Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesALLRNCT06341192
Comparison Between Combined ALLR With Single Bundle and Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
A study testing Single-bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstruction and Double-bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstruction in people with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, run by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to test and compare different surgical techniques in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. The main questions it aims to answer are: What are the optimal criteria for selecting between single-bundle ACL reconstruction combined with anterolateral ligament (ALL)… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
- What is being tested?
- Single-bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstruction and Double-bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstruction
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 26 Jun 2024to 31 Oct 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients plan to receive ACL surgery
- at least 18 years old
Who cannot join
- Presented history of the injured leg or congenital abnormality
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Taiwan1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Chang Gung memorial hospital
Taoyuan, taoyuan, 333
Cheng-Pang Yang, Dr, ronnie80097@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Clinical Comparison and Motion Analysis of Sports Function Between Combined Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction With Single Bundle and Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
The goal of this clinical trial is to test and compare different surgical techniques in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- What are the optimal criteria for selecting between single-bundle ACL reconstruction combined with anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction combined with ALL reconstruction?
- How do these two surgical techniques compare in terms of post-operative knee stability, functional outcomes, and reducing re-tear rates?
Read more
Participants will:
- Undergo pre-operative MRI imaging, ligament stability testing, and motion analysis evaluations
- Be randomly assigned to either:
- Single-bundle ACL + ALL reconstruction
- Double-bundle ACL + ALL reconstruction
- Receive the assigned surgical procedure
- Participate in post-operative follow-ups, ligament stability testing, and motion analysis at 6 months and 1 year
Researchers will compare the single-bundle ACL + ALL group and the double-bundle ACL + ALL group to see if one technique demonstrates superior knee stability, functional outcomes (e.g. return to sport ability), and lower ACL re-tear rates.
Read the detailed description
Anterolateral ligament(ALL) combined with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction(ACL) has become more and more popular in recent years, as ALL could protect the ACL graft in tibial internal rotation, and prevent the ACL graft from rupture. Cottet et al. proposed a minimal invasive method with Y-figure construct of ALL, without acquiring additional graft from the patient. Their data showed significant lower graft re-rupture rate and faster return-to-sport(RTS). There are many different techniques of ACL combined ALL reconstruction. While these methods mostly are single bundle ACL combined ALL reconstruction. Previous cadaver studies told that the anterior cruciate ligament is composed of anteromedial and posterolateral bundle. It had been debated between single bundle and double bundle ACL reconstruction for years. As a result, it is meaningful to compare the clinical outcomes between ALL combined with single bundle or double bundle ACL reconstruction. Our studies included MRI image, arthrometer measurement and optical motion capture system. We hope to compare the clinical outcomes and sports function between A: single bundle ACL combined ALL reconstruction and B: double bundle ACL combined ALL reconstruction.
- Being tested
- Single-bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstruction, Double-bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstruction
- Keywords
- anterior cruciate ligament, anterolateral ligament, single bundle, double bundle, optical motion capture, graft rupture
- Medical subject headings
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Single-bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstructionProcedure or surgery
Single-Bundle ACL + ALL Reconstruction Group:
Patients in this group will undergo reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) using a single-bundle graft technique.
In addition, they will have the anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstructed using a portion of the same graft material.
The single ACL bundle is typically positioned to replicate the anatomic footprint of the native ACL.
For the ALL reconstruction, a commonly used technique is the Sonnery-Cottet ALL reconstruction using a gracilis tendon graft.
This combines an intra-articular ACL reconstruction with an extra-articular lateral tenodesis to improve rotational instability.
Double-bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstructionProcedure or surgery
Double-Bundle ACL + ALL Reconstruction Group:
Patients in this group will undergo anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction using two graft bundles to more anatomically replicate the native ACL\'s anteromedial and posterolateral bundles.
Like the single-bundle group, they will also have supplemental ALL reconstruction performed using a portion of the graft material.
The double-bundle ACL reconstruction aims to better restore the ACL\'s complex anatomic footprint and bundles\' tension patterns.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Double bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstruction | Experimental | ACL reconstruction with triple folded semitendinosus and non folded gracilis and fibertape Receives: Procedure: Double-bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstruction |
| Single bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstruction | Experimental | Single bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstruction Receives: Procedure: Single-bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstruction |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score. The IKDC is a patient-completed tool, which contains sections on knee symptoms (7 items), function (2 items), and sports activities (2 items). Scores range from 0 points (lowest level of function or highest level of symptoms) to 100 points (highest level of function and lowest level of symptoms).
