MyopiaNCT06344429
Stellest Lenses and Low-concentration Atropine Myopia Control Among Children
A study testing Stellest Lenses, Stellest Lenses+0.05% atropine and Single vision Lenses+0.05% atropine in people with Myopia, run by Essilor-Polylite Taiwan Co., Ltd. at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
The prevalence of myopia is increasing globally, especially in Asian countries. 70-80% of the young population suffers from myopia, and almost 20% have high myopia. High myopia can easily lead to blinding diseases, including retinal detachment, macular degeneration, and glaucoma. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 12 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Myopia
- What is being tested?
- Stellest Lenses, Stellest Lenses+0.05% atropine and Single vision Lenses+0.05% atropine
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 20 Aug 2023to 20 Aug 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 12 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Children aged 6~12 year-old.
- Equivalent diopter: -0.75~-4.00 D.
- Astigmatism and anisometropia <2.50 D.
- Best corrected visual acuity of one eye reaches 1.0.
Who cannot join
- Strabismus, amblyopia, and abnormal binocular vision.
- Other eye diseases.
- Have a history of using myopia control products within six months.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Taiwan1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Kaohsiung City, 833401
Pei-Chang Wu
Pei-Chang Wu
About this study
Official title: Exploring the Effects of Treatment With Stellest Lenses and Low-concentration Atropine for Myopia Control Among Children.
The prevalence of myopia is increasing globally, especially in Asian countries. 70-80% of the young population suffers from myopia, and almost 20% have high myopia. High myopia can easily lead to blinding diseases, including retinal detachment, macular degeneration, and glaucoma. In Taiwan, according to a survey by the National Health Administration, the proportion of myopia among Grade 1 students has exceeded 81%.
There are many ways to control myopia progression. High concentrations of atropine have been reported highly effective in the control of the myopia progression. However the accompanied side effects such as photophobia and near blurred vision. Recent research shows that low-concentration atropine can achieve similar control effect and more acceptable with much minimal side effect compared to high concentration of atropine.
Read more
Multiple animal experiments have confirmed that giving retinal myopia defocus signals can effectively decrease the growth of the eye, thereby inhibiting the progression of myopia. Therefore, regarding lens design, myopic defocus does play an important role in myopia control, including orthokeratology lenses, multifocal soft contact lenses, and peripheral defocus lenses.
Stellest, a myopia control lens based on the myopia defocus theory, is equipped with highly aspheric lenslet technology. In a recent study, compared with single vision lenses, Stellest significantly slowed down the myopia progression reaching 67% and retard axial elongation reaching 64% The purpose of this study is to explore the effectiveness of Stellest Lenses in controlling myopia in Taiwanese children and whether Stellest Lenses combined with low-concentration atropine eye drops can increase the effect of myopia control.
Read the detailed description
The prevalence of myopia has been increasing in the world, especially in East Asia. The prevalence of myopia and high myopia is estimated up to 50% and 10% of the global population, respectively in 2050. The social economic burden of this myopia epidemic will increase substantially, because of the risk of myopia-related complications, such as early onset of cataract, glaucoma, myopic macular degeneration and retinal detachment. The use of myopia control interventions in school myopia can help reduce severity of myopia in the further life of this population with potential reduce of the risk of these pathologies.
There are several ways to control school myopia progression. High concentrations of atropine have been reported highly effective in the control of the myopia progression. However the accompanied side effects such as photophobia and near blurred vision. Recent research shows that low-concentration atropine can achieve similar control effect and more acceptable with much minimal side effect compared to high concentration of atropine.
Research in animal models has shown that imposed myopic optical defocus in peripheral retina, the focal plane in front of the retina, has an inhibitory effect on eye growth to stop myopia progression. Recently, it has been reported that spectacle lenses with aspherical lenslets with myopic defocus (Stellest™ lenses) effectively slow myopia progression reaching 67% and retard axial elongation reaching 64% compared with single vision lenes in 1 year study.
The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of the Stellest lenses, 0.05% atropine and combined treatment for the myopia control in Taiwanese children.
