AzTrials
AzTrials

Retinopathy of PrematurityNCT06517836

Automated Screening Device to Detect MTMROP

A study testing iROP DL in people with Retinopathy of Prematurity and ROP, run by Siloam Vision at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the i-ROP DL system for autonomous ROP screening. To demonstrate the sensitivity and specificity of the i-ROP DL system on images obtained by healthcare providers in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) setting to detect more than mild ROP (MTMROP), defined as type 2 or worse… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 4 weeks to 2 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Retinopathy of Prematurity, ROP
What is being tested?
iROP DL
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,284 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
20 Oct 2024to 1 Mar 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 4 weeks to 2 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Eligible subjects under protocol e-ROP, defined as Infants with birth weight (BW) less than 1251 g meeting current ROP screening.
  • All examinations will be eligible for inclusion regardless of the e-ROP label for image quality.
  • Cases are collected during the telemedicine-based remote digital fundus imaging (RDFI-TM) evaluations.

Who cannot join

  • Postmenstrual age greater than 39 weeks at first opportunity for imaging unless transferred in for ROP treatment.
  • Admission to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) with regressing or treated ROP.
  • Significant media opacity precluding visualization of the retina.
  • Major ocular or systemic congenital abnormality.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Oregon Health and Sciences University

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Validation Study of i-ROP DL, an Automated Screening Device to Detect More Than Mild Retinopathy of Prematurity (MTMROP)

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the i-ROP DL system for autonomous ROP screening. To demonstrate the sensitivity and specificity of the i-ROP DL system on images obtained by healthcare providers in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) setting to detect more than mild ROP (MTMROP), defined as type 2 or worse (as defined by the Early Treatment for ROP [ETROP] study), or pre-plus, compared to an image-based reference standard diagnosis (RSD).

This study will utilize a large multicenter dataset of images obtained as part of the Multicenter Telemedicine Approaches to Evaluating Acute-phase ROP (e-ROP) Study, a National Institute of Health multicenter study.

Read the detailed description

Retinopathy of prematurity is a disease that develops when babies are born prematurely, before the retina has fully developed. It is a leading cause of childhood blindness worldwide, but blindness is usually avoidable with accurate diagnosis, and timely treatment of babies with treatment-requiring disease. The purpose of diagnostic eye exams therefore (sometimes referred to as "ROP screening" examinations by clinicians) is to identify severe disease that requires treatment, and administer treatment, to reduce the risk of blindness.

Each country has accepted criteria for which babies require eye examinations for ROP. In the United States, all babies born less than 31 weeks post-menstrual age (PMA) or under 1500 grams require diagnostic eye examinations starting at 31 weeks PMA or 4 weeks after birth, whichever is later. Exams are repeated at 1-2 week intervals depending on the level of disease identified on examination.

Diagnosis of ROP is made using either ophthalmoscopy (in person examination at the bedside) or using telemedicine with remote digital fundus imaging. Telemedicine has become an acceptable standard of care for ROP diagnostic examinations, and in most telemedicine workflows, exams are repeated weekly to minimize the risk of missing ROP. Whether exams occur in person or via telemedicine, the ophthalmologist is responsible for documenting the presence or absence of ROP using the International Classification of ROP (ICROP) guidelines, including documenting the presence and degree of zone, stage, and plus disease.

The zone, stage and plus disease classifications lead to overall disease severity categories, as defined by the Early Treatment for ROP (ETROP) study (see Table). The ETROP study determined that urgent treatment (within 48 hours) should occur when babies develop "type 1" ROP, but was not indicated for babies with type 2 ROP or less. Follow-up guidelines are determined by the responsible physician based on the level of disease, although in telemedicine these typically occur weekly.

ROP "screening" criteria are designed to be highly sensitive so that babies with any risk of developing type 1 ROP are captured in the screening population and receive diagnostic eye examinations. As a result, most babies who receive examinations do not have severe ROP on examination. ROP examinations (especially in person ophthalmoscopic examinations where scleral depression is utilized) are stressful to the neonates, and time consuming to the ophthalmologist, and thus the current system is inefficient and exposes neonates to added stress, which can have significant short and long-term consequences . The ideal solution would be to reduce the number of in person examinations a baby receives without missing any cases of type 1 ROP, and limit the number of diagnostic eye examinations an ophthalmologist needs to perform to those babies with more than mild ROP (type 2 or worse).

