AzTrials
AzTrials

Advanced Soft Tissue SarcomaPhase 3NCT06370871

Brightline-3: A Study to Find Out Whether Brigimadlin in Combination With Ezabenlimab Helps People With Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma

A Phase 3 study testing Brigimadlin, Ezabenlimab and Gemcitabine in people with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma and Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma (UPS), run by Boehringer Ingelheim.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is open to adults with specific types of advanced soft tissue sarcoma. People with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) or myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) can join the study if they have a normal version of the TP53 gene. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Brigimadlin, Ezabenlimab and Gemcitabine
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
27 Jun 2024to 13 Oct 2028
Phase
Phase 3

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Provision of signed and dated, written informed consent form (ICF) in accordance with International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use - Good clinical practice (ICH-GCP) and local legislation prior to any trial-specific procedures, sampling, or analyses
  • Male or female patients ≥18 years old at the time of signature of the ICF
  • Histologically proven diagnosis of one of the following:
  • Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) with TP53 wild-type status
  • Myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) with TP53 wild-type status
  • Written pathology report indicating the diagnosis of UPS or MFS must be available
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Written report from the trial central laboratory indicating TP53 wild-type status
  • One prior systemic regimen for advanced disease with documented progressive disease as per serial radiologic imaging. If prior systemic cytotoxic treatment for soft tissue sarcoma was given in a neoadjuvant, adjuvant or perioperative setting that treatment would count as one line of therapy in case of radiological progression during that treatment or within 3 months after completing that systemic therapy. If progression or relapse occurred after >3 months after completing that systemic therapy, the pre-, post or perioperative treatment would not count as a line of treatment for advanced disease
  • Patient must be willing to donate mandatory blood and tissue samples for the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and biomarker analyses
  • Presence of at least one target lesion according to RECIST Version 1.1 Further inclusion criteria apply

Who cannot join

  • Prior treatment with immunotherapy in the context of anticancer therapy
  • Previous administration of gemcitabine, taxanes, brigimadlin or any other mouse double minute 2 homolog-p53 (MDM2-p53) or MDMX (MDM4)-p53 antagonist
  • Previous or concomitant malignancies other than the one treated in this trial within the previous 2 years, except effectively treated non-melanoma skin cancers, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, ductal carcinoma in situ or other malignancy that is considered cured by local treatment
  • Patient unable to swallow the trial medication
  • Any history or presence of uncontrolled gastrointestinal disorders that could affect the intake and/or absorption of the trial drug (e.g., nausea, vomiting, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, chronic diarrhea, malabsorption) in the opinion of the investigator
  • Active bleeding, significant risk of hemorrhage (e.g., previous severe gastrointestinal bleeding, previous hemorrhagic stroke at any time), or current bleeding disorder (e.g., hemophilia, von Willebrand disease)
  • Known history of severe hypersensitivity reactions to other monoclonal antibodies or known hypersensitivity or known contraindication to the trial medications or their excipients
  • Active autoimmune disease or a documented history of autoimmune disease, that requires systemic treatment, i.e., corticosteroids or immunosuppressive drugs, except for vitiligo or resolved childhood asthma/atopy, alopecia, or any chronic skin condition that does not require systemic therapy; patients with autoimmune-related hypothyroidism on a stable dose of thyroid hormone replacement and/or controlled Type 1 diabetes mellitus on a stable insulin regimen are eligible Further exclusion criteria apply

About this study

Official title: Brightline-3: A Phase III, Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center Trial of Brigimadlin + Ezabenlimab Compared to Gemcitabine + Docetaxel for Second-line Treatment of Patients With Advanced TP53 Wild-type Soft Tissue Sarcoma Subtypes

This study is open to adults with specific types of advanced soft tissue sarcoma. People with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) or myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) can join the study if they have a normal version of the TP53 gene. This is a study for people whose earlier treatment isn't working anymore, and their doctors suggest a new treatment to stop the sarcoma from getting worse.

The purpose of this study is to compare a medicine called brigimadlin in combination with another medicine called ezabenlimab with chemotherapy. Brigimadlin is a so-called MDM2-p53 antagonist that is being developed to treat cancer. Ezabenlimab is an antibody that may help the immune system fight cancer.

Read more

Participants are put into 3 groups by chance:

  • Ezabenlimab group: Participants receive ezabenlimab as an infusion into a vein every 3 weeks
  • Brigimadlin + ezabenlimab group: Participants take brigimadlin as tablets and receive ezabenlimab as an infusion into a vein every 3 weeks
  • Chemotherapy group: Participants get chemotherapy as an infusion into a vein on 2 days every 3 weeks. Chemotherapy is a combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel which is often used in the treatment of sarcoma.

There are twice as many participants in the brigimadlin + ezabenlimab group and in the chemotherapy group, compared to those in the ezabenlimab group.

Participants can continue treatment in the study as long as they benefit from it and can tolerate it.

Doctors regularly check the size of the tumor and check whether it has spread to other parts of the body. The doctors also regularly check participants' health and take note of any unwanted effects. Participants in this study use an app on a mobile phone to regularly answer questions about their health and well-being. This is to find out if their quality of life is changing.

