KeratoconusNCT06522789
Preoperative Corneal Measurements Estimate the Corrected Distance Visual Acuity After Corneal Cross-linking
A study testing corneal cross-linking procedure in people with Keratoconus, run by Sistina Ophthalmology Hospital at 1 site in North Macedonia.
Trial summary
This study aims to determine if objective markers describing corneal optical density (COD), thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), anterior (ARC), and posterior (PRC) surface radii over the 3mm thinnest region of the cornea could provide a model for calculating corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) after corneal… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 11 to 45 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Keratoconus
- What is being tested?
- corneal cross-linking procedure
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 124 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNorth Macedonia
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2018to 30 Jul 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 11 to 45 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Group 1 consisted of cases in which the astigmatism had increased by 1D or more, according to subjective refraction and corneal surface topography, over the previous year.
- Group 2 subjects consisted of confirmed keratoconus without signs of progression who opted to continue with their prescription glasses and tear-enhancing drops where necessary
- Group 3 is a control group of age- and gender-matched individuals without signs of keratoconus.
Who cannot join
- prior corneal surgeries, pachymetry less than 400 microns, scars or cloudings of the cornea, chemical injuries, severe dry eye, delayed epithelial healing and any inflammatory eye surface process before the CXL procedure
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Could Automated Objective Measurements Acquired at the Preoperative Stage Estimate the Corrected Distance Visual Acuity After Corneal Cross-linking in Keratoconus?
This study aims to determine if objective markers describing corneal optical density (COD), thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), anterior (ARC), and posterior (PRC) surface radii over the 3mm thinnest region of the cornea could provide a model for calculating corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) after corneal cross-linking (CXL) in keratoconus.
Read the detailed description
A prospective, partially masked, semi-randomised, interventional clinical trial was undertaken between April 2018 and July 2023 in the refractive surgery department of the Sistina Ophthalmology Hospital in Skopje.
The patients' examination before the treatment and on every follow-up was a meticulous process that included assessment of CDVA (Aitomu LCD Digital Vision Eye Chart, Shanghai, China), refraction, tonometry, and corneal characteristics using Pentacam HR (Oculus, Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), biomicroscopy and dilated fundus examination. Corneal topography, thickness distribution, and COD profiles were captured for later analysis. The COD profile, which describes the turbidity of the cornea in the central apical region and the three concentric annular zones, was a vital part of the examination. The Pentacam software computed a figure, ranging from 0 (totally clear) to 100 (totally opaque), along a grey scale describing the optical density in each of the 12 regions. A higher number signifies increased turbidity and reduced transparency; a lower number represents the opposite. The software also averaged the total optical density in the apex, each concentric zone, each layer, and the cornea. A total of 20 COD values are generated for a single cornea. COD values for the central 0-2mm region covering the anterior (0-2ant) and central layers (0-2cent), paracentral 2-6mm annulus covering the anterior (2-6ant) and central layers (2-6cent), total anterior region layer (tot ant), total central layer (tot cent), and whole cornea (tot) were recorded. Separate COD values for the peripheral (6-10mm and 10-12mm annuli) and posterior (60µ) regions of the cornea were excluded as these regions are least likely to be affected by CXL. On all occasions, three consecutive Pentacam scans were taken in a dark room, and the best-quality scan was selected for recording and analysis. For each case, the COD (in greyscale units), thinnest corneal thickness (TCT, µ), anterior (ARC) and posterior (PRC) corneal radii of curvature(mm) values measured over a 3mm diameter zone covering the cone of the cornea were sequestered from the best scan.
