AzTrials
AzTrials

Respiratory FailureNCT06506123

Patient-Ventilator Dyssynchrony Detection With a Machine Learning Algorithm

An observational study of Respiratory Failure, run by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a diagnostic study aiming to compare accuracy to detect and classify patient-ventilator dyssynchronies by a machine learning algorithm, compared to the gold-standard defined as dyssynchronies diagnosed and classified by mechanical ventilator and esophageal pressure waveforms analyzed by experts. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Respiratory Failure
What is being tested?
Artificial Intelligence Detection and Classification of Patient-Ventilator Dyssynchronies
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
25 May 2024to 24 Dec 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adult subjects under mechanical ventilation, with an assisted or assist-controlled mode, who are monitored with an esophageal pressure balloon due to clinical indication are eligible.

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects under assisted or assist-controlled mechanical ventilation and monitored with esophageal pressure balloon.

Who cannot join

  • Refusal from patient's family or attending physician

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Glauco M Plens, MD contact

+5511982213020

glaucomplens@gmail.com

Brazil1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Heart Institute, University of São Paulo

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403900

    Glauco M Plens, MD, +5511982213020, glaucomplens@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Automated Detection and Classification of Patient-Ventilator Dyssynchrony With a Machine Learning Algorithm

This is a diagnostic study aiming to compare accuracy to detect and classify patient-ventilator dyssynchronies by a machine learning algorithm, compared to the gold-standard defined as dyssynchronies diagnosed and classified by mechanical ventilator and esophageal pressure waveforms analyzed by experts.

The main question of this study is:

  • Are patient-ventilator dyssynchronies accurately detected and classified by an artificial intelligence algorithm when compared to experts analyzing esophageal pressure and mechanical ventilator waveforms?
Read the detailed description

This is a diagnostic, observational study, aiming to assess patient-ventilator dyssynchrony automated detection and classification by a machine learning algorithm. Accuracy of the machine learning algorithm will be compared with the gold-standard, defined as dyssynchronies detected and classified by mechanical ventilation experts.

Experts will analyzed airway pressure, flow, volume and esophageal pressure waveforms to detect and classify dyssynchronies.

Being tested
Artificial Intelligence Detection and Classification of Patient-Ventilator Dyssynchronies
Keywords
mechanical ventilation, artificial intelligence
Medical subject headings
Respiratory Insufficiency

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Artificial Intelligence Detection and Classification of Patient-Ventilator DyssynchroniesDevice

    Machine learning algorithm to detect and classify patient-ventilator dyssynchronies, which is integrated in the mechanical ventilator (Fleximag Max, Magnamed, Brazil).

Study groups in NCT06506123
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Artificial Intelligence Detection and Classification of Patient-Ventilator DyssynchroniesThis is a single arm study, since all subjects included will be exposed to both diagnostic methods (artificial intelligence and experts). The proposed diagnostic method is a machine learning algorithm integrated in the mechanical ventilator FlexiMag Max 700 (Magnamed, Brazil), which will continuously record data from mechanical ventilation of included subjects for a time period of up to 72 hours. The gold-standard involves esophageal pressure waveform recording and offline analysis by experts.
Receives: Device: Artificial Intelligence Detection and Classification of Patient-Ventilator Dyssynchronies

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnostic Accuracy of the Artificial Intelligence algorithm

    Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of the artificial intelligence algorithm to detect and classify patient-ventilator dyssynchronies. These accuracy indexes will be estimated for each kind of dyssinchrony: ineffective effort, autotriggering, double triggering, reverse triggering, reverse triggering with a double cycle

    Measured: 3 days

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Pendelluft detection

    Percentage of cycles with pendelluft detected with the artificial intelligence algorithm compared to the percentage of cycles with pendelluft detected with the esophageal pressure

    Measured: 3 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Jul 2024
  2. Study start25 May 2024
  3. Primary completion24 May 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion24 Dec 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06506123
Sponsor's protocol ID
CAAE 78855824.7.0000.0068
Status last verified
May 2024
First submitted
24 May 2024
Last updated
17 Jul 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Amato MB, Barbas CS, Medeiros DM, Magaldi RB, Schettino GP, Lorenzi-Filho G, Kairalla RA, Deheinzelin D, Munoz C, Oliveira R, Takagaki TY, Carvalho CR. Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1998 Feb 5;338(6):347-54. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199802053380602.

    PubMed 9449727
  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network; Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 4;342(18):1301-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801.

    PubMed 10793162
  • Sousa MLEA, Magrans R, Hayashi FK, Blanch L, Kacmarek RM, Ferreira JC. Clusters of Double Triggering Impact Clinical Outcomes: Insights From the EPIdemiology of Patient-Ventilator aSYNChrony (EPISYNC) Cohort Study. Crit Care Med. 2021 Sep 1;49(9):1460-1469. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005029.

    PubMed 33883458
  • Sousa MLA, Magrans R, Hayashi FK, Blanch L, Kacmarek RM, Ferreira JC. Predictors of asynchronies during assisted ventilation and its impact on clinical outcomes: The EPISYNC cohort study. J Crit Care. 2020 Jun;57:30-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.01.023. Epub 2020 Jan 21.

    PubMed 32032901
  • Blanch L, Villagra A, Sales B, Montanya J, Lucangelo U, Lujan M, Garcia-Esquirol O, Chacon E, Estruga A, Oliva JC, Hernandez-Abadia A, Albaiceta GM, Fernandez-Mondejar E, Fernandez R, Lopez-Aguilar J, Villar J, Murias G, Kacmarek RM. Asynchronies during mechanical ventilation are associated with mortality. Intensive Care Med. 2015 Apr;41(4):633-41. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3692-6. Epub 2015 Feb 19.

    PubMed 25693449
  • LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature. 2015 May 28;521(7553):436-44. doi: 10.1038/nature14539.

    PubMed 26017442

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Respiratory Failure, run by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Glauco M Plens, MD (+5511982213020, glaucomplens@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Artificial Intelligence algorithm (time frame: 3 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06506123, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jul 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in