Being tested
Brigimadlin, Ezabenlimab, Gemcitabine, Docetaxel
Medical subject headings
Histiocytoma, Malignant Fibrous, Dermatofibrosarcoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BrigimadlinDrug

    Also called BI 907828

    Brigimadlin

  • EzabenlimabDrug

    Also called BI 754091

    Ezabenlimab

  • GemcitabineDrug

    Solution for infusion

  • DocetaxelDrug

    Solution for infusion

Study groups in NCT06370871
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm A: EzabenlimabExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Ezabenlimab
Arm B: Brigimadlin + ezabenlimabExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Brigimadlin; Drug: Ezabenlimab
Arm C: Gemcitabine + docetaxelActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Gemcitabine; Drug: Docetaxel

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Progression-free survival

    Progression-free survival is defined as the time from randomization until the earliest of tumor progression according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1, based on blinded central independent review or death from any cause.

    Measured: up to 4 years.

  2. Overall survival

    Overall survival, defined as the time from randomization until death from any cause.

    Measured: up to 4 years.

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Objective response

    Objective response (OR), defined as a best overall response of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST Version 1.1 (based on central independent review) from the date of randomization until the earliest of disease progression, death, or last evaluable tumor assessment before start of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, loss to follow-up, or withdrawal of consent.

    Measured: up to 4 years.

  2. Duration of objective response

    Duration of objective response (DOR), defined as the time from first documented confirmed OR according to RECIST Version 1.1 until the earliest of disease progression or death among patients with confirmed objective response (based on central independent review).

    Measured: up to 4 years.

  3. Disease control

    Disease control (DC), defined as a best overall response of CR, PR, or stable disease (SD), where best overall response is defined according to RECIST Version 1.1 (based on central independent review).

    Measured: up to 4 years.

  4. Duration of disease control

    Duration of disease control, defined as the time from randomization until the earliest of disease progression according to RECIST Version 1.1 (based on central independent review) or death from any cause among patients with disease control.

    Measured: up to 4 years.

  5. Occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5

    Measured: up to 4 years.

  6. Occurrence of treatment-emergent AEs leading to study drug discontinuation

    Measured: up to 4 years.

  7. Mean change from baseline to Week 12 in the domain fatigue (based on items from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer core quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the EORTC item library)

    Fatigue will be assessed via 8 items. The score of each item ranges from 0-100 with higher scores indicating higher symptomology.

    Measured: At baseline and at Week 12.

  8. Mean change from baseline to Week 12 in the domain fatigability (based on items from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC item library)

    Fatigability will be assessed via 12 items. The score of each item ranges from 0-100 with higher scores indicating higher symptomology.

    Measured: At baseline and at Week 12.

  9. Mean change from baseline to week 12 in the domain physical functioning (based on items from the EORTC QLQ-C30)

    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item cancer-specific instrument that assesses participant reported outcomes (PROs). The gloabl health status and the quality of life are 2 of the 30 items and are scored from 1 (1=very poor) to 7 (7=excellent).

    All other items have 4 possible scores (1= not at all, 2= a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much).

    Measured: At baseline and at Week 12.

  10. Mean change from baseline to week 12 in the domain pain (based on items from the EORTC QLQ-C30)

    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item cancer-specific instrument that assesses participant reported outcomes (PROs). The gloabl health status and the quality of life are 2 of the 30 items and are scored from 1 (1=very poor) to 7 (7=excellent).

    All other items have 4 possible scores (1= not at all, 2= a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much).

    Measured: At baseline and at Week 12.

  11. Mean change from baseline to week 12 in the domain dyspnea (based on items from the EORTC QLQ-C30)

    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item cancer-specific instrument that assesses participant reported outcomes (PROs). The gloabl health status and the quality of life are 2 of the 30 items and are scored from 1 (1=very poor) to 7 (7=excellent).

    All other items have 4 possible scores (1= not at all, 2= a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much).

    Measured: At baseline and at Week 12.

  12. Mean change from baseline to week 12 in the domain global health status / quality of life (based on items from the EORTC QLQ-C30)

    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item cancer-specific instrument that assesses participant reported outcomes (PROs). The gloabl health status and the quality of life are 2 of the 30 items and are scored from 1 (1=very poor) to 7 (7=excellent).

    All other items have 4 possible scores (1= not at all, 2= a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much).

    Measured: At baseline and at Week 12.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Apr 2024
  2. Study start27 Jun 2024 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion3 Jul 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion13 Oct 2028 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Sponsor decision.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06370871
Sponsor's protocol ID
1403-0006
Other IDs
2022-502985-26-00, U1111-1292-9594
Status last verified
Jul 2024
First submitted
15 Apr 2024
Last updated
17 Jul 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Once the criteria in section "Time Frame" are fulfilled, researchers can use the following link https://www.mystudywindow.com/msw/datasharing to request access to the clinical study documents regarding this study, and upon a signed "Document Sharing Agreement". Furthermore, researchers can request access to the clinical study data, for this and other listed studies, after the submission of a research proposal and according to the terms outlined in the website.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in