Dental ImplantsCantileversNCT06534398
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Implant-supported Prostheses With Cantilever Extensions After 10 Years of Function
An observational study of Dental Implants, run by Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki at 1 site in Greece.
Trial summary
A retrospective examination was performed on patients who had received treatment with dental implants supporting a prosthesis with a cantilever extension for at least 10 years of function. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Dental Implants
- What is being tested?
- Dental implant prosthesis with cantilever extension
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 19 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGreece
- Study dates
- 1 May 2024to 30 Jul 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: The patient sample of this study is part of a retrospective evaluation of patients who received treatment with dental implants in a private periodontal practice environment between 2000 and 2013, with at least 10 years of functional loading of their prosthetic work. Patients who received Fixed Dental Prostheses with Cantilever Extension were included in this study sample
The inclusion criteria were as follows:
- Age 18 years and over
- Systemic health or controlled medical conditions
- Periodontal health, either no periodontal disease, or previously treated periodontal disease and under a supportive periodontal maintenance (SPT) program
- Smokers were included but encouraged to enter a smoking cessation program
- Patients with bruxism or parafunctional habits were included.
The exclusion criteria were as follows:
- Uncontrolled medical conditions
- Active uncontrolled periodontal disease
- Inability to present for the reevaluation appointment
- Immediate implant placement
- Cantilever units that were part of full-arch restorations
- Cantilever units that were connected to a single implant
- Non-existent opposing dentition
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Greece1 site
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Dentistry
Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, 54124
About this study
Official title: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Implant-supported Prostheses With Cantilever Extensions. A Retrospective Study With a Follow-up of at Least 10 Years.
A retrospective examination was performed on patients who had received treatment with dental implants supporting a prosthesis with a cantilever extension for at least 10 years of function.
Read the detailed description
The successful use of osseointegrated dental implants in replacing missing teeth has been adequately documented, with multiple studies reporting long-term success exceeding 10 years of function. However, there is still insufficient evidence in cases where availability of adequate bone precludes ideal placement of implants. Examples of cases like these include the posterior maxilla when pneumatization of the maxillary sinus does not allow for placement of implants, or areas of thin bone that would require extensive guided bone regeneration (GBR) techniques and increase patient morbidity. In such cases the use of fixed dental prostheses (FDPC's) with cantilever extension has been suggested in lieu of sinus lift techniques or GBR procedures. However, few studies have actually addressed the long-term success of such FDPC's, both from a surgical and a prosthetic standpoint, especially in posterior areas of the mandible and maxilla where loading forces are expected to be higher.
Two studies addressed this issue in the early 2000's with successful outcomes reported for an observation period of 5 years. Others reported similar outcomes after a mean observation period of 5.6 years. The 5th Consensus Conference of the European Association of Osseointegration (EAO) suggested that such treatment can be recommended to patients, albeit with little available evidence and limited follow-up of cases. Recent studies have delved further into this issue, offering longer follow-up data of more than 10 years of function. They included both 2 unit FDP's anchored on one implant and 3 unit FDP's anchored on two implants with cantilever extensions. They concluded that this treatment modality is a reliable option with long-term stability and few complications, mainly prosthetic.
The aim of this retrospective study is to offer further data on the long-term success and complications when at least two dental implants are used to support a FDPC in the posterior areas of both jaws, after at least 10 years of function.
- Conditions
- Dental Implants
- Being tested
- Dental implant prosthesis with cantilever extension
- Keywords
- Dental implants, cantilever extension, biologic complications, technical complications
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dental implant prosthesis with cantilever extensionDevice
A retrospective study on the radiographic and clinical findings of implant-supported dental prostheses with cantilever extensions in place and function for at least 10 years
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean bone loss
Mean bone loss measured from the difference of the bone levels at time of implant placement compared to the time of examination
Measured: 10 years at least
Secondary outcomes (3)
Mean Probing Depth
The average probing depth at the time of examination at each implant site
Measured: 10 years at least
Biologic complications
Recording of biologic complications around implants (health, peri-implant mucositis, peri-implantitis
Measured: 10 years at least
Technical complications
Recording of prosthetic complications encountered at the dental prostheses with cantilever extensions
Measured: 10 years at least
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Aug 2024
- Study start1 May 2024
- Primary completion30 Jul 2024
- Study completion30 Jul 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (20)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Dental ImplantsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Aristotle University Of ThessalonikiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 19 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ioannis Vouros, DDS, PhD, Study chair, Professor of Periodontology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06534398
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Cantilever implants
- Acronym
- Cantilevers
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 30 Jul 2024
- Last updated
- 7 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Wennstrom J, Zurdo J, Karlsson S, Ekestubbe A, Grondahl K, Lindhe J. Bone level change at implant-supported fixed partial dentures with and without cantilever extension after 5 years in function. J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Dec;31(12):1077-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00603.x.
PubMed 15560808Schmid E, Morandini M, Roccuzzo A, Ramseier CA, Sculean A, Salvi GE. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extension. A retrospective cohort study with a follow-up of at least 10 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Dec;31(12):1243-1252. doi: 10.1111/clr.13672. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
PubMed 32991763Aglietta M, Iorio Siciliano V, Blasi A, Sculean A, Bragger U, Lang NP, Salvi GE. Clinical and radiographic changes at implants supporting single-unit crowns (SCs) and fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) with one cantilever extension. A retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 May;23(5):550-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02391.x. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
PubMed 22250868Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Peri-implant health. J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S249-S256. doi: 10.1002/JPER.16-0424.
PubMed 29926949Baumer A, Toekan S, Saure D, Korner G. Survival and success of implants in a private periodontal practice: a 10 year retrospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2020 Mar 30;20(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01064-z.
PubMed 32228667Berglundh T, Armitage G, Araujo MG, Avila-Ortiz G, Blanco J, Camargo PM, Chen S, Cochran D, Derks J, Figuero E, Hammerle CHF, Heitz-Mayfield LJA, Huynh-Ba G, Iacono V, Koo KT, Lambert F, McCauley L, Quirynen M, Renvert S, Salvi GE, Schwarz F, Tarnow D, Tomasi C, Wang HL, Zitzmann N. Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45 Suppl 20:S286-S291. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12957.
PubMed 29926491Chappuis V, Buser R, Bragger U, Bornstein MM, Salvi GE, Buser D. Long-term outcomes of dental implants with a titanium plasma-sprayed surface: a 20-year prospective case series study in partially edentulous patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Dec;15(6):780-90. doi: 10.1111/cid.12056. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
PubMed 23506385Derks J, Schaller D, Hakansson J, Wennstrom JL, Tomasi C, Berglundh T. Effectiveness of Implant Therapy Analyzed in a Swedish Population: Prevalence of Peri-implantitis. J Dent Res. 2016 Jan;95(1):43-9. doi: 10.1177/0022034515608832.
PubMed 26701919Frisch E, Wild V, Ratka-Kruger P, Vach K, Sennhenn-Kirchner S. Long-term results of implants and implant-supported prostheses under systematic supportive implant therapy: A retrospective 25-year study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Dec;22(6):689-696. doi: 10.1111/cid.12944. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
PubMed 32969180Gracis S, Michalakis K, Vigolo P, Vult von Steyern P, Zwahlen M, Sailer I. Internal vs. external connections for abutments/reconstructions: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:202-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02556.x.
PubMed 23062143Halg GA, Schmid J, Hammerle CH. Bone level changes at implants supporting crowns or fixed partial dentures with or without cantilevers. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Oct;19(10):983-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01556.x.
PubMed 18828813Hammerle CHF, Cordaro L, Alccayhuaman KAA, Botticelli D, Esposito M, Colomina LE, Gil A, Gulje FL, Ioannidis A, Meijer H, Papageorgiou S, Raghoebar G, Romeo E, Renouard F, Storelli S, Torsello F, Wachtel H. Biomechanical aspects: Summary and consensus statements of group 4. The 5th EAO Consensus Conference 2018. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 18:326-331. doi: 10.1111/clr.13284.
PubMed 30306690Karoussis IK, Salvi GE, Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Bragger U, Hammerle CH, Lang NP. Long-term implant prognosis in patients with and without a history of chronic periodontitis: a 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI Dental Implant System. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Jun;14(3):329-39. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.000.00934.x.
