AzTrials
AzTrials

Diabetic Foot UlcerREBOUNDNCT06420245

Clinical Utility of an Amniotic Membrane Allograft for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Wound Management

A study testing Orion TM Amniotic Membrane Allograft in people with Diabetic Foot Ulcer, run by Legacy Medical Consultants at 8 sites in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if use of Orion™, a dual-layer amniotic membrane allograft, in addition to standard wound care treatment can improve patient outcomes for people over the age of 50 with diabetic foot ulcers. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Diabetic Foot Ulcer
What is being tested?
Orion TM Amniotic Membrane Allograft
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
240 participants
Where
8 sitesUnited States
Study dates
30 Dec 2025to Jul 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Ambulatory patients ≥ 50 and ≤ 85 years of age;
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent;
  • Willing and able to comply with study requirements;
  • Presence of Wagner 1 and superficial Wagner 2 DFU extending at least through the dermis provided the DFU is located in the foot distal to the medial malleolus
  • If multiple Wagner 1 and superficial Wagner 2 DFUs are present, the largest ulcer meeting DFU eligibility criteria will be selected as the index DFU in the study;
  • Index ulcer is able to be visualized and accurately measured with eKare Insights;
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Non-study ulcers must be > 2 cm (.79 in.) from the index ulcer;
  • Index DFU identified ≥ 4 weeks prior to study screening and < 52 weeks from the date of informed consent;
  • Index DFU area > 1.0 cm2 (0.39 in.) and < 25 cm2 (9.84 in.) at screening and at Wound Management Period Visit #1;
  • Index DFU offloaded according to SOC for entire run-in period, prior to randomization;
  • Potential participant is under the care of a clinician for diabetic management and other medical conditions (the site PI may assist/direct the patient in the pre-screening period to obtain a PCP).
  • Index foot has adequate circulation defined as meeting one (1) of the following within 30 days of screening:
  • ABI ≥ 0.7 and ≤ 1.3 AND TBI > 0.7; B. Dorsum transcutaneous oxygen tension measurement (TcPO2) ≥ 40 mmHg; C. Arterial duplex with biphasic flow in BOTH the DP and PT arteries verified by PI and documented.

Who cannot join

  • Index foot ulcer documented to be caused by a medical condition other than diabetes;
  • Potential subject has five (5) or more DFUs and/or VLUs in the target limb;
  • DFU is secondary to Charcot neuroarthropathy;
  • Treatment with an antibiotic impregnated primary dressing ≤ 4 weeks prior to study screening;
  • Index ulcer is potentially or confirmed by biopsy to be cancerous;
  • Index ulcer site has undergone radiation therapy;
Show all 38Show fewer
  • Venous leg ulcers in diabetic patients;
  • Active infection proximal to or at site of index ulcer;
  • Index foot ulcer reduced in area by ≥ 20% at the end of the 4-week run-in period;
  • Presence of active osteomyelitis or bone infection as verified by x-ray /MRI within 30 days of visit #1 of the run-in period;
  • Raynaud's disease;
  • Unreconstructible arterial ischemia which may lead to nonhealing;
  • Treatment with immunosuppressants, including systemic corticosteroids for ≥ 2 weeks within 30 days prior to study screening, or are anticipated during study participation;
  • Any active cancer undergoing treatment ≤ 30 days prior to wound management visit #1 of the run-in period, or is anticipated during study participation;
  • Treatment with chemotherapy within 30 days of the first study wound management visit of the run-in period, or is anticipated during study participation;
  • Diabetics with poor metabolic control, defined as HbA1c ≥ 12.0%, within 30 days of visit #1 of the run-in period;
  • Participation in an investigational device, biologic, or drug study currently or within 30 days of study wound management visit #1 of the run-in period;
  • Prior use of any advanced skin substitute product on the index ulcer within 60 days of visit #1 of the run-in period;
  • Index ulcer was continued to be treated after visit #1 of the run-in period and/or anticipate treatment during study participation with any of the following prohibited therapies:
  • Biomedical or topical growth factor;
  • Topical steroids applied to the index ulcer surface;
  • On medications that are considered immune system modulators that could affect graft incorporation;
  • Scarlet red dressing;
  • Dakin's solution;
  • Mafenide acetate;
  • Tincoban;
  • Zinc sulfate;
  • Povidone-iodine solution;
  • Polymyxin/nystatin;
  • Chlorhexidine;
  • Patient is taking a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor (COX-2 inhibitor); such as, celecoxib (Celebrex, Consensi, Elyxyb), valdecoxib (Bextra), amlodipine (Consensi);
  • Patient has serum creatinine > 2.5 mg/dL within 30 days of study wound management visit #1 of the run-in period;
  • Autoimmune connective tissue disease;
  • End stage renal disease (ESRD);
  • Presence of any condition which would seriously compromise the subject's ability to complete this study;
  • Known history of poor adherence to medical therapy and/or clinic appointments;
  • Pregnant, or planning to become pregnant during the study;
  • Life expectancy < 1 year.

