AzTrials
AzTrials

Borrelia Burgdorferi NeuroborreliosisDOTA-LYMENCT06392815

64Cu-DOTATATE-PET for Lyme Neuroborreliosis

A study testing Cu DOTATATE PET in people with Borrelia Burgdorferi Neuroborreliosis, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of the study is to investigate the applicability and performance of 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT/MR for diagnosis in patients with Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB). In this prospective, observational cohort study with 64Cu-DOTATATE, the investigators wish to include a total of 50 patients clinically suspected of LNB. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Borrelia Burgdorferi Neuroborreliosis
What is being tested?
Cu DOTATATE PET
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
20 May 2024to 31 Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 years AND
  • Clinical suspicion of LNB AND
  • Must be able to read and understand the patient information and to give informed consent -

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy OR
  • Breast-feeding OR
  • Concluded antibiotic treatment OR
  • Weight more than the maximum weight limit for the PET/CT/MRI bed of the scanner (140 kg) OR
  • History of allergic reaction attributable to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to 64Cu-DOTATATE OR
  • Contraindications to MR (check list) -

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Denmark1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Anne-Mette Lebech

    Copenhagen, Capital Region, 2100

    Anne-Mette Lebech, +4535458622, Anne-Mette.lebech@regionh.dk

    Recruiting

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: 64Cu-DOTATATE-PET Imaging for Lyme Neuroborreliosis

The aim of the study is to investigate the applicability and performance of 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT/MR for diagnosis in patients with Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB).

In this prospective, observational cohort study with 64Cu-DOTATATE, the investigators wish to include a total of 50 patients clinically suspected of LNB. The investigators will investigate the diagnostic value of 64Cu-DOTATATE-PET comparing clinically suspected and CSF verified LNB patients with clinically suspected patients without CSF verification.

The investigators hypothesize that the information obtained from 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT/MRI can improve the diagnostics of LNB as well as that 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT/MRI will be able to contribute to the follow-up of patients by adding prognostic information and the risk of persistent symptoms. The application of 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT/MRI in the diagnostic work-up of LNB would thus expectedly lead to a more precise diagnosis and risk assessment.

Read the detailed description

Background

Imaging of neuroinfections is well documented, however with several restrictions due to the heterogeneity of pathogens. Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB) is a tick-borne infection, caused by Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato complex (Bb) and among the most prevalent bacterial infections of the nervous system. Due to climatic and environmental changes, the incidence of tickborne diseases is increasing throughout Europe, in Denmark the annual incidence is estimated to 3-4/100,000. Adults mainly manifests as a self-limiting subacute painful meningoradiculitis, lymphocytic meningitis and/or cranial nerve palsy, symptoms of CNS involvement such as acute encephalitis and myelitis are rare. Over time, most cases of Bb infection is thought to be self-resolving, however antibiotics accelerate the process by eradicating the pathogen and reduces the risk of disseminated late infection and persistent symptoms. The response to antibiotics can be slow, but the majority of patients report marked improvement in symptoms after treatment, a proportion of patients, do however report to experience persistent residual symptoms including fatigue, pain or cognitive disturbances and studies have suggested that late diagnosis and the burden of symptoms at time of treatment initiation increases the risk of these symptoms.

If antibiotic treatment is initiated as early as possible, LNB has a very good prognosis, early diagnosis and treatment initiation are therefore of paramount interest.

As no markers in plasma can be used to diagnose or follow LNB, the diagnosis of LNB is based on clinical symptoms in combination with elevated white blood cell count in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the detection of specific Bb intrathecal antibody production. However, Bb serology has several disadvantages in the ability to confirm active disease and monitor disease activity and response to antibiotic treatment. Bb antibodies in CSF are first detectable weeks after onset of the neuroinfection and they may persist for years even after the disease has been well-treated. In addition, symptoms can be unspecific, evolving over time and even mimic other neurological diseases potentially resulting in misdiagnosis, diagnostic delay and reduced patient outcome. The investigators recently reported a median duration of neurological symptoms before first hospital contact of 21 days in a Danish nationwide prospective cohort study of 194 LNB patients included between 2015-2018. Currently, the only way to monitor disease activity - although not ideal - is to to perform a re-lumbar puncture, which is an invasive procedure, not always possible or successful and with risk of post lumbar puncture headache which develops in 10-20% of the patients.

Improving diagnosis, ideally non-invasively, is therefore of great interest and new methods to confirm active disease and monitor the effect of treatment an important field of research which might promote a shift from empirical treatment to personalized medicine with expected improvement in patient outcome.

Non-invasive imaging seems an obvious solution. The investigators have retrospectively studied the value of CT and MRI in diagnosis of LNB and found no value of computerized tomography (CT)-head and limited value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-Brain/Spine. Regarding use of positron emission tomography (PET) the most commonly used ligand for infection and inflammation imaging is the radiolabeled glucose analogue, fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG). However, 18F-FDG has major limitations including low specificity, as it is taken up by any cell with increased glucose metabolism including but not restricted to leukocytes, macrophages, monocytes, lymphocytes and giant cells. In addition, as the normal brain has high glucose consumption, it is difficult (impossible) to obtain sufficient contrast in LNB as inflammation is primarily in the meninges. Indeed, the investigators have confirmed from cases of LNB that had 18F-FDG-PET could not be used. Due to these limitations, there is an unmet need for other, more specific, targeted radioligands to improve imaging of infectious diseases e.g. LNB and the adjacent inflammatory response.

