AzTrials
AzTrials

PruritusPhase 2CANNA-ITCHNCT06435299

Efficacy and Tolerance of THC 25: CBD 25 in Patients With Severe Pruritus: a Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study

A Phase 2 study testing Cannabis oil in people with Pruritus, run by University Hospital, Brest at 6 sites in France.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Chronic pruritus affects 10-20% of the population and causes a major reduction in quality of life, comparable to pain, with significant psychological, social, and functional consequences. Current treatments are often insufficient, highlighting the urgent need for new therapeutic options. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pruritus
What is being tested?
Cannabis oil
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
218 participants
Where
6 sitesFrance
Study dates
1 Jan 2027to 1 Mar 2029
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Severe pruritus, defined by a mean WI-NRS score ≥7/10 (evaluated on one week before inclusion, regardless of the cause of the pruritus
  • Insufficient relief (WI-NRS ≥7/10 ) or poor tolerance (adverse effects) of accessible drug and non-drug therapies
  • Stable treatment (for treatment of the prurit) for at least 6 weeks
  • Affiliated or benefiting of a social security
  • Informed consent (personally dated and) signed by the participant or any representatives (impartial witness/trusted person)

Who cannot join

  • Patients unable to consent.
  • Patients refusing to participate in research.
  • Patients under guardianship or conservatorship.
  • Personal history of psychotic disorders.
  • Severe hepatic impairment, defined as prothrombin level <50% or with predictive biological impairment.
  • Moderate to severe renal impairment, with an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤ 44 mL/min/1.73 m².
Show all 14Show fewer
  • Severe cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease, including history of myocardial infarction or stroke.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  • Lack of understanding of questionnaires or inability to follow up.
  • Women of childbearing potential unwilling to use appropriate contraception.
  • Cannabinoid use outside the clinical trial
  • Use of cannabis or its derivatives less than one week before inclusion
  • History of hypersensitivity or allergy to any cannabinoid product.
  • Allergy to nuts.

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Laurent MISERY, PU-PH contact

laurent.misery@chu-brest.fr

6 sites in 1 country

France6 sites
  • CHU Angers

    Angers, France, 49000

    YANNICK LE CORRE, MD, 02 41 35 34 19, yalecorre@chu-angers.fr

  • CHD Vendée

    La Roche-sur-Yon, France, 85925

    Carole POIRAUD, MD, 02 51 44 61 83, Carole.poiraud@ght85.fr

  • Groupe Hospitalier La Rochelle

    La Rochelle, France, 17300

    Cécile FRENARD, MD, 05 45 45 51 83, Cecile.frenard@ght-atlantique17.fr

  • CHU de Nantes

    Nantes, France, 44093

    Sebastien BARBAROT, MD-PHD, 02 40 08 40 86, sebastien.barbarot@chu-nantes.fr

  • CHU de Poitiers

    Poitiers, France, 86000

    Ewa HAINAUT, MD, 05 49 44 44 59, Ewa.HAINAUT@chu-poitiers.fr

  • CHRU de Tours

    Tours, France, 37044

    Laurent MACHET, MD-PHD, 02 47 47 87 73, machet@univ-tours.fr

Other trials in France

About this study

Chronic pruritus affects 10-20% of the population and causes a major reduction in quality of life, comparable to pain, with significant psychological, social, and functional consequences. Current treatments are often insufficient, highlighting the urgent need for new therapeutic options.

Recent advances in the pathophysiology of itch have shown the involvement of the endocannabinoid system (CB1, CB2, and TRPV1 receptors) in modulating itch signal transmission and cutaneous inflammation. Cannabinoids, particularly the balanced CBD:THC combination, appear promising as they provide both central and peripheral antipruritic effects, while CBD helps mitigate the psychotropic side effects of THC.

Read more

Preclinical studies and limited clinical data suggest efficacy across various forms of pruritus (dermatological, uremic, cholestatic), though robust controlled trials are still lacking. Evidence from nabiximols (1:1 CBD:THC spray) in other conditions such as neuropathic pain and spasticity further supports the rationale for this approach.

Therefore, sublingual LGP THC25:CBD25 oil has been selected for its balanced ratio, simple administration route, and expected tolerability, to evaluate its efficacy and safety in the treatment of chronic pruritus.

Conditions
Pruritus
Being tested
Cannabis oil, Placebo
Keywords
itching, THC, CBD
Medical subject headings
Pruritus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cannabis oilDrug

    Patients in this arm will have to take Cannabis oil (50mg/mL) twice a day with the daily dose estimated during auto titration phase (from W0 to W2)

  • PlaceboDrug

    Patients in this arm will have to take Placebo oil twice a day with the daily dose estimated during auto titration phase (from W0 to W2)

