Catheter; Infection (Indwelling Catheter)NCT06474845
Efficacy of the T-Control® Catheter Compared to the Foley-type Catheter in Patients With Long-term Catheterization
A study testing Foley-type catheter in people with Catheter; Infection (Indwelling Catheter) and Quality of Life, run by Rethink Medical SL at 6 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the new urinary catheter T-Control® allows a reduction in infections associated with urinary catheters and a better quality of life of urinary catheter patients compared to the conventional Foley-type catheter (the currently used in clinical practice). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Catheter; Infection (Indwelling Catheter), Quality of Life, Catheter Related Complication
- What is being tested?
- Foley-type catheter
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 12 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 10 Feb 2024to 1 Sep 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Men or women aged ≥18 years
- Patients who require change of bladder catheter.
- Patients with indication of bladder catheterization for at least 4 weeks.
- Patients who maintain cognitive and physical ability for self-monitoring of the catheter valve.
- Patients who sign ICF prior to the performance of any study-specific procedure.
Who cannot join
- Use of current antibiotic treatment or in the 2 weeks prior to the study inclusion.
- Patients undergoing chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunosuppressants or retroviral treatment.
- Patients with bilateral obstructive supravesical uropathy.
- Inability to read and understand the language of the Hospital's country.
- Patients who are participating in a clinical trial or intends to participate during the course of this study.
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 2 countries.
6 sites in 2 countries
Portugal3 sites
Prof. Doutor Fernando Fonseca Hospital
Amadora, 2720-276
Egas Moniz Hospital
Lisbon, 1349-019
Unidade Local de Saúde de Santa Maria - Centro de Investigação Clínica
Lisbon, 1649-028
Spain3 sites
Regional University Hospital of Malaga
Málaga, Andalucía/Spain, 29010
Rey Juan Carlos University Hospital
Móstoles, Madrid/Spain, 28933
La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital
Valencia, Valencia, 46026
About this study
Official title: Multicentre International Randomized Clinical Study to Assess the Efficacy of the T-Control® Catheter vs. a Conventional Foley-type Catheter
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the new urinary catheter T-Control® allows a reduction in infections associated with urinary catheters and a better quality of life of urinary catheter patients compared to the conventional Foley-type catheter (the currently used in clinical practice). It will also learn about the safety profile of the T-Control® catheter and its cost-effectiveness. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does the T-Control® catheter lower the number of infections of the patients who need long-term catheterization? Does he T-Control® catheter implies a better perceived quality of life of long-term catheterization patients?
Read more
Participants will:
Be catheterized with T-Control® or Foley catheter. Visit the clinic after 4 weeks for checkups, fullfill questionnaires and tests. Keep a diary of their symptoms and adverse events related to the catheter.
Read the detailed description
This is a comparative, randomized, controlled, multicentric clinical study with two arms in which the T-control® catheter is compared with a conventional Foley-type catheter.
The main objective of this study is to determine the efficacy of T-Control® compared to the conventional Foley-type catheter, by comparing the number of CAUTIs (both symptomatic and asymptomatic) in patients with long-term catheterization. While the secondary objectives are: to determine the Health-related QoL (HRQoL) and analyze the self-perceived QoL of catheterized patients, as well as the acceptability of the T-Control® device, patient's satisfaction and patients' experience framed in the trajectory of the disease; to compare the safety profile between T-Control® and the conventional Foley-type catheter and the antibiotics used; to determine the cost-effectiveness of T-Control® versus the conventional Foley-type catheter, from the perspective of the hospital; and to measure the level of satisfaction of healthcare professionals with the different types of urinary catheters.
Follow-up includes both the time of the catheter insertion until its removal or change, lasting 4 weeks. All the parameters collected during the follow-up visit refer to the 4 weeks during which the patient has had the catheter inserted.
- Being tested
- T-Control® catheter, Foley-type catheter
- Keywords
- Catheterization, CAUTI, Foley catheter, QoL
- Medical subject headings
- Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
T-Control® catheterDevice
Patients will be catheterized with T-Control® for 4 weeks
Foley-type catheterDevice
Patients will be catheterized with a conventional Foley-type catheter for 4 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental arm (T-Control®) | Experimental | Patients catheterized with a catheter with a control valve for intermittent drainage Receives: Device: T-Control® catheter |
| Control arm (Foley) | Active comparator | Patients catheterized with a conventional urinary catheter with continuous drainage Receives: Device: Foley-type catheter |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rate of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (symptomatic and asymptomatic)
Number of infections divided by number of patients. The presence of pathogenic microorganisms in quantities greater than or equal to 1,000 CFU/ml will determine the presence of infection, while, in the absence of symptoms of infection, a determination of microorganisms greater than or equal to 100,000 CFU/ml will indicate asymptomatic infection.
