AzTrials
AzTrials

LeiomyosarcomaMYSTRNCT06521060

The Role of Pre-Surgical Tru - Cut Biopsy in the Management of Atypical Myometrial Lesions

An observational study of Leiomyosarcoma, run by Charles University, Czech Republic at 1 site in Czechia.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The Tru-cut biopsy (TCB) for targeting pelvic tumors is well established in gynecologic oncology. However, its reliability for differentiating of uterine sarcoma in "myoma-like" uterine lesions has been confirmed by only a few studies, which were either retrospective or provided only pilot result on the limited number… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Leiomyosarcoma
What is being tested?
tru cut biopsy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
250 participants
Where
1 siteCzechia
Study dates
Oct 2024to Jun 2028
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: * Age ≥ 18 years * Women indicated for uterus-preserving surgery (tumour resection) or hysterectomy for myometrial lesion ('myoma-like' uterine tumour(s))

Who may be able to join

  • Signed informed consent
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Women indicated for uterus-preserving surgery (tumour resection) or hysterectomy for myometrial lesion ('myoma-like' uterine tumour(s))
  • USG finding of atypical myometrial lesion/s a

Who cannot join

  • patient 's refusal
  • age < 18 years
  • ongoing pregnancy
  • inability to perform TCB /contraindications for TCB (trombocytopenia, coagulopathy, PID, colpitis) or definitive surgery (myomectomy or hysterectomy)
  • USG finding of more than 2 atypical lesion/s with a diameter ≤ 20 mm and ≥ 100 mm
  • inability to perform any of the 3 core needle biopsy approaches (transvervical, trans uterine cavity, transvaginal) because of anatomical, localization issues. The percutaneous transabdominal biopsy is not allowed
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Polymyomatous uterus that may not be examined adequately with routine transvaginal ultrasound
  • myoma (which would be subject to TCB) type 7 according to FIGO classification 16
  • history of conservative hormonal therapy less than 3 months prior to study enrolment
  • history of conservative therapy via uterine artery embolisation or laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion
  • history of pregnancy less than one year prior to study enrollment

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Czechia1 site
  • General hospital

    Prague, 12800

Other trials in Czechia

About this study

The Tru-cut biopsy (TCB) for targeting pelvic tumors is well established in gynecologic oncology. However, its reliability for differentiating of uterine sarcoma in "myoma-like" uterine lesions has been confirmed by only a few studies, which were either retrospective or provided only pilot result on the limited number of prospectively enrolled patients (N=34). Proving that preoperative TCB can provide accurate information about the histological nature of the tumor would have great impact for setting an adequate tailored oncologically safe approach, especially in patients with sonographically atypical lesions. Additionally, the biopsy should be safe, with transcervical, transuterine cavity ("in organ" biopsy) approaches preferred to avoid the risk of needle canal contamination if sarcoma is diagnosed. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of the Tru-cut biopsy (TCB) of sonographically atypical myometrial lesions as a complementary diagnostic method in the preoperative management of patients scheduled for uterus preserving procedure or hysterectomy. Additionally, we aim to assess the impact of this procedure on patients´ quality of life and clinical management. MYSTR is a single arm, prospective, multicentric cohort study.

Read the detailed description

A total of 250 patients is planned to be enrolled, accounting for an estimated 15% dropout rate. Study data will be collected and managed using REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) open-source platform, which allows for the secure collection of research data via a web-based interface. REDCap was developed by Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tennessee, is used by Charles University in Prague under a standing agreement to allow the usage of REDCap for academic and research purposes. The REDCap platform environment is compliant with 21 CFR Part 11, FISMA, HIPAA, and GDPR.

Patients will be identified at each of the participating site. If a patient meets all inclusion criteria, she will be informed about the study and asked to sign an informed consent (ICF). All patients referred for TCB will have their blood count and baseline coagulation parameters checked prior to performing the biopsy to eliminate bleeding complications. All patients will undergo a standard-of-care ultrasound examination with a focus on the description of the fibroid with atypical features according to the MUSA statement and/or Basel sarcoma scale score (BSS). A patient will be included in the study if she will meet one or more of the following MUSA criterion: irregular tumor borders, cystic areas in the lesion (as a sign of central necrosis), nonuniform echogenicity, moderate-to-abundant intralesional vascularity and an absence of calcifications, and/or BSS total score ≥ 1.

The patient will be further referred to MRI imaging (optional) and will undergo TCB within 4 weeks after US exam. In selected centers which will decide to participate in this optional part of the trial, all patients with ≥ 1 MUSA criterion and/or BSS total score ≥ 1 based on the US examination will be referred for MRI imaging. Images will be acquired with 3T MRI. The sequences parameters (Sagittal T2, Coronal T2, Axial T2, Axial DWI, Axial T1 3D DIXON, Axial Perfusion T1 3D, Axial T1 3D DIXON post contrast) will be evaluated in accordance with European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines. Two experienced readers in gynecologic oncology imaging will review all MRI images and calculate the MRI score.

