AzTrials
AzTrials

Gastrointestinal DysfunctionCODECSNCT06466174

Determination of the Safety and Efficacy of Two Probiotic Strains

A study of Gastrointestinal Dysfunction, run by The Archer-Daniels-Midland Company.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of two probiotic strains in adults with mild to moderate gastrointestinal discomfort. The main questions it aims to answer is whether 6-week administration of a probiotic can improve how the participant feels regarding their gut health. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Gastrointestinal Dysfunction
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
100 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jun 2024to May 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Signed Informed consent form
  • Healthy adults aged 18-65 years
  • Subclinical mild to moderate gastrointestinal complaints (GSRS-IBS score 20-45 at baseline)

Who cannot join

  • Presence of a serious congenital anomaly or chronic medical condition that would contraindicate participation, including history of major gastrointestinal surgery, chronic gastrointestinal illness, abnormal intestinal anatomy or significant abdominal disorder
  • Severe chronic illnesses
  • Known immunodeficiency
  • Use of immunosuppressive agents (corticosteroids, methotrexate…)
  • Presence of severe immunodeficient family members as provided by subjects self-report
  • Pregnancy, 6 months postpartum period or current breastfeeding
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Women of childbearing age planning pregnancy during the course of the study
  • Actively participating in another clinical study, having completed a clinical study in the past 60 days or being in the exclusion period of a previous clinical study
  • Not able to understand and comply with requirements of the study
  • Use of probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics, antibiotics within 3 weeks of study commencement

About this study

Official title: Determination of the Safety and Efficacy of Two Probiotic Strains in Adults With Mild to Moderate Gastrointestinal Discomfort

The goal of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of two probiotic strains in adults with mild to moderate gastrointestinal discomfort. The main questions it aims to answer is whether 6-week administration of a probiotic can improve how the participant feels regarding their gut health. This is done by completing a weekly questionnaire and the results are compared between the 6 weeks the participants are on a placebo and the 6 weeks the participants are on the probiotic. Participants will also provide a blood sample, and stool sample at the start and end of each treatment. Similarly, the results from the blood samples and stool samples will be analysed to determine if there is any improvement in markers related to gut health.

Read the detailed description

In this randomized, crossover, double-blind, prospective, placebo controlled study we aim to determine the safety and efficacy of two probiotic strains in adults with mild to moderate gastrointestinal discomfort. 100 healthy adults with subclinical mild to moderate gastrointestinal complaints (GSRS-IBS score 20-45 inclusive), 50 subjects per strain (test sequence). The GSRS-IBS (gastrointestinal symptom rating scale - irritable bowel syndrome) questionnaire ranges from 0-78 with a greater score indicating a higher occurrence of gastrointestinal symptoms. Safety: To evaluate adverse events that occur during the probiotic treatment period as compared to the placebo period. Incidence and duration of upper respiratory tract symptoms, urinary tract symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms as primary outputs. Efficacy: To evaluate the effect of 6-week probiotic administration on gastrointestinal homeostasis using GSRS-IBS score as an index as compared to placebo. Following a screening period, participants will provide stool, urine (safety) and blood samples prior to commencing a 6 week course of either placebo or one of the probiotics. At this time participants will again provide blood and stool samples. Throughout the study participants will maintain a daily diary to note any unusual events and to report stool consistency using Bristol stool chart. The participants will also complete a once-weekly questionnaire (GSRS-IBS questionnaire) relating to gut health. There will then be a 3-week washout period where they will take no products. After these 3 weeks the participants will again provide a stool and blood samples, and as before maintain their daily diary and weekly questionnaire for 6 weeks while on the probiotic or placebo (they will have swapped at this point). After these 6 weeks the participants will again provide stool and blood samples.

Being tested
Placebo 1 to Probiotic A, Probiotic A to Placebo 1, Placebo 2 to Probiotic B, Probiotic B to Placebo 2
Keywords
probiotic, gastrointestinal discomfort

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Placebo 1 to Probiotic ADietary supplement

    42 day Crossover study design between Placebo 1 and Probiotic A (n = 25)

  • Probiotic A to Placebo 1Dietary supplement

    42 day Crossover study design between Probiotic A and Placebo 1 (n = 25)

  • Placebo 2 to Probiotic BDietary supplement

    42 day Crossover study design between Placebo 2 and Probiotic B (n = 25)

  • Probiotic B to Placebo 2Dietary supplement

    42 day Crossover study design between Probiotic B and Placebo 2 (n = 25)

Study groups in NCT06466174
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Placebo 1 to Probiotic AActive comparatorSequence A1 (n=25): Placebo 1 administered daily for 42 days, followed by 21 days washout, then 1 x 10^9 colony forming units (CFU) of Probiotic A administered daily for 42 days
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Placebo 1 to Probiotic A
Placebo 2 to Probiotic BActive comparatorSequence B1 (n=25): Placebo 2 administered daily for 42 days, followed by 21 days washout and 42 days Probiotic formula: containing 1 x 10^9 CFU of Probiotic B administered daily
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Placebo 2 to Probiotic B
Probiotic A to Placebo 1Active comparatorSequence A2 (n=25): 1 x 10^9 CFU of Probiotic A administered daily for 42 days, followed by 21 days washout, then Placebo 1 administered daily for 42 days
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Probiotic A to Placebo 1
Probiotic B to Placebo 2Active comparatorSequence B2 (n=25): 1 x 10^9 CFU of Probiotic B administered daily for 42 days, followed by 21 days washout and 42 days Placebo 2 administered daily for 42 days
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Probiotic B to Placebo 2

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in GSRS-IBS score

    Change in the GSRS-IBS score while participants are on the treatment as compared with placebo. GSRS-IBS ranges from 0-78 with a greater score indicating a higher occurence of gastrointestinal symptoms

    Measured: Baseline vs Week 6

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Incidence of upper respiratory tract symptoms

    Incidence of upper respiratory tract symptoms, as captured by incidence of upper respiratory tract as reported by clinician/PI

    Measured: Baseline vs Week 6

  2. Duration of upper respiratory tract symptoms

    Duration of upper respiratory tract symptoms, as captured by duration of upper respiratory tract as reported by clinician/PI

    Measured: Baseline vs Week 6

  3. Incidence of urinary tract infections

    Incidence of urinary tract infections, as captured by incidence of urinary tract infections as reported by clinician/PI

    Measured: Baseline vs Week 6

  4. Duration of urinary tract infections

    Duration of urinary tract infections, as captured by duration of urinary tract infections as reported by clinician/PI

    Measured: Baseline vs Week 6

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Jun 2024
  2. Study startJun 2024 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionMay 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMay 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Model description
Placebo crossover to probiotic A Probiotic A crossover to Placebo Placebo crossover to probiotic B Probiotic B crossover to Placebo
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06466174
Sponsor's protocol ID
PCTB202108
Acronym
CODECS
Status last verified
Jun 2024
First submitted
16 May 2024
Last updated
20 Jun 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study of Gastrointestinal Dysfunction, run by The Archer-Daniels-Midland Company.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in GSRS-IBS score (time frame: Baseline vs Week 6). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jun 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in