AzTrials
AzTrials

Hand InjuriesNCT06438224

Clinical Utility of ESWT in Restoring Hand Function of Patients With Nerve Injury and Hypertrophic Scars Due to Burns

A study testing Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in people with Hand Injuries and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy, run by Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Joint contractures and nerve injuries are common after hand burns. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is effective not only for the regeneration of various tissues, including scar tissues, but also for reducing pain and pruritus in patients with burns. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
What is being tested?
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT)
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
1 Jan 2023to 20 Aug 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • ≥ 18 years old
  • had sustained a deep partial-thickness (second-degree) or a full-thickness (third-degree) burn in the right dominant hand, which had been treated with a split-thickness skin graft (STSG) after the thermal injury
  • nerve injury to the hand was confirmed by electromyography
  • < 6 months prior to the enrollment

Who cannot join

  • musculoskeletal diseases (fracture, amputation, rheumatoid arthritis, and degenerative joint diseases) of the hands
  • acute infection
  • malignant tumors
  • coagulopathy
  • pregnancy
  • potential for additional skin damage if exposed to ESWT and conventional occupational therapy.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Hangang sacred heart hodpital

    Seoul, 07247

    Ragyem Sung, 82-10-5939-2541, sung6652@hallym.or.kr

    Recruiting

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Clinical Utility of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Restoring Hand Function of Patients With Nerve Injury and Hypertrophic Scars Due to Burns

Joint contractures and nerve injuries are common after hand burns. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is effective not only for the regeneration of various tissues, including scar tissues, but also for reducing pain and pruritus in patients with burns. Researchers have attempted to explore the effects of ESWT on hand dysfunction caused by nerve injury following burns. The investigators planned to evaluate the effects of ESWT (compared to sham stimulation) on hands with nerve injury and hypertrophic scars and thereby on hand function. The ESWT parameters were as follows: energy flux density, 0.05-0.30 mJ/mm2; frequency, 4 Hz; 1000 to 2000 impulses per treatment; and 12 treatments, one/week for 12 weeks. Outcome measures were as follows: 10-point visual analog scale for pain, Jebsen-Taylor hand function test, grip strength, Purdue Pegboard test, ultrasound measurement of scar thickness, and skin characteristics before and immediately after 12 weeks of treatment.

Read the detailed description

Burns that occur in the hand cause early joint range-of-motion (ROM) limitations and hand muscle weakness that significantly affect quality of life. Hand burns, though restricted to a small total body surface area (TBSA), can have significant functional consequences. Joint contractures and nerve injuries are common after hand burns. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is effective not only for the regeneration of various tissues, including scar tissues, but also for reducing pain and pruritus in patients with burns.

The investigators have attempted to explore the effects of ESWT on hand dysfunction caused by nerve injury following burns. The investigators planned to evaluate the effects of ESWT (compared to sham stimulation) on hands with nerve injury and hypertrophic scars and thereby on hand function. The ESWT parameters were as follows: energy flux density, 0.05-0.30 mJ/mm2; frequency, 4 Hz; 1000 to 2000 impulses per treatment; and 12 treatments, one/week for 12 weeks. Outcome measures were as follows: 10-point visual analog scale for pain, Jebsen-Taylor hand function test, grip strength, Purdue Pegboard test, ultrasound measurement of scar thickness, and skin characteristics before and immediately after 12 weeks of treatment.

Being tested
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), sham stimulation
Keywords
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy, hypertrophic scar, burns, hand function, nerve injury
Medical subject headings
Hand Injuries, Burns, Cicatrix, Hypertrophic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT)Other

    Those in the ESWT group were asked to select the most hypertrophic and retracting scars for treatment. ESWT was conducted using the Duolith SD-1® device (StorzMedical, Tägerwilen, Switzerland), with an electromagnetic cylindrical coil source used to focus the shock wave. ESWT was performed around the primary treatment site, at an intensity of 100 impulses/cm2, an energy flux density (EFD) of 0.05 to 0.30 mJ/mm2, and frequency of 4 Hz. Regarding the volume of treatment, 1000-3000 impulses were administered per session for 12 sessions held at 1-week intervals.

