Lower Limb AmputationAMPADinRehabNCT06471855
Clinical and Psychological Adjustment of Patients With LLA: a Multidisciplinary Rehabilitative Intervention Project
A study testing Multidisciplinary Conventional and Technology-based Rehabilitation and Multidisciplinary Conventional Rehabilitation in people with Lower Limb Amputation and Prosthesis User, run by Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Most of the limb amputation related to vascular disease is often secondary to a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The amputation involves significant motor, psychological, and social challenges for patients, with a major effect on their psycho-physical health. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Lower Limb Amputation, Prosthesis User
- What is being tested?
- Multidisciplinary Conventional and Technology-based Rehabilitation and Multidisciplinary Conventional Rehabilitation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2023to Jun 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Risk of amputation or Lower limb amputation or prothesis use for vascular disease and diabetes type 2
Who cannot join
- more than 80 years older
- severe clinical condition (ie, chronic heart failure [New York Heart Association Classification-IV - NYHA-IV], ischemic heart disease [Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification-IV - CCS-IV], neoplastic disease, acute respiratory disease);
- non-Italian education
- severe visual-perceptive deficits
- severe cognitive impairment (MMSE ≤ 26 Foderaro et al, 2022);
- severe mental health condition or psychiatric disorder compromising participation in the study;
- absence or withdrawal of the informed consent to participate.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, IRCCS
Pavia, PV, 27100
Antonia Dr Pierobon, +390385247255, antonia.pierobon@icsmaugeri.it
About this study
Official title: Clinical and Psychological Adjustment of Patients With Lower Limb Amputation: a Multidisciplinary Rehabilitative Intervention Project (AMP_ADinRehab Study)
Most of the limb amputation related to vascular disease is often secondary to a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The amputation involves significant motor, psychological, and social challenges for patients, with a major effect on their psycho-physical health. The psychological processes that characterize this clinical population are still poorly investigated. Adopting a biopsychosocial approach, the present randomized prospective quali-quantitative study protocol aims to evaluate the behavioural and psychological adaptation at various stages of the disease: risk of amputation, lower limb amputation, and prosthesis use. In the last phase, patients with prosthesis will receive traditional rehabilitation treatment and technology-based rehabilitation (experimental) or not (active comparator) with randomized controlled enrolment. The evaluation will be based on a semi-structured interview, specific to the disease stage and constructed using the Three Factor Model, and rating scales. Patient's medical history, functional status (ie, motor functionality, autonomy in BIM and FIM, risk of falls, subjective perceived pain), and psychological aspects (ie, emotional impact, HRQoL, anxiety and depression symptoms, personality traits, acceptance, adherence, body image, the experience of the prosthesis and technology-based rehabilitation, expectations for the future) will be investigated. The audio-recorded and transcribed interviews will be analyzed using the Interpretive Description approach.
Read the detailed description
It has been shown in the literature that most lower limb amputations are due to diseases related to vascular problems and diabetes, with different incidences depending on geographical region and ethnicity. There are various levels of lower limb amputation (LLA): from the fingertips or tarsal area; trans-tibial amputations, which involve the removal of part of the tibia and fibula; trans-femoral amputations, which are at the level of the femur; and hip amputations. Scientific literature and clinical experience suggest that the loss of a limb through amputation has a major impact on quality of life and physical and psychological well-being. Important are the repercussions on mobility and, specifically, the inability to walk has a negative impact on the performance of basic daily activities and reintegration into society. Amputation can also produce emotional disorders, leading to a change in levels of anxiety, depression, and pain, generating significant changes in the person's quality of life. Self-acceptance of a person with lower limb amputation is seen as a complex process, in which the prosthesis plays the role of a life-enhancing tool. Indeed, the prosthesis allows people to return to living life 'normally', increase their quality of life and restore their body image. Rehabilitation programs for amputees all have a common aim, which is to improve people's mobility and general functioning through the use of the prosthesis, that promote reintegration into the community and the overall improvement of these people's quality of life. In fact, the use of a prosthesis has a great effect on these patients as it attempts to contrast the negative impact of lower limb amputation in various areas: physical, psychological, and social. The prosthesis is considered not only as an enabling device, but also as a central component for personal and social identity. Over the last 20 years, rehabilitation has increasingly started to use high-tech components, such as robotic and virtual reality rehabilitation, both immersive and non-immersive. The use of technological components not only constitutes an innovative, accessible, and increasingly useful treatment tool, but is also recognized as an added value to traditional rehabilitation due to the positive impact it has on activities of daily living. Rehabilitation with virtual reality, consists of the integration to traditional rehabilitation practice of high-tech devices that allow multisensory stimulation and interaction with virtual environments, that simulate situations and contexts of daily life at different levels of immersion.
