AzTrials
AzTrials

KeratoconusNCT06522789

Preoperative Corneal Measurements Estimate the Corrected Distance Visual Acuity After Corneal Cross-linking

A study testing corneal cross-linking procedure in people with Keratoconus, run by Sistina Ophthalmology Hospital at 1 site in North Macedonia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to determine if objective markers describing corneal optical density (COD), thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), anterior (ARC), and posterior (PRC) surface radii over the 3mm thinnest region of the cornea could provide a model for calculating corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) after corneal… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 11 to 45 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Keratoconus
What is being tested?
corneal cross-linking procedure
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
124 participants
Where
1 siteNorth Macedonia
Study dates
1 Apr 2018to 30 Jul 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 11 to 45 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Group 1 consisted of cases in which the astigmatism had increased by 1D or more, according to subjective refraction and corneal surface topography, over the previous year.
  • Group 2 subjects consisted of confirmed keratoconus without signs of progression who opted to continue with their prescription glasses and tear-enhancing drops where necessary
  • Group 3 is a control group of age- and gender-matched individuals without signs of keratoconus.

Who cannot join

  • prior corneal surgeries, pachymetry less than 400 microns, scars or cloudings of the cornea, chemical injuries, severe dry eye, delayed epithelial healing and any inflammatory eye surface process before the CXL procedure

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

North Macedonia1 site
  • Fanka Gilevska

    Skopje, 1000

Other trials in North Macedonia

About this study

Official title: Could Automated Objective Measurements Acquired at the Preoperative Stage Estimate the Corrected Distance Visual Acuity After Corneal Cross-linking in Keratoconus?

This study aims to determine if objective markers describing corneal optical density (COD), thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), anterior (ARC), and posterior (PRC) surface radii over the 3mm thinnest region of the cornea could provide a model for calculating corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) after corneal cross-linking (CXL) in keratoconus.

Read the detailed description

A prospective, partially masked, semi-randomised, interventional clinical trial was undertaken between April 2018 and July 2023 in the refractive surgery department of the Sistina Ophthalmology Hospital in Skopje.

The patients' examination before the treatment and on every follow-up was a meticulous process that included assessment of CDVA (Aitomu LCD Digital Vision Eye Chart, Shanghai, China), refraction, tonometry, and corneal characteristics using Pentacam HR (Oculus, Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), biomicroscopy and dilated fundus examination. Corneal topography, thickness distribution, and COD profiles were captured for later analysis. The COD profile, which describes the turbidity of the cornea in the central apical region and the three concentric annular zones, was a vital part of the examination. The Pentacam software computed a figure, ranging from 0 (totally clear) to 100 (totally opaque), along a grey scale describing the optical density in each of the 12 regions. A higher number signifies increased turbidity and reduced transparency; a lower number represents the opposite. The software also averaged the total optical density in the apex, each concentric zone, each layer, and the cornea. A total of 20 COD values are generated for a single cornea. COD values for the central 0-2mm region covering the anterior (0-2ant) and central layers (0-2cent), paracentral 2-6mm annulus covering the anterior (2-6ant) and central layers (2-6cent), total anterior region layer (tot ant), total central layer (tot cent), and whole cornea (tot) were recorded. Separate COD values for the peripheral (6-10mm and 10-12mm annuli) and posterior (60µ) regions of the cornea were excluded as these regions are least likely to be affected by CXL. On all occasions, three consecutive Pentacam scans were taken in a dark room, and the best-quality scan was selected for recording and analysis. For each case, the COD (in greyscale units), thinnest corneal thickness (TCT, µ), anterior (ARC) and posterior (PRC) corneal radii of curvature(mm) values measured over a 3mm diameter zone covering the cone of the cornea were sequestered from the best scan.

The CXL procedure for group one adhered to the standard Dresden protocol. All patients received topical anaesthetic (Tetracaine HCL 0.5%, Alcon Forth Worth, Texas) and a miotic (Isopto Carpine 2% HCl, Alcon, Fort Worth, Texas) drops 30 minutes before the procedure. The periocular region and conjunctival sac were washed with 10% povidone-iodine (Betadine 10%, Alcaloid, Skopje). Manual epithelial scraping with a crescent knife followed. Pachymetry was kept over 400 μm during the procedure and measured with an ultrasound hand pachymeter (Pocket II, Quantel Medical, Cournon d'Auvergne, France). Riboflavin (Peschke D, Peschke Trade, Huenenberg, Switzerland) was applied every 3 minutes for 30 minutes. We performed corneal UV-A radiation with a wavelength of 370 nm and energy of 3mW using a UVA CXL lamp (VEGA CBM-X-Linker, Carleton Optical, Chesham, UK) for 30 minutes (6 cycles of 5 minutes each). Device testing was performed before every procedure, and irradiance density measured between 2.7-and-3.3 mW/cm2 was tolerated. At the end of the corneal CXL procedure, topical atropine 1% (Atropine Sulphate, Cooper, Athens, Greece), antibiotic (Tobrex, Alcon, Fort Worth, Texas) drops were instilled and a bandage soft contact lens (Air Optix Night \& Day Aqua, Alcon, Texas) was placed over the cornea. Peschke® D. Riboflavin used in the study group was a standard Riboflavin solution consisting of 0.1% Riboflavin diluted into 20% dextran 500. The soaking time was 20-30 minutes or until microscopy showed riboflavin particles in the anterior chamber. Tobradex (Alcon, Fort Worth, Texas) eyedrops, a suspension of 0.3% Tobramycine and 0.05% Dexamethasone were prescribed for application after CXL. The dosage was four times per day for the first two weeks, then tapered twice daily for the next two weeks, and then to one drop per day for the last two weeks. All patients received topical steroids for a total of 6 weeks.

