Nursing EducationNCT06520852
The Effect of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Preparation of Patient Education Material
A study testing Group using artificial intelligence tools in addition to traditional tools in preparing educational materials in people with Nursing Education and Artificial Intelligence, run by TC Erciyes University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This research was conducted to examine the effect of students' use of AI tools while preparing patient education material on the quality, understandability and actionability of the material in terms of content. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 46 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Nursing Education, Artificial Intelligence
- What is being tested?
- Group using artificial intelligence tools in addition to traditional tools in preparing educational materials
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 180 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 5 Feb 2024to 7 Jun 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 46 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- agreeing to participate in the study,
- taking the Fundamentals of Nursing II course for the first time,
- not working as a nurse in a hospital or any health institution.
Who cannot join
- not agreeing to participate in the study
- having prepared patient education materials before
- repeating the Fundamentals of Nursing II course
- not having internet access
- not having a computer or smartphone.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Preparation of Patient Education Material on the Comprehensibility, Actionability and Quality of the Material
This research was conducted to examine the effect of students' use of AI tools while preparing patient education material on the quality, understandability and actionability of the material in terms of content. Students in the control group used auxiliary tools such as books, journals and websites while preparing patient education materials. Students in the intervention group used AI tools in addition to tools such as books, journals, and websites.
Read the detailed description
This research was conducted to examine the effect of students' use of AI tools while preparing patient education material on the quality, understandability and actionability of the material in terms of content. Students in the control group used auxiliary tools such as books, journals and websites while preparing patient education materials. Students in the intervention group used AI tools in addition to tools such as books, journals, and websites. Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool and Global Quality Scale were used to evaluate the educational materials.
- Conditions
- Nursing Education, Artificial Intelligence
- Being tested
- Group using artificial intelligence tools in addition to traditional tools in preparing educational materials
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Group using artificial intelligence tools in addition to traditional tools in preparing educational materialsOther
Also called artificial intelligence
Students in the intervention group used AI tools in addition to tools such as books, journals, and websites.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Group using artificial intelligence tools in addition to traditional tools in preparing educational materials Receives: Other: Group using artificial intelligence tools in addition to traditional tools in preparing educational materials |
| Control group | No intervention | Group using traditional tools in preparing educational materials |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Understandability of the material
Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials: The tool consists of a total of 26 items, 19 items evaluating the understandability of the materials and 7 items evaluating their actionability. PEMAT scores materials from 0 to 100 points for understandability and actionability.
Measured: After the students have completed the materials (5 days later)
Actionability of the material
Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials: The tool consists of a total of 26 items, 19 items evaluating the understandability of the materials and 7 items evaluating their actionability. PEMAT scores materials from 0 to 100 points for understandability and actionability.
Measured: After the students have completed the materials (5 days later)
Quality of the material
Global Quality Scale : According to this scale, the quality of the training materials was evaluated on a 5-point scale (1: poor quality, 2: low quality - limited use, 3: somewhat useful, 4: useful, 5: useful-excellent quality).
Measured: After the students have completed the materials (5 days later)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Jul 2024
- Study start5 Feb 2024
- Primary completion31 May 2024
- Study completion7 Jun 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Nursing EducationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by TC Erciyes UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- TC Erciyes University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sevda Korkut, TC Erciyes University
- Investigators
- SEVDA KORKUT, Principal investigator, TC Erciyes University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06520852
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2024-04/14
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 21 Jul 2024
- Last updated
- 25 Jul 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jul 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Preparation of Patient Education Material on the Comprehensibility, Actionability and Quality of the Material
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06520852
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2024-04/14
- Conditions
- Nursing Education, Artificial Intelligence
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- TC Erciyes UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 5 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Jun 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This research was conducted to examine the effect of students' use of AI tools while preparing patient education material on the quality, understandability and actionability of the material in terms of content. Students in the control group used auxiliary tools such as books, journals and websites while preparing patient education materials. Students in the intervention group used AI tools in addition to tools such as books, journals, and websites.
Detailed description
This research was conducted to examine the effect of students' use of AI tools while preparing patient education material on the quality, understandability and actionability of the material in terms of content. Students in the control group used auxiliary tools such as books, journals and websites while preparing patient education materials. Students in the intervention group used AI tools in addition to tools such as books, journals, and websites. Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool and Global Quality Scale were used to evaluate the educational materials.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Other: Group using artificial intelligence tools in addition to traditional tools in preparing educational materialsGroup using artificial intelligence tools in addition to traditional tools in preparing educational materials |
| Control group | No intervention | –Group using traditional tools in preparing educational materials |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 46 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- agreeing to participate in the study,
- taking the Fundamentals of Nursing II course for the first time,
- not working as a nurse in a hospital or any health institution.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- not agreeing to participate in the study
- having prepared patient education materials before
- repeating the Fundamentals of Nursing II course
- not having internet access
- not having a computer or smartphone.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Group using artificial intelligence tools in addition to traditional tools in preparing educational materialsAlso: artificial intelligenceStudents in the intervention group used AI tools in addition to tools such as books, journals, and websites. | Other | Intervention group |
Primary outcome
Understandability of the material
Time frame: After the students have completed the materials (5 days later)
Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials: The tool consists of a total of 26 items, 19 items evaluating the understandability of the materials and 7 items evaluating their actionability. PEMAT scores materials from 0 to 100 points for understandability and actionability.
Actionability of the material
Time frame: After the students have completed the materials (5 days later)
Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials: The tool consists of a total of 26 items, 19 items evaluating the understandability of the materials and 7 items evaluating their actionability. PEMAT scores materials from 0 to 100 points for understandability and actionability.
Quality of the material
Time frame: After the students have completed the materials (5 days later)
Global Quality Scale : According to this scale, the quality of the training materials was evaluated on a 5-point scale (1: poor quality, 2: low quality - limited use, 3: somewhat useful, 4: useful, 5: useful-excellent quality).
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jul 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Nursing Education
Not yet recruiting
Mobile Game-Based Versus Classic First Aid Education in Adolescents: Randomized Controlled Trial
First Aid, Health Education in Schoolchildren
Not yet recruiting
The Effectiveness of Comic-based Learning Materials on Nursing Students' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Confidence in Dementia Care
Dementia Care Education, Students, Nursing
Not yet recruiting
King's Theory-Based Multicomponent Interventions in Heart Failure Patient Rehabilitation
Heart Failure, Cardiac Rehabilitation
Not yet recruiting
SELF-ASSESSMENT AND KNOWLEDGE LEVEL OF NURSING STUDENTS' PATIENT SAFETY COMPETENCY
Simulation Training, Nursing Education
Not yet recruiting
Compression-Only Versus Standard Basic Life Support Training in Nursing Students
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
SEVDA KORKUT principal investigator
TC Erciyes University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Group using artificial intelligence tools in addition to traditional tools in preparing educational materials in people with Nursing Education and Artificial Intelligence, run by TC Erciyes University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Understandability of the material (time frame: After the students have completed the materials (5 days later)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jul 2024.