Measured: Preoperative, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
Marx's activity score;The Marx Scale consists of four questions concerning four activities or actions: running, cutting, deceleration, and pivoting. The patient or survey respondent is asked to report on the frequency with which they performed the activity in their healthiest state within the past year. From 0 point(the worst) to 16 points(the best).
Measured: Preoperative, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
SANE score, The Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) is a patient rating from 0-100. Patients rate their current illness score in relation to their pre-injury baseline
Measured: Preoperative, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year
Knee ligament stability:
Anterior tibial translation measured using a ligament arthrometer (GNRB) to objectively quantify anteroposterior knee laxity
Measured: Preoperative, 6 months, 1 year
Knee ligament stability clinical evaluation
Lachman test
Measured: Preoperative, 6 months, 1 year
Knee ligament stability clinical evaluation
pivot shift test
Measured: Preoperative, 6 months, 1 year
Knee ligament stability clinical evaluation
Anterior drawer test
Measured: Preoperative, 6 months, 1 year
Functional performance and return to sport
Lower limb muscle strength
Measured: Preoperative, 6 months, 1 year
Functional performance and return to sport
Lower limb symmetry index
Measured: Preoperative, 6 months, 1 year
Imaging
Pre- and post-operative X-ray analysis to assess bone tunnels position
Measured: Preoperative, 1 year
Imaging
Pre- and post-operative MRI analysis to assess graft ligamentization.
Measured: Preoperative, 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Apr 2024
- Study start26 Jun 2024
- Primary completion31 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Oct 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Single-Bundle ACL + ALL Reconstruction Group: * Patients in this group will undergo reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) using a single-bundle graft technique. * In addition, they will have the anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstructed using a portion of the same graft material. * For the ALL reconstruction, a commonly used technique is the Sonnery-Cottet ALL reconstruction using a split graft. Double-Bundle ACL + ALL Reconstruction Group: * Patients in this group will undergo anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction using two graft bundles to more anatomically replicate the native ACL's anteromedial and posterolateral bundles. * Like the single-bundle group, they will also have supplemental ALL reconstruction performed using a portion of the graft material. * The double-bundle ACL reconstruction aims to better restore the ACL's complex anatomic footprint and bundles' tension patterns.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Cheng-Pang Dr. Yang, Principal investigator, Cheng Gung memorial hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06341192
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ChangGungMH ALL SB DB
- Acronym
- ALLR
- Status last verified
- Jan 2025
- First submitted
- 18 Mar 2024
- Last updated
- 25 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: 1. Protection of participant privacy and confidentiality is paramount in this study involving sensitive medical data and procedures. Sharing identifiable IPD could breach the trust and privacy of these patients undergoing knee surgeries. 2. The informed consent process likely did not explicitly state or obtain approval from participants to share their individual-level data, including medical images, functional assessments, and clinical outcomes, with third parties outside the research team.
Publications
Cameron KL, Peck KY, Davi SM, Owens CRBD, Svoboda CRSJ, DiStefano LJ, Marshall SW, de la Motte SJ, Beutler CRAI, Padua DA. Association Between Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) Items and the Incidence Rate of Lower Extremity Stress Fracture. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Jun 9;10(6):23259671221100790. doi: 10.1177/23259671221100790. eCollection 2022 Jun.
PubMed 35706554Helito CP, Helito PVP, Costa HP, Demange MK, Bordalo-Rodrigues M. Assessment of the Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Acute Injuries of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament. Arthroscopy. 2017 Jan;33(1):140-146. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.05.009. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
PubMed 27324971Sonnery-Cottet B, Thaunat M, Freychet B, Pupim BH, Murphy CG, Claes S. Outcome of a Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Technique With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1598-605. doi: 10.1177/0363546515571571. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
PubMed 25740835Batty LM, Firth A, Moatshe G, Bryant DM, Heard M, McCormack RG, Rezansoff A, Peterson DC, Bardana D, MacDonald PB, Verdonk PCM, Spalding T, Getgood AMJ; STABILITY Study Group; Willits K, Birmingham T, Hewison C, Wanlin S, Firth A, Pinto R, Martindale A, O'Neill L, Jennings M, Daniluk M, Boyer D, Zomar M, Moon K, Pritchett R, Payne K, Fan B, Mohan B, Buchko GM, Hiemstra LA, Kerslake S, Tynedal J, Stranges G, Mcrae S, Gullett L, Brown H, Legary A, Longo A, Christian M, Ferguson C, Mohtadi N, Barber R, Chan D, