High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (High-risk PCI)REC-CHIPMCSNCT06373120
Interventional Ventricular Assist System for PCI in CHIP Patients
A study testing Microaxial flow pump and VA-ECMO in people with High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (High-risk PCI) and Left Ventricular Assist Devices, run by Shenzhen Core Medical Technology CO.,LTD. at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
In patients with complex coronary artery disease (CAD), determining the optimal revascularization strategy (percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains a challenge. These high-risk patients pose an extreme surgical risk. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (High-risk PCI), Left Ventricular Assist Devices
- What is being tested?
- Microaxial flow pump and VA-ECMO
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 262 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 4 Mar 2024to 13 Feb 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 Years to 90 Years
- The Heart Team determined that the patients required coronary artery revascularization, but there is a high risk of CABG or the patients refuses CABG. After evaluation by the Heart Team, it was concluded that the patients can benefit from revascularization by undergoing high risk PCI
- The subject is diagnosed with acute or chronic coronary syndrome, and
- LVEF≤ 35% or
- LVEF ≤ 40% and NYHA Classification is III or IV
- Patients who are able to give informed consent and complete the follow-up
Show all 15Show fewer
- Image inclusion criteria
- At least two vessel chronic total occlusions (CTOs) (diameter of occluded artery ≥ 2.5mm)
- Unprotected left main coronary artery disease, and meeting one or more complex PCI maneuver criteria
- Three-vessel disease and meeting two or more complex PCI criteria
- Complex PCI maneuvers are defined as:
- Bifurcation require the treatment of both branches (including stents or PTCA)
- Calcification require Excimer laser coronary atherectomy, intravascular lithotripsy, or rotational atherectomy
- Severe tortuosity
- Target lesion is CTO (diameter of occluded artery ≥ 2.5mm and J-CTO score ≥ 2 points)
Who cannot join
- Had mechanical circulatory support treatment (such as IABP, ECMO, pVAD) before randomization
- Acute myocardial infarction or with thrombolytic treatment within 7 days
- Cardiopulmonary resuscitation within 24 hours
- Cardiogenic shock (systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg for more than 30 minutes or requiring vasoactive drugs to maintain systolic blood pressure above 90 mmHg) or hemodynamically unstable
- pVAD and ECMO cannot be inserted or contraindicated (including but not limited to left ventricular mural thrombus, artificial aortic valve or cardiac contraction device, moderate to severe aortic stenosis, moderate to severe aortic valve insufficiency, peripheral stents, tortuosity, dissection and other severe vascular diseases obstructing the insertion of the study device, aortic dissection, aneurysm or severe abnormalities of the ascending aorta and/or aortic arch, red blood cell fragility or blood disorders, hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy)
- Abnormal coagulation function (routine blood test indicates platelet count less than 50×109/L, or more than 700×109/L)
Show all 18Show fewer
- Active visceral bleeding occurred within 1 month
- Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke occurred within 1 month
- Known contraindication to antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications
- Known contraindication to medications such as Heparin or contrast.
- Need for dialysis treatment
- Active infection
- Expected life span of less than one year
- Patient is a woman who is pregnant or nursing (a pregnancy test must be performed within 7 days prior to the index procedure in women of child-bearing potential according to local practice)
- Currently participating in another trial and not yet at its primary endpoint
- Severe pulmonary arterial hypertension
- Severe right heart failure or severe tricuspid regurgitation
- Unforeseen circumstances that the researcher has deemed to be inappropriate
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Interventional Ventricular Assist System for PCI in Complicated and High-risk Patient: a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Trial
In patients with complex coronary artery disease (CAD), determining the optimal revascularization strategy (percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains a challenge. These high-risk patients pose an extreme surgical risk. However, with the development of new interventional techniques and materials, PCI is a good alternative to CABG and is referred to as complex high-risk indicated PCI (CHIP).
During CHIP, hemodynamics can deteriorate because of temporary complete coronary occlusion or profound myocardial ischemia. This could result in loss of cardiac output and hemodynamics collapse. Mechanical support during CHIP facilitates native cardiac function by achieving a stable hemodynamic state to withstand repetitive derangements such as ischemia caused by prolonged and repeated balloon inflations, and resume original cardiac function immediately postprocedure or shortly thereafter.
Read more
There are several mechanical circulatory support (MCS) systems available, i.e., intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP), Impella, TandemHeart, and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). These MCS have been widely studied in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by cardiogenic shock and showed conflicting results. However, studies regarding the use of MCS in the setting of CHIP are much less abundant and no randomized study has compared Impella with VA-ECMO in CHIP patients.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of interventional ventricular assist system (CorVad) compared to the venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) system in providing circulatory support for complicated and high-risk patient with indications for PCI.
- Conditions
- High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (High-risk PCI), Left Ventricular Assist Devices
- Being tested
- Microaxial flow pump, VA-ECMO
- Keywords
- Microaxial flow pump, ECMO, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, left ventricular assist devices
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Microaxial flow pumpDevice
The microaxial flow pump (The CorVad percutaneous ventricular assist system device) is a microaxial rotary blood pump that expels blood from the left ventricle into the ascending aorta, thus unloading the left ventricle. The CorVad system device can be introduced through a femoral percutaneous approach (14Fr) and can deliver an output of up to 4-6 L/min.