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 1 country.

8 sites in 1 country

United States8 sites
  • Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science

    Chicago, Illinois, 60064

  • Stamford Health Medical Group

    Darien, Connecticut, 06820

  • DPMG

    Palm Springs, California, 92262

  • Chesapeake Research Group

    Pasadena, Maryland, 21122

  • Optimum Care Research Center

    Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33025

  • Oregon Health & Science University

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

  • Center for Clinical Research Inc.

    San Francisco, California, 94115

  • ILD Research Center

    Vista, California, 92081

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Prospective, Post-market Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) to Demonstrate Clinical Utility of an Amniotic Membrane Allograft in Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU) Wound Management

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if use of Orion™, a dual-layer amniotic membrane allograft, in addition to standard wound care treatment can improve patient outcomes for people over the age of 50 with diabetic foot ulcers. The study aims to determine the incidence of complete wound closure at the end of 12 weeks of treatment. Researchers will compare the outcomes between a group of people treated with standard wound care and another group treated with standard wound care in addition to the amniotic membrane allograft to see if the amniotic membrane allograft improves wound healing.

During the study, participants will visit their doctor weekly over a 12 week period, which is standard for diabetic foot ulcer treatment procedures, and fill out a questionnaire measuring quality of life.

Read the detailed description

Lower extremity diabetic ulcers are a common complication affecting millions of people in the United States. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical utility of Orion™, a dual-layer amniotic membrane allograft, versus standard wound care in the management of diabetic foot ulcers. Amniotic membrane allografts are confirmed by the FDA Tissue Reference Group to meet the criteria for regulation solely under Section 361 of the PHS Act as defined in 21 CFR Part 1271 for the management of diabetic foot ulcers. Investigators hypothesize that the group of participants who receive amniotic membrane allografts in addition to standard wound care will experience a faster rate and higher incidence of complete wound closure compared to standard wound care alone. For only partially healed wounds, investigators anticipate a statistically significant reduction in the size of the ulcer and improved quality of life for participants in the experimental arm compared to standard wound care alone.

Being tested
Orion TM Amniotic Membrane Allograft, Standard of Care (SOC)
Keywords
amniotic membrane allograft, diabetic foot ulcer, DFU
Medical subject headings
Diabetic Foot

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Orion TM Amniotic Membrane AllograftDevice

    The intervention is a sterile allograft made from dehydrated extracellular matrix, designed to promote wound healing by providing a reliable and protective wound covering. Amniotic membranes are hypothesized to promote healing in open wounds by serving as a scaffold to support native tissue ingrowth, encouraging angiogenesis, and limiting microbial spread.

  • Standard of Care (SOC)Procedure or surgery

    Standard wound care entails surgical debridement as needed to remove all non-viable tissue, screening for infection and probing of the wound for bone, weekly application of a collagen alginate primary dressing, and off-loading using a removable diabetic offloading cam-walker or total contact cast.