Method: This study will be conducted 2 years at the Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan. Children aged 6 to 12 years old with myopic refraction of at least -0.75 D in both eyes, astigmatism of less than -2.5 D, were enrolled in this open label, randomized study. Excluded were those with ocular diseases (e.g., cataract, congenital retinal diseases, amblyopia, and strabismus), previous use of atropine, or orthokeratology lens orother optical methods for myopia control within 6 months, allergy to atropine, or systemic diseases (e.g., endocrine, cardiac, and respiratory diseases). Written informed consent will be obtained from parents or guardians and the participants. The study will be sent to the Ethics Committee of the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and will be registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov Registry, the Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (registration no:). All procedures are conducted according to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.
100 Participants in this study were randomized to receive Stellest lenses spectacle (ST) (N=34), 0.05% atropine with single vision lenses (ASV) (N=33) and combined treatment (STA) (N=33). 0.05% atropine eye drops is dropped once nightly in both eyes in ASV and STA group. The gender and age are balanced across the 3 treatment arms. The trial medications were prepackaged identically with the number of study subjects and the expiration date. Expiry duration for the batch of eye drops was 2 years.
All subjects are recruited and randomized to 3 treatment groups at the baseline visit. Boys and girls are recruited to have a balance in gender. All subjects are then followed up on the same schedule with the same examination protocol: at 2 weeks (monitor visit), 6 months, and 12 months from the baseline visit. The purpose of the monitor visit at 2 weeks was to determine the hyperopic shift, if any, that has been reported in a higher concentration of atropine in the previous studies.
At each visit, distant best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in was assessed by an optic technician using the Landolt C chart and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) by well-trained an study team staff. Near visual acuity was assessed using best-corrected distance spectacle correction with a reduced logMAR reading chart placed at 40 cm under well-lit conditions. The near point of accommodation was measured using a Royal Air Force (RAF) near point rule (Harlow, Essex, UK) with best-corrected distance spectacle correction.
Participants were instructed to move the target inward until the N5 print became slightly blurred and then outward until it just became clear. Accommodation amplitude was calculated as the inverse of the near point of accommodation.
Mesopic pupil size and photopic pupil size were measured. Cycloplegic autorefraction was performed using an autorefractor after the tropicamide regimen, which consisted of at least 3 cycles of eye drops. At the first cycle, 2 separate eye drops, tropicamide 1%, were administered to both eyes at 5 minutes apart. A 2nd and 3rd cycle of the same cycloplegic drops would be administered 10 minutes after the previous cycle. If the pupil size was less than 6.0 mm, further cycles of cycloplegic eye drops would be administered if necessary to ensure the pupils are well dilated. Five readings, all of which had to be less than 0.25 D apart, were obtained and averaged. Spherical equivalent (SE) was calculated as spherical power plus half of the cylinder power. Ocular AL was measured by on noncontact partial coherence interferometry and optic coherencetomography. Five readings, with a maximum-minimum deviation of 0.05 mm or less, were taken and averaged. A diary on the trial medication was kept for each subject. Compliance level of each subject was classified according to the mean number of using atropine per week as reported by participants over the 12 months. Subjects with 75% compliance rate (i.e., a mean of 5.25 days/week) were considered to have good compliance. Subjects were also offered sunwear orsunglasses or (which darken on exposure to ultraviolet or sunlight) if they experienced glare or if their parents were worried of excessive light exposure, or progressive glasses (reading add) if they experienced difficulty with near vision. All subjects were prescribed with best-corrected spectacles.
At the baseline, validated questionnaires on outdoor time and near work were administered to parents. In addition, children wear outdoor time smartwatch for 1 week to evaluation the outdoor time every day in the baseline, 6-month F/U and 12-month F/U. Outdoor activities includes time spent on sports and leisure, whereas near works included time on homework, cell phone, computer, video games, and watching TV. Parental refraction is documented by noncycloplegic autorefraction measurement, for both parents of each child at baseline. At the 12-month follow-up visit, the Chinese version of the 25-Item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire was administered to all subjects to determine the impact of different treatment groups on the vision-related quality of life.
A total of 11 subscales are addressed: general health, general vision, ocular pain, near vision, distance vision, social function, mental health, role limitations, dependency, color vision, and peripheral vision. Driving is excluded.
The primary outcome was myopia progression in terms of SE change over 1 year. Myopia progression in each eye was further categorized as mild (<0.5 D), moderate (0.5-0.99 D), or severe (≥1.0 D). The secondary outcomes included AL change at 1 year. Side effect parameters included changes in accommodation amplitude, mesopic and photopic pupil sizes, and distant BCVA and near visual acuity. All ophthalmic parameters, including SE, AL, accommodation, pupil size, and visual acuity, were monitored from baseline.
During each visit, subjects and parents were given an open-ended opportunity to report any medical illness or adverse events. They were also specifically asked about symptoms related to allergy, blurred near vision, glare, or visual loss, and if subjects had been ill or hospitalized since the previous visit. Adverse events (AEs) will be followed, recorded, and reported in the CRF throughout the entire study and only relevant to spectacle or atropine used signs and symptoms. The investigator will assess the severity (intensity) of each AE as mild, moderate or severe, and will also categorize each AE as to its potential relationship to IP (0.05% atropine or Stellest Lenses) using the categories of yes or no.
An Serious Adverse Events (SAE),an SAE is any event that meets any of the following criteria: Results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/ birth defect, is important medical event. Investigator is obliged to respond and meet strict regulatory and IRB timelines associated with expedited reporting obligations for events of this nature. Relevant SAE reporting and follow up information should be notice sponsor immediately and file it along.
Confidentiality and Data Management All information generated in this study is considered highly confidential and must not be disclosed to any person or entity directly involved with the study unless prior written consent is gained from the sponsor. However, authorized regulatory officials, IRB personnel, the sponsor, and its authorized representatives are allowed full access to the records.
All study subjects and legal representative must be informed that their personal study-related data will be used by the sponsor in accordance with local data protection law and the General Data Protection Regulation. The level of disclosure must also be explained to the subject and legal representative, who will be required to give consent for their data to be used as described in the ICF. The subject and legal representative must be informed that medical records may be examination by auditors or other authorized personnel appointed by the sponsor, by appropriated IRB members, and by inspectors from regulatory authorities.
Identification of subjects and CRFs shall be by unique subject identification numbers only. All personal identifiers according to applicable regulations (eg, number, phone number) must be redacted permanently by the site personnel and replaced with the subject's unique identification member in all records and data before transfer to the sponsor (or designee).
All personnel details will be treated as confidential by the investigator and staff.
Statistical Analysis: All data were analyzed based on the intention-to-treat principle. Change of parameters was defined by the difference between the baseline and the corresponding follow-up values. Chi-square test and Fisher exact test were used to test the group difference in categoric data. Analysis of variance was used to test the group difference of continuous data. SPSS software was used for data analyses. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
- Conditions
- Myopia
- Being tested
- Stellest Lenses, Stellest Lenses+0.05% atropine, Single vision Lenses+0.05% atropine
- Medical subject headings
- Myopia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Stellest LensesDevice
All subjects are recruited and randomized to 3 treatment groups at the baseline visit.
A Group:Stellest Lenses spectacle (ST)
Stellest Lenses+0.05% atropineCombination product
All subjects are recruited and randomized to 3 treatment groups at the baseline visit.
B Group:Combined Treatment
Single vision Lenses+0.05% atropineDrug
All subjects are recruited and randomized to 3 treatment groups at the baseline visit.
C Group:0.05% Atropine with single vision
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Stellest lenses spectacle | Experimental | 34 children wear Stellest lenses for all day. Receives: Device: Stellest Lenses |
| Stellest lenses+0.05% atropine | Experimental | 33 children wear Stellest lenses for all day, and 0.05% atropine eye drops is dropped once nightly in both eyes. Receives: Combination Product: Stellest Lenses+0.05% atropine |
| Single vision lenses+0.05% atropine | Placebo comparator | 33 children wear Single lenses for all day, and 0.05% atropine eye drops is dropped once nightly in both eyes. Receives: Drug: Single vision Lenses+0.05% atropine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Spherical equivalent refraction power
Spherical equivalent (SE) was calculated as spherical power plus half of the cylinder power
Measured: At 2 weeks (monitor visit), 6 months, and 12 months from the baseline visit
Axial length
Ocular AL was measured by on non contact partial coherence interferometry and optic coherence tomography.
