AzTrials
AzTrials

Isolated Focal Hand DystoniaNCT06422104

Neuromodulation Therapy for Task-Specific Dystonia

A study testing Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in people with Isolated Focal Hand Dystonia, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to apply a non-invasive brain stimulation technology called repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in patients with focal hand dystonia (FHD). The goal of the study is to identify which cortical target (premotor cortex (PMC) or primary somatosensory cortex (PSC)) will show benefit after… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Isolated Focal Hand Dystonia
What is being tested?
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
12 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
23 Aug 2018to 13 Jan 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy Control Participants:
  • 18yrs and older
  • Left or Right hand dominance
  • Age-matched to Focal Hand dystonia patients
  • Must be able to sign informed consent
  • Must be literate
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Focal Hand dystonia Patients:
  • 18yrs and older
  • Left or Right hand dominance
  • Diagnosed with Writer's Cramp dystonia in left or right hand
  • Must be able to sign informed consent
  • Must be literate

Who cannot join

  • Healthy Control Participants (visits 2, 3, 4, and 5) and Focal Hand dystonia Patients (visits 2, 3, 4, and 5):
  • Other neurological movement disorders diagnoses including other types of dystonia, Parkinsonism, or essential tremor
  • Botulinum toxin injections within 3 months of research study
  • Medications with effects on the central nervous system including anticholinergic, benzodiazepines, and muscle relaxants among others within 1 week of the study
  • No physical or occupational therapy of the upper extremities
  • Any contraindications to MRI (ie: metal in body or implanted medical devices, etc)
  • Any contraindication on TMS adult safety screening (TASS form) including seizure history, pregnancy, brain injury, cranial metal implants, known structural brain lesion

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Duke University Health System

    Durham, North Carolina, 27705

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Development of Mechanistically Informed Therapy for Task-Specific Dystonia Using Noninvasive Neuromodulation

This study aims to apply a non-invasive brain stimulation technology called repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in patients with focal hand dystonia (FHD). The goal of the study is to identify which cortical target (premotor cortex (PMC) or primary somatosensory cortex (PSC)) will show benefit after active rTMS compared to sham rTMS. A secondary goal of the study is to understand if 10 Hz rTMS can show behavioral benefit compared to sham rTMS. The study will evaluate rTMS response using measures if writing on a sensor tablet, examiner and patient dystonia rating scales and brain imaging scan (functional MRI) to understand brain changes after rTMS. Safety measures include adherence to TMS guidelines and thorough medical screening to prevent seizures.

Read the detailed description

The primary objective of this study is to develop rTMS for FHD. The focus is to assess whether stimulating the PMC or PSC will show greater improvement in writing behavior. This research builds upon prior studies that have demonstrated improvement in behavior after rTMS to PMC and PSC. The study includes five sequential visits:

  • Visit 1 behavior writing measures and dystonia rating scales.
  • Visit 2 includes task-based functional MRI brain scans to develop cortical target for rTMS sessions.
  • Visits 3, 4, and 5: FHD participants receive 10 Hz rTMS to PMC, PSC and sham rTMS to PMC in a cross over design with at minimum one week of washout between sessions. Participants complete behavior writing measures and rating scales on same day before and after each TMS session and an fMRI after each TMS session. Up to 5 Healthy Volunteers were recruited to help develop the TMS visits.

The information in this record reflects Visits 3-5

Being tested
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationDevice

    10 Hz repetitive TMS will be delivered for 20 minutes per session and 0.7 Hz for 20 minutes per session

Study groups in NCT06422104
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
10 Hz rTMS to premotor cortexActive comparator10 Hz rTMS to premotor cortex
Receives: Device: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
10 Hz rTMS to primary somatosensory cortexActive comparator10 Hz rTMS to primary somatosensory cortex
Receives: Device: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
0.7 Hz rTMS to premotor cortexActive comparator0.7 Hz rTMS to premotor cortex
Receives: Device: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Feasibility of Accurately Delivering TMS During the Task of Writing as Measured by Number of Participants Who Completed the TMS Sessions

    Measured: Pre-TMS and post-TMS session (each session is approximately 45 minutes)

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Safety, as Measured by TMS Acute Side Effects

    Measured: During TMS session (each session is approximately 45 minutes)

  2. Change in Peak Accelerations Behavior (Calculated by Taking the Change in Peak Accelerations From Behavior Performed Before and After Each TMS Visit).