The psychological processes characterizing this clinical population are still poorly investigated and here are few studies using rehabilitation with high-tech instruments on patients with prostheses after LLA.
Following this line, the purpose of this prospective study protocol is to explore changes and evolutions in the psychological and behavioural adaptation constructs in patients at high vascular risk of LLA, already amputated or undergoing prosthesis adaptation; these ones receiving traditional rehabilitation treatment and technology-based rehabilitation (experimental) or not (active comparator) with randomized controlled enrolment. This quali-quantitative study project comes from the need to have a holistic vision of the patient acceptance process in the various phases of the disease and of the factors involved in the process of adaptation to the prosthesis, analyzing the state of health.
Specifically, the study objectives are:
- to analyze HRQoL, psychological and behavioral adaptation in patients at high vascular risk of LLA, already amputated or undergoing prosthesis adaptation.
- to present a multidisciplinary rehabilitation intervention model, traditional rehabilitation vs traditional rehabilitation with technology-based rehabilitation, and study its impact on the HRQoL in patients with prostheses (only trans-tibial amputations).
- Conditions
- Lower Limb Amputation, Prosthesis User
- Being tested
- Multidisciplinary Conventional and Technology-based Rehabilitation, Multidisciplinary Conventional Rehabilitation
- Keywords
- Amputee, Multidisciplinary rehabilitation, HRQoL, Psychological adaptation, Usability, HT/robotic rehabilitation, Psychoeducation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Multidisciplinary Conventional and Technology-based RehabilitationDevice
Patients will receive conventional treatment consisting of two daily sessions (3 weeks) and including traditional rehabilitation activities like range of motion exercises (passive, active assisted, and active), progressive resistive exercises, balance and strength training, and aerobic conditioning. The intervention procedures will follow the routine multidisciplinary clinical practice of the Institute where the study will be carried out. According to their individualized rehabilitation project, patients will undergo non-immersive VR-based rehabilitation. VR-based rehabilitation will consist of one daily session (3 weeks) and will be conducted by the implementation of a single non-immersive VR device among the D-WallTM (TechnoBody SRL, Italy). Part of the duration of the whole treatment will be dedicated to the use of the device, resulting in the same amount of rehabilitation for all participants.
Multidisciplinary Conventional RehabilitationOther
Patients will receive conventional treatment consisting of two daily sessions (3 weeks) and including traditional rehabilitation activities like range of motion exercises (passive, active assisted, and active), progressive resistive exercises, balance and strength training, and aerobic conditioning. The intervention procedures will follow the routine multidisciplinary clinical practice of the Institute where the study will be carried out. Procedures will be adapted according to the patient's medical diagnosis, disability severity, and to consequent rehabilitation objectives in favor of an individualized rehabilitation project and program. If necessary, patients might therefore undergo parallel rehabilitation activities (ie, occupational therapy, cognitive stimulation) that will be kept under control throughout data collection and analyses.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Technology-based Rehabilitation Group | Experimental | Patients will undergo conventional treatment and, additionally, virtual reality-based rehabilitation. Receives: Device: Multidisciplinary Conventional and Technology-based Rehabilitation |
| Conventional Rehabilitation Group | Active comparator | Patients will undergo conventional treatment exclusively. Receives: Other: Multidisciplinary Conventional Rehabilitation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Short-term changes in Modified Barthel Index (MBI)
The Modified Barthel Index (MBI) evaluates patient's autonomy to perform ADLs (ie, chair/bed transfer, ambulation, stair climbing, toilet transfer, bowel control, bladder control, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, feeding). Total scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate higher patient's autonomy.
Measured: From baseline (T0) to 3 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
Short-term changes in Morse Fall Scale (MFS)
The Morse Falls Scale (MFS) evaluates patient's risk of falls. Total scores ranges from 0 to 125 with higher scores reflecting a greater risk of falling.
Measured: From baseline (T0) to 3 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
Short-term changes in Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
The Functional Independent Measure (FIM) evaluates patient's disability level according to motor and cognitive subscores. Total scores range from 18 (complete dependence) to 126 (complete independence). Two subscores can be calculated: FIM motor (range 13-91) and FIM cognitive (range 5-35).
