AzTrials
AzTrials

Heart Valve DiseaseCDSS-ValveNCT06392464

Validation of Naevia Medical in Valvulopathies

An observational study of Heart Valve Disease, run by Dilemma Solutions S.L. at 1 site in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study aims to validate naevia medical, a knowledge-based clinical decision support system (CDSS), for clinical benefit and safety in cases of cardiac valvulopathies. Using a series of retrospective clinical cases of heart valve disease, the research will evaluate the number of appropriate and inappropriate… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
Heart Valve Disease
What is being tested?
Clinical decision support system (software)
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
106 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
27 Mar 2024to 24 Jan 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients evaluated in the outpatient clinic affected by heart valve disease

Who may be able to join

  • Patients randomly selected from those presented during the year 2022 in medical-surgical sessions, with a primary diagnosis of:
  • aortic valve stenosis
  • aortic insufficiency
  • mitral valve stenosis
  • mitral insufficiency (greater than moderate severity)..
  • Patients randomly selected from valvulopathy clinic records attended during the year 2022, with a primary diagnosis of
Show all 10Show fewer
  • aortic valve stenosis
  • aortic insufficiency
  • mitral valve stenosis
  • mitral insufficiency (greater than moderate severity)

Who cannot join

  • Subjects under 18 years old.
  • Inability to anonymize the case.
  • Clinical cases of valvulopathies in which a complex congenital heart disease coexists.
  • Clinical cases that do not meet the minimum data set necessary for decision-making.
  • Clinical cases with a primary diagnosis other than valvulopathy.
  • Presence of bacterial endocarditis

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, 15701

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Clinical Validation Study of Naevia Medical, a Clinical Decision Support System, in Heart Valve Disease

The study aims to validate naevia medical, a knowledge-based clinical decision support system (CDSS), for clinical benefit and safety in cases of cardiac valvulopathies. Using a series of retrospective clinical cases of heart valve disease, the research will evaluate the number of appropriate and inappropriate recommendations during baseline measurement (conventional management) and after CDSS activation.

Read the detailed description

The objective of this study is to validate both the clinical benefit and safety of a knowledge-based clinical decision support system (CDSS), naevia medical, applied to clinical cases of cardiac valvulopathies.

naevia medical aims to bridge the gap between scientific evidence and medical practice by improving adherence to scientific recommendations.

The research aims to establish and verify that the naevia medical product is suitable for its intended purposes and provides the specified intended functionality as outlined by its manufacturer under normal conditions of use. It seeks to verify the clinical benefits of the product compared to conventional management by enhancing healthcare professionals' ability to provide a greater number of scientifically based recommendations tailored to each patient's specific situation. Additionally, the study aims to establish the clinical safety of the product by identifying potential undesirable side effects under normal usage conditions and evaluating whether these effects constitute acceptable risks in relation to the benefits provided.

To achieve these objectives, a clinical research study will be conducted to assess naevia medical's capacity to increase appropriate recommendations and decrease inappropriate recommendations received by patients with valvulopathy, compared to conventional management without support.

The study proposes a pre-test-post-test design with a randomly assigned group, utilizing a longitudinal approach with repeated measures and retrospective validation. Evaluation criteria will focus on the number of appropriate and inappropriate recommendations during baseline measurement (conventional management) and after CDSS activation, using a series of retrospective clinical cases of heart valve disease.

Being tested
Clinical decision support system (software)
Keywords
clinical decision support system, artificial intelligence, cdss
Medical subject headings
Heart Valve Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Clinical decision support system (software)Device

    Use of a clinical decision support system. "Naevia Medical" is clinical decision support software (CDSS) that, based on clinical input data (patient history, symptoms, complementary test data, etc.) from adult patients with heart disease, provides healthcare professionals with prioritized, justified, and referenced recommendations and knowledge-related suggestions related to diagnosis, prognosis, and/or treatment (recommended tests, medications, alerts, etc.)

Study groups in NCT06392464
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients with heart valve diseaseThe same group of patients is evaluated with a pre-test-post-test design with a randomly assigned group, utilizing a longitudinal approach with repeated measures and retrospective validation.
Receives: Device: Clinical decision support system (software)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Relevant Appropriate Recommendations

    Number of relevant appropriate recommendations. Only high-level recommendations (class I and IIa) were included and evaluated in the study.

    Measured: 1 week

  2. Number of Inappropriate Recommendations

    Number of inappropriate recommendations (that do not apply to the specific case)

    Measured: 1 week

  3. Number of Relevant Missing Recommendations

    Number of relevant missing recommendations. Only high-level recommendations (class I and IIa) were included and evaluated in the study.

    Measured: 1 week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Apr 2024
  2. Study start27 Mar 2024
  3. Primary completion24 Jan 2025
  4. Study completion24 Jan 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
106 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06392464
Sponsor's protocol ID
2024/104
Acronym
CDSS-Valve
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
26 Apr 2024
Last updated
31 Dec 2025
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Heart Valve Disease, run by Dilemma Solutions S.L. at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 31 Dec 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Relevant Appropriate Recommendations (time frame: 1 week). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Dec 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in