AzTrials
AzTrials

Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA)/StrokeRESTRONCT06441552

The Natural History of Recovery After Stroke

An observational study of Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA)/Stroke, run by Adi Negev-Nahalat Eran at 3 sites in 2 countries.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this longitudinal observational study is to learn the course of recovery after stroke. Specifically, in this study we will learn and describe the changes in cognitive, motor and sensory function over time in stroke patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA)/Stroke
What is being tested?
non-interventional
How many people
200 participants
Where
3 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
1 Feb 2024to Jan 2027
How long will I take part?
1 Year
Phase
Observational

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Stroke survivors and healthy adults.

Who may be able to join

  • >18 years of age
  • Independent in all activities of daily living before the stroke.
  • In- and out-patients at Adi-Negev Nahalat-Eran rehabilitation center, with first ever stroke, or with a recurrent stroke that did not lead to disability (were independent in ADL before the second stroke).
  • Medically stable
  • Able to provide informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • The presence of any degenerative neurological condition, neuropathy, myopathy or Polio that are not secondary to stroke, excluding diabetic related changes.
  • Traumatic brain injury and/or extra-cerebral hemorrhage.
  • Significant psychiatric condition, including alcoholism and drug abuse.
  • Any severe orthopedic condition (such as amputation or severe pain that limits activity) or chronic pain syndrome.
  • Participation in another interventional study.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 2 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Simona Bar-Haim, PhD contact

972-54-470-2553

barhaims@bgu.ac.il

Lior Smuelof, PhD contact

shmuelof@gmail.com

3 sites in 2 countries

Israel2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Rambam/Technion

    Haifa

    David Tanne, MD, D_TANNE@rambam.health.gov.il

    Firas Mawase, PhD, 972-54-782-3017, mawasef@bm.technion.ac.il

    Not yet recruiting
  • Adi-Negev Nahalat Eran

    Ofakim

    Shilo Kramer, MD, shilok@adi-il.org

    Simona Bar-Haim, PhD, barhaims@bgu.ac.il

    Recruiting

Other trials in Israel

Palestinian Territories1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Al-Ahli hospital

    Hebron

    Akram Amro, PhD, akram1973@yahoo.com

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in Palestinian Territories

About this study

Official title: Learning the Natural History of Recovery After Stroke - Cognitive, Motor and Sensory Function

The goal of this longitudinal observational study is to learn the course of recovery after stroke. Specifically, in this study we will learn and describe the changes in cognitive, motor and sensory function over time in stroke patients.

Read the detailed description

This study constitutes the first step in the RESTRO project: Evaluation of an accessible and affordable neurorehabilitation program to promote recovery and to enhance the quality of life after stroke. In this study, we will monitor sensorimotor and cognitive functions of Stroke patients along the first 6 to 12 month following their stroke. Data from three primary sites will be collected and compared in several time points, and its relation to the type and intensity of the rehabilitation program, usually provided in each site, will be tested.

Being tested
non-interventional
Medical subject headings
Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • non-interventionalOther

    non-interventional

Study groups in NCT06441552
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
OfakimNon-interventional group, recruited at Adi-Negev Rehabilitation Center, Israel.
Receives: Other: non-interventional
HaifaNon-interventional group, recruited at Rambam Health Care Campus, Israel.
Receives: Other: non-interventional
HebronNon-interventional group, recruited through Green Land Society for Health Development, Palestine.
Receives: Other: non-interventional

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)

    Fugl-Meyer Assessment:

    Motor score is on a 0-100 scale. High score is better.

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  2. Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)

    Action Research Arm Test Score is on a 0-57 scale. High score is better.

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  3. 10-meter walk test (10MWT)

    Outcome is the average walking velocity over 10 meters. Measured in m/sec.

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

Secondary outcomes (51)
  1. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)

    measure of stroke severity on a 0-42 scale, with lower scores indicates lower severity (lower is better).

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks)

  2. The Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (SSEQ)

    This is a self-reported ability perception scale. Outcome range is 0-130 with higher scores indicate a better self-perceived ability.

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  3. The Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT)

    This is an upper extremity dexterity test. Outcome is the time taken to complete the task. Measured in sec.

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-year

  4. The Functional Dexterity Test (FDT)

    This is an upper extremity dexterity test. Outcome is the time taken to complete the task. Measured in sec.

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-year

  5. The Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT)

    This is an instrument aimed at detecting visual neglect. In this study we use only two subsections of the test: star cancellation (scored on a 0-54 scale) and representational drawing (scored on a 0-3 scale). For both, higher scores are better.

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks)

  6. The Ashworth scale

    This instrument is used to detect spasticity (increased muscle tone). Outcome is 0-4 scale, with lower scores means better outcome (less spasticity).

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks)

  7. Kinetics-fingers1

    To measure fingers kinetics, we will use a custom-built device that measures finger force for flexion and extension. Outcome is the force in Newtons (N) generated by each finger.