The CXL procedure for group one adhered to the standard Dresden protocol. All patients received topical anaesthetic (Tetracaine HCL 0.5%, Alcon Forth Worth, Texas) and a miotic (Isopto Carpine 2% HCl, Alcon, Fort Worth, Texas) drops 30 minutes before the procedure. The periocular region and conjunctival sac were washed with 10% povidone-iodine (Betadine 10%, Alcaloid, Skopje). Manual epithelial scraping with a crescent knife followed. Pachymetry was kept over 400 μm during the procedure and measured with an ultrasound hand pachymeter (Pocket II, Quantel Medical, Cournon d'Auvergne, France). Riboflavin (Peschke D, Peschke Trade, Huenenberg, Switzerland) was applied every 3 minutes for 30 minutes. We performed corneal UV-A radiation with a wavelength of 370 nm and energy of 3mW using a UVA CXL lamp (VEGA CBM-X-Linker, Carleton Optical, Chesham, UK) for 30 minutes (6 cycles of 5 minutes each). Device testing was performed before every procedure, and irradiance density measured between 2.7-and-3.3 mW/cm2 was tolerated. At the end of the corneal CXL procedure, topical atropine 1% (Atropine Sulphate, Cooper, Athens, Greece), antibiotic (Tobrex, Alcon, Fort Worth, Texas) drops were instilled and a bandage soft contact lens (Air Optix Night \& Day Aqua, Alcon, Texas) was placed over the cornea. Peschke® D. Riboflavin used in the study group was a standard Riboflavin solution consisting of 0.1% Riboflavin diluted into 20% dextran 500. The soaking time was 20-30 minutes or until microscopy showed riboflavin particles in the anterior chamber. Tobradex (Alcon, Fort Worth, Texas) eyedrops, a suspension of 0.3% Tobramycine and 0.05% Dexamethasone were prescribed for application after CXL. The dosage was four times per day for the first two weeks, then tapered twice daily for the next two weeks, and then to one drop per day for the last two weeks. All patients received topical steroids for a total of 6 weeks.
The postoperative care was comprehensive, ensuring the patient's well-being and recovery. It included a combination of antibiotic/corticosteroid drops instilled four times daily for the next two weeks, after which the drops were tapered off gradually over six weeks. Postoperative examinations were scheduled for one day, four days, 1-week until epithelisation and bandage lens removal, then 1-,3-,6-months, and 1-year postoperatively. After that, the patients were advised to complete an ophthalmological examination at least yearly.
Data from the treated eye, or just the right eye in bilateral cases, were analysed. Details of CDVA, COD, TCT, ARC and PRC values were stored in Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA) and analysed to determine the significance of any differences between groups (Mann Whitney U test or unpaired t-test) and changes occurring within each group (Friedman test or 1-way ANOVA for repeat measures, Wilcoxon signed rank or paired t-test). If significant changes were found, then the analysis would be extended to determine the significance of any association between the change (i.e., preop value-postop value) in the parameter and the value at the start of the study (Spearman's rho or Pearson correlation). Depending on the outcome of this analysis, the data would be further scrutinised to determine if a feasible model could be constructed (linear and multiple regression analysis) to predict the likely CDVA after CXL or after one year in untreated cases. Non-parametric tests were applied when data were not normally distributed (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test of normality). The changes and differences were considered statistically significant when p˂0.05.
- Conditions
- Keratoconus
- Being tested
- corneal cross-linking procedure
- Keywords
- Keratoconus, cross-linking, corneal optical density
- Medical subject headings
- Keratoconus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
corneal cross-linking procedureProcedure or surgery
Standard Dresden protocol corneal cross-linking procedure The CXL procedure adhered to the standard Dresden protocol. All patients received topical anaesthetic (Tetracaine HCL 0.5%, Alcon Forth Worth, Texas) and a miotic (Isopto Carpine 2% HCl, Alcon, Fort Worth, Texas) drops 30 minutes before the procedure. The periocular region and conjunctival sac were washed with 10% povidone-iodine (Betadine 10%, Alcaloid, Skopje). Manual epithelial scraping with a crescent knife followed. Pachymetry was kept over 400 μm during the procedure and measured with an ultrasound hand pachymeter (Pocket II, Quantel Medical, Cournon d'Auvergne, France). Riboflavin (Peschke D, Peschke Trade, Huenenberg, Switzerland) was applied every 3 minutes for 30 minutes. We performed corneal UV-A radiation with a wavelength of 370 nm and energy of 3mW using a UVA CXL lamp (VEGA CBM-X-Linker, Carleton Optical, Chesham, UK) for 30 minutes (6 cycles of 5 minutes each).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Active comparator | The total number of patients who underwent CXL was seventy-seven; 23 were females, and 54 were males of the mean (±sd, range) age 24.2 (±7.0, 11-44) years. Receives: Procedure: corneal cross-linking procedure |
| Group 2 | No intervention | Twenty-three patients, six females and 17 males of mean age 27.3 (±7.0, 17-44) years, were untreated. |
| Group 3 | No intervention | Twenty-four subjects, nine females and 15 males of mean age 24.7 (±7.6, 17-45) years, were recruited as controls. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Association between preoperative corneal characteristics derived by Pentacam and subjective parameter CDVA and postoperative CDVA at the end of the follow-up period
Associations between Corneal Optical Density, Thinnest Corneal Thickness, Anterior Radius Curvature (ARC), Posterior Radius Curvature (PRC), ARC/PRC ratio, CDVA values at the start of the study and CDVA at postoperative.