Macrophages is a potential and promising target for the diagnosing of more specific infections and in particular LNB. Macrophages have anti-inflammatory properties with high phagocytic activity, and they are not only involved in the early immune response but present as long as the infection is active. Macrophage activation can be monitored by the circulating biomarker soluble CD163, the intrathecal inflammation in LNB does not lead to any or only very subtle peripheral measurable changes of normal infectious parameters even with highly active but localized infection as in LNB. As activated macrophages overexpresses somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (sstr2), the activity of macrophages can be visualized by PET imaging targeting sstr2 using the ligand 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N'',N'''-tetraacetic acid]-d-Phe1,Tyr3-octreotate (DOTATATE). At Rigshospitalet the investigators recently developed 64Cu-DOTATATE with a physical half-life of 12.7 hours (vs. 1 hour) and a 4-fold better theoretical (positron range) spatial resolution compared to existing 68Ga-labeled tracers. These characteristics are a prerequisite. Accordingly, the investigators found in a pre-clinical trial that 64Cu-DOTATATE was able to non-invasively detect and monitor Lyme borreliosis in a murine model of Lyme arthritis and that delayed imaging, later than 3 h and ideally 24 h post injection, was necessary to obtain good target-to-background ratios in images of Bb infection.

In humans, the investigators previously demonstrated that 64Cu-DOTATATE-PET could visualize macrophages in vivo in atherosclerotic, carotid plaques prior to endarterectomy. Gene expression analysis on the excised plagues demonstrated at close correlation between CD163 gene expression and PET tracer uptake confirming that it was indeed macrophages that were visualized.

In this prospective, observational cohort study with 64Cu-DOTATATE, the investigators wish to include a total of 50 patients clinically suspected of LNB. The investigators will investigate the diagnostic value of 64Cu-DOTATATE-PET comparing clinically suspected and CSF verified LNB patients with clinically suspected patients without CSF verification. The investigators further wish to explore if the biomarkers sCD163, NfL, and Tau may contribute to the diagnostics of LNB, and if 64Cu-DOTATATE PE/CT/MRI have a prognostic value by including a follow-up visit 6 months after treatment, comparing patients with persistent symptoms to patients without persistent symptoms. The investigators hypothesize that the information obtained from 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT/MRI and the biomarkers sCD163 and NfL can improve the diagnostics of LNB. The investigators also hypothesize that 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT/MRI will be able to contribute to the follow-up of patients by adding prognostic information and the risk of persistent symptoms. The application of 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT/MRI in the diagnostic work-up of LNB would thus expectedly lead to a more precise diagnosis and risk assessment.

Being tested
Cu DOTATATE PET
Keywords
borrelia burgdorferi, Neuroborreliosis, Dotatate PET
Medical subject headings
Lyme Neuroborreliosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cu DOTATATE PETDiagnostic test

    The primary endpoint of the study is diagnostic performance for detecting LNB by 64Cu-DOTATATE-PET/CT/MRI measured as the difference in uptake between patients with definite LNB and patients without LNB. The primary read-out from 64Cu-DOTATATE-PET/CT/MRI is SUV in CNS and reference organs

Study groups in NCT06392815
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
NeuroborreliosisOther25 patients with possible or confirmed neuroborreliosis
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Cu DOTATATE PET
controlsOther25 patients investigated for neuroborreliosis but with normal CSF examination
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Cu DOTATATE PET

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Primary

    Sensitivity and specificity of 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT/MR for detection of LNB in patients clinically suspected of LNB using CSF as reference

    Measured: 2,5 years

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Secondary

    Correlation between responders vs. non-responders on 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT/MR and outcome at 6 months measured according to 36-item short form survey (SF-36) score and multidimensional fatigue inventoryscore (MFI-20 score). The SF-36 is a set of self reported quality of life measures.Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing better health status. MFI-20 The MFI is a 20-item self-report instrument designed to measure fatigue.Subscale scores (range 4-20) are calculated as the sum of item ratings and a total fatigue score (range 20-100) is calculated as the sum of subscale scores. Higher scores indicate a higher level of fatigue.

    Measured: 2,5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Apr 2024
  2. Study start20 May 2024 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Mar 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06392815
Sponsor's protocol ID
RH8622
Acronym
DOTA-LYME
Status last verified
May 2024
First submitted
25 Apr 2024
Last updated
21 May 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cu DOTATATE PET in people with Borrelia Burgdorferi Neuroborreliosis, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Anne-Mette Lebech (+4535458622, Anne-Mette.lebech@regionh.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Primary (time frame: 2,5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 May 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in