Measured: At 2 weeks (monitor visit), 6 months, and 12 months from the baseline visit
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Apr 2024
- Study start20 Aug 2023
- Primary completion20 Aug 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion20 Aug 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for MyopiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Essilor-Polylite Taiwan Co., Ltd.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06344429
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STL_CT_0001
- Status last verified
- Apr 2024
- First submitted
- 20 Mar 2024
- Last updated
- 4 Apr 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Apr 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Exploring the Effects of Treatment With Stellest Lenses and Low-concentration Atropine for Myopia Control Among Children.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06344429
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STL_CT_0001
- Conditions
- Myopia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Essilor-Polylite Taiwan Co., Ltd.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 20 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Aug 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 20 Aug 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The prevalence of myopia is increasing globally, especially in Asian countries. 70-80% of the young population suffers from myopia, and almost 20% have high myopia. High myopia can easily lead to blinding diseases, including retinal detachment, macular degeneration, and glaucoma. In Taiwan, according to a survey by the National Health Administration, the proportion of myopia among Grade 1 students has exceeded 81%.
There are many ways to control myopia progression. High concentrations of atropine have been reported highly effective in the control of the myopia progression. However the accompanied side effects such as photophobia and near blurred vision. Recent research shows that low-concentration atropine can achieve similar control effect and more acceptable with much minimal side effect compared to high concentration of atropine.
Multiple animal experiments have confirmed that giving retinal myopia defocus signals can effectively decrease the growth of the eye, thereby inhibiting the progression of myopia. Therefore, regarding lens design, myopic defocus does play an important role in myopia control, including orthokeratology lenses, multifocal soft contact lenses, and peripheral defocus lenses.
Stellest, a myopia control lens based on the myopia defocus theory, is equipped with highly aspheric lenslet technology. In a recent study, compared with single vision lenses, Stellest significantly slowed down the myopia progression reaching 67% and retard axial elongation reaching 64% The purpose of this study is to explore the effectiveness of Stellest Lenses in controlling myopia in Taiwanese children and whether Stellest Lenses combined with low-concentration atropine eye drops can increase the effect of myopia control.
Detailed description
The prevalence of myopia has been increasing in the world, especially in East Asia. The prevalence of myopia and high myopia is estimated up to 50% and 10% of the global population, respectively in 2050. The social economic burden of this myopia epidemic will increase substantially, because of the risk of myopia-related complications, such as early onset of cataract, glaucoma, myopic macular degeneration and retinal detachment. The use of myopia control interventions in school myopia can help reduce severity of myopia in the further life of this population with potential reduce of the risk of these pathologies.
There are several ways to control school myopia progression. High concentrations of atropine have been reported highly effective in the control of the myopia progression. However the accompanied side effects such as photophobia and near blurred vision. Recent research shows that low-concentration atropine can achieve similar control effect and more acceptable with much minimal side effect compared to high concentration of atropine.
Research in animal models has shown that imposed myopic optical defocus in peripheral retina, the focal plane in front of the retina, has an inhibitory effect on eye growth to stop myopia progression. Recently, it has been reported that spectacle lenses with aspherical lenslets with myopic defocus (Stellest™ lenses) effectively slow myopia progression reaching 67% and retard axial elongation reaching 64% compared with single vision lenes in 1 year study.
The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of the Stellest lenses, 0.05% atropine and combined treatment for the myopia control in Taiwanese children.
Method: This study will be conducted 2 years at the Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan. Children aged 6 to 12 years old with myopic refraction of at least -0.75 D in both eyes, astigmatism of less than -2.5 D, were enrolled in this open label, randomized study. Excluded were those with ocular diseases (e.g., cataract, congenital retinal diseases, amblyopia, and strabismus), previous use of atropine, or orthokeratology lens orother optical methods for myopia control within 6 months, allergy to atropine, or systemic diseases (e.g., endocrine, cardiac, and respiratory diseases). Written informed consent will be obtained from parents or guardians and the participants. The study will be sent to the Ethics Committee of the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and will be registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov Registry, the Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (registration no:). All procedures are conducted according to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.
100 Participants in this study were randomized to receive Stellest lenses spectacle (ST) (N=34), 0.05% atropine with single vision lenses (ASV) (N=33) and combined treatment (STA) (N=33). 0.05% atropine eye drops is dropped once nightly in both eyes in ASV and STA group. The gender and age are balanced across the 3 treatment arms. The trial medications were prepackaged identically with the number of study subjects and the expiration date. Expiry duration for the batch of eye drops was 2 years.
All subjects are recruited and randomized to 3 treatment groups at the baseline visit. Boys and girls are recruited to have a balance in gender. All subjects are then followed up on the same schedule with the same examination protocol: at 2 weeks (monitor visit), 6 months, and 12 months from the baseline visit. The purpose of the monitor visit at 2 weeks was to determine the hyperopic shift, if any, that has been reported in a higher concentration of atropine in the previous studies.
