TeamworkFEARLESS_ICUNCT06389773
Teamwork for Resilient Staff and Safe Care in ICU
An observational study of Teamwork, run by King's College London at 3 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The goal of this ethnographic study is to observe how healthcare professionals work together in an intensive care unit (ICU). The main questions it aims to answer are How do healthcare staff work together in everyday ICU settings? What helps people work together in ICUs? What challenges do staff face in working… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Teamwork
- How many people
- 75 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 21 Mar 2025to 31 Jul 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: healthcare professionals working in a selected intensive care unit
Who may be able to join
- healthcare professionals
- work in an intensive care unit
- work in a selected case study site
Who cannot join
- not a healthcare professional (e.g. patients and their families)
- not working in an intensive care unit
- not working in a selected case study site
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United Kingdom3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Recruiting
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Harefield
Laura Barker, 01895-823737 Ext 83730, L.Barker2@rbht.nhs.uk
Andreas Xyrichis, andreas.xyrichis@kcl.ac.uk
- Recruiting
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Southampton
Donna Rawlings, 02381 206401, Donna.Rawlings@uhs.nhs.uk
Andreas Xyrichis, andreas.xyrichis@kcl.ac.uk
- Recruiting
Somerset NHS Foundation Trust
Yeovil
Cecilia Cole, Cecilia.Cole@SomersetFT.nhs.uk
Andreas Xyrichis, andreas.xyrichis@kcl.ac.uk
About this study
Official title: Fostering Teamwork for Resilient Staff and Safe Care: Driving Post-pandemic Recovery and Renewal in Intensive Care Units
The goal of this ethnographic study is to observe how healthcare professionals work together in an intensive care unit (ICU). The main questions it aims to answer are
- How do healthcare staff work together in everyday ICU settings?
- What helps people work together in ICUs?
- What challenges do staff face in working together in ICUs?
- How have teamwork practices changed since the COVID-19 pandemic?
Researchers will shadow staff during their day-to-day work. Key staff members will also be interviewed about their perceptions and experiences of teamwork.
Read the detailed description
Teamwork impacts staff wellbeing and patient outcomes. This study focuses on the factors that facilitate or challenge teamworking practices in ICUs. A rapid ethnographic approach, including observation and interviews, ensures that what people say they do and what they actually do match up in practice. This project has two interrelated components: observation and one-on-one interviews.
Observations: A researcher will shadow various healthcare professionals in 10 different ICU units. These observations will cover multiple professions and different shift patterns, including handovers, ward rounds, and multi-disciplinary team meetings. This allows for a range of interactions to be covered which will elucidate how healthcare professionals work together. Written consent will be obtained from each healthcare professional shadowed, and researchers will observe in 20-minute blocks where possible to minimize burden. Researchers will record their observations in the form of fieldnotes which will be either hand-written or recorded on a dedicated iPad. Fieldnotes will later be expanded on, typed up, and pseudonymized. During this observation period, researchers may engage in informal discussions with healthcare professionals to clarify what they observe where appropriate though these will not be audio recorded. Additionally, while patients and their family members will provide verbal consent where possible for the researcher to be present in the room or at the bedside, data will not be collected on them.
All three members of the research team will visit each site; however, one researcher will remain at the site for the duration of the research period. Each site will incur a minimum of 75 observation hours over the course of four weeks.
Interviews: To supplement the observations, researchers will conduct one-on-one semi-structured interviews with key healthcare professionals in each study site. Initially, these individuals will be identified and approached by the researcher during the observation phase. Researchers will then employ a snowball method to identify further potential healthcare professionals to include. At least 15 healthcare professionals per site will be interviewed for this study. All healthcare professionals will provide their written consent for the interview.
Data analysis: All formal interview audio recordings will be recorded using a Dictaphone voice recorder with the participant's consent. These recordings will be transcribed using a King's College London approved transcription service and anonymised. Thematic analysis will be conducted to identify recurring themes (Braun and Clarke, 2006). The transcripts will be read and reread for familiarization before coding the data. During the coding process, a code book will be created with a list of codes and descriptions to accompany. To validate the coding, each researcher will code a small, random selection of the transcripts using the code book. Coding will be discussed to reach an agreement. Field notes obtained through observation will be spoken aloud by the researcher using a Dictaphone voice recorder and sent to the transcription service. The transcripts will be anonymized and uploaded to NVivo to be thematically analysed. The analysis will focus on answering the research questions, using constructs from the conceptual frameworks to sensitize the analysis.
- Conditions
- Teamwork
- Keywords
- wellbeing, intensive care, patient safety
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Examine the changing nature of teamwork in ICUs in the post-pandemic context
Ethnographic data, including observational notes and interview transcripts will be collected and analysed using thematic analysis.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Apr 2024
- Study start21 Mar 2025
- Primary completion31 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Jul 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for TeamworkStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by King's College LondonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Other
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- King's College London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06389773
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 302958
- Acronym
- FEARLESS_ICU
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 25 Apr 2024
- Last updated
- 5 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Due to the ethnographic nature of the data collection, it will not be possible to make individual participant data available to other researchers.