Measured: one year
Associations between predicted and actual CDVA following CXL
The differences in the mean predicted values measured at six months and one year.
Measured: one year
Secondary outcomes (3)
Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA) changes in all three groups during the follow up
Comparison of CDVA changes between the groups
Measured: one year
Corneal Optical Density (COD) changes in all three groups during the follow up
COD values for the central 0-2mm region covering the anterior (0-2ant) and central layers (0-2cent), paracentral 2-6mm annulus covering the anterior (2-6ant) and central layers (2-6cent), total anterior region layer (tot ant), total central layer (tot cent), and whole cornea (tot) were recorded. Separate COD values for the peripheral (6-10mm and 10-12mm annuli) and posterior (60µ) regions of the cornea were excluded as these regions were least likely to be affected by CXL.
Measured: one year
Corneal thickness (TCT) changes in all three groups during the follow up.
Comparison of TCT changes between the groups
Measured: one year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jul 2024
- Study start1 Apr 2018
- Primary completion30 Jul 2022
- Study completion30 Jul 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for KeratoconusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 124 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sistina Ophthalmology Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Fanka Gilevska, Sistina Ophthalmology Hospital
- Investigators
- Fanka Gilevska, PhD cand, Principal investigator, Sistina Ophthalmology Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06522789
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 17-25 10.02.2017
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 22 Jul 2024
- Last updated
- 30 Jul 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Gilevska F, Biscevic A, Bohac M, Patel S. Could Automated Objective Measurements Acquired at the Preoperative Stage Estimate the Corrected Distance Visual Acuity after Corneal Cross-Linking in Keratoconus? Ophthalmol Ther. 2024 Oct;13(10):2599-2614. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-00993-0. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
PubMed 39110318
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jul 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Could Automated Objective Measurements Acquired at the Preoperative Stage Estimate the Corrected Distance Visual Acuity After Corneal Cross-linking in Keratoconus?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06522789
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 17-25 10.02.2017
- Conditions
- Keratoconus
- Keywords
- Keratoconus, cross-linking, corneal optical density
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 124 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sistina Ophthalmology HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jul 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to determine if objective markers describing corneal optical density (COD), thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), anterior (ARC), and posterior (PRC) surface radii over the 3mm thinnest region of the cornea could provide a model for calculating corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) after corneal cross-linking (CXL) in keratoconus.
Detailed description
A prospective, partially masked, semi-randomised, interventional clinical trial was undertaken between April 2018 and July 2023 in the refractive surgery department of the Sistina Ophthalmology Hospital in Skopje.
The patients' examination before the treatment and on every follow-up was a meticulous process that included assessment of CDVA (Aitomu LCD Digital Vision Eye Chart, Shanghai, China), refraction, tonometry, and corneal characteristics using Pentacam HR (Oculus, Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), biomicroscopy and dilated fundus examination. Corneal topography, thickness distribution, and COD profiles were captured for later analysis. The COD profile, which describes the turbidity of the cornea in the central apical region and the three concentric annular zones, was a vital part of the examination. The Pentacam software computed a figure, ranging from 0 (totally clear) to 100 (totally opaque), along a grey scale describing the optical density in each of the 12 regions. A higher number signifies increased turbidity and reduced transparency; a lower number represents the opposite. The software also averaged the total optical density in the apex, each concentric zone, each layer, and the cornea. A total of 20 COD values are generated for a single cornea. COD values for the central 0-2mm region covering the anterior (0-2ant) and central layers (0-2cent), paracentral 2-6mm annulus covering the anterior (2-6ant) and central layers (2-6cent), total anterior region layer (tot ant), total central layer (tot cent), and whole cornea (tot) were recorded. Separate COD values for the peripheral (6-10mm and 10-12mm annuli) and posterior (60µ) regions of the cornea were excluded as these regions are least likely to be affected by CXL. On all occasions, three consecutive Pentacam scans were taken in a dark room, and the best-quality scan was selected for recording and analysis. For each case, the COD (in greyscale units), thinnest corneal thickness (TCT, µ), anterior (ARC) and posterior (PRC) corneal radii of curvature(mm) values measured over a 3mm diameter zone covering the cone of the cornea were sequestered from the best scan.
