Shoulder DiseaseC-PRONCT06435494
Cross-sectorial Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Chronic Degenerative Shoulder Conditions
A study testing Systematic use of patient reported outcome measures in clinical work with the patients in people with Shoulder Disease and Shoulder Impingement, run by University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen at 6 sites in Denmark.
Trial summary
This research project aims to test if systematic (extensive) use of patient-reported outcomes across treatment boundaries can 1. improve patients' and health professionals' understanding of individual patients' conditions and health changes, 2. improve indications for treatment, 3. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 120 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Shoulder Disease, Shoulder Impingement, Shoulder Osteoarthritis
- What is being tested?
- Systematic use of patient reported outcome measures in clinical work with the patients
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,000 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesDenmark
- Study dates
- 12 Aug 2024to 1 Sep 2030
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 120 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- shoulder pain with no acute trauma
Who cannot join
- Age <18 years
- Non-Danish citizenship
- Unable to understand written or spoken Danish
- Inability to master electronic means of communication and/or not having an electronic communication (E-boks)
- Employee at participating centre or other relation to participating health professionals that might affect independent consent
- Psychiatric conditions, mental conditions and substance abuse that might affect the ability to provide informed consent or responding to PROMs
- Disseminated malignant condition, other serious medical conditions or other life crisis where the focus on a shoulder research project is unreasonable
- Already included in the study with the contralateral shoulder
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
6 sites in 1 country
Denmark6 sites
Privathospitalet Danmark
Charlottenlund, 2920
Department of Physiotherapy, Univesity Hospital Gentofte
Gentofte Municipality, Hellerup, 2900
Department of rehabilitation, Gentofte Kommune
Hellerup, 2900
Division of shoulder and elbow surgery, Department of orthopaedics, Univesity Hospital Gentofte
Hellerup, 2900
Genoptræning og Rehabilitering, Rødovre Kommune
Rødovre Municipality, Rødovre, 2610
Mit Lægehus
Rødovre Municipality, 2610
About this study
Official title: C-PRO - The Effect of Cross-sectorial Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Patients With Chronic Degenerative Shoulder Conditions
This research project aims to test if systematic (extensive) use of patient-reported outcomes across treatment boundaries can
- improve patients' and health professionals' understanding of individual patients' conditions and health changes,
- improve indications for treatment,
- strengthen patient empowerment, and
- reduce patients' utilization of health services.
The study will be performed in the particular context of patients with chronic degenerative conditions of the shoulder. These patients are characterized by contact with numerous health professionals from different health sectors, such as general practitioner, physiotherapists and surgical referral centres, which challenges coherence and communication for the individual treatment decisions. The research project will be performed as a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a 1-year inclusion period and two years of follow-up.
- Conditions
- Shoulder Disease, Shoulder Impingement, Shoulder Osteoarthritis, Shoulder Frozen, Shoulder Capsulitis, Shoulder Bursitis
- Being tested
- Systematic use of patient reported outcome measures in clinical work with the patients
- Medical subject headings
- Shoulder Impingement Syndrome, Bursitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Systematic use of patient reported outcome measures in clinical work with the patientsOther
Se description of the arms
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | All patients will be asked to complete a number of questionaires: EQ5D-5L, a study specific questionaire (designed specifically for this study) and a shoulder-disease-specific questionaire (the Oxford Shoulder Score). For patients in the intervention group, the results of the questionaires will be accessable for patient and health-care professionals and will be used to illustrate the problems, make a prognostic model for the specific patient based on previous PRO results from other patients and will be used in monitoring the treatment of the patient. Receives: Other: Systematic use of patient reported outcome measures in clinical work with the patients |
| Control | No intervention | All patients will be asked to complete a number of questionaires: EQ5D-5L, a study specific questionaire and a shoulder-disease-specific questionaire. For patients int he control group, this will be collected, but not accessed or used during the treatment of the patient. The data will be used in the final analyses of the study. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Treatment cost per change in life quality
The treatment cost during the study period expressed as the cost per improvement in life quality, similar to the cost per QALY (quality adjusted life years). The total cost will be calculated from hospital contacts, physiotherapy sessions and primary healthcare contacts. The EQ5D-5L will be used as a generic life quality measure. The primary outcome for the intervention and control group will be compared.
Measured: From inclusion time and the 2 following years.
Secondary outcomes (11)
Treatment cost per change in life quality stratisfied according to the specific shoulder diagnosis
The same as primary outcome, but stratified according to the specific shoulder diagnosis
Measured: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
Patient satisfaction with the treatment of their shoulder problem
Measured by questionaire (specifically the question "are you satisfied with the treatment fo your shoulder so far"?