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  8. Kinetics-fingers2

    To measure fingers kinetics, we will use a custom-built device that measures finger force for flexion and extension. Outcome measure is the Individuation Index, measured in arbitrary units (a.u.). The individuation index is calculated as the ratio between the forces generated by the non-instructed digits and the force generated by the instructed digit. This index evaluates the ability to generate force in each digit independently of the other digits.

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  9. Kinetics-grip

    Grip force will be measured using the microFET Digital HandGrip Dynamometer (Hoggan Scientific). Outcome is the maximal force in Newtons.

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  10. Kinematics-reaching

    Kinematic measurements of upper extremity reaching task:

    Kinematic measures will be extracted using markerless pose estimation algorithms (such as OpenPose and MediaPipe). Reaching error (distance of the hand from the target) and reaching extent (maximum distance of the wriest from the shoulder). Measured in mm.

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  11. Kinematics-duration

    Kinematic measurements of upper extremity reaching tasks:

    Kinematic measures will be extracted using markerless pose estimation algorithms (such as OpenPose and MediaPipe). Reaching duration. Measured in seconds.

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  12. Kinematics-smoothness

    Kinematic measurements of upper extremity reaching tasks:

    Kinematic measures will be extracted using markerless pose estimation algorithms (such as OpenPose and MediaPipe). Reaching smoothness as the integrated jerk (as described by Platz et al. 1994, Dimensions are L^2/T^6) and the spectral arch length (as described by Balasubramanian et al. 2015).

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  13. Kinematics-Inter-joint coordination

    Kinematic measurements of upper extremity reaching tasks:

    Kinematic measures will be extracted using markerless pose estimation algorithms (such as OpenPose and MediaPipe). Inter-joint coordination will be measured through computing the cross correlation between elbow, writs and shoulder joint angles and the proportion of time when joints flexed or extend together. Arbitrary units.

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  14. Rehabilitation-intensity

    Number of rehabilitative sessions per week, in total and for each modality separately (e.g., physical therapy, occupational therapy, etc.)

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  15. Rehabilitation-time

    Time, in minutes, of each therapy session.

    Measured: one or more of: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  16. Rehabilitation-period

    Period of time (in month) for which the participant received therapy.

    Measured: one or more of: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  17. Supporting data-age

    Age at admission, in years.

    Measured: Baseline

  18. Supporting data-sex

    Biological Male or Female

    Measured: Baseline

  19. Supporting data-time1

    time from stroke onset in days

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  20. Supporting data-time2

    other time periods (e.g., inpatient time, rehabilitation duration, etc.) in Months.

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  21. anthropometric data-height

    Height in cm

    Measured: Baseline

  22. anthropometric data-weight

    Weight in kg

    Measured: Baseline

  23. supporting data-directional

    affected brain side: L/R/Both affected body side: L/R/Both hand dominance: L/R leg dominance: L/R

    Measured: Baseline

  24. supporting data-medical history

    Any relevant history of illnesses.

    Measured: Baseline

  25. Cognition-impairment

    Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). 0-30 scale with higher values indicate better cognitive state.

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  26. Cognition-inhibition1

    Percent correct responses in an anti-saccade computerized task.

    Measured: one or more of : Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  27. Cognition-inhibition2

    Reaction time (in msec) in an anti-saccade computerized task.

    Measured: one or more of : Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  28. Timed up and Go test (TUG)

    Time taken to complete the TUG task. Measured in seconds.

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  29. Gait Specific attentional profile (G-SAP)

    This is a questioner aimed at evaluating the attentional profile of the patient during walking. It has several subscales measured on a Likert 5-point scale. Total score range is 11-55 with lower values indicate better outcome.

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  30. Gait analysis-temporal

    Gait analysis while participants are walking on a treadmill (Zebris FDM-T Treadmill, Zebris Medical GmbH, Germany) with an embedded force sensors array. Temporal measures include step and stride time. Measured in seconds.

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  31. Gait analysis-spatial

    Gait analysis while participants are walking on a treadmill (Zebris FDM-T Treadmill, Zebris Medical GmbH, Germany) with an embedded force sensors array. Spatial measures include step and stride length and width. Measured in meters.

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  32. Gait analysis-steadiness

    Gait analysis while participants are walking on a treadmill (Zebris FDM-T Treadmill, Zebris Medical GmbH, Germany) with an embedded force sensors array. Steadiness is measured by calculating the maximal Lyapunov exponent of the center of pressure dynamics (as described by Rosenstein et al. 1993). Units of measure are arbitrary.

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  33. Gaze-angle1

    Gaze behavior during walking using a mobile eye-tracker (Pupil Invisible, Pupil Labs, Germany). Head, eye and gaze (head and eye combined) angles on the sagittal and horizontal planes will be measured. Outcome in degrees.

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  34. Gaze-angle2

    Gaze behavior during walking using a mobile eye-tracker (Pupil Invisible, Pupil Labs, Germany). Gaze angles will be measured relative to the vanishing point. Outcome in %.

