AzTrials
AzTrials

Liberation From Mechanical Ventilation in ICU PatientsNCT06461754

Prediction of Successful Liberation From Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Via Lung and Diaphragmatic Ultrasound in Intensive Care Unit Patients, Prospective, Observational Study

An observational study of Liberation From Mechanical Ventilation in ICU Patients, run by Sohag University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) remains a challenge for intensive care physicians. Although standard indices such as blood gases and respiratory clinical data are used routinely but they still have some limitations. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Sonographic evaluation of diaphragm and lung
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
21 Sep 2022to 20 Dec 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: 80 patients who were admitted to the ICU and on invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours and ready for weaning

Who may be able to join

  • Over 18 years of age, more than 24 hours on IMV, and prepared for weaning

Who cannot join

  • A spinal cord injury that exceeded T8, arrhythmias, heart failure, hemodynamic instability, terminal extubation, pregnancy, pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, COPD, thoracostomy, chest injuries that impeded ultrasound, pleural lesions, or neuromuscular diseases

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Sohag University Hospital

    Sohag

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) remains a challenge for intensive care physicians. Although standard indices such as blood gases and respiratory clinical data are used routinely but they still have some limitations. Diaphragmatic and lung sonographic parameters (pulmonary scores) recently became the hot spot to help in anticipation of liberation from IMV.The aim of this study was to ensure that, sonographic diaphragmatic thickening indices and lung scores are reliable and accurate additional tools to anticipate successful liberation from IMV in intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

Methods: This study was a prospective, observational study conducted at Sohag university hospital on 80 patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and mechanically ventilated invasively for more than 24 hours and they were ready for weaning by standard methods. At the time of spontaneous breathing trials (SBT), we did diaphragm and lung ultrasound, where we applied diaphragmatic thickening indices (DTI) and a modified lung ultrasound scores (LUSm). Patients classified into two groups; failed group (FG) and (SG) of liberation from IMV. Comparison between (FG) and (SG) in relation to pulmonary scores (DTI and LUSm) were recorded. Cut-off values, sensitivity and specificity for DTI and LUSm were obtained. Also, comparison between (FG) and (SG) in relation to demographic, clinical and respiratory data were assessed and all data were statistically analysed.

Being tested
Sonographic evaluation of diaphragm and lung

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Sonographic evaluation of diaphragm and lungOther

    While the patient in a semi-sitting position (20-40 degree), by ultrasound, the diaphragm thickness was measured in the zone of apposition, on the mid-axillary line among the 8th and 10th intercostal spaces, using a 7-10 MHz linear probe in (M) mode. at the end of expiration and at the end of inspiration by capturing nearly three images during spontaneous patient breathing. The average of three DTI measurements was calculated In lung ultrasound, 2-4 MHz convex ultrasound probe in (B) mode was employed. We implemented a modified LUSm in our investigation, which assessed four lung regions on each side.

Study groups in NCT06461754
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Succeeded Group (SG)Group of patients who succeeded weaning from mechanical ventilation
Receives: Other: Sonographic evaluation of diaphragm and lung
Failed Group (FG)Group of patients who failed weaning from mechanical ventilation
Receives: Other: Sonographic evaluation of diaphragm and lung

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. a cut off values for DTI and LUSm with sensitivity and specificity for anticipation of liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation

    we reporte a cut-off value for DTI and LUSm below or above which the risk for failure of weaning can be predicted with a sensitivity persent and a specificity persent.

    Measured: One year

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. The correlations of DTI and LUSm with demographic, clinical and respiratory data

    We recorded the relations of DTI and LUSm with demographic, clinical and respiratory data in prediction of succeeded liberation from IMV

    Measured: one year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Jun 2024
  2. Study start21 Sep 2022
  3. Primary completion20 Oct 2023
  4. Study completion20 Dec 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
80 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06461754
Sponsor's protocol ID
Soh-Med-22-09-20
Status last verified
Jun 2024
First submitted
11 Jun 2024
Last updated
26 Jun 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Publications

  • Tenza-Lozano E, Llamas-Alvarez A, Jaimez-Navarro E, Fernandez-Sanchez J. Lung and diaphragm ultrasound as predictors of success in weaning from mechanical ventilation. Crit Ultrasound J. 2018 Jun 18;10(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13089-018-0094-3.

    PubMed 29911284
  • Gok F, Mercan A, Kilicaslan A, Sarkilar G, Yosunkaya A. Diaphragm and Lung Ultrasonography During Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Patients. Cureus. 2021 May 16;13(5):e15057. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15057.

    PubMed 34007779
  • Farghaly S, Hasan AA. Diaphragm ultrasound as a new method to predict extubation outcome in mechanically ventilated patients. Aust Crit Care. 2017 Jan;30(1):37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2016.03.004. Epub 2016 Apr 22.

    PubMed 27112953
  • Ferrari G, De Filippi G, Elia F, Panero F, Volpicelli G, Apra F. Diaphragm ultrasound as a new index of discontinuation from mechanical ventilation. Crit Ultrasound J. 2014 Jun 7;6(1):8. doi: 10.1186/2036-7902-6-8. eCollection 2014.

    PubMed 24949192

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Liberation From Mechanical Ventilation in ICU Patients, run by Sohag University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

a cut off values for DTI and LUSm with sensitivity and specificity for anticipation of liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation (time frame: One year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06461754, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jun 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in