Measured: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
Number of patients treated with surgery
To evaluate if any difference in referral to surgery occurs between the intervention group and the control group, and analyse if any reasons for a difference can be identified
Measured: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
Number of contacts with either the hospital or the family doctor due to problems with the treated shoulder
To evaluate if any difference in medical contacts due to the treated shoulder occurs between the intervention and the control groups, and analyse if any reasons for a difference can be identified
Measured: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
Number and types of complications during the treatment of the shoulder problem
To evaluate if any difference in complications in relation to the treatment of the shoulder occurs between the intervention and the control groups, and analyse if any reasons for a difference can be identified
Measured: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
For patients still working: Number and duration (measured in days) of any periods of sick-leave/unemployment due to the shoulder problem
To evaluate if any difference in employment-status and/or sick-leave occurs between the intervention and the control groups, and analyse if any reasons for a difference can be identified
Measured: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
Development in the PRO score, represented by Oxford Shoulder Score, over time for each specific shoulder disease
To evaluate the development of PRO scores during a treatment of the included shoulder diseases with regards to the different treatment options, to create a reference for future treatments of these patients
Measured: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
PRO score, represented by Oxford Shoulder Score, as predictors?
To evaluate if a PRO score can differentiate patients with regards to who might benefit from specific treatment regimens/effect of treatments measured by PRO
Measured: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
If use of systematic PRO scores, represented by Oxford Shoulder Score, changes the referral-pattern between the involved sectors
To evaluate if PRO scores has the potential to be used to screen patients before making a referral between sectors
Measured: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
Health professionals' assessments of history and usefulness of the prognosis tools developed for this study (the Database setup in Procordo).
To evaluate if the involved professionals experience any gain in the use of the PRO scores in the daily treatment of the patients. This will be evaluated at every visit with the patient by a questionaire to the treating professionals.
Measured: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
Patient satisfaction with the PRO score system build in the Database system (Procordo)
Satisfaction and qualitative assessment of history and prognosis tool (intervention group only). This will be investigated by questionaire in relation to the completion of the PROs every 3 month during the study period.
Measured: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 May 2024
- Study start12 Aug 2024
- Primary completion1 Sep 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Sep 2030 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Shoulder DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Patients evaluated and treated for a degenerative shoulder disorder will be randomised into two groups before first evaluation. For the intervention group, Patient reported outcomes (PRO) will be a part of the evaluation and follow-up of treatment. In the control group, it will not. Evaluation with PRO will be conducted every 3 months for 2 years follow-up.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 1,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, VIVE - The Danish Center for Social Science Research, The Novo Nordic Foundation, Region Capital Denmark, Mit Lægehus, Rødovre, Denmark, Genoptræning og Rehabilitering, Rødovre Kommune, Denmark, Center for Rehabilitering og Forebyggelse, Gentofte Kommune, Denmark, Privathospitalet Danmark
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Anne Marie Nyholm, University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen
- Investigators
- Anders Odgaard, MD, DrMed, Study director, Copenhagen University Hospital, RigshospitaletAnne M Nyholm, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Gentofte, CopenhagenBo S Olsen, MD, PhD, Study chair, University Hospital, Gentofte, CopenhagenCarsten B Juhl, PT, MPH, PhD, Study chair, University Hospital, Gentofte, CopenhagenBente A Esbensen, Cand.cur., PhD, Study chair, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06435494
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H-23039139
- Acronym
- C-PRO
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 16 May 2024
- Last updated
- 2 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Nyholm AM, Esbensen BA, Westergaard CL, Kjellberg J, Juhl CB, Olsen BS, Odgaard A. Cross-sectoral use of Patient-Reported Outcomes (C-PRO)-the effect on the cost per improvement in quality of life for patients with chronic degenerative shoulder conditions-a protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2025 Dec 12;27(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-09329-0.
PubMed 41382298
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- C-PRO - The Effect of Cross-sectorial Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Patients With Chronic Degenerative Shoulder Conditions
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06435494
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- C-PRO / H-23039139
- Conditions
- Shoulder Disease, Shoulder Impingement, Shoulder Osteoarthritis, Shoulder Frozen, Shoulder Capsulitis, Shoulder Bursitis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 1,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Gentofte, CopenhagenUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, VIVE - The Danish Center for Social Science Research, The Novo Nordic Foundation, Region Capital Denmark, Mit Lægehus, Rødovre, Denmark, Genoptræning og Rehabilitering, Rødovre Kommune, Denmark, Center for Rehabilitering og Forebyggelse, Gentofte Kommune, Denmark, Privathospitalet Danmark
- Study start
- 12 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Sep 2030 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 May 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This research project aims to test if systematic (extensive) use of patient-reported outcomes across treatment boundaries can
- improve patients' and health professionals' understanding of individual patients' conditions and health changes,
- improve indications for treatment,
- strengthen patient empowerment, and
- reduce patients' utilization of health services.