The tru-cut biopsy is performed as an out-patient procedure without the need of any anesthesia in lithotomic position. Using an automatic biopsy gun and 18-gauge disposable core tissue biopsy needle four tissue cylinder samples are taken from the tumor. If the localization of the lesion and anatomical conditions allow, the transcervical approach without breaking the continuity of the perimetrium is preferred. If the lesion is localized in the uterine doom, or targetable by the uterine cavity, the transcervical canal approach is feasible and should be considered. If both above-described methods are not feasible, a transvaginal approach is also possible. In all cases transvaginal US is used for correct navigation. Patients will be observed for 30 minutes following the biopsy and then discharged. Other follow up of the patients will be done 24 hours and two weeks after the procedure via phone with the assessment of the patient´s pain, overall experience, and eventual complications.

Intraoperative and early post-procedural complications will be evaluated, and adverse events will be assessed on the 14th post-TCB day according to the Clavien-Dindo Surgical complications classification. Pain will be assessed during the TCB, 30 minutes after the procedure, and after 24 hours using the Numeric rating scale (NRS). Overall experience will be assessed using questionnaire: FACIT-TS-G (Version 4) 30 minutes after the procedure.

Specimen evaluation will be conducted at each participating site by dedicated, experienced pathologist according to standard diagnostic procedures. The biological nature of spindle cell leiomyocellular tumors will be determined according to Table 2 (modified from the WHO classification of female genital tumors 2020).

If necessary, immunohistochemical or molecular examination will be used. For smooth muscle lesions the gene mutation status of PTEN, pRb, TP53, MTAP, ATRX, and DAXX will be analyzed. In lesions of other histological types, RNA next-generation sequencing will be performed, optionally accompanied by immunohistochemical examination. These examinations are routinely performed as a part of standardized diagnostic procedures and will not be covered by the project's expenses. Histology findings from other than the main sight that will fail to meet the characteristics of conventional leiomyoma (either from TCB or definitive histology result) will undergo a second evaluation at the main site by a senior gyneco-pathologist. Following samples will be stored in biobanks at each respective institution: tumor sample DNA (isolated from one snap-frozen TCB sample); representative formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue block and representative FFPE non-tumor myometrial tissue block (both harvested during curative surgery). All samples will be collected with the intention to be used for future translational and exploratory research, including studies that aim to evaluate the association between biomarkers and clinical-surgical-pathological characteristics. All samples will be stored in the biobank at the respective institution. Participation in the translatory part is not obligatory for the trial participation but is highly recommended. A separate consent form will be provided to the patient to obtain permission for all biological material storage and future translational studies. Based on the histology result obtained from the TCB, patients will be categorized into three groups. Subsequent clinical management will be determined according to the appropriate group:

Subgroup 1: Patients with a typical benign histological result of TCB will undergo elective surgery within 8 weeks from receiving the results, with a preference of a minimally invasive approach, i.e., most often laparoscopic myomectomy or laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Subgroup 2: Patients with an atypical histological result of TCB (i.e., other than conventional leiomyoma but with no signs of malignancy) will undergo elective surgery within 6 weeks from receiving the results, with a preference of laparoscopy but excluding unprotected power morcellation of pathological tissue.

Uncontained morcellation will be used strictly for tumors with benign TCB histology and nonsuspicious perioperative appearance of resected uterine tumor. Contained morcellation technique will be strictly preferred for all other tumors, i.e., with non-standard TCB histology and/or atypical or suspicious perioperative appearance, or standard TCB histology and atypical or suspicious perioperative appearance.

Subgroup 3: Patients with a histological result from the TCB that are clearly malignant or suspicious for malignancy undergo open surgery, specifically abdominal hysterectomy. In cases of women with incomplete reproductive plans, open resection of the tumor may be performed after detailed consultation with the oncogynecological team and the patient, a secondary hysterectomy may be added based on the result of definitive histology. The procedure should be done as soon as possible, with a maximum interval between the result of TCB histology and elective surgery no more than 3 weeks.

In cases of tumors without penetration through the uterine serosa (according to US and perioperatively) and without requiring morcellation for the specimen evacuation, total laparoscopic hysterectomy can be performed.

Subgroup 4: In case of invalid TCB histology result, the patient will undergo contained morcellation during laparoscopic procedure or open surgery within 4 weeks after the TCB.

