AzTrials
AzTrials

Carpal Tunnel SyndromeNCT06405438

Comparison of the Efficacy of Peloid Therapy and Paraffin Treatment in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

An observational study of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, run by Beylikduzu State Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study compares the effectiveness of peloid therapy and paraffin treatment in carpal tunnel syndrome. Patients who have already received 2 weeks of peloid therapy or 15 sessions of paraffin treatment will be assessed. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
10 Oct 2024to 20 Jan 2025
How long will I take part?
3 Months
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with mild and moderate carpal tunnel syndrome

Who may be able to join

  • Patients aged between 18 and 65 years old.
  • Patients diagnosed with mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome based on electrophysiological evaluations.
  • Patients experiencing symptoms for a minimum of 3 months.

Who cannot join

  • Patients diagnosed with neuropathic conditions such as polyneuropathy, brachial plexopathy, or thoracic outlet syndrome.
  • Patients with a history of previous injections or surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Büşra Şirin Ahısha contact

(0212) 856 27 40

bsrn080@gmail.com

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Beylikdüzü State Hospital

    Istanbul, 34147

    Büşra Şirin Ahısha, MD, (0212) 856 27 40, bsrn080@gmail.com

    Büşra Şirin Ahısha, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

This study compares the effectiveness of peloid therapy and paraffin treatment in carpal tunnel syndrome. Patients who have already received 2 weeks of peloid therapy or 15 sessions of paraffin treatment will be assessed. Pain and symptom severity are assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ). Electrophysiological examinations will also be conducted at the same time points: baseline, 4 weeks post-treatment, and a 12-week follow-up.

Read the detailed description

Our study will include 60 patients aged 18-65 who visited the outpatient clinics of Beylikdüzü State Hospital between January 1, 2024, and September 1, 2024, and were diagnosed with mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome based on electrophysiological examinations. These patients received either peloid or paraffin treatment. Patients with symptoms persisting for a minimum of 3 months will be included in the study. In this study, pain levels will be evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and the type and severity of symptoms will be assessed with the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ). At our hospital, the standard paraffin treatment consists of 15 sessions, administered 5 days per week, while the peloid therapy consists of 10 sessions, also administered 5 days per week. The VAS, BCTQ scores, and electrophysiological evaluations of the patients will be assessed at the 4th and 12th weeks post-treatment. Electrophysiological parameters including median nerve distal motor latency (MMNDL), median nerve distal sensory latency (MNSDL), sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV), compound muscle action potential (CMAP), and sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) will be recorded.

Being tested
No intervention
Keywords
carpal tunnel syndrome, median neuropathy, median nerve, peloid therapy, mud therapy
Medical subject headings
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Median Neuropathy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • No interventionOther

    No intervention.

Study groups in NCT06405438
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Peloid therapy groupPatients in this group have already received peloid therapy for their carpal tunnel syndrome. Peloid therapy involves the application of natural mud, typically rich in minerals, to the affected area. The sessions will also last approximately 20-30 minutes per day, administered consecutively for 5 days a week, totaling 10 sessions for 2 weeks.
Receives: Other: No intervention
Paraffin treatment groupIn this group, patients have already received paraffin treatment for their carpal tunnel syndrome. Paraffin treatment involves immersing the affected hand or hands in a mixture of heated paraffin wax. The sessions will last approximately 20-30 minutes per day, 5 days a week, for a total of 15 sessions for 3 weeks.
Receives: Other: No intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire

    The Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) consists of two parts: the Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) and the Functional Status Scale (FSS). Both parts are scored on a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms or functional impairment.The highest possible total score for the Symptom Severity Scale is 55, which reflects the most severe symptoms.The highest possible total score for the Functional Status Scale is 40, indicating the greatest functional impairment.The minimum total score is 19 (indicating minimal or no symptoms and functional limitations).

    The maximum total score is 95 (indicating the most severe symptoms and functional limitations).

    As the total score increases, the severity of symptoms and functional limitations worsens, meaning higher scores reflect worse outcomes.

    Measured: 0 day, 4th week and 12th week

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Visual Analogue Scale

    The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain.

    The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a tool used to measure pain intensity. It is typically represented as a 10 cm or 100 mm line, where the patient marks their pain level.

    The minimum score is 0, which indicates no pain. The maximum score is 100, indicating the worst possible pain. As the score increases, the severity of pain worsens. In this scale, higher scores reflect more intense pain levels. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranges from 0 to 100 where higher scores reflect greater pain intensity.

    Measured: 0 day, 4th week and 12th week

  2. Median nerve distal motor latency

    It is a finding from electrophysiological evaluation

    Measured: 0 day, 4th week and 12th week

  3. Median nerve distal sensory latency

    It is a finding from electrophysiological evaluation

    Measured: 0 day, 4th week and 12th week

  4. Sensory nerve conduction velocity

    It is a finding from electrophysiological evaluation

    Measured: 0 day, 4th week and 12th week

  5. Motor nerve conduction velocity

    It is a finding from electrophysiological evaluation

    Measured: 0 day, 4th week and 12th week

  6. Sensory nerve action potential amplitude

    It is a finding from electrophysiological evaluation

    Measured: 0 day, 4th week and 12th week

  7. Motor nerve action potential amplitude

    It is a finding from electrophysiological evaluation

    Measured: 0 day, 4th week and 12th week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 May 2024
  2. Study start10 Oct 2024
  3. Primary completion20 Jan 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion20 Jan 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Other
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
Target duration
3 Months
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06405438
Sponsor's protocol ID
BeylikduzuStateH
Status last verified
Oct 2024
First submitted
5 May 2024
Last updated
26 Oct 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, run by Beylikduzu State Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Büşra Şirin Ahısha ((0212) 856 27 40, bsrn080@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (time frame: 0 day, 4th week and 12th week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Oct 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in