The study will be performed in the particular context of patients with chronic degenerative conditions of the shoulder. These patients are characterized by contact with numerous health professionals from different health sectors, such as general practitioner, physiotherapists and surgical referral centres, which challenges coherence and communication for the individual treatment decisions. The research project will be performed as a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a 1-year inclusion period and two years of follow-up.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Patients evaluated and treated for a degenerative shoulder disorder will be randomised into two groups before first evaluation. For the intervention group, Patient reported outcomes (PRO) will be a part of the evaluation and follow-up of treatment. In the control group, it will not. Evaluation with PRO will be conducted every 3 months for 2 years follow-up.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Other: Systematic use of patient reported outcome measures in clinical work with the patientsAll patients will be asked to complete a number of questionaires: EQ5D-5L, a study specific questionaire (designed specifically for this study) and a shoulder-disease-specific questionaire (the Oxford Shoulder Score). For patients in the intervention group, the results of the questionaires will be accessable for patient and health-care professionals and will be used to illustrate the problems, make a prognostic model for the specific patient based on previous PRO results from other patients and will be used in monitoring the treatment of the patient. |
| Control | No intervention | –All patients will be asked to complete a number of questionaires: EQ5D-5L, a study specific questionaire and a shoulder-disease-specific questionaire. For patients int he control group, this will be collected, but not accessed or used during the treatment of the patient. The data will be used in the final analyses of the study. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 120 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- shoulder pain with no acute trauma
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Age <18 years
- Non-Danish citizenship
- Unable to understand written or spoken Danish
- Inability to master electronic means of communication and/or not having an electronic communication (E-boks)
- Employee at participating centre or other relation to participating health professionals that might affect independent consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Systematic use of patient reported outcome measures in clinical work with the patientsSe description of the arms | Other | Intervention |
Primary outcome
Treatment cost per change in life quality
Time frame: From inclusion time and the 2 following years.
The treatment cost during the study period expressed as the cost per improvement in life quality, similar to the cost per QALY (quality adjusted life years). The total cost will be calculated from hospital contacts, physiotherapy sessions and primary healthcare contacts. The EQ5D-5L will be used as a generic life quality measure. The primary outcome for the intervention and control group will be compared.
11 secondary outcomes
Treatment cost per change in life quality stratisfied according to the specific shoulder diagnosis
Time frame: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
Patient satisfaction with the treatment of their shoulder problem
Time frame: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
Number of patients treated with surgery
Time frame: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
Number of contacts with either the hospital or the family doctor due to problems with the treated shoulder
Time frame: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
Number and types of complications during the treatment of the shoulder problem
Time frame: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
For patients still working: Number and duration (measured in days) of any periods of sick-leave/unemployment due to the shoulder problem
Time frame: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
Development in the PRO score, represented by Oxford Shoulder Score, over time for each specific shoulder disease
Time frame: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
PRO score, represented by Oxford Shoulder Score, as predictors?
Time frame: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
If use of systematic PRO scores, represented by Oxford Shoulder Score, changes the referral-pattern between the involved sectors
Time frame: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
Health professionals' assessments of history and usefulness of the prognosis tools developed for this study (the Database setup in Procordo).
Time frame: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
Patient satisfaction with the PRO score system build in the Database system (Procordo)
Time frame: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Apr 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41382298Nyholm AM, Esbensen BA, Westergaard CL, Kjellberg J, Juhl CB, Olsen BS, Odgaard A. Cross-sectoral use of Patient-Reported Outcomes (C-PRO)-the effect on the cost per improvement in quality of life for patients with chronic degenerative shoulder conditions-a protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2025 Dec 12;27(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-09329-0.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Shoulder Disease
Recruiting
Effects of Cervicothoracic Mobilization in Patients With Supraspinatus Tendinitis
Rotator Cuff Tendonitis
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Clinic Versus mHealth Application-Based Shoulder Rehabilitation in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis
Adhesive Capsulitis
Recruiting
Minimum Effective Local Anesthetic Volume for Ultrasound Guided Superior Trunk Block
Musculoskeletal Diseases or Conditions
Recruiting
Hybrid mHealth and Telerehabilitation vs Conventional Physiotherapy for Subacromial Pain Syndrome
Subacromial Pain Syndrome
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
E-CEL UVEC Cells as an Adjunct Cell Therapy for the Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in Adults
Rotator Cuff Tears, Muscle Atrophy or Weakness
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Anders Odgaard, MD, DrMed study director
Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
Anne M Nyholm, MD, PhD principal investigator
University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen
Bo S Olsen, MD, PhD study chair
University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Systematic use of patient reported outcome measures in clinical work with the patients in people with Shoulder Disease and Shoulder Impingement, run by University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen at 6 sites in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Treatment cost per change in life quality (time frame: From inclusion time and the 2 following years.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06435494, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Apr 2025.