This scenario is directly analogous to diabetic retinopathy, where the recommendation is for all diabetics to have an eye examination every year, even though only a small minority will have treatment-requiring disease. In diabetic retinopathy, autonomous AI has provided an alternative care delivery model where screening examinations occur in the primary care office, and only positive screens are sent for full ophthalmoscopic examination by an eye care provider.

In this clinical study, we are proposing to use the i-ROP DL system as an autonomous screening software as medical device for the detection of "more than mild ROP" (MTMROP) defined as type 2 or type 1 ROP using ETROP criteria. Digital images can be acquired by a technician in a standardized fashion. The system can analyze the images and output a positive or negative exam result.

  • A positive result triggers a referral for telemedical review by an ophthalmologist using the same set of images (does not require additional stress to babies). The responsible clinician can document the level of ROP and recommend either in person examination for possible treatment, or repeat screening examination or telemedical review at the appropriate interval.
  • A negative result automatically triggers a scheduled follow-up appointment for repeated screening examination in 1 week.

The i-ROP DL system was originally trained to diagnose plus disease at 3 levels (no plus, pre-plus or plus ). Subsequent work using the outputs for plus disease classification, we developed the concept of a "vascular severity score" (VSS) as an output of the system. The VSS is applied at the eye level from 1-9 and reflects the spectrum of vascular changes in pre-plus and plus disease. Because pre-plus and plus disease develop in more severe ROP, the VSS can be used as an objective assessment of ROP severity, increasing with increasing stage of disease, and overall category of ROP.

Thus, with the appropriate cut-point, the VSS can be used for screening purposes ensuring nearly 100% sensitivity for detection of treatment-requiring (type 1) ROP, and high sensitivity for detection of type 2 (or worse) ROP. The cut-point for this study will be >=2.9.

This study will utilize a large multicenter dataset of images obtained as part of the Multicenter Telemedicine Approaches to Evaluating Acute-phase ROP (e-ROP) Study, a National Institute of Health multicenter study.

Importantly, the e-ROP study was designed and executed prospectively to evaluate telemedical eye examinations compared to in person ophthalmoscopic examinations. Digital fundus images were acquired using the Retcam Shuttle by trained technicians using a standardized protocol for image acquisition. Images were then subsequently read by telemedical graders. All babies received in person ophthalmological examinations by ophthalmologists who were masked to the images and were not part of the image acquisition process. In other words, the study was perfectly designed to evaluate an autonomous screening model for ROP where images are acquired by non-physicians using a defined protocol at the point of care and only positive exams are subsequently reviewed by the ophthalmologist.

Being tested
iROP DL
Keywords
Retinopathy of Prematurity, ROP
Medical subject headings
Retinopathy of Prematurity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • iROP DLDevice

    First, to evaluate the i-ROP DL system for autonomous ROP screening. To demonstrate the sensitivity and specificity of the i-ROP DL system on images obtained by technicians in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) setting to detect more than mild ROP (MTMROP), defined as type 2 or worse from the Early Treatment for ROP study) compared to an image-based reference standard diagnosis (RSD).

Study groups in NCT06517836
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
eROP dataExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: iROP DL

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. sensitivity and specificity of the i-ROP DL system

    sensitivity and specificity of the I-ROP DL system for more than mild ROP and treatment requiring (type 1) ROP

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Jul 2024
  2. Study start20 Oct 2024
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2025
  4. Study completion1 Mar 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1,284 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06517836
Sponsor's protocol ID
SVCT-002
Other IDs
1R44EY035596-01
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
18 Jul 2024
Last updated
18 Dec 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing iROP DL in people with Retinopathy of Prematurity and ROP, run by Siloam Vision at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

sensitivity and specificity of the i-ROP DL system (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Dec 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in