The postoperative care was comprehensive, ensuring the patient's well-being and recovery. It included a combination of antibiotic/corticosteroid drops instilled four times daily for the next two weeks, after which the drops were tapered off gradually over six weeks. Postoperative examinations were scheduled for one day, four days, 1-week until epithelisation and bandage lens removal, then 1-,3-,6-months, and 1-year postoperatively. After that, the patients were advised to complete an ophthalmological examination at least yearly.

Data from the treated eye, or just the right eye in bilateral cases, were analysed. Details of CDVA, COD, TCT, ARC and PRC values were stored in Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA) and analysed to determine the significance of any differences between groups (Mann Whitney U test or unpaired t-test) and changes occurring within each group (Friedman test or 1-way ANOVA for repeat measures, Wilcoxon signed rank or paired t-test). If significant changes were found, then the analysis would be extended to determine the significance of any association between the change (i.e., preop value-postop value) in the parameter and the value at the start of the study (Spearman's rho or Pearson correlation). Depending on the outcome of this analysis, the data would be further scrutinised to determine if a feasible model could be constructed (linear and multiple regression analysis) to predict the likely CDVA after CXL or after one year in untreated cases. Non-parametric tests were applied when data were not normally distributed (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test of normality). The changes and differences were considered statistically significant when p˂0.05.

Conditions
Keratoconus
Being tested
corneal cross-linking procedure
Keywords
Keratoconus, cross-linking, corneal optical density
Medical subject headings
Keratoconus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • corneal cross-linking procedureProcedure or surgery

    Standard Dresden protocol corneal cross-linking procedure The CXL procedure adhered to the standard Dresden protocol. All patients received topical anaesthetic (Tetracaine HCL 0.5%, Alcon Forth Worth, Texas) and a miotic (Isopto Carpine 2% HCl, Alcon, Fort Worth, Texas) drops 30 minutes before the procedure. The periocular region and conjunctival sac were washed with 10% povidone-iodine (Betadine 10%, Alcaloid, Skopje). Manual epithelial scraping with a crescent knife followed. Pachymetry was kept over 400 μm during the procedure and measured with an ultrasound hand pachymeter (Pocket II, Quantel Medical, Cournon d'Auvergne, France). Riboflavin (Peschke D, Peschke Trade, Huenenberg, Switzerland) was applied every 3 minutes for 30 minutes. We performed corneal UV-A radiation with a wavelength of 370 nm and energy of 3mW using a UVA CXL lamp (VEGA CBM-X-Linker, Carleton Optical, Chesham, UK) for 30 minutes (6 cycles of 5 minutes each).

Study groups in NCT06522789
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1Active comparatorThe total number of patients who underwent CXL was seventy-seven; 23 were females, and 54 were males of the mean (±sd, range) age 24.2 (±7.0, 11-44) years.
Receives: Procedure: corneal cross-linking procedure
Group 2No interventionTwenty-three patients, six females and 17 males of mean age 27.3 (±7.0, 17-44) years, were untreated.
Group 3No interventionTwenty-four subjects, nine females and 15 males of mean age 24.7 (±7.6, 17-45) years, were recruited as controls.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Association between preoperative corneal characteristics derived by Pentacam and subjective parameter CDVA and postoperative CDVA at the end of the follow-up period

    Associations between Corneal Optical Density, Thinnest Corneal Thickness, Anterior Radius Curvature (ARC), Posterior Radius Curvature (PRC), ARC/PRC ratio, CDVA values at the start of the study and CDVA at postoperative.

    Measured: one year

  2. Associations between predicted and actual CDVA following CXL

    The differences in the mean predicted values measured at six months and one year.

    Measured: one year

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA) changes in all three groups during the follow up

    Comparison of CDVA changes between the groups

    Measured: one year

  2. Corneal Optical Density (COD) changes in all three groups during the follow up

    COD values for the central 0-2mm region covering the anterior (0-2ant) and central layers (0-2cent), paracentral 2-6mm annulus covering the anterior (2-6ant) and central layers (2-6cent), total anterior region layer (tot ant), total central layer (tot cent), and whole cornea (tot) were recorded. Separate COD values for the peripheral (6-10mm and 10-12mm annuli) and posterior (60µ) regions of the cornea were excluded as these regions were least likely to be affected by CXL.

    Measured: one year

  3. Corneal thickness (TCT) changes in all three groups during the follow up.

    Comparison of TCT changes between the groups

    Measured: one year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jul 2024
  2. Study start1 Apr 2018
  3. Primary completion30 Jul 2022
  4. Study completion30 Jul 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
124 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06522789
Sponsor's protocol ID
17-25 10.02.2017
Status last verified
Jul 2024
First submitted
22 Jul 2024
Last updated
30 Jul 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Gilevska F, Biscevic A, Bohac M, Patel S. Could Automated Objective Measurements Acquired at the Preoperative Stage Estimate the Corrected Distance Visual Acuity after Corneal Cross-Linking in Keratoconus? Ophthalmol Ther. 2024 Oct;13(10):2599-2614. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-00993-0. Epub 2024 Aug 7.

    PubMed 39110318

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing corneal cross-linking procedure in people with Keratoconus, run by Sistina Ophthalmology Hospital at 1 site in North Macedonia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in North Macedonia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Association between preoperative corneal characteristics derived by Pentacam and subjective parameter CDVA and postoperative CDVA at the end of the follow-up period (time frame: one year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06522789, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jul 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in