PubMed 12755783Lekholm U, Grondahl K, Jemt T. Outcome of oral implant treatment in partially edentulous jaws followed 20 years in clinical function. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2006;8(4):178-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00019.x.
PubMed 17100743Mombelli A, van Oosten MA, Schurch E Jr, Land NP. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1987 Dec;2(4):145-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302x.1987.tb00298.x. No abstract available.
PubMed 3507627
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Implant-supported Prostheses With Cantilever Extensions. A Retrospective Study With a Follow-up of at Least 10 Years.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06534398
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Cantilevers / Cantilever implants
- Conditions
- Dental Implants
- Keywords
- Dental implants, cantilever extension, biologic complications, technical complications
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 19 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Aristotle University Of ThessalonikiUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 May 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jul 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A retrospective examination was performed on patients who had received treatment with dental implants supporting a prosthesis with a cantilever extension for at least 10 years of function.
Detailed description
The successful use of osseointegrated dental implants in replacing missing teeth has been adequately documented, with multiple studies reporting long-term success exceeding 10 years of function. However, there is still insufficient evidence in cases where availability of adequate bone precludes ideal placement of implants. Examples of cases like these include the posterior maxilla when pneumatization of the maxillary sinus does not allow for placement of implants, or areas of thin bone that would require extensive guided bone regeneration (GBR) techniques and increase patient morbidity. In such cases the use of fixed dental prostheses (FDPC's) with cantilever extension has been suggested in lieu of sinus lift techniques or GBR procedures. However, few studies have actually addressed the long-term success of such FDPC's, both from a surgical and a prosthetic standpoint, especially in posterior areas of the mandible and maxilla where loading forces are expected to be higher.
Two studies addressed this issue in the early 2000's with successful outcomes reported for an observation period of 5 years. Others reported similar outcomes after a mean observation period of 5.6 years. The 5th Consensus Conference of the European Association of Osseointegration (EAO) suggested that such treatment can be recommended to patients, albeit with little available evidence and limited follow-up of cases. Recent studies have delved further into this issue, offering longer follow-up data of more than 10 years of function. They included both 2 unit FDP's anchored on one implant and 3 unit FDP's anchored on two implants with cantilever extensions. They concluded that this treatment modality is a reliable option with long-term stability and few complications, mainly prosthetic.
The aim of this retrospective study is to offer further data on the long-term success and complications when at least two dental implants are used to support a FDPC in the posterior areas of both jaws, after at least 10 years of function.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The patient sample of this study is part of a retrospective evaluation of patients who received treatment with dental implants in a private periodontal practice environment between 2000 and 2013, with at least 10 years of functional loading of their prosthetic work. Patients who received Fixed Dental Prostheses with Cantilever Extension were included in this study sample
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dental implant prosthesis with cantilever extensionA retrospective study on the radiographic and clinical findings of implant-supported dental prostheses with cantilever extensions in place and function for at least 10 years | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Mean bone loss
Time frame: 10 years at least
Mean bone loss measured from the difference of the bone levels at time of implant placement compared to the time of examination
3 secondary outcomes
Mean Probing Depth
Time frame: 10 years at least
Biologic complications
Time frame: 10 years at least
Technical complications
Time frame: 10 years at least
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Aug 2024.
- Results publication: PubMed 15560808Wennstrom J, Zurdo J, Karlsson S, Ekestubbe A, Grondahl K, Lindhe J. Bone level change at implant-supported fixed partial dentures with and without cantilever extension after 5 years in function. J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Dec;31(12):1077-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00603.x.
- Results publication: PubMed 32991763Schmid E, Morandini M, Roccuzzo A, Ramseier CA, Sculean A, Salvi GE. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extension. A retrospective cohort study with a follow-up of at least 10 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Dec;31(12):1243-1252. doi: 10.1111/clr.13672. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
- Results publication: PubMed 22250868Aglietta M, Iorio Siciliano V, Blasi A, Sculean A, Bragger U, Lang NP, Salvi GE. Clinical and radiographic changes at implants supporting single-unit crowns (SCs) and fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) with one cantilever extension. A retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 May;23(5):550-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02391.x. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
- Results publication: PubMed 29926949Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Peri-implant health. J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S249-S256. doi: 10.1002/JPER.16-0424.