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  35. Gaze-downward

    Gaze behavior during walking using a mobile eye-tracker (Pupil Invisible, Pupil Labs, Germany). Time spent looking onto the walking surface. Outcome in %.

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  36. Gaze-look-ahead distance

    Gaze behavior during walking using a mobile eye-tracker (Pupil Invisible, Pupil Labs, Germany). Look-ahead distance. Outcome in meters.

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  37. Balance-Berg

    Berg Balance Scale (BBS) measured on a 0-56 scale with higher score represent better outcome.

    Measured: baseline

  38. Balance-postural steadiness1

    Postural Sway (Zebris FDM-T Treadmill, Zebris Medical GmbH, Germany). Outcome is sway range in mm.

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  39. Balance-postural steadiness2

    Postural Sway (Zebris FDM-T Treadmill, Zebris Medical GmbH, Germany). Outcome is sway velocity in mm/sec.

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  40. Balance-postural steadiness3

    Postural Sway (Zebris FDM-T Treadmill, Zebris Medical GmbH, Germany). Outcome is sway area in mm^2.

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  41. Balance-postural steadiness4

    Postural Sway (Zebris FDM-T Treadmill, Zebris Medical GmbH, Germany). Outcome is the short-term diffusion coefficients, as described by Collins and De-Luka (1993), measured in mm^2/sec.

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  42. Habitual activity1

    Monitoring habitual activity during hospital stay. Time spent walking, sitting and laying in hours/day. Measured over 3-5 consecutive days.

    Measured: one or more of :Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  43. Habitual activity2

    Monitoring habitual activity during hospital stay. Distance walked in meters/day. Measured over 3-5 consecutive days.

    Measured: one or more of :Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  44. Sensory-tactile

    Sensory acuity will be measured using Semmes-Weinstein monofilament. Outcome is in grams.

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  45. Coordination-LE1

    LEMOCOT- Lower Extremity Motor Coordinating Test. Outcome is the number of touches (count).

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  46. Coordination-LE2

    LEMOCOT- Lower Extremity Motor Coordinating Test. Outcome is the touches' errors (distance from the middle of the target), measured in mm. To measure errors, the LEMOCOT will be performed on an array of force sensors (Zebris FDM-T Treadmill, Zebris Medical GmbH, Germany) that detects the touches position.

    Measured: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  47. Reticulospinal excitability

    Response enhancement following a startling auditory stimuli (StartReact measure). Reaction time is measured in msec based on EMG signal from the wrist extensors and biceps (gtech USB-Amp). The StartReact measure is the enhancement in reaction time in the startle condition (LED+105Db auditory stimulus) compared to a control condition (LED+80Db auditory stimulus)

    Measured: one or more of: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  48. Muscle controllability1

    The ability to control a cursor in a virtual environment using EMG recordings from wrist extensors and biceps (Trigno Wireless EMG System, Delsys, USA). Outcome is success rate in %.

    Measured: one or more of: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  49. Muscle controllability2

    The ability to control a cursor in a virtual environment using EMG recordings from wrist extensors and biceps (Trigno Wireless EMG System, Delsys, USA). Outcome is time to target sec.

    Measured: one or more of: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  50. Muscle controllability3

    The ability to control a cursor in a virtual environment using EMG recordings from wrist extensors and biceps (Trigno Wireless EMG System, Delsys, USA). Outcome is path length in cm.

    Measured: one or more of: Baseline (<3weeks), 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

  51. Neuroimaging

    CT/MRI based structural neuroimaging. Outcomes are the areas affected by stroke.

    Measured: one or more of :1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Jun 2024
  2. Study start1 Feb 2024
  3. Primary completionJan 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJan 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
Target duration
1 Year
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06441552
Sponsor's protocol ID
ADINEGEV-2023_106
Other IDs
SIS70023GR0026
Acronym
RESTRO
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
30 Apr 2024
Last updated
3 Oct 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: all IPD that underlie results in a publication

Publications

  • Rosenstein, M. T., Collins, J. J., & De Luca, C. J. (1993). A practical method for calculating largest Lyapunov exponents from small data sets. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 65(1-2), 117-134.

  • Platz T, Denzler P, Kaden B, Mauritz KH. Motor learning after recovery from hemiparesis. Neuropsychologia. 1994 Oct;32(10):1209-23. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(94)90103-1.

    PubMed 7845561
  • Balasubramanian S, Melendez-Calderon A, Roby-Brami A, Burdet E. On the analysis of movement smoothness. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015 Dec 9;12:112. doi: 10.1186/s12984-015-0090-9.

    PubMed 26651329
  • Collins JJ, De Luca CJ. Open-loop and closed-loop control of posture: a random-walk analysis of center-of-pressure trajectories. Exp Brain Res. 1993;95(2):308-18. doi: 10.1007/BF00229788.

    PubMed 8224055

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in