Measured: 4 weeks
Magnitude of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (symptomatic and asymptomatic)
Amount of pathogenic microorganisms present in urine (in CFU/ml) divided by number of patients
Measured: 4 weeks
Secondary outcomes (6)
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
The EuroQ-5Dimensions-5Levels questionnaire will be administered to assess the HRQoL. The questionnaire comprises five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression) with 5 levels each (no problems, mild problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems/disability). The response results in a 1-digit number that expresses the selected level for that dimension. The digits of the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the health status of the patient. The minimum value is 11111, indicating the worse outcome, whereas the maximum value is 55555, indicating the better outcome. In addition, it also features the EuroQoL Visual Analog Scale (EQ VAS), which records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analog scale from 0 to 100, where the endpoints are labelled "The best health you can imagine" (100) and "The worst health you can imagine" (0).
Measured: 4 weeks
Catheter Related Quality of Life
A specific questionnaire to measure the self-perceived quality of life of catheterized patients will be administered. It includes questions that collect data on the type of the bladder catheter and on the accessories used (collection bag, plug or others), questions related to the impact of the catheter in lifestyle and change of habits, functionality and usability in relation to the catheter and the accessories used, adverse events, and emotions perceived due to the use of the bladder catheter.
In order to quantitatively evaluate the responses, the statements will include response options with scores on a scale of 1 to 5 or 1 to 10. The maximum score is 200, indicating the worst perceived quality of life, whereas 26 is the minimum score, indicating the better perceived quality of life.
Measured: 4 weeks
Adverse events
Number of adverse events realated to catheterization
Measured: 4 weeks
Antibiotic treatments
Number of antibiotic treatments administered along with the dose and treatment time
Measured: 4 weeks
Cost-effectiveness
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) will be used, which results from dividing the difference in costs between alternatives by the difference in effectiveness (incremental cost per QALY gained)
Measured: 4 weeks
Satisfaction of health professionals
The degree of satisfaction of the members of the research team involved in the use of the catheters will be evaluated through an ad hoc questionnaire
Measured: 9 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jun 2024
- Study start10 Feb 2024
- Primary completion1 May 2026
- Study completion1 Sep 2026
Why it stopped: Study was terminated due to lack of funding.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Catheter; Infection (Indwelling Catheter)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Comparative, randomized, controlled, multicentric clinical study with two arms
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Rethink Medical SL
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Evidenze CRO, Centro para el Desarrollo Tecnológico y la Innovación (CDTI), Spain
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jose Medina-Polo, Dr., Study chair, Hospital Universitario 12 de OctubreSalvador Arlandis Guzmán, Dr., Principal investigator, La Fe University and Polytechnic HospitalRaúl Vozmediano Chicharro, Dr., Principal investigator, Carlos Haya Regional University HospitalDavid Carracedo Calvo, Dr., Principal investigator, Rey Juan Carlos University HospitalJose Carlos Santos, Dr., Principal investigator, Hospital Egas MonizAlberto Marques Silva, Dr., Principal investigator, Prof. Doutor Fernando Fonseca HospitalJosé Manuel Palma dos Reis, Dr., Principal investigator, Unidade Local de Saúde de Santa Maria - Centro de Investigação Clínica
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06474845
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RM-TCONTROL-2024-05
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 18 Jun 2024
- Last updated
- 4 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: All IPD that underlie results in a publication will be available from the Sponsor upon reasonable request.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multicentre International Randomized Clinical Study to Assess the Efficacy of the T-Control® Catheter vs. a Conventional Foley-type Catheter
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06474845
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RM-TCONTROL-2024-05
- Keywords
- Catheterization, CAUTI, Foley catheter, QoL
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Study was terminated due to lack of funding.
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Rethink Medical SLIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Evidenze CRO, Centro para el Desarrollo Tecnológico y la Innovación (CDTI), Spain
- Study start
- 10 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 May 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Sep 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the new urinary catheter T-Control® allows a reduction in infections associated with urinary catheters and a better quality of life of urinary catheter patients compared to the conventional Foley-type catheter (the currently used in clinical practice). It will also learn about the safety profile of the T-Control® catheter and its cost-effectiveness. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does the T-Control® catheter lower the number of infections of the patients who need long-term catheterization? Does he T-Control® catheter implies a better perceived quality of life of long-term catheterization patients?
Participants will:
Be catheterized with T-Control® or Foley catheter. Visit the clinic after 4 weeks for checkups, fullfill questionnaires and tests. Keep a diary of their symptoms and adverse events related to the catheter.
Detailed description
This is a comparative, randomized, controlled, multicentric clinical study with two arms in which the T-control® catheter is compared with a conventional Foley-type catheter.
The main objective of this study is to determine the efficacy of T-Control® compared to the conventional Foley-type catheter, by comparing the number of CAUTIs (both symptomatic and asymptomatic) in patients with long-term catheterization. While the secondary objectives are: to determine the Health-related QoL (HRQoL) and analyze the self-perceived QoL of catheterized patients, as well as the acceptability of the T-Control® device, patient's satisfaction and patients' experience framed in the trajectory of the disease; to compare the safety profile between T-Control® and the conventional Foley-type catheter and the antibiotics used; to determine the cost-effectiveness of T-Control® versus the conventional Foley-type catheter, from the perspective of the hospital; and to measure the level of satisfaction of healthcare professionals with the different types of urinary catheters.
Follow-up includes both the time of the catheter insertion until its removal or change, lasting 4 weeks. All the parameters collected during the follow-up visit refer to the 4 weeks during which the patient has had the catheter inserted.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Comparative, randomized, controlled, multicentric clinical study with two arms
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental arm (T-Control®) | Experimental | Device: T-Control® catheterPatients catheterized with a catheter with a control valve for intermittent drainage |
| Control arm (Foley) | Active comparator | Device: Foley-type catheterPatients catheterized with a conventional urinary catheter with continuous drainage |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Men or women aged ≥18 years
- Patients who require change of bladder catheter.
- Patients with indication of bladder catheterization for at least 4 weeks.
- Patients who maintain cognitive and physical ability for self-monitoring of the catheter valve.
- Patients who sign ICF prior to the performance of any study-specific procedure.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Use of current antibiotic treatment or in the 2 weeks prior to the study inclusion.
- Patients undergoing chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunosuppressants or retroviral treatment.
- Patients with bilateral obstructive supravesical uropathy.
- Inability to read and understand the language of the Hospital's country.
- Patients who are participating in a clinical trial or intends to participate during the course of this study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| T-Control® catheterPatients will be catheterized with T-Control® for 4 weeks | Device | Experimental arm (T-Control®) |
| Foley-type catheterPatients will be catheterized with a conventional Foley-type catheter for 4 weeks | Device | Control arm (Foley) |
Primary outcome
Rate of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (symptomatic and asymptomatic)
Time frame: 4 weeks
Number of infections divided by number of patients. The presence of pathogenic microorganisms in quantities greater than or equal to 1,000 CFU/ml will determine the presence of infection, while, in the absence of symptoms of infection, a determination of microorganisms greater than or equal to 100,000 CFU/ml will indicate asymptomatic infection.
Magnitude of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (symptomatic and asymptomatic)
Time frame: 4 weeks
Amount of pathogenic microorganisms present in urine (in CFU/ml) divided by number of patients
6 secondary outcomes
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
Time frame: 4 weeks
Catheter Related Quality of Life
Time frame: 4 weeks
Adverse events
Time frame: 4 weeks
Antibiotic treatments
Time frame: 4 weeks
Cost-effectiveness
Time frame: 4 weeks
Satisfaction of health professionals
Time frame: 9 months
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Study was terminated due to lack of funding.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Sep 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. All IPD that underlie results in a publication will be available from the Sponsor upon reasonable request.
Related trials for Catheter; Infection (Indwelling Catheter)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Evaluate of the Use of Uromune as a Potential Non-antibiotic Prophylactic Strategy for Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infection in Patients With Long-term Catheterization.
Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTIs)
Recruiting
Effectiveness of the NowCath Foley in Reducing Catheter-Associated UTIs and Blockages in Long-Term Indwelling Catheter Users (REDUCE)
Urinary Catheters, Urinary Catheterization
Not yet recruiting
The Effect of Education on Patients' Attitudes and Anxiety Towards CAUTI Prevention
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection, Indwelling Urinary Catheter
Recruiting
REPLACE: The Impact of Catheter Replacement in Patients With Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infection
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Bacteriuria and Indwelling Urinary Catheter.
Bacteriuria Asymptomatic, Urinary Tract Infections
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jose Medina-Polo, Dr. study chair
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Salvador Arlandis Guzmán, Dr. principal investigator
La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital
Raúl Vozmediano Chicharro, Dr. principal investigator
Carlos Haya Regional University Hospital
6 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Foley-type catheter in people with Catheter; Infection (Indwelling Catheter) and Quality of Life, run by Rethink Medical SL at 6 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in Portugal, Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Study was terminated due to lack of funding.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rate of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (symptomatic and asymptomatic) (time frame: 4 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Sep 2026.