  • sham stimulationOther

    the sham group was treated using an adapter that had the same shape but did not emit any energy

Study groups in NCT06438224
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT)ExperimentalThose in the ESWT group were asked to select the most hypertrophic and retracting scars for treatment. ESWT was conducted using the Duolith SD-1® device (StorzMedical, Tägerwilen, Switzerland), with an electromagnetic cylindrical coil source used to focus the shock wave. ESWT was performed around the primary treatment site, at an intensity of 100 impulses/cm2, an energy flux density (EFD) of 0.05 to 0.30 mJ/mm2, and frequency of 4 Hz. Regarding the volume of treatment, 1000-3000 impulses were administered per session for 12 sessions held at 1-week intervals.
Receives: Other: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT)
sham groupSham comparatorthe sham group was treated using an adapter that had the same shape but did not emit any energy
Receives: Other: sham stimulation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 10-point visual analog scale (VAS)

    self-reported pain severity, ratings ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain

    Measured: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. the total active motion (TAM) scoring system

    range of motion measurement, higher scores indicating better range of motion. For each finger, the maximum angle is 260 degrees and the minimum angle is 260 degrees.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  2. Jebsen-Taylor hand function test (JTT)

    The JTT consists of seven subtests, each scored on a 0-15-point scale, with higher scores indicating better hand function

    Measured: 12 weeks

  3. Grip and pinch strengths

    quantified using a hand-held dynamometer (Lafayette Instrument, USA), with higher socres indicating more stronger

    Measured: 12 weeks

  4. Scar thickness

    quantified using ultrasonography (128 BW1 US system, Medison, Korea)

    Measured: 12 weeks

  5. erythema

    Mexameter®(MX18, Courage-Khazaka Electronics GmbH, Germany) was used to measure the melanin levels. Higher values indicated darker.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  6. Trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL)

    measured using a Tewameter® (Courage-Khazaka Electronic GmbH, Germany) to evaluate water evaporation. Higher values indicated skin dryness

    Measured: 12 weeks

  7. pigmentation

    Mexameter®(MX18, Courage-Khazaka Electronics GmbH, Germany) was used to measure the severity of erythema. Higher values indicated redder skin.

    Measured: 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 May 2024
  2. Study start1 Jan 2023
  3. Primary completion10 Jul 2024
  4. Study completion20 Aug 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
ESWT was conducted using the Duolith SD-1® device (StorzMedical, Tägerwilen, Switzerland), with an electromagnetic cylindrical coil source used to focus the shock wave. ESWT was performed around the primary treatment site, at an intensity of 100 impulses/cm2, an energy flux density (EFD) of 0.05 to 0.30 mJ/mm2, and frequency of 4 Hz. Regarding the volume of treatment, 1000-3000 impulses were administered per session for 12 sessions held at 1-week intervals. As in previous studies, the sham group was treated using an adapter that had the same shape but did not emit any energy
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06438224
Sponsor's protocol ID
HangangSHH-18
Status last verified
Aug 2024
First submitted
27 May 2024
Last updated
20 Aug 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Thiele S, Thiele R, Gerdesmeyer L. Lateral epicondylitis: This is still a main indication for extracorporeal shockwave therapy. Int J Surg. 2015 Dec;24(Pt B):165-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.09.034. Epub 2015 Oct 9.

    PubMed 26455532
  • Cui HS, Hong AR, Kim JB, Yu JH, Cho YS, Joo SY, Seo CH. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Alters the Expression of Fibrosis-Related Molecules in Fibroblast Derived from Human Hypertrophic Scar. Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Jan 2;19(1):124. doi: 10.3390/ijms19010124.

    PubMed 29301325

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in people with Hand Injuries and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy, run by Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Sung Rakyum (82-2-2639-5900, sung6652@hallym.or.kr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

10-point visual analog scale (VAS) (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06438224, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Aug 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in