AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Kidney DiseasesNCT06343129

Effects of a Whole-food, Plant-based Nutrition Program on BP and Potassium in Subjects With CKD

A study testing Dietary education program in people with Chronic Kidney Diseases, run by University of Rochester at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if an educational program emphasizing a whole food plant based diet favorably impacts blood pressure while not significantly increasing blood potassium levels, by comparing a group of patients receiving the educational program with a control group of patients receiving no… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Kidney Diseases
What is being tested?
Dietary education program
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
43 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
26 Oct 2020to 12 Dec 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age greater than 18 years
  • Subjects with CKD 3 and 4 (as determined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate of ≥ 15 ml/min but < 60 ml/min for at least three months)
  • Subjects with hypertension, defined as use of antihypertension medication:
  • Lack of significant proteinuria ( subjects will have a 24 hour urine protein value of < 500 mg or a spot protein to creatinine ratio of < 0.5 or a microalbumin to creatinine ratio < 300) within previous 3 months.
  • Fluent in English language
  • Able and willing to comply with the testing schedule and the meeting schedule of the Jumpstart
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Able and willing to comply with dietary advice of whole-food plant based diet given during the educational session
  • Able and willing to give informed consent
  • Must have computer/internet access to participate in virtual Zoom educational sessions (intervention group only)

Who cannot join

  • Kidney disease requiring immunosuppressive therapy
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Pregnancy
  • Life expectancy < 12 months
  • History of solid organ transplant or anticipated solid organ transplant in next 2 months
  • History of hyperkalemia: (two or more potassium levels ≥ 5.0 Meq/L or those requiring intervention for high potassium levels within the last six months)
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Subjects with malabsorptive syndromes
  • Subjects with history of bariatric surgery or planned bariatric surgery in the next 2 months
  • Subjects on warfarin
  • Subjects with documented eating disorder at the time of consent
  • Allergy or intolerance of a plant-based or plant-derived food (gluten, soy, etc.)
  • Following a vegan diet in the six months prior to consent
  • Major surgery within 60 days prior to consent

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • Clinical Research Center of the University of Rochester Medical Center

    Rochester, New York, 14642

  • University of Rochester Medical Center

    Rochester, New York, 14642

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Effects of an Education Program Emphasizing a Whole-food, Plant-based Nutrition Program on Blood Pressure and Blood Potassium Levels in Subjects With Chronic Kidney Disease

The purpose of this study is to determine if an educational program emphasizing a whole food plant based diet favorably impacts blood pressure while not significantly increasing blood potassium levels, by comparing a group of patients receiving the educational program with a control group of patients receiving no specific education.

Read the detailed description

The primary objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that educating hypertensive chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3 and 4 patients on the benefit of a whole food plant based (WFPB) diet in the context of a 15-day educational program ("Jumpstart program") will lead to improved blood pressure control and will not increase rates of hyperkalemia.

Other objectives:

  1. To test the effect of the Jumpstart program on degree of uptake on a WFPB diet via a 3 day food recall.
  2. To test the effect of the Jumpstart program on other important outcomes in CKD in the following domains:
  3. Body composition such as weight and body mass index (BMI).
  4. Quality of life.
  5. Laboratory tests including- serum levels of sodium, bicarbonate, chloride, Blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, albumin, parathyroid hormone, fibroblast growth factor 23, lipids, C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate.
  6. To test the effect of the Jumpstart program on quality of life in hypertensive CKD patients.
Being tested
Dietary education program
Keywords
Diet, Plant-based, Whole food, Hypertension, Hyperkalemia, Blood pressure, Potassium, Systolic blood pressure, Diastolic blood pressure
Medical subject headings
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Hypertension, Hyperkalemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Dietary education programBehavioural