    Change in peak accelerations behaviors pre- and post-TMS is calculated by taking the change in peak accelerations from behavior performed before and after each TMS visit. Higher measures of peak accelerations represent greater writing dysfluency and worsening dystonia.

    Measured: Pre-TMS and post-TMS session (each session is approximately 45 minutes)

  3. Brain Connectivity Between Superior Parietal Cortex to Right Cerebellum VIII

    Brain connectivity was assessed using functional magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. The z-score is mathematical calculation of the synchronization between brain regions. Specifically, functional connectivity z-scores quantify the strength of synchronization between brain regions by transforming Pearson correlation coefficients (r-values) into normally distributed values (z-scores). This Fisher-z transformation stabilizes variance, enabling valid group-level statistical comparisons (e.g., t-tests) of functional connectivity. Positive Z-scores (Z scores> 0) represent stronger synchronization between brain regions and strengthening of connectivity between brain regions; negative Z-scores (Z-scores <0) indicate anti-synchronization between brain regions and weakening of connectivity between brain regions.

    Measured: Post-TMS session (each session is approximately 45 minutes)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 May 2024
  2. Study start23 Aug 2018
  3. Primary completion13 Jan 2023
  4. Study completion13 Jan 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Model description
Double-blind cross-over design with participants receiving TMS at two cortical locations.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
12 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06422104
Sponsor's protocol ID
Pro00094131
Status last verified
May 2024
First submitted
24 Apr 2024
Last updated
13 Apr 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Mulcahey PJ, Peterchev AV, Calakos N, Bukhari-Parlakturk N. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: the road to clinical therapy for dystonia. Dystonia. 2023 August; 2.

  • Bukhari-Parlakturk N, Mulcahey PJ, Lutz M, Ghazi R, Huang Z, Dannhauer M, Simsek Z, Groves S, Lipp M, Fei M, Tran T, Wood E, Beynel L, Scott B, Termsarasab P, Petty C, Al-Khalidi HR, Voyvodic J, Appelbaum LG, Davis S, Michael A, Peterchev AV, Calakos N. Functional MRI-guided personalized TMS decreases basal ganglia activity and improves focal hand dystonia. International Organization of Human Brain Mapping Conference. Montreal, Canada. July 22-26, 2023. virtual poster presentation.

  • Bukhari-Parlakturk N, Mulcahey PJ, Lutz M, Ghazi R, Huang Z, Dannhauer M, Simsek Z, Groves S, Lipp M, Fei M, Tran T, Wood E, Beynel L, Scott B, Termsarasab P, Petty C, Al-Khalidi HR, Voyvodic J, Appelbaum LG, Davis S, Michael A, Peterchev AV, Calakos N. Functional MRI-guided personalized TMS decreases basal ganglia activity and improves focal hand dystonia. International Dystonia Symposium. Dublin, Ireland. June 1-3, 2023. poster presentation.

  • Bukhari-Parlakturk N, Lutz MW, Al-Khalidi HR, Unnithan S, Wang JE, Scott B, Termsarasab P, Appelbaum LG, Calakos N. Suitability of Automated Writing Measures for Clinical Trial Outcome in Writer's Cramp. Mov Disord. 2023 Jan;38(1):123-132. doi: 10.1002/mds.29237. Epub 2022 Oct 13.

    PubMed 36226903
  • Dannhauer M, Huang Z, Beynel L, Wood E, Bukhari-Parlakturk N, Peterchev AV. TAP: targeting and analysis pipeline for optimization and verification of coil placement in transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neural Eng. 2022 Apr 21;19(2):10.1088/1741-2552/ac63a4. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac63a4.

    PubMed 35377345
  • Bukhari-Parlakturk N, Mulcahey PJ, Lutz MW, Ghazi R, Huang Z, Dannhauer M, Termsarasab P, Scott B, Simsek ZB, Groves S, Lipp M, Fei M, Tran TK, Wood E, Beynel L, Petty C, Voyvodic JT, Appelbaum LG, Al-Khalidi HR, Davis SW, Michael AM, Peterchev AV, Calakos N. Motor network reorganization associated with rTMS-induced writing improvement in writer's cramp dystonia. Brain Stimul. 2025 Mar-Apr;18(2):198-210. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2025.02.005. Epub 2025 Feb 7.

    PubMed 39924101

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in people with Isolated Focal Hand Dystonia, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Apr 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Feasibility of Accurately Delivering TMS During the Task of Writing as Measured by Number of Participants Who Completed the TMS Sessions (time frame: Pre-TMS and post-TMS session (each session is approximately 45 minutes)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06422104, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Apr 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in