AzTrials
AzTrials

Atrial FibrillationDIPENCT06381245

First-time Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Registry

An observational study of Atrial Fibrillation and Arrhythmia, run by Medical University of Warsaw at 1 site in Poland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent cardiac arrhythmia affecting millions globally, with projections indicating a doubling of cases by 2050. AF is linked to heightened cardiovascular risks like stroke and increased healthcare costs. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Atrial Fibrillation, Arrhythmia
What is being tested?
PPG-based remote heart rhythm/rate monitoring, ECG-based remote heart rhythm/rate monitoring and Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography examination
How many people
340 participants
Where
1 sitePoland
Study dates
1 Dec 2023to 30 Apr 2026
How long will I take part?
12 Months
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients undergoing first-time ablation (radiofrequency or pulsed field)

Who may be able to join

  • paroxysmal or persistent AF
  • first-time ablation of AF

Who cannot join

  • patients unable to give informed consent
  • serious health condition existing before ablation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Poland1 site
  • Medical University of Warsaw

    Warsaw

Other trials in Poland

About this study

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent cardiac arrhythmia affecting millions globally, with projections indicating a doubling of cases by 2050. AF is linked to heightened cardiovascular risks like stroke and increased healthcare costs. Ablation, targeting the arrhythmia substrate, is a method to manage AF, yet recurrence rates remain high (20-45% in the first year). Studies highlight the impact of comorbidities, AF characteristics, ablation techniques, and myocardial remodeling markers on AF progression and ablation efficacy. However, there's no definitive guidance on selecting these factors for predicting treatment success.

The aim of this study is to investigate predictors of successful AF ablation in the following areas: (a) clinical factors, (b) electrophysiological, (c) electrocardiographic, (d) ultrasound, (e) cardiac anatomy, (f) biomarkers.

Read the detailed description

AF is a multifactorial disease influenced by many possible mechanisms. This study will examine several different predictors of successful AF ablation: (a) clinical factors, (b) electrophysiological, (c) electrocardiographic, (d) ultrasound, (e) cardiac anatomy, (f) biomarkers. Analysis of these factors will help determine the optimal combination of predictors of successful ablation. This combination of prognostic factors can then be used to tailor therapeutic decisions specifically to individual patients and to improve patient selection for invasive treatment. Better patient selection and choice of ablation type can help increase success rates and avoid unnecessary procedures and their associated risks.

Being tested
PPG-based remote heart rhythm/rate monitoring, ECG-based remote heart rhythm/rate monitoring, Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography examination, Liver ultrasound examination, Rotational angiography with three-dimensional reconstruction
Keywords
Atrial fibrillation, Arrhythmia, Pulsed field ablation, Radiofrequency ablation, Catheter ablation, Prediction, Detection, Mobile Health, Telemedicine
Medical subject headings
Atrial Fibrillation, Arrhythmias, Cardiac

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PPG-based remote heart rhythm/rate monitoringDiagnostic test

    PPG-based remote heart rhythm/rate monitoring

  • ECG-based remote heart rhythm/rate monitoringDiagnostic test

    ECG-based remote heart rhythm/rate monitoring

  • Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography examinationDiagnostic test

    Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography examination

  • Liver ultrasound examinationDiagnostic test

    Liver ultrasound examination

  • Rotational angiography with three-dimensional reconstructionDiagnostic test

    Rotational angiography with three-dimensional reconstruction

  • Blood-derived biomarker analysisDiagnostic test

    Blood-derived biomarker analysis

  • Mobile health-based spirometryDiagnostic test

    Mobile health-based spirometry

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Late AF recurrence

    Late AF recurrence

    Measured: 3-12 months after ablation

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Late recurrence of AF or atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter

    Late recurrence of AF or atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter

    Measured: 3-12 months after ablation

  2. Early recurrence of AF

    Early recurrence of AF

    Measured: <3 months after ablation

  3. Early recurrence of AF or atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter

    Early recurrence of AF or atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter

    Measured: <3 months after ablation

  4. Time to AF recurrence and the impact of early recurrence on late AF recurrence

    Time to AF recurrence and the impact of early recurrence on late AF recurrence

    Measured: <3 and 3-12 months after ablation

  5. The superiority of monitoring using mobile health devices over traditional heart rhythm monitoring

    The superiority of monitoring using mobile health devices over traditional heart rhythm monitoring

    Measured: 3 months after ablation

  6. Progression or regression of AF

    Progression of AF (from paroxysmal to persistent or persistent to permanent) or regression of AF (from persistent to paroxysmal)

    Measured: 3-12 months after ablation

  7. Modification of treatment, including antiarrhythmic treatment

    Modification of treatment, including antiarrhythmic treatment

    Measured: 3-12 months after ablation

  8. AF-related quality of life and symptoms

    AF-related quality of life and symptoms

    Measured: Before, 3 and 12 months after ablation

  9. Periprocedural complications

    Periprocedural complications (e.g. cardiac tamponade, vascular complications, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, stroke, transient ischemic attack)

    Measured: Around ablation

  10. Heart rate variability and rate

    Heart rate variability and rate

    Measured: <3 months after ablation

  11. Blood biomarker levels

    Blood biomarker levels

    Measured: Before, 3 and 12 months after ablation

  12. Ablation procedure parameters

    Ablation procedure parameters (e.g. ablation time, procedure time, number of applications, amount of painkillers used)

    Measured: At ablation

  13. Cardiac remodelling

    Cardiac remodelling based on transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography parameters

    Measured: Before, 3 and 12 months after ablation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Apr 2024
  2. Study start1 Dec 2023
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2026
  4. Study completion30 Apr 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
340 participants (actual)
Target duration
12 Months
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06381245
Sponsor's protocol ID
KB/265/2023
Acronym
DIPE
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
18 Apr 2024
Last updated
23 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Krzowski B, Jablonska M, Gawlik M, Zaborska-Dworak M, Gawalko M, Marchel M, Lodzinski P, Balsam P, Grabowski M, Peller M. Perioperative parameters and myocardial necrosis: a real-world comparison of Farapulse and Varipulse. Cardiol J. 2026;33:e00226036. doi: 10.5603/cj.106769.

    PubMed 41972517

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Atrial Fibrillation and Arrhythmia, run by Medical University of Warsaw at 1 site in Poland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Late AF recurrence (time frame: 3-12 months after ablation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06381245, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in