At each visit, distant best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in was assessed by an optic technician using the Landolt C chart and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) by well-trained an study team staff. Near visual acuity was assessed using best-corrected distance spectacle correction with a reduced logMAR reading chart placed at 40 cm under well-lit conditions. The near point of accommodation was measured using a Royal Air Force (RAF) near point rule (Harlow, Essex, UK) with best-corrected distance spectacle correction.
Participants were instructed to move the target inward until the N5 print became slightly blurred and then outward until it just became clear. Accommodation amplitude was calculated as the inverse of the near point of accommodation.
Mesopic pupil size and photopic pupil size were measured. Cycloplegic autorefraction was performed using an autorefractor after the tropicamide regimen, which consisted of at least 3 cycles of eye drops. At the first cycle, 2 separate eye drops, tropicamide 1%, were administered to both eyes at 5 minutes apart. A 2nd and 3rd cycle of the same cycloplegic drops would be administered 10 minutes after the previous cycle. If the pupil size was less than 6.0 mm, further cycles of cycloplegic eye drops would be administered if necessary to ensure the pupils are well dilated. Five readings, all of which had to be less than 0.25 D apart, were obtained and averaged. Spherical equivalent (SE) was calculated as spherical power plus half of the cylinder power. Ocular AL was measured by on noncontact partial coherence interferometry and optic coherencetomography. Five readings, with a maximum-minimum deviation of 0.05 mm or less, were taken and averaged. A diary on the trial medication was kept for each subject. Compliance level of each subject was classified according to the mean number of using atropine per week as reported by participants over the 12 months. Subjects with 75% compliance rate (i.e., a mean of 5.25 days/week) were considered to have good compliance. Subjects were also offered sunwear orsunglasses or (which darken on exposure to ultraviolet or sunlight) if they experienced glare or if their parents were worried of excessive light exposure, or progressive glasses (reading add) if they experienced difficulty with near vision. All subjects were prescribed with best-corrected spectacles.
At the baseline, validated questionnaires on outdoor time and near work were administered to parents. In addition, children wear outdoor time smartwatch for 1 week to evaluation the outdoor time every day in the baseline, 6-month F/U and 12-month F/U. Outdoor activities includes time spent on sports and leisure, whereas near works included time on homework, cell phone, computer, video games, and watching TV. Parental refraction is documented by noncycloplegic autorefraction measurement, for both parents of each child at baseline. At the 12-month follow-up visit, the Chinese version of the 25-Item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire was administered to all subjects to determine the impact of different treatment groups on the vision-related quality of life.
A total of 11 subscales are addressed: general health, general vision, ocular pain, near vision, distance vision, social function, mental health, role limitations, dependency, color vision, and peripheral vision. Driving is excluded.
The primary outcome was myopia progression in terms of SE change over 1 year. Myopia progression in each eye was further categorized as mild (<0.5 D), moderate (0.5-0.99 D), or severe (≥1.0 D). The secondary outcomes included AL change at 1 year. Side effect parameters included changes in accommodation amplitude, mesopic and photopic pupil sizes, and distant BCVA and near visual acuity. All ophthalmic parameters, including SE, AL, accommodation, pupil size, and visual acuity, were monitored from baseline.
During each visit, subjects and parents were given an open-ended opportunity to report any medical illness or adverse events. They were also specifically asked about symptoms related to allergy, blurred near vision, glare, or visual loss, and if subjects had been ill or hospitalized since the previous visit. Adverse events (AEs) will be followed, recorded, and reported in the CRF throughout the entire study and only relevant to spectacle or atropine used signs and symptoms. The investigator will assess the severity (intensity) of each AE as mild, moderate or severe, and will also categorize each AE as to its potential relationship to IP (0.05% atropine or Stellest Lenses) using the categories of yes or no.
An Serious Adverse Events (SAE),an SAE is any event that meets any of the following criteria: Results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/ birth defect, is important medical event. Investigator is obliged to respond and meet strict regulatory and IRB timelines associated with expedited reporting obligations for events of this nature. Relevant SAE reporting and follow up information should be notice sponsor immediately and file it along.