    Also called Nutritional education program

    Jumpstart educational program:

    https://www.rochesterlifestylemedicine.com/about-community-jumpstart/

Study groups in NCT06343129
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Jumpstart Educational ProgramExperimentalJumpstart sessions on day 1, 2, 5, 8, 12, and 15. Tests at baseline and week 2 visit: blood pressure, height and weight measurements to calculate a body mass index, urine tests to assess antioxidant activity, quality of life questionnaire (~8 minutes to complete) about physical and mental symptoms, a 3-day food record to assess if participants are changing their diet over the course of the study, assessment of medication use. Tests performed at day 1, day 8, and day 15: A small blood draw [about 1 teaspoon] to check chemistry levels, cholesterol, and markers of inflammation. Laboratory tests are reviewed once available, and participant contacted by the study team either by telephone or My Chart regarding clinically significant results that require intervention. If potassium levels are higher than 5.2 Meq/L, the study team contacts the participant or their alternate contact directly. For the intervention group, this is in addition to the finger-stick blood collection.
Receives: Behavioral: Dietary education program
Control groupNo interventionParticipants randomized to the control group continue to receive medical, dietary, and nutritional advice from their medical team as normal. The testing is the same testing as the intervention group and will be done at day 1, day 8, and day 15 of the study. They do not participate in the educational sessions during the study but will have the opportunity to participate in the program at no charge at the conclusion of the study.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean change in systolic blood pressure

    Unit of measurement - mm Hg

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  2. Mean change in diastolic blood pressure

    Unit of measurement - mm Hg

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  3. Mean change in potassium levels

    Unit of measurement - mEq/L

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  4. Proportion of participants developing hyperkalemia

    Percentage

    Measured: Day 15

Secondary outcomes (41)
  1. Mean Change in energy/day

    Unit of measurement - kcal/day. Subjects completed a 3-day food record prior to intervention and during Jumpstart (or equivalent time for controls). Participants were given a recording form, and verbal and written instructions to record relevant details for all foods and beverages consumed. Portion size was estimated, using food visual aids, or measured, using weight scales or volume measures. A research dietitian (NW) provided the food record instruction and reviewed the completed records with participants to increase the quality of the report. The food record data was then entered into the Nutrition Data System for Research (NSDR, Nutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities) for calculation of nutrient intake.

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  2. Mean change in energy/kg of body mass

    Unit of measurement - kcal/kg/day. Subjects completed a 3-day food record prior to intervention and during Jumpstart (or equivalent time for controls). Participants were given a recording form, and verbal and written instructions to record relevant details for all foods and beverages consumed. Portion size was estimated, using food visual aids, or measured, using weight scales or volume measures. A research dietitian (NW) provided the food record instruction and reviewed the completed records with participants to increase the quality of the report. The food record data was then entered into the Nutrition Data System for Research (NSDR, Nutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities) for calculation of nutrient intake.

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  3. Mean change in total fat

    Unit of measurement - grams. Subjects completed a 3-day food record prior to intervention and during Jumpstart (or equivalent time for controls). Participants were given a recording form, and verbal and written instructions to record relevant details for all foods and beverages consumed. Portion size was estimated, using food visual aids, or measured, using weight scales or volume measures. A research dietitian (NW) provided the food record instruction and reviewed the completed records with participants to increase the quality of the report. The food record data was then entered into the Nutrition Data System for Research (NSDR, Nutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities) for calculation of nutrient intake.

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  4. Mean change in % calories from fat

    Unit of measurement - Percentage. Subjects completed a 3-day food record prior to intervention and during Jumpstart (or equivalent time for controls). Participants were given a recording form, and verbal and written instructions to record relevant details for all foods and beverages consumed. Portion size was estimated, using food visual aids, or measured, using weight scales or volume measures. A research dietitian (NW) provided the food record instruction and reviewed the completed records with participants to increase the quality of the report. The food record data was then entered into the Nutrition Data System for Research (NSDR, Nutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities) for calculation of nutrient intake.