The CXL procedure for group one adhered to the standard Dresden protocol. All patients received topical anaesthetic (Tetracaine HCL 0.5%, Alcon Forth Worth, Texas) and a miotic (Isopto Carpine 2% HCl, Alcon, Fort Worth, Texas) drops 30 minutes before the procedure. The periocular region and conjunctival sac were washed with 10% povidone-iodine (Betadine 10%, Alcaloid, Skopje). Manual epithelial scraping with a crescent knife followed. Pachymetry was kept over 400 μm during the procedure and measured with an ultrasound hand pachymeter (Pocket II, Quantel Medical, Cournon d'Auvergne, France). Riboflavin (Peschke D, Peschke Trade, Huenenberg, Switzerland) was applied every 3 minutes for 30 minutes. We performed corneal UV-A radiation with a wavelength of 370 nm and energy of 3mW using a UVA CXL lamp (VEGA CBM-X-Linker, Carleton Optical, Chesham, UK) for 30 minutes (6 cycles of 5 minutes each). Device testing was performed before every procedure, and irradiance density measured between 2.7-and-3.3 mW/cm2 was tolerated. At the end of the corneal CXL procedure, topical atropine 1% (Atropine Sulphate, Cooper, Athens, Greece), antibiotic (Tobrex, Alcon, Fort Worth, Texas) drops were instilled and a bandage soft contact lens (Air Optix Night \& Day Aqua, Alcon, Texas) was placed over the cornea. Peschke® D. Riboflavin used in the study group was a standard Riboflavin solution consisting of 0.1% Riboflavin diluted into 20% dextran 500. The soaking time was 20-30 minutes or until microscopy showed riboflavin particles in the anterior chamber. Tobradex (Alcon, Fort Worth, Texas) eyedrops, a suspension of 0.3% Tobramycine and 0.05% Dexamethasone were prescribed for application after CXL. The dosage was four times per day for the first two weeks, then tapered twice daily for the next two weeks, and then to one drop per day for the last two weeks. All patients received topical steroids for a total of 6 weeks.
The postoperative care was comprehensive, ensuring the patient's well-being and recovery. It included a combination of antibiotic/corticosteroid drops instilled four times daily for the next two weeks, after which the drops were tapered off gradually over six weeks. Postoperative examinations were scheduled for one day, four days, 1-week until epithelisation and bandage lens removal, then 1-,3-,6-months, and 1-year postoperatively. After that, the patients were advised to complete an ophthalmological examination at least yearly.
Data from the treated eye, or just the right eye in bilateral cases, were analysed. Details of CDVA, COD, TCT, ARC and PRC values were stored in Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA) and analysed to determine the significance of any differences between groups (Mann Whitney U test or unpaired t-test) and changes occurring within each group (Friedman test or 1-way ANOVA for repeat measures, Wilcoxon signed rank or paired t-test). If significant changes were found, then the analysis would be extended to determine the significance of any association between the change (i.e., preop value-postop value) in the parameter and the value at the start of the study (Spearman's rho or Pearson correlation). Depending on the outcome of this analysis, the data would be further scrutinised to determine if a feasible model could be constructed (linear and multiple regression analysis) to predict the likely CDVA after CXL or after one year in untreated cases. Non-parametric tests were applied when data were not normally distributed (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test of normality). The changes and differences were considered statistically significant when p˂0.05.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Active comparator | Procedure: corneal cross-linking procedureThe total number of patients who underwent CXL was seventy-seven; 23 were females, and 54 were males of the mean (±sd, range) age 24.2 (±7.0, 11-44) years. |
| Group 2 | No intervention | –Twenty-three patients, six females and 17 males of mean age 27.3 (±7.0, 17-44) years, were untreated. |
| Group 3 | No intervention | –Twenty-four subjects, nine females and 15 males of mean age 24.7 (±7.6, 17-45) years, were recruited as controls. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 11 to 45 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Group 1 consisted of cases in which the astigmatism had increased by 1D or more, according to subjective refraction and corneal surface topography, over the previous year.