Measured: From baseline (T0) to 3 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
Short-term changes in Timed Up & Go Test (TUG)
The Timed Up \& Go Test measures patient's risk of falling, static and dynamic balance by estimating the time patient takes to stand up from an armchair, walk forward for 3 meters, turn, walk back to the chair and sit down. The longer the time this takes, the higher the risk of falling.
Measured: From baseline (T0) to 3 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
Short-term changes in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) measures patient's subjective perceived pain with a visual representation. Total scores range from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate more severe pain.
Measured: From baseline (T0) to 3 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
Amputee Mobility Predictor (AMP)
Amputee Mobility Predictor (AMP): it is a well known tool that clearly assesses the functional status of the amputee. It is composed of 21 items, each divided in 3 scoring choices: 0 indicates inability to perform the task; 1 implies minimal level of achievement or that some assistance was required in completing the task and 2 denotes complete independence or mastery of the task. The items must be submitted with an increasing level of difficulty to allow for the progressive assessment of the amputee. In particular, the evaluation goes from the ability to maintain sitting balance, gradually increasing the difficulty level of the activities to the final steps which are about collecting data during gait and during the use of particular assistive devices. The total score range for the AMP is 0 to 42 points.
Measured: 3 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)
The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) screening test evaluates the patient's cognitive functions (ie, sense of orientation, memory, attention, language function, visual-spatial abilities, the ability to count, remember things, repeat and execute orders). Total scores range from 0 to 30. Lower scores indicate more severe cognitive disorders.
Measured: Baseline (T0)
The Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 - Short Version (PID-5-BF)
The Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 - Short Version (PID-5-BF) evaluates personality trait assessment (ie, Negative Affectivity, Detachment, Antagonism, Disinhibition and Psychoticism).
Total scores range from 0 to 75. Higher scores indicate more dysfunction in the specific personality trait domain.
Measured: Baseline (T0)
The Antecedents and Self-Efficacy on Adherence Schedule (ASonA)
The Antecedents and Self-Efficacy on Adherence Schedule (ASonA) evaluates the antecedents (ie, health literacy, understanding of illness, perception of social support, acceptance of health-related limitations), the self-efficacy (the beliefs and self-care strategies on adherence for physical activity, diet, alcohol consumption and smoking avoidance) and the affectivity (the emotional response related to health status).
Total scores range from 0 to 84. High scores correspond to higher perceived self-efficacy in the investigated domains.
Measured: Baseline (T0)
Short-term changes in EuroQoL-VAS (EQ-VAS)
The EuroQoL-VAS (EQ-VAS) evaluates self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale (0: the worst health you can imagine; 100: the best health you can imagine). Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
Measured: From baseline (T0) to 3 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
Short-term changes in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)
The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) evaluates anxiety symptoms severity in the last 2 weeks. Total scores range from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate more severe anxiety.
Measured: From baseline (T0) to 3 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
Short-term changes in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) evaluates depression symptoms severity in the last 2 weeks. Total scores range from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate more severe depression.
Measured: From baseline (T0) to 3 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
Short-term changes in Body Image Scale (BIS)
The Body Image Scale (BIS) evaluates the alteration of the body image. Total scores range from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate more distress symptoms.
Measured: From baseline (T0) to 3 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES)
The Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES) evaluates prosthesis experience and adaptation (ie, general adaptation, social adaptation, adaptation to limitation, functional satisfaction, aesthetic satisfaction, weight satisfaction of the prothesis). This instrument also includes a final section analysing the presence of phantom limb and stump pain, and other medical issues. Total scores range from 25 to 125. Higher scores indicate a worse adaptation.
Measured: 3 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The Technology Assisted Rehabilitation Patient Perception Questionnaire (TARPP-Q)
The Technology Assisted Rehabilitation Patient Perception Questionnaire (TARPP-Q) is an ad-hoc questionnaire measuring patients' experience of use of the devices (ie, technology learnability, acceptability, usefulness, adaptability, adverse effects, engagement, enjoyment, safety, perceived effectiveness). Total scores range from 10 to 40. Higher scores indicate better patient's experience of use of the devices.