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  5. Mean change in % calories from carbohydrates

    Unit of measurement - Percentage. Subjects completed a 3-day food record prior to intervention and during Jumpstart (or equivalent time for controls). Participants were given a recording form, and verbal and written instructions to record relevant details for all foods and beverages consumed. Portion size was estimated, using food visual aids, or measured, using weight scales or volume measures. A research dietitian (NW) provided the food record instruction and reviewed the completed records with participants to increase the quality of the report. The food record data was then entered into the Nutrition Data System for Research (NSDR, Nutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities) for calculation of nutrient intake.

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  6. Mean change in % calories from protein

    Unit of measurement - Percentage. Subjects completed a 3-day food record prior to intervention and during Jumpstart (or equivalent time for controls). Participants were given a recording form, and verbal and written instructions to record relevant details for all foods and beverages consumed. Portion size was estimated, using food visual aids, or measured, using weight scales or volume measures. A research dietitian (NW) provided the food record instruction and reviewed the completed records with participants to increase the quality of the report. The food record data was then entered into the Nutrition Data System for Research (NSDR, Nutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities) for calculation of nutrient intake.

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  7. Mean change in Animal protein

    Unit of measurement - grams. Subjects completed a 3-day food record prior to intervention and during Jumpstart (or equivalent time for controls). Participants were given a recording form, and verbal and written instructions to record relevant details for all foods and beverages consumed. Portion size was estimated, using food visual aids, or measured, using weight scales or volume measures. A research dietitian (NW) provided the food record instruction and reviewed the completed records with participants to increase the quality of the report. The food record data was then entered into the Nutrition Data System for Research (NSDR, Nutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities) for calculation of nutrient intake.

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  8. Mean change in Vegetable protein

    Unit of measurement - grams. Subjects completed a 3-day food record prior to intervention and during Jumpstart (or equivalent time for controls). Participants were given a recording form, and verbal and written instructions to record relevant details for all foods and beverages consumed. Portion size was estimated, using food visual aids, or measured, using weight scales or volume measures. A research dietitian (NW) provided the food record instruction and reviewed the completed records with participants to increase the quality of the report. The food record data was then entered into the Nutrition Data System for Research (NSDR, Nutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities) for calculation of nutrient intake.

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  9. Mean change in cholesterol

    Unit of measurement - milligrams. Subjects completed a 3-day food record prior to intervention and during Jumpstart (or equivalent time for controls). Participants were given a recording form, and verbal and written instructions to record relevant details for all foods and beverages consumed. Portion size was estimated, using food visual aids, or measured, using weight scales or volume measures. A research dietitian (NW) provided the food record instruction and reviewed the completed records with participants to increase the quality of the report. The food record data was then entered into the Nutrition Data System for Research (NSDR, Nutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities) for calculation of nutrient intake.

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  10. Mean change in Total dietary fiber

    Unit of measurement - grams. Subjects completed a 3-day food record prior to intervention and during Jumpstart (or equivalent time for controls). Participants were given a recording form, and verbal and written instructions to record relevant details for all foods and beverages consumed. Portion size was estimated, using food visual aids, or measured, using weight scales or volume measures. A research dietitian (NW) provided the food record instruction and reviewed the completed records with participants to increase the quality of the report. The food record data was then entered into the Nutrition Data System for Research (NSDR, Nutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities) for calculation of nutrient intake.

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  11. Mean change in Total fiber per 1000 kcal

    Unit of measurement - Subjects completed a 3-day food record prior to intervention and during Jumpstart (or equivalent time for controls). Participants were given a recording form, and verbal and written instructions to record relevant details for all foods and beverages consumed. Portion size was estimated, using food visual aids, or measured, using weight scales or volume measures. A research dietitian (NW) provided the food record instruction and reviewed the completed records with participants to increase the quality of the report. The food record data was then entered into the Nutrition Data System for Research (NSDR, Nutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities) for calculation of nutrient intake.