Publications
Xyrichis A, Rose L. Interprofessional collaboration in the intensive care unit: Power sharing is key (but are we up to it?). Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2024 Feb;80:103536. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2023.103536. Epub 2023 Sep 30. No abstract available.
PubMed 37783179
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Fostering Teamwork for Resilient Staff and Safe Care: Driving Post-pandemic Recovery and Renewal in Intensive Care Units
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06389773
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FEARLESS_ICU / 302958
- Conditions
- Teamwork
- Keywords
- wellbeing, intensive care, patient safety
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- King's College LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 21 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this ethnographic study is to observe how healthcare professionals work together in an intensive care unit (ICU). The main questions it aims to answer are
- How do healthcare staff work together in everyday ICU settings?
- What helps people work together in ICUs?
- What challenges do staff face in working together in ICUs?
- How have teamwork practices changed since the COVID-19 pandemic?
Researchers will shadow staff during their day-to-day work. Key staff members will also be interviewed about their perceptions and experiences of teamwork.
Detailed description
Teamwork impacts staff wellbeing and patient outcomes. This study focuses on the factors that facilitate or challenge teamworking practices in ICUs. A rapid ethnographic approach, including observation and interviews, ensures that what people say they do and what they actually do match up in practice. This project has two interrelated components: observation and one-on-one interviews.
Observations: A researcher will shadow various healthcare professionals in 10 different ICU units. These observations will cover multiple professions and different shift patterns, including handovers, ward rounds, and multi-disciplinary team meetings. This allows for a range of interactions to be covered which will elucidate how healthcare professionals work together. Written consent will be obtained from each healthcare professional shadowed, and researchers will observe in 20-minute blocks where possible to minimize burden. Researchers will record their observations in the form of fieldnotes which will be either hand-written or recorded on a dedicated iPad. Fieldnotes will later be expanded on, typed up, and pseudonymized. During this observation period, researchers may engage in informal discussions with healthcare professionals to clarify what they observe where appropriate though these will not be audio recorded. Additionally, while patients and their family members will provide verbal consent where possible for the researcher to be present in the room or at the bedside, data will not be collected on them.
All three members of the research team will visit each site; however, one researcher will remain at the site for the duration of the research period. Each site will incur a minimum of 75 observation hours over the course of four weeks.
Interviews: To supplement the observations, researchers will conduct one-on-one semi-structured interviews with key healthcare professionals in each study site. Initially, these individuals will be identified and approached by the researcher during the observation phase. Researchers will then employ a snowball method to identify further potential healthcare professionals to include. At least 15 healthcare professionals per site will be interviewed for this study. All healthcare professionals will provide their written consent for the interview.
Data analysis: All formal interview audio recordings will be recorded using a Dictaphone voice recorder with the participant's consent. These recordings will be transcribed using a King's College London approved transcription service and anonymised. Thematic analysis will be conducted to identify recurring themes (Braun and Clarke, 2006). The transcripts will be read and reread for familiarization before coding the data. During the coding process, a code book will be created with a list of codes and descriptions to accompany. To validate the coding, each researcher will code a small, random selection of the transcripts using the code book. Coding will be discussed to reach an agreement. Field notes obtained through observation will be spoken aloud by the researcher using a Dictaphone voice recorder and sent to the transcription service. The transcripts will be anonymized and uploaded to NVivo to be thematically analysed. The analysis will focus on answering the research questions, using constructs from the conceptual frameworks to sensitize the analysis.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Other
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- healthcare professionals working in a selected intensive care unit
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- healthcare professionals
- work in an intensive care unit
- work in a selected case study site
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- not a healthcare professional (e.g. patients and their families)
- not working in an intensive care unit
- not working in a selected case study site
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Examine the changing nature of teamwork in ICUs in the post-pandemic context
Time frame: 12 months
Ethnographic data, including observational notes and interview transcripts will be collected and analysed using thematic analysis.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Aug 2026.
- Background: PubMed 37783179Xyrichis A, Rose L. Interprofessional collaboration in the intensive care unit: Power sharing is key (but are we up to it?). Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2024 Feb;80:103536. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2023.103536. Epub 2023 Sep 30. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Due to the ethnographic nature of the data collection, it will not be possible to make individual participant data available to other researchers.
Related trials for Teamwork
RecruitingObservational study
Operating-Room Distractions, Surgeon Workload, Anxiety, Teamwork and Intraoperative Adverse Events (ORCHESTRA)
Colorectal Diseases, Anal Diseases
Active, not recruiting
The Patient and Family Centered I-PASS LISTEN Study: Language, Inclusion, Safety, and Teamwork for Equity Now
Communication
Active, not recruiting
Teamwork, Targets, Technology, and Tight Control in Newly Diagnosed Pediatric T1D - 4T Study
Type1diabetes
Recruiting
Achieving Diagnostic Excellence Through Prevention and Teamwork
Diagnostic Errors
Recruiting
Pain Management Teams Using Whole Health to Optimize Function and Safety in Veterans: The TEAMWORK Trial
Chronic Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Teamwork, run by King's College London at 3 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Andreas Xyrichis, PhD (+442078483649, andreas.xyrichis@kcl.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Examine the changing nature of teamwork in ICUs in the post-pandemic context (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06389773, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Aug 2026.