- Results publication: PubMed 32228667Baumer A, Toekan S, Saure D, Korner G. Survival and success of implants in a private periodontal practice: a 10 year retrospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2020 Mar 30;20(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01064-z.
- Results publication: PubMed 29926491Berglundh T, Armitage G, Araujo MG, Avila-Ortiz G, Blanco J, Camargo PM, Chen S, Cochran D, Derks J, Figuero E, Hammerle CHF, Heitz-Mayfield LJA, Huynh-Ba G, Iacono V, Koo KT, Lambert F, McCauley L, Quirynen M, Renvert S, Salvi GE, Schwarz F, Tarnow D, Tomasi C, Wang HL, Zitzmann N. Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45 Suppl 20:S286-S291. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12957.
- Results publication: PubMed 23506385Chappuis V, Buser R, Bragger U, Bornstein MM, Salvi GE, Buser D. Long-term outcomes of dental implants with a titanium plasma-sprayed surface: a 20-year prospective case series study in partially edentulous patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Dec;15(6):780-90. doi: 10.1111/cid.12056. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
- Results publication: PubMed 26701919Derks J, Schaller D, Hakansson J, Wennstrom JL, Tomasi C, Berglundh T. Effectiveness of Implant Therapy Analyzed in a Swedish Population: Prevalence of Peri-implantitis. J Dent Res. 2016 Jan;95(1):43-9. doi: 10.1177/0022034515608832.
- Results publication: PubMed 32969180Frisch E, Wild V, Ratka-Kruger P, Vach K, Sennhenn-Kirchner S. Long-term results of implants and implant-supported prostheses under systematic supportive implant therapy: A retrospective 25-year study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Dec;22(6):689-696. doi: 10.1111/cid.12944. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
- Results publication: PubMed 23062143Gracis S, Michalakis K, Vigolo P, Vult von Steyern P, Zwahlen M, Sailer I. Internal vs. external connections for abutments/reconstructions: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:202-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02556.x.
- Results publication: PubMed 18828813Halg GA, Schmid J, Hammerle CH. Bone level changes at implants supporting crowns or fixed partial dentures with or without cantilevers. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Oct;19(10):983-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01556.x.
- Results publication: PubMed 30306690Hammerle CHF, Cordaro L, Alccayhuaman KAA, Botticelli D, Esposito M, Colomina LE, Gil A, Gulje FL, Ioannidis A, Meijer H, Papageorgiou S, Raghoebar G, Romeo E, Renouard F, Storelli S, Torsello F, Wachtel H. Biomechanical aspects: Summary and consensus statements of group 4. The 5th EAO Consensus Conference 2018. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 18:326-331. doi: 10.1111/clr.13284.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Dental Implants
Not yet recruiting
Free Soft Tissue Grafts (FSTG) Using Autograft Palatal Donor Tissue vs. Xenograft Collagen Matrix (Zderm™)
Gingival Recession Localized Moderate, Dental Implant
Not yet recruiting
Safety Assessment of Placing a Single Dental Implant Without Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Simple Cases: A Pilot Study
Tooth Loss and Rehabillitation, Dental Implant Failure
RecruitingObservational study
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Dentsply Sirona PrimeTaper Implants
Dental Implants
Active, not recruiting
The Aim of the Study Will be Clinically and Radio Graphically Comparison of Two Implant Designs Used to Treat Atrophied Mandible . Implant Design Comparison Will Done for Implant Stability,Peri-implant Soft Tissue Health Changes and Bone Changes .Patients Will be Divided Randomly Into Two Group
Dental Implant Bone Loss, Peri-Implant Health
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Ascorbic Acid-Loaded I-PRF With Partially Demineralized Dentin Graft on Alveolar Ridge Preservation
Alveolar Ridge Preservation Post-Extraction Bone Healing Dental Implant Site Development Tooth Loss, Alveolar Bone Regeneration Following Odontectomy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ioannis Vouros, DDS, PhD study chair
Professor of Periodontology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Dental Implants, run by Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki at 1 site in Greece.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Greece. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean bone loss (time frame: 10 years at least). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06534398, which also lists 20 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Aug 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.