The definitive histology results from the surgery will be evaluated using the same histopathological criteria as in TCB histology. Definitive histology will be compared with the histological results from the pre-surgical TCB.

For the primary endpoint analysis, the accuracy of the histological results from TCB will be established using the definitive postoperative histological results as a reference standard.

The sample size of 217 patients with sonographically atypical myometrial lesions was calculated to establish the accuracy of the diagnostic method, with the degree of estimate precision of 0.07, 95% confidence and 80% power; assuming ratio between patients with/ without atypical lesion as per final pathology of 23:77, as based on the retrospective database data. Considering a possible dropout or unavailability of data in 15% of the patients, the final sample size reaches 250 patients. Analysis was computed using PASS 13 Power Analysis and Sample Size Software (2014). NCSS, LLC. Kaysville, Utah, USA, ncss.com/software/pass.

If this trial proves the accuracy of TCB of myometrial lesion, it could provide a new diagnostic tool and significantly impact the clinical practice.

A positive study outcome could establish level A evidence for a change of international standards and implement prehabilitation into a routine clinical practice. On a national level, the study aims to standardize and improve the care for gynecological patients with sonographic atypical myometrial lesions. A primary endpoint final analysis is intended for publication in a top medical journal. The study could also provide prospective genomic characterization analyses of myometrial tumors as well as the exploratory analysis of the reliability of individual imaging methods in the preliminary selection of patients with atypical myometrial findings.

Conditions
Leiomyosarcoma
Being tested
tru cut biopsy
Keywords
tru cut biopsy, leiomyoma
Medical subject headings
Leiomyosarcoma, Leiomyoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • tru cut biopsyProcedure or surgery

    Proving that preoperative TCB could provide accurate information about the histological nature of the tumor would have great impact for setting an adequate, tailored, oncologically safe treatment approach.

Study groups in NCT06521060
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Tru cut biopsyA single arm, prospective, multicentric cohort study. A total of 250 patients is planned to be enrolled, accounting for an estimated 15% dropout rate.
Receives: Procedure: tru cut biopsy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of accuracy

    Accuracy is defined as the concordance of the results of preoperative histology from TCB with the result of definitive histology from the operative specimen

    Measured: 3 years

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Rate of adequately performed TCBs

    defined as the number of TCBs with adequate encroachment of the lesion with bioptic needle (by the US) and sufficient tissue sample for the histopathological analysis to the total number of TCBs.

    Measured: 3 years

  2. Number of complications

    number of complications after TCB divided by the number of patients. Intraoperative and early post-procedural complications will be assessed using a questionnaire. Adverse events will be assessed 14th post-TCB day according to the Clavien-Dindo Surgical complications classification

    Measured: 3 years

  3. Pain associated with TCB

    Assessment of patient´s pain during, 30 minutes after, and 24 hours after the procedure using the Numeric rating scale (NRS)

    Measured: 24 hours

  4. Comparison of the preoperative MRI examination to US imaging

    Testing the superiority of either approach, sensitivity and specificity of the MRI imaging when compared to US examination will be analyzed

    Measured: 3 years

  5. Patient satisfaction with the diagnostic MRI and TCB

    1 questionnaire: Patient experience of the diagnostic modalities will be assessed using developed and validated Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire

    Measured: 3 years

  6. Impact of TCB on clinical management

    the change of clinical management of patients with uterine "myoma-like" tumors caused by the TCB histology results (frequency of open surgeries and rate of necessary use of contained morcellation during laparoscopic myomectomy or hysterectomy)

    Measured: 3 years

  7. Frequency of non-standard histological findings

    the frequency of atypical histological findings (other than conventional leiomyoma) from the results of definitive histology in the group of women with sonographically atypical initial findings

    Measured: 3 years

  8. Validation of the US markers of atypical myometrial lesions

    External validation of the MUSA statement and/or Basel sarcoma scale score (BSS), correlation of respective imaging score and final pathology result

    Measured: 3 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Jul 2024
  2. Study startOct 2024 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionJan 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
250 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06521060
Sponsor's protocol ID
NW24J-03-00025
Acronym
MYSTR
Status last verified
Nov 2023
First submitted
3 Dec 2023
Last updated
25 Jul 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Abdel Wahab C, Jannot AS, Bonaffini PA, Bourillon C, Cornou C, Lefrere-Belda MA, Bats AS, Thomassin-Naggara I, Bellucci A, Reinhold C, Fournier LS. Diagnostic Algorithm to Differentiate Benign Atypical Leiomyomas from Malignant Uterine Sarcomas with Diffusion-weighted MRI. Radiology. 2020 Nov;297(2):361-371. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020191658. Epub 2020 Sep 15.