Measured: 3 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Jun 2024
- Study start1 Jun 2023
- Primary completionJan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lower Limb AmputationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpAThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Two-arm, parallel, randomized prospective quasi-experimental study design
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Antonia Dr Pierobon, Principal investigator, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, IRCCS
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06471855
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2768
- Acronym
- AMPADinRehab
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 18 Jun 2024
- Last updated
- 23 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical and Psychological Adjustment of Patients With Lower Limb Amputation: a Multidisciplinary Rehabilitative Intervention Project (AMP_ADinRehab Study)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06471855
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AMPADinRehab / 2768
- Conditions
- Lower Limb Amputation, Prosthesis User
- Keywords
- Amputee, Multidisciplinary rehabilitation, HRQoL, Psychological adaptation, Usability, HT/robotic rehabilitation, Psychoeducation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpAUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Most of the limb amputation related to vascular disease is often secondary to a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The amputation involves significant motor, psychological, and social challenges for patients, with a major effect on their psycho-physical health. The psychological processes that characterize this clinical population are still poorly investigated. Adopting a biopsychosocial approach, the present randomized prospective quali-quantitative study protocol aims to evaluate the behavioural and psychological adaptation at various stages of the disease: risk of amputation, lower limb amputation, and prosthesis use. In the last phase, patients with prosthesis will receive traditional rehabilitation treatment and technology-based rehabilitation (experimental) or not (active comparator) with randomized controlled enrolment. The evaluation will be based on a semi-structured interview, specific to the disease stage and constructed using the Three Factor Model, and rating scales. Patient's medical history, functional status (ie, motor functionality, autonomy in BIM and FIM, risk of falls, subjective perceived pain), and psychological aspects (ie, emotional impact, HRQoL, anxiety and depression symptoms, personality traits, acceptance, adherence, body image, the experience of the prosthesis and technology-based rehabilitation, expectations for the future) will be investigated. The audio-recorded and transcribed interviews will be analyzed using the Interpretive Description approach.
Detailed description
It has been shown in the literature that most lower limb amputations are due to diseases related to vascular problems and diabetes, with different incidences depending on geographical region and ethnicity. There are various levels of lower limb amputation (LLA): from the fingertips or tarsal area; trans-tibial amputations, which involve the removal of part of the tibia and fibula; trans-femoral amputations, which are at the level of the femur; and hip amputations. Scientific literature and clinical experience suggest that the loss of a limb through amputation has a major impact on quality of life and physical and psychological well-being. Important are the repercussions on mobility and, specifically, the inability to walk has a negative impact on the performance of basic daily activities and reintegration into society. Amputation can also produce emotional disorders, leading to a change in levels of anxiety, depression, and pain, generating significant changes in the person's quality of life. Self-acceptance of a person with lower limb amputation is seen as a complex process, in which the prosthesis plays the role of a life-enhancing tool. Indeed, the prosthesis allows people to return to living life 'normally', increase their quality of life and restore their body image. Rehabilitation programs for amputees all have a common aim, which is to improve people's mobility and general functioning through the use of the prosthesis, that promote reintegration into the community and the overall improvement of these people's quality of life. In fact, the use of a prosthesis has a great effect on these patients as it attempts to contrast the negative impact of lower limb amputation in various areas: physical, psychological, and social. The prosthesis is considered not only as an enabling device, but also as a central component for personal and social identity. Over the last 20 years, rehabilitation has increasingly started to use high-tech components, such as robotic and virtual reality rehabilitation, both immersive and non-immersive. The use of technological components not only constitutes an innovative, accessible, and increasingly useful treatment tool, but is also recognized as an added value to traditional rehabilitation due to the positive impact it has on activities of daily living. Rehabilitation with virtual reality, consists of the integration to traditional rehabilitation practice of high-tech devices that allow multisensory stimulation and interaction with virtual environments, that simulate situations and contexts of daily life at different levels of immersion.
The psychological processes characterizing this clinical population are still poorly investigated and here are few studies using rehabilitation with high-tech instruments on patients with prostheses after LLA.
Following this line, the purpose of this prospective study protocol is to explore changes and evolutions in the psychological and behavioural adaptation constructs in patients at high vascular risk of LLA, already amputated or undergoing prosthesis adaptation; these ones receiving traditional rehabilitation treatment and technology-based rehabilitation (experimental) or not (active comparator) with randomized controlled enrolment. This quali-quantitative study project comes from the need to have a holistic vision of the patient acceptance process in the various phases of the disease and of the factors involved in the process of adaptation to the prosthesis, analyzing the state of health.
Specifically, the study objectives are:
- to analyze HRQoL, psychological and behavioral adaptation in patients at high vascular risk of LLA, already amputated or undergoing prosthesis adaptation.