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  12. Mean change in calcium

    Unit of measurement - milligrams. Subjects completed a 3-day food record prior to intervention and during Jumpstart (or equivalent time for controls). Participants were given a recording form, and verbal and written instructions to record relevant details for all foods and beverages consumed. Portion size was estimated, using food visual aids, or measured, using weight scales or volume measures. A research dietitian (NW) provided the food record instruction and reviewed the completed records with participants to increase the quality of the report. The food record data was then entered into the Nutrition Data System for Research (NSDR, Nutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities) for calculation of nutrient intake.

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  13. Mean change in phosphorous

    Unit of measurement - milligrams. Subjects completed a 3-day food record prior to intervention and during Jumpstart (or equivalent time for controls). Participants were given a recording form, and verbal and written instructions to record relevant details for all foods and beverages consumed. Portion size was estimated, using food visual aids, or measured, using weight scales or volume measures. A research dietitian (NW) provided the food record instruction and reviewed the completed records with participants to increase the quality of the report. The food record data was then entered into the Nutrition Data System for Research (NSDR, Nutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities) for calculation of nutrient intake.

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  14. Mean change in magnesium

    Unit of measurement - milligrams. Subjects completed a 3-day food record prior to intervention and during Jumpstart (or equivalent time for controls). Participants were given a recording form, and verbal and written instructions to record relevant details for all foods and beverages consumed. Portion size was estimated, using food visual aids, or measured, using weight scales or volume measures. A research dietitian (NW) provided the food record instruction and reviewed the completed records with participants to increase the quality of the report. The food record data was then entered into the Nutrition Data System for Research (NSDR, Nutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities) for calculation of nutrient intake.

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  15. Mean change in sodium

    Unit of measurement - milligrams. Subjects completed a 3-day food record prior to intervention and during Jumpstart (or equivalent time for controls). Participants were given a recording form, and verbal and written instructions to record relevant details for all foods and beverages consumed. Portion size was estimated, using food visual aids, or measured, using weight scales or volume measures. A research dietitian (NW) provided the food record instruction and reviewed the completed records with participants to increase the quality of the report. The food record data was then entered into the Nutrition Data System for Research (NSDR, Nutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities) for calculation of nutrient intake.

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  16. Mean change in potassium

    Unit of measurement - milligrams. Subjects completed a 3-day food record prior to intervention and during Jumpstart (or equivalent time for controls). Participants were given a recording form, and verbal and written instructions to record relevant details for all foods and beverages consumed. Portion size was estimated, using food visual aids, or measured, using weight scales or volume measures. A research dietitian (NW) provided the food record instruction and reviewed the completed records with participants to increase the quality of the report. The food record data was then entered into the Nutrition Data System for Research (NSDR, Nutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities) for calculation of nutrient intake.

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  17. Mean change in body mass

    Unit of measurement - kilograms. Subjects completed a 3-day food record prior to intervention and during Jumpstart (or equivalent time for controls). Participants were given a recording form, and verbal and written instructions to record relevant details for all foods and beverages consumed. Portion size was estimated, using food visual aids, or measured, using weight scales or volume measures. A research dietitian (NW) provided the food record instruction and reviewed the completed records with participants to increase the quality of the report. The food record data was then entered into the Nutrition Data System for Research (NSDR, Nutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities) for calculation of nutrient intake.

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  18. Mean change in body mass index

    Unit of measurement - kg/m². Subjects completed a 3-day food record prior to intervention and during Jumpstart (or equivalent time for controls). Participants were given a recording form, and verbal and written instructions to record relevant details for all foods and beverages consumed. Portion size was estimated, using food visual aids, or measured, using weight scales or volume measures. A research dietitian (NW) provided the food record instruction and reviewed the completed records with participants to increase the quality of the report. The food record data was then entered into the Nutrition Data System for Research (NSDR, Nutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities) for calculation of nutrient intake.