Study groups in NCT06435299
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cannabis oilExperimentalCBD:THC oil 50mg/mL arm : An auto-titration phase will take place during the first 14 days of treatment: 0.2 ml on the first day then increase of 0.2 ml every 2 days in 2 daily doses, that is to say then only 0.1 per day , up to 1 ml/day maximum. If any tolerable side-effects occurred, patients were advised not to increase the dose; if intolerable side-effects occurred, dose reduction was advised. After initial titration, the dose will then be maintained for 4 consecutive weeks.
Receives: Drug: Cannabis oil
PLACEBOPlacebo comparatorPlacebo arm : An auto-titration phase will take place during the first 14 days of treatment with the same modalities as experimental group If any tolerable side-effects occurred, patients were advised not to increase the dose; if intolerable side-effects occurred, dose reduction was advised. After initial titration, the dose will then be maintained for 4 consecutive weeks.
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. WI-NRS change

    Binary outcome (success or failure). Success is defined by a reduction of 30% in WINRS (Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale - On a scale of 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable)) from the inclusion visit to week 6.

    Measured: Week 0

  2. WI-NRS change

    Binary outcome (success or failure). Success is defined by a reduction of 30% in WINRS (Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale - On a scale of 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable)) from the inclusion visit to week 6.

    Measured: Week 6

Secondary outcomes (18)
  1. WI-NRS change from W0 to W2

    • Proportion of patients achieving at least a weekly mean reduction of 4 points in WI-NRS (Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale - On a scale of 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable)) score from inclusion visit to week 2

    Measured: Week 0

  2. WI-NRS change from W0 to W2

    • Proportion of patients achieving at least a weekly mean reduction of 4 points in WI-NRS (Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale - On a scale of 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable)) score from inclusion visit to week 2

    Measured: Week 2

  3. WI-NRS change from W2 to W6

    Proportion of patients achieving at least a weekly mean reduction of 4 points in WI-NRS (Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale - On a scale of 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable)) score from week 2 to week 6.

    Measured: Week 2

  4. WI-NRS change from W2 to W6

    Proportion of patients achieving at least a weekly mean reduction of 4 points in WI-NRS (Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale - On a scale of 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable)) score from week 2 to week 6.

    Measured: Week 6

  5. ItchyQoL change from W0 to W2

    • Change in ItchyQoL score from inclusion (= Week 0) visit to week 2 (The ItchyQoL questionnaire contains 22 items, and each item is rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1 = never to 5 = all the time)

    Measured: Week 0

  6. ItchyQoL change from W0 to W2

    • Change in ItchyQoL score from inclusion (= Week 0) visit to week 2 (The ItchyQoL questionnaire contains 22 items, and each item is rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1 = never to 5 = all the time)

    Measured: Week 2

  7. ItchyQoL change from W2 to W6

    • Percent change in ItchyQoL score from Week 2 visit to week 6 (The ItchyQoL questionnaire contains 22 items, and each item is rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1 = never to 5 = all the time)

    Measured: Week 2

  8. ItchyQoL change from W2 to W6

    • Change in ItchyQoL score from Week 2 visit to week 6.(The ItchyQoL questionnaire contains 22 items, and each item is rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1 = never to 5 = all the time)

    Measured: Week 6

  9. Chronic Itch Burden Scale change from W0 to W2

    • Change in Chronic Itch Burden Scale - 10 from inclusion (= Week 0) visit to week 2 (10 questions rated from "Not at all" to "Very much" on patient itching)

    Measured: Week 0

  10. Chronic Itch Burden Scale change from W0 to W2

    • Change in Chronic Itch Burden Scale - 10 from inclusion (= Week 0) visit to week 2 (10 questions rated from "Not at all" to "Very much" on patient itching)

    Measured: Week 2

  11. Chronic Itch Burden Scale change from W2 to W6

    • Percent change in Chronic Itch Burden Scale - 10 from Week 2 visit to week 6 (10 questions rated from "Not at all" to "Very much" on patient itching)

    Measured: Week 2

  12. Chronic Itch Burden Scale change from W2 to W6

    • Percent change in Chronic Itch Burden Scale - 10 from Week 2 visit to week 6 (10 questions rated from "Not at all" to "Very much" on patient itching)

    Measured: Week 6

  13. Treatment adverse events

    • Incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events.

    Measured: Week 0

  14. Treatment adverse events

    • Incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events.

    Measured: Week 2

  15. Treatment adverse events

    • Incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events.

    Measured: Week 4

  16. Treatment adverse events

    • Incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events.

    Measured: Week 6

  17. Treatment adverse events

    • Incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events.

    Measured: Week 8

  18. Treatment Observance Rate

    • Number of observant patients (YES/NO) in both arms: Observance (defined as YES) is considered as taking at least one dose of treatment per day over the W0 - W6 period.

    Measured: Week 6

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 May 2024
  2. Study start1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Mar 2029 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Mar 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
A Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
218 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06435299
Sponsor's protocol ID
29BRC23.0164
Acronym
CANNA-ITCH
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
27 Mar 2024
Last updated
12 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Cannabis oil in people with Pruritus, run by University Hospital, Brest at 6 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 6 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Laurent MISERY, PU-PH (laurent.misery@chu-brest.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

WI-NRS change (time frame: Week 0). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in