    PubMed 32930650
  • Bonneau C, Thomassin-Naggara I, Dechoux S, Cortez A, Darai E, Rouzier R. Value of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the characterization of uterine mesenchymal tumors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Mar;93(3):261-8. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12325.

    PubMed 24372487
  • Kubik-Huch RA, Weston M, Nougaret S, Leonhardt H, Thomassin-Naggara I, Horta M, Cunha TM, Maciel C, Rockall A, Forstner R. European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Guidelines: MR Imaging of Leiomyomas. Eur Radiol. 2018 Aug;28(8):3125-3137. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5157-5. Epub 2018 Feb 28.

    PubMed 29492599
  • Kawamura N, Ichimura T, Ito F, Shibata S, Takahashi K, Tsujimura A, Ishiko O, Haba T, Wakasa K, Ogita S. Transcervical needle biopsy for the differential diagnosis between uterine sarcoma and leiomyoma. Cancer. 2002 Mar 15;94(6):1713-20. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10382.

    PubMed 11920533
  • Tamura R, Kashima K, Asatani M, Nishino K, Nishikawa N, Sekine M, Serikawa T, Enomoto T. Preoperative ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of 63 uterine tumors having high signal intensity upon T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Jul;24(6):1042-7. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000189.

    PubMed 24927248
  • Verschuere H, Froyman W, Van den Bosch T, Van Hoefs M, Kaijser J, Van Schoubroeck D, Van Rompuy AS, Vergote I, Timmerman D. Safety and efficiency of performing transvaginal ultrasound-guided tru-cut biopsy for pelvic masses. Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Jun;161(3):845-851. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.03.026. Epub 2021 Apr 12.

    PubMed 33858675
  • Mascilini F, Quagliozzi L, Moro F, Moruzzi MC, De Blasis I, Paris V, Scambia G, Fagotti A, Testa AC. Role of transvaginal ultrasound-guided biopsy in gynecology. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Jan;30(1):128-132. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000734. Epub 2019 Oct 23.

    PubMed 31645428
  • Wang L, Li S, Zhang Z, Jia J, Shan B. Prevalence and occult rates of uterine leiomyosarcoma. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Aug 14;99(33):e21766. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021766.

    PubMed 32872073
  • Raffone A, Raimondo D, Neola D, Travaglino A, Giorgi M, Lazzeri L, De Laurentiis F, Carravetta C, Zupi E, Seracchioli R, Casadio P, Guida M. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI in the differential diagnosis between uterine leiomyomas and sarcomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Apr;165(1):22-33. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15136. Epub 2023 Sep 21.

    PubMed 37732472
  • Knipprath-Meszaros AM, Tozzi A, Butenschon A, Reina H, Schoetzau A, Montavon C, Heinzelmann-Schwarz V, Manegold-Brauer G. High negative prediction for the Basel sarcoma score: Sonographic assessment of features suspicious of uterine sarcoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Jul;174:182-189. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.05.005. Epub 2023 May 19.

    PubMed 37210928
  • De Bruyn C, Ceusters J, Vanden Brande K, Timmerman S, Froyman W, Timmerman D, Van Rompuy AS, Coosemans A, Van den Bosch T. Ultrasound features using MUSA terms and definitions in uterine sarcoma and leiomyoma: cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 May;63(5):683-690. doi: 10.1002/uog.27535. Epub 2024 Apr 5.

    PubMed 37970762
  • Bell SW, Kempson RL, Hendrickson MR. Problematic uterine smooth muscle neoplasms. A clinicopathologic study of 213 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1994 Jun;18(6):535-58.

    PubMed 8179071
  • Bedient CE, Magrina JF, Noble BN, Kho RM. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;201(6):566.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.05.049. Epub 2009 Aug 15.

    PubMed 19683685
  • Suzuki Y, Wada S, Nakajima A, Fukushi Y, Hayashi M, Matsuda T, Asano R, Sakurai Y, Noguchi H, Shinohara T, Sato C, Fujino T. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Grading System for Preoperative Diagnosis of Leiomyomas and Uterine Smooth Muscle Tumors. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Mar-Apr;25(3):507-513. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.08.660. Epub 2017 Oct 24.

    PubMed 29079462
  • Cotrino I, Carosso A, Macchi C, Baima Poma C, Cosma S, Ribotta M, Viora E, Sciarrone A, Borella F, Zola P. Ultrasound and clinical characteristics of uterine smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential (STUMPs). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Aug;251:167-172. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.05.040. Epub 2020 May 25.

    PubMed 32505056

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Leiomyosarcoma, run by Charles University, Czech Republic at 1 site in Czechia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Kristyna Hlinecka (+420605413210, Kristyna.Hlinecka2@vfn.cz), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of accuracy (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06521060, which also lists 22 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jul 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in