- Group 2 subjects consisted of confirmed keratoconus without signs of progression who opted to continue with their prescription glasses and tear-enhancing drops where necessary
- Group 3 is a control group of age- and gender-matched individuals without signs of keratoconus.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- prior corneal surgeries, pachymetry less than 400 microns, scars or cloudings of the cornea, chemical injuries, severe dry eye, delayed epithelial healing and any inflammatory eye surface process before the CXL procedure
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| corneal cross-linking procedureStandard Dresden protocol corneal cross-linking procedure The CXL procedure adhered to the standard Dresden protocol. All patients received topical anaesthetic (Tetracaine HCL 0.5%, Alcon Forth Worth, Texas) and a miotic (Isopto Carpine 2% HCl, Alcon, Fort Worth, Texas) drops 30 minutes before the procedure. The periocular region and conjunctival sac were washed with 10% povidone-iodine (Betadine 10%, Alcaloid, Skopje). Manual epithelial scraping with a crescent knife followed. Pachymetry was kept over 400 μm during the procedure and measured with an ultrasound hand pachymeter (Pocket II, Quantel Medical, Cournon d'Auvergne, France). Riboflavin (Peschke D, Peschke Trade, Huenenberg, Switzerland) was applied every 3 minutes for 30 minutes. We performed corneal UV-A radiation with a wavelength of 370 nm and energy of 3mW using a UVA CXL lamp (VEGA CBM-X-Linker, Carleton Optical, Chesham, UK) for 30 minutes (6 cycles of 5 minutes each). | Procedure or surgery | Group 1 |
Primary outcome
Association between preoperative corneal characteristics derived by Pentacam and subjective parameter CDVA and postoperative CDVA at the end of the follow-up period
Time frame: one year
Associations between Corneal Optical Density, Thinnest Corneal Thickness, Anterior Radius Curvature (ARC), Posterior Radius Curvature (PRC), ARC/PRC ratio, CDVA values at the start of the study and CDVA at postoperative.
Associations between predicted and actual CDVA following CXL
Time frame: one year
The differences in the mean predicted values measured at six months and one year.
3 secondary outcomes
Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA) changes in all three groups during the follow up
Time frame: one year
Corneal Optical Density (COD) changes in all three groups during the follow up
Time frame: one year
Corneal thickness (TCT) changes in all three groups during the follow up.
Time frame: one year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jul 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39110318Gilevska F, Biscevic A, Bohac M, Patel S. Could Automated Objective Measurements Acquired at the Preoperative Stage Estimate the Corrected Distance Visual Acuity after Corneal Cross-Linking in Keratoconus? Ophthalmol Ther. 2024 Oct;13(10):2599-2614. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-00993-0. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Keratoconus
RecruitingObservational study
UNITY DX Cornea Study
Tomography
Not yet recruiting
Performance Evaluation of the OCUTOP Hand-held Corneal Topographer
Corneal Topography, Dry Eye Syndromes
Recruiting
Proof-of-Concept for a Novel Optical Aperture Contact Lens in Presbyopia and Keratoconus
Keratoconus, Presbyopia
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Test the Diagnostic Potential of Brillouin Microscopy for Corneal Ectasia
Keratoconus, Ectasia
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Corneal Biomechanical Analysis Using Brillouin Microscopy
Keratoconus, Keratoconus, Unstable
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Fanka Gilevska, PhD cand principal investigator
Sistina Ophthalmology Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing corneal cross-linking procedure in people with Keratoconus, run by Sistina Ophthalmology Hospital at 1 site in North Macedonia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in North Macedonia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Association between preoperative corneal characteristics derived by Pentacam and subjective parameter CDVA and postoperative CDVA at the end of the follow-up period (time frame: one year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06522789, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jul 2024.