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  19. Mean change in sodium measured in blood

    Unit of measurement - mEq/L

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  20. Mean change in chloride measured in blood

    Unit of measurement - mEq/L

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  21. Mean change in bicarbonate measured in blood

    Unit of measurement - mEq/L

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  22. Mean change in blood urea nitrogen (BUN) measured

    Unit of measurement - mg/dl

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  23. Mean change in creatinine measured in blood

    Unit of measurement - mg/dl

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  24. Mean change in glucose measured in blood

    Unit of measurement - mg/dl

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  25. Mean change in calcium measured in blood

    Unit of measurement - mg/dl

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  26. Mean change in phosphorous measured in blood

    Unit of measurement - mg/dl

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  27. Mean change in parathyroid hormome (PTH) measured in blood

    Unit of measurement - pg/mL

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  28. Mean change in albumin measured in blood

    Unit of measurement - pg/mL

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  29. Mean change in magnesium measured in blood

    Unit of measurement - mEq/L

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  30. Mean change in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) measured in blood

    Unit of measurement - mm/hr

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  31. Mean change in fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-23 measured in blood

    Unit of measurement - RU/ml

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  32. Mean change in total cholesterol measured in blood

    Unit of measurement - mg/dl

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  33. Mean change in low density lipoprotein (LDL) measured in blood

    Unit of measurement - mg/dl

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  34. Mean change in high density lipoprotein (HDL) measured in blood

    Unit of measurement - mg/dl

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  35. Mean change in triglycerides measured in blood

    Unit of measurement - mg/dl

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  36. Mean change in 8-isoprostane measured in urine

    Unit of measurement - (ng/mg of creat)/kg

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  37. Mean change in symptoms

    Higher scores indicate better health. Scores are transformed linearly to 0-100 range.

    The symptom list assesses the extent of bother (not at all, somewhat, moderately, very much, extremely) during the last 30 days in terms of issues particularly relevant to patients with kidney disease including soreness in muscles, pain (joint,back, chest), headaches, cramps during dialysis, bruising, itchy skin, shortness of breath, dizziness, lack of appetite, excessive thirst, numbness in hands or feet, trouble with memory, blurred vision, nausea, or other problems with the access site.

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  38. Mean change in effects of kidney disease

    Higher scores indicate better health. Scores are transformed linearly to 0-100 range.

    Effects of kidney disease on daily life were assessed using the same five-point response scale used for the symptom/problem list and included restrictions on fluid and dietary intake, and impact on work, carrying out family responsibilities, travel, lifting objects, personal appearance, and time available to get things done.

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  39. Mean change in burden of kidney disease

    Higher scores indicate better health. Scores are transformed linearly to 0-100 range.

    The burden of kidney disease scale assesses perceptions of frustration and interference of kidney disease in one's life using a definitely true to definitely false response scale (interferes too much with life, too much time spent dealing with it, feel frustrated dealing with it, feel like a burden on family).

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  40. Mean change in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (MOS SF-12) physical composite

    Higher scores indicate better health. Scores are transformed linearly to 0-100 range.

    Physical composite includes questions on how you feel about your physical health. In the survey, participants are asked if they could do things like climb stairs, move a table, or push a vacuum. How well they think they feel physically is a key measure of their health.

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  41. Mean change in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (MOS SF-12) mental composite

    Higher scores indicate better health. Scores are transformed linearly to 0-100 range.

    Mental composite includes questions about general health, activity limits, ability to accomplish desired tasks, depression and anxiety, energy level, and social activities.

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Apr 2024
  2. Study start26 Oct 2020
  3. Primary completion12 Dec 2022
  4. Study completion12 Dec 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
43 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06343129
Sponsor's protocol ID
3817
Status last verified
Apr 2024
First submitted
26 Mar 2024
Last updated
17 Apr 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Dietary education program in people with Chronic Kidney Diseases, run by University of Rochester at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean change in systolic blood pressure (time frame: Baseline to day 15). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Apr 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in