  2. Study start15 Sep 2024 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Feb 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Sep 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
A retrospective control group with patients starting DP before January 2020 will be included and compared with an intervention group that will systematically include all patients starting DP since the start of the study.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06536673
Sponsor's protocol ID
CEIC-2900
Status last verified
Sep 2024
First submitted
16 Jul 2024
Last updated
19 Sep 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Bonnal H, Bechade C, Boyer A, Lobbedez T, Guillouet S, Verger C, Ficheux M, Lanot A. Effects of educational practices on the peritonitis risk in peritoneal dialysis: a retrospective cohort study with data from the French peritoneal Dialysis registry (RDPLF). BMC Nephrol. 2020 May 29;21(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-01867-w.

    PubMed 32471380
  • Cho Y, Htay H, Johnson DW. Centre effects and peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017 Jun 1;32(6):913-915. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfx054. No abstract available.

    PubMed 28505351
  • Gadola L, Poggi C, Poggio M, Saez L, Ferrari A, Romero J, Fumero S, Ghelfi G, Chifflet L, Borges PL. Using a multidisciplinary training program to reduce peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int. 2013 Jan-Feb;33(1):38-45. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2011.00109. Epub 2012 Jul 1.

    PubMed 22753455
  • Bieber S, Mehrotra R. Peritoneal Dialysis Access Associated Infections. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2019 Jan;26(1):23-29. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2018.09.002.

    PubMed 30876613

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Intervention to reduce infectious complications of peritoneal dialysis and Data collection from the patient's clinical history in people with Peritoneal Infection, run by Universitat de Lleida.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Elena Fernàndez Labadía, PhD student (+34626-321-345, elena.fernandez@udl.cat), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of peritonitis (time frame: 1 year after educational intervention.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06536673, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in