Study groups in NCT06420245
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard of Care (SOC)Active comparatorStandard of care DFU wound management
Receives: Procedure: Standard of Care (SOC)
Amniotic Membrane plus Standard of CareExperimentalWeekly application of Orion™ amniotic membrane allograft in addition to standard of care DFU wound management
Receives: Device: Orion TM Amniotic Membrane Allograft; Procedure: Standard of Care (SOC)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence of Complete Wound Closure

    Percentage of enrolled study participants demonstrating 100% re-epithelialization of the index wound without leaking exudate at 12 weeks post-randomization.

    Measured: starting from randomization until last visit of the 12-week wound management period

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Time to complete wound closure

    time to 100% re-epithelialization of the index ulcer without leaking exudate as assessed by Kare inSight®, starting at randomization through identification of complete wound closure.

    Measured: From time of randomization until the end of the twelve (12) week Wound Management Period.

  2. Incidence of complete wound closure

    Incidence of complete wound closure, defined as 100% re-epithelialization of the index ulcer without leaking exudate as assessed by eKare inSight® at eight (8) weeks post-randomization.

    Measured: From time of randomization to eight (8) weeks post-randomization.

  3. Number of Orion™ Allografts or collagen alginate (SOC) dressings required for complete wound closure.

    The number of Number of Orion™ Allografts or collagen alginate (SOC) dressings required for complete wound closure during twelve (12) week Wound Management Period.

    Measured: From the time of randomization through the twelve (12) week Wound Management Period.

  4. Change in Quality of Life metrics

    Change in QoL metrics at twelve (12) weeks post-randomization compared to baseline as reported by the subject in the WOUND-Q QoL questionnaires: Life Impact (8-32; higher is better); Lower Limb Symptoms (10-40; higher is better)

    Measured: starting from randomization to last visit of the 12-week wound management period

  5. Recurrence Within Six Months

    Recurrence within six (6) months post wound managment period completion, defined as meeting the primary endpoint and reopening of index ulcer at the same site within six (6) months.

    Measured: starting from last visit of the 12-week wound management period until 6-month follow-up visit

  6. Change in wound size

    Percent area change of index ulcer at completion of twelve (12) weeks post-randomization.

    Measured: from the time of randomization through twelve (12) weeks post-randomization.

  7. Change in QoL metrics in follow-up.

    Change in QoL metrics to six (6) months after completion of the Wound Management Period as reported by the patient in the WOUND-Q QoL questionnaire.

    Measured: From time of completion of the Wound Management Period through six (6) months.

  8. Adverse events

    Adverse events from randomization through six (6) month follow-up.

    Measured: From the time of randomization through six (6) month follow-up.

  9. Serious adverse events

    Occurrence of serious adverse events (SAEs) from randomization through six (6) month follow-up.

    Measured: From the time of randomization through six (6) month follow-up.

  10. Major amputations

    Major amputations defined as amputation above the metatarsals.

    Measured: From the time of randomization through six (6) month follow-up.

  11. Minor amputations

    Minor amputations defined as amputation involving toe or metatarsal only.

    Measured: From the time of randomization through six (6) month follow-up.

  12. Hospital admission(s)

    Hospital admission(s) and diagnosis from randomization through six (6) month follow-up.

    Measured: From the time of randomization through six (6) month follow-up.

  13. Emergency Department (ED) visit(s)

    ED visit(s) without admission through six (6) month follow-up.

    Measured: From the time of randomization through six (6) month follow-up.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 May 2024
  2. Study start30 Dec 2025
  3. Primary completionNov 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJul 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
240 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06420245
Sponsor's protocol ID
LEGA-CLIN-2024-01
Acronym
REBOUND
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
14 May 2024
Last updated
28 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Orion TM Amniotic Membrane Allograft in people with Diabetic Foot Ulcer, run by Legacy Medical Consultants at 8 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 38 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 8 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incidence of Complete Wound Closure (time frame: starting from randomization until last visit of the 12-week wound management period). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in