VA-ECMODevice
Veno-arterial extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is a device originally created to replace heart and lung function. Venous deoxygenated blood is mechanically suctioned from a large central vein through a venous cannula by a centrifugal pump. It is then oxygenated, warmed, and restored into systemic circulation through an arterial cannula.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Microaxial flow pump | Experimental | The microaxial flow pump (The CorVad percutaneous ventricular assist system) will offer intraoperative hemodynamic support during high-risk PCI procedures. Receives: Device: Microaxial flow pump |
| VA-ECMO | Active comparator | The VA-ECMO offers intraoperative hemodynamic support during high-risk PCI procedures. Receives: Device: VA-ECMO |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Major adverse event
Major adverse event is a composite endpoint, defined as all-cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction, revascularization, cardiovascular hospitalization, MCS-ARC defined bleeding types 3, 4, or 5, acute kidney injury, serious device-related adverse events, cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Measured: 1 month
Secondary outcomes (17)
All-cause death
Measured: 1, 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months
Stroke
Measured: 1, 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months
Myocardial infarction
Measured: 1, 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months
Revascularization
Measured: 1, 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months
Cardiovascular hospitalization
Rehospitalization due to cardiovascular reasons
Measured: 1, 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months
MCS-ARC defined type 3, 4, 5 bleeding
Bleeding is defined by the "Updated definitions of adverse events for trials and registries of mechanical circulatory support: A consensus statement of the mechanical circulatory support academic research consortium" (MRC-ARC)
Measured: 1 month
Acute kidney injury
Measured: 1 month
Serious device-related adverse events
Including but not limited to cardiac structural impairment, severe limb ischemia (pale, pulseless, and necrotic), infection, aortic and aortic valve impairment, hemolysis, peri-procedural complications that cause death, permanent/severe disability to the subject, or significantly prolonged hospital stay or need for surgical intervention
Measured: 1 month
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Measured: 1 month
Hospitalization time
Measured: 1 month
Intensive care unit (ICU/CCU) stay time
Measured: 1 month
ECMO/Corvad utilization time
Measured: 1 month
Hemodynamic disorder
Hemodynamic disorder is defined as average arterial pressure (MAP) below 60 mmHg for more than 10 minutes with the requirement of additional vasoactive medications
Measured: 1 month
Transfusion rate
Transfusion rate is defined as patients who had transfusion / all enrolled patients.
Measured: 1 month
Units of transfusion
Measured: 1 month
Major adverse event
Major adverse event is a composite endpoint, defined as all-cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction, revascularization, cardiovascular hospitalization, MCS-ARC defined bleeding types 3, 4, or 5, acute kidney injury, serious device-related adverse events, cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Measured: 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months
Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events
Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events is a composite endpoint, defined as all-cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction, revascularization, cardiovascular hospitalization
Measured: 1, 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Apr 2024
- Study start4 Mar 2024
- Primary completion13 Feb 2025
- Study completion13 Feb 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (High-risk PCI)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Prospective, 1:1 randomized, controlled, multicenter trial to assess effectiveness and safety of CorVad compared to VA-ECMO in complicated and high-risk patient with indications for PCI
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 262 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shenzhen Core Medical Technology CO.,LTD.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ling Tao, M.D., Ph.D., Study chair, Xijing HospitalChao Gao, M.D., Ph.D., Study chair, Xijing Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06373120
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- QX20231057-X-1
- Acronym
- REC-CHIPMCS
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 11 Mar 2024
- Last updated
- 12 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Interventional Ventricular Assist System for PCI in Complicated and High-risk Patient: a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06373120
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REC-CHIPMCS / QX20231057-X-1
- Conditions
- High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (High-risk PCI), Left Ventricular Assist Devices
- Keywords
- Microaxial flow pump, ECMO, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, left ventricular assist devices
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 262 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Shenzhen Core Medical Technology CO.,LTD.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 4 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 13 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 13 Feb 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In patients with complex coronary artery disease (CAD), determining the optimal revascularization strategy (percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains a challenge. These high-risk patients pose an extreme surgical risk. However, with the development of new interventional techniques and materials, PCI is a good alternative to CABG and is referred to as complex high-risk indicated PCI (CHIP).
During CHIP, hemodynamics can deteriorate because of temporary complete coronary occlusion or profound myocardial ischemia. This could result in loss of cardiac output and hemodynamics collapse. Mechanical support during CHIP facilitates native cardiac function by achieving a stable hemodynamic state to withstand repetitive derangements such as ischemia caused by prolonged and repeated balloon inflations, and resume original cardiac function immediately postprocedure or shortly thereafter.