Confidentiality and Data Management All information generated in this study is considered highly confidential and must not be disclosed to any person or entity directly involved with the study unless prior written consent is gained from the sponsor. However, authorized regulatory officials, IRB personnel, the sponsor, and its authorized representatives are allowed full access to the records.
All study subjects and legal representative must be informed that their personal study-related data will be used by the sponsor in accordance with local data protection law and the General Data Protection Regulation. The level of disclosure must also be explained to the subject and legal representative, who will be required to give consent for their data to be used as described in the ICF. The subject and legal representative must be informed that medical records may be examination by auditors or other authorized personnel appointed by the sponsor, by appropriated IRB members, and by inspectors from regulatory authorities.
Identification of subjects and CRFs shall be by unique subject identification numbers only. All personal identifiers according to applicable regulations (eg, number, phone number) must be redacted permanently by the site personnel and replaced with the subject's unique identification member in all records and data before transfer to the sponsor (or designee).
All personnel details will be treated as confidential by the investigator and staff.
Statistical Analysis: All data were analyzed based on the intention-to-treat principle. Change of parameters was defined by the difference between the baseline and the corresponding follow-up values. Chi-square test and Fisher exact test were used to test the group difference in categoric data. Analysis of variance was used to test the group difference of continuous data. SPSS software was used for data analyses. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Stellest lenses spectacle | Experimental | Device: Stellest Lenses34 children wear Stellest lenses for all day. |
| Stellest lenses+0.05% atropine | Experimental | Combination Product: Stellest Lenses+0.05% atropine33 children wear Stellest lenses for all day, and 0.05% atropine eye drops is dropped once nightly in both eyes. |
| Single vision lenses+0.05% atropine | Placebo comparator | Drug: Single vision Lenses+0.05% atropine33 children wear Single lenses for all day, and 0.05% atropine eye drops is dropped once nightly in both eyes. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 12 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Children aged 6~12 year-old.
- Equivalent diopter: -0.75~-4.00 D.
- Astigmatism and anisometropia <2.50 D.
- Best corrected visual acuity of one eye reaches 1.0.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Strabismus, amblyopia, and abnormal binocular vision.
- Other eye diseases.
- Have a history of using myopia control products within six months.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Stellest LensesAll subjects are recruited and randomized to 3 treatment groups at the baseline visit. A Group:Stellest Lenses spectacle (ST) | Device | Stellest lenses spectacle |
| Stellest Lenses+0.05% atropineAll subjects are recruited and randomized to 3 treatment groups at the baseline visit. B Group:Combined Treatment | Combination product | Stellest lenses+0.05% atropine |
| Single vision Lenses+0.05% atropineAll subjects are recruited and randomized to 3 treatment groups at the baseline visit. C Group:0.05% Atropine with single vision | Drug | Single vision lenses+0.05% atropine |
Primary outcome
Spherical equivalent refraction power
Time frame: At 2 weeks (monitor visit), 6 months, and 12 months from the baseline visit
Spherical equivalent (SE) was calculated as spherical power plus half of the cylinder power
Axial length
Time frame: At 2 weeks (monitor visit), 6 months, and 12 months from the baseline visit
Ocular AL was measured by on non contact partial coherence interferometry and optic coherence tomography.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Apr 2024.
Related trials for Myopia
Recruiting
Managing Premyopia in Chinese Children Using Artificial Intelligence Assisted Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segments Based Spectacle Lens: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Pre-myopia, Myopia
Not yet recruiting
BRIGHT-LIGHT: Studying Red Light Therapy for Severe Short-Sightedness or Short-Sightedness That Worsens Despite Standard Treatment
Myopia, Myopia Progressing
Not yet recruiting
Clinical Performance and Outcomes After Toric Lens Transition
Astigmatism
Active, not recruiting
Effect of IOP Lowering on Progressive HM
High Myopia, Intraocular Pressure
Recruiting
Evaluation of a New Laser Refractive Vision Correction Using the TENEO™ 317 Model 2
Hyperopia and Myopia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Stellest Lenses, Stellest Lenses+0.05% atropine and Single vision Lenses+0.05% atropine in people with Myopia, run by Essilor-Polylite Taiwan Co., Ltd. at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Eric Tsai (+886 2-2528-8001 ext. 316, erictsai@essilor.com.tw), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Spherical equivalent refraction power (time frame: At 2 weeks (monitor visit), 6 months, and 12 months from the baseline visit). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Apr 2024.