- to present a multidisciplinary rehabilitation intervention model, traditional rehabilitation vs traditional rehabilitation with technology-based rehabilitation, and study its impact on the HRQoL in patients with prostheses (only trans-tibial amputations).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Two-arm, parallel, randomized prospective quasi-experimental study design
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Technology-based Rehabilitation Group | Experimental | Device: Multidisciplinary Conventional and Technology-based RehabilitationPatients will undergo conventional treatment and, additionally, virtual reality-based rehabilitation. |
| Conventional Rehabilitation Group | Active comparator | Other: Multidisciplinary Conventional RehabilitationPatients will undergo conventional treatment exclusively. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Risk of amputation or Lower limb amputation or prothesis use for vascular disease and diabetes type 2
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- more than 80 years older
- severe clinical condition (ie, chronic heart failure [New York Heart Association Classification-IV - NYHA-IV], ischemic heart disease [Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification-IV - CCS-IV], neoplastic disease, acute respiratory disease);
- non-Italian education
- severe visual-perceptive deficits
- severe cognitive impairment (MMSE ≤ 26 Foderaro et al, 2022);
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Multidisciplinary Conventional and Technology-based RehabilitationPatients will receive conventional treatment consisting of two daily sessions (3 weeks) and including traditional rehabilitation activities like range of motion exercises (passive, active assisted, and active), progressive resistive exercises, balance and strength training, and aerobic conditioning. The intervention procedures will follow the routine multidisciplinary clinical practice of the Institute where the study will be carried out. According to their individualized rehabilitation project, patients will undergo non-immersive VR-based rehabilitation. VR-based rehabilitation will consist of one daily session (3 weeks) and will be conducted by the implementation of a single non-immersive VR device among the D-WallTM (TechnoBody SRL, Italy). Part of the duration of the whole treatment will be dedicated to the use of the device, resulting in the same amount of rehabilitation for all participants. | Device | Technology-based Rehabilitation Group |
| Multidisciplinary Conventional RehabilitationPatients will receive conventional treatment consisting of two daily sessions (3 weeks) and including traditional rehabilitation activities like range of motion exercises (passive, active assisted, and active), progressive resistive exercises, balance and strength training, and aerobic conditioning. The intervention procedures will follow the routine multidisciplinary clinical practice of the Institute where the study will be carried out. Procedures will be adapted according to the patient's medical diagnosis, disability severity, and to consequent rehabilitation objectives in favor of an individualized rehabilitation project and program. If necessary, patients might therefore undergo parallel rehabilitation activities (ie, occupational therapy, cognitive stimulation) that will be kept under control throughout data collection and analyses. | Other | Conventional Rehabilitation Group |
Primary outcome
Short-term changes in Modified Barthel Index (MBI)
Time frame: From baseline (T0) to 3 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The Modified Barthel Index (MBI) evaluates patient's autonomy to perform ADLs (ie, chair/bed transfer, ambulation, stair climbing, toilet transfer, bowel control, bladder control, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, feeding). Total scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate higher patient's autonomy.
Short-term changes in Morse Fall Scale (MFS)
Time frame: From baseline (T0) to 3 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The Morse Falls Scale (MFS) evaluates patient's risk of falls. Total scores ranges from 0 to 125 with higher scores reflecting a greater risk of falling.
Short-term changes in Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
Time frame: From baseline (T0) to 3 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The Functional Independent Measure (FIM) evaluates patient's disability level according to motor and cognitive subscores. Total scores range from 18 (complete dependence) to 126 (complete independence). Two subscores can be calculated: FIM motor (range 13-91) and FIM cognitive (range 5-35).
Short-term changes in Timed Up & Go Test (TUG)
Time frame: From baseline (T0) to 3 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The Timed Up \& Go Test measures patient's risk of falling, static and dynamic balance by estimating the time patient takes to stand up from an armchair, walk forward for 3 meters, turn, walk back to the chair and sit down. The longer the time this takes, the higher the risk of falling.
Short-term changes in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time frame: From baseline (T0) to 3 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) measures patient's subjective perceived pain with a visual representation. Total scores range from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate more severe pain.
Amputee Mobility Predictor (AMP)
Time frame: 3 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
Amputee Mobility Predictor (AMP): it is a well known tool that clearly assesses the functional status of the amputee. It is composed of 21 items, each divided in 3 scoring choices: 0 indicates inability to perform the task; 1 implies minimal level of achievement or that some assistance was required in completing the task and 2 denotes complete independence or mastery of the task. The items must be submitted with an increasing level of difficulty to allow for the progressive assessment of the amputee. In particular, the evaluation goes from the ability to maintain sitting balance, gradually increasing the difficulty level of the activities to the final steps which are about collecting data during gait and during the use of particular assistive devices. The total score range for the AMP is 0 to 42 points.
The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Time frame: Baseline (T0)
The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) screening test evaluates the patient's cognitive functions (ie, sense of orientation, memory, attention, language function, visual-spatial abilities, the ability to count, remember things, repeat and execute orders). Total scores range from 0 to 30. Lower scores indicate more severe cognitive disorders.
The Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 - Short Version (PID-5-BF)
Time frame: Baseline (T0)
The Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 - Short Version (PID-5-BF) evaluates personality trait assessment (ie, Negative Affectivity, Detachment, Antagonism, Disinhibition and Psychoticism). Total scores range from 0 to 75. Higher scores indicate more dysfunction in the specific personality trait domain.
The Antecedents and Self-Efficacy on Adherence Schedule (ASonA)
Time frame: Baseline (T0)
The Antecedents and Self-Efficacy on Adherence Schedule (ASonA) evaluates the antecedents (ie, health literacy, understanding of illness, perception of social support, acceptance of health-related limitations), the self-efficacy (the beliefs and self-care strategies on adherence for physical activity, diet, alcohol consumption and smoking avoidance) and the affectivity (the emotional response related to health status). Total scores range from 0 to 84. High scores correspond to higher perceived self-efficacy in the investigated domains.
Short-term changes in EuroQoL-VAS (EQ-VAS)
Time frame: From baseline (T0) to 3 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The EuroQoL-VAS (EQ-VAS) evaluates self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale (0: the worst health you can imagine; 100: the best health you can imagine). Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
Short-term changes in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)
Time frame: From baseline (T0) to 3 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) evaluates anxiety symptoms severity in the last 2 weeks. Total scores range from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate more severe anxiety.
Short-term changes in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Time frame: From baseline (T0) to 3 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) evaluates depression symptoms severity in the last 2 weeks. Total scores range from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate more severe depression.
Short-term changes in Body Image Scale (BIS)
Time frame: From baseline (T0) to 3 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The Body Image Scale (BIS) evaluates the alteration of the body image. Total scores range from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate more distress symptoms.
The Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES)
Time frame: 3 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES) evaluates prosthesis experience and adaptation (ie, general adaptation, social adaptation, adaptation to limitation, functional satisfaction, aesthetic satisfaction, weight satisfaction of the prothesis). This instrument also includes a final section analysing the presence of phantom limb and stump pain, and other medical issues. Total scores range from 25 to 125. Higher scores indicate a worse adaptation.
The Technology Assisted Rehabilitation Patient Perception Questionnaire (TARPP-Q)
Time frame: 3 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)
The Technology Assisted Rehabilitation Patient Perception Questionnaire (TARPP-Q) is an ad-hoc questionnaire measuring patients' experience of use of the devices (ie, technology learnability, acceptability, usefulness, adaptability, adverse effects, engagement, enjoyment, safety, perceived effectiveness). Total scores range from 10 to 40. Higher scores indicate better patient's experience of use of the devices.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Feb 2026.
Related trials for Lower Limb Amputation
RecruitingObservational study
Cryo NerVe Block Extremity AmputatioN RegIStry for Post Operative and pHantom Limb Pain
Amputation, Amputation of Lower Limb
Recruiting
Uses of Phantom Sensations Induced by Global and Local Modifications of the Prosthetic Socket as Somatosensory Feedback During Walking in Lower Limb Amputees
Lower Limb Amputation
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Role of Perineural Catheter in Pain Control and Opioid Consumption After Major Amputation of Lower Limb
Lower Limb Surgery, Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Usability of the Smart Hallway System in Clinical Setting
Amputation, Gait Disorders, Neurologic
Recruiting
Bio Leg: Advancing Mobility (BAM)
Amputation of Lower Limb Above Knee, Amputee
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Antonia Dr Pierobon principal investigator
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, IRCCS
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Multidisciplinary Conventional and Technology-based Rehabilitation and Multidisciplinary Conventional Rehabilitation in people with Lower Limb Amputation and Prosthesis User, run by Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Antonia Dr Pierobon (+390385247255, antonia.pierobon@icsmaugeri.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Short-term changes in Modified Barthel Index (MBI) (time frame: From baseline (T0) to 3 weeks of rehabilitation (T1)). The study lists 15 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2026.