There are several mechanical circulatory support (MCS) systems available, i.e., intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP), Impella, TandemHeart, and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). These MCS have been widely studied in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by cardiogenic shock and showed conflicting results. However, studies regarding the use of MCS in the setting of CHIP are much less abundant and no randomized study has compared Impella with VA-ECMO in CHIP patients.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of interventional ventricular assist system (CorVad) compared to the venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) system in providing circulatory support for complicated and high-risk patient with indications for PCI.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Prospective, 1:1 randomized, controlled, multicenter trial to assess effectiveness and safety of CorVad compared to VA-ECMO in complicated and high-risk patient with indications for PCI
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Microaxial flow pump | Experimental | Device: Microaxial flow pumpThe microaxial flow pump (The CorVad percutaneous ventricular assist system) will offer intraoperative hemodynamic support during high-risk PCI procedures. |
| VA-ECMO | Active comparator | Device: VA-ECMOThe VA-ECMO offers intraoperative hemodynamic support during high-risk PCI procedures. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
- 18 Years to 90 Years
- The Heart Team determined that the patients required coronary artery revascularization, but there is a high risk of CABG or the patients refuses CABG. After evaluation by the Heart Team, it was concluded that the patients can benefit from revascularization by undergoing high risk PCI
- The subject is diagnosed with acute or chronic coronary syndrome, and
- Patients who are able to give informed consent and complete the follow-up
- Image inclusion criteria
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Had mechanical circulatory support treatment (such as IABP, ECMO, pVAD) before randomization
- Acute myocardial infarction or with thrombolytic treatment within 7 days
- Cardiopulmonary resuscitation within 24 hours
- Cardiogenic shock (systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg for more than 30 minutes or requiring vasoactive drugs to maintain systolic blood pressure above 90 mmHg) or hemodynamically unstable
- pVAD and ECMO cannot be inserted or contraindicated (including but not limited to left ventricular mural thrombus, artificial aortic valve or cardiac contraction device, moderate to severe aortic stenosis, moderate to severe aortic valve insufficiency, peripheral stents, tortuosity, dissection and other severe vascular diseases obstructing the insertion of the study device, aortic dissection, aneurysm or severe abnormalities of the ascending aorta and/or aortic arch, red blood cell fragility or blood disorders, hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Microaxial flow pumpThe microaxial flow pump (The CorVad percutaneous ventricular assist system device) is a microaxial rotary blood pump that expels blood from the left ventricle into the ascending aorta, thus unloading the left ventricle. The CorVad system device can be introduced through a femoral percutaneous approach (14Fr) and can deliver an output of up to 4-6 L/min. | Device | Microaxial flow pump |
| VA-ECMOVeno-arterial extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is a device originally created to replace heart and lung function. Venous deoxygenated blood is mechanically suctioned from a large central vein through a venous cannula by a centrifugal pump. It is then oxygenated, warmed, and restored into systemic circulation through an arterial cannula. | Device | VA-ECMO |
Primary outcome
Major adverse event
Time frame: 1 month
Major adverse event is a composite endpoint, defined as all-cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction, revascularization, cardiovascular hospitalization, MCS-ARC defined bleeding types 3, 4, or 5, acute kidney injury, serious device-related adverse events, cardiopulmonary resuscitation
17 secondary outcomes
All-cause death
Time frame: 1, 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months
Stroke
Time frame: 1, 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months
Myocardial infarction
Time frame: 1, 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months
Revascularization
Time frame: 1, 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months
Cardiovascular hospitalization
Time frame: 1, 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months
MCS-ARC defined type 3, 4, 5 bleeding
Time frame: 1 month
Acute kidney injury
Time frame: 1 month
Serious device-related adverse events
Time frame: 1 month
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Time frame: 1 month
Hospitalization time
Time frame: 1 month
Intensive care unit (ICU/CCU) stay time
Time frame: 1 month
ECMO/Corvad utilization time
Time frame: 1 month
Hemodynamic disorder
Time frame: 1 month
Transfusion rate
Time frame: 1 month
Units of transfusion
Time frame: 1 month
Major adverse event
Time frame: 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months
Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events
Time frame: 1, 3, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jan 2026.
Related trials for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (High-risk PCI)
Not yet recruiting
Hs-CRP-Guided Colchicine Treatment Targets in Very-High-Risk Patients With Coronary Artery Disease After PCI (TARGET-CHD)
Coronary Artery Disease, Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD)
Recruiting
Pivotal Study of the SUpira System in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous COronaRy InTervention (HRPCI)
Coronary Artery Disease, High Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Recruiting
ELEVATE High-Risk PCI Pivotal Study
High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (High-risk PCI)
RecruitingPhase 4
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Escalation From Standard-dose Clopidogrel to Low-Dose Prasugrel in Patients With High Bleeding and Ischemic Risk Undergoing PCI: A Prospective, Randomized Pharmacodynamic Study (TAILOR-BLEED-2)
Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD), Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)
Active, not recruiting
Impella ECP Early Feasibility Study
High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ling Tao, M.D., Ph.D. study chair
Xijing Hospital
Chao Gao, M.D., Ph.D. study chair
Xijing Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Microaxial flow pump and VA-ECMO in people with High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (High-risk PCI) and Left Ventricular Assist Devices, run by Shenzhen Core Medical Technology CO.,LTD. at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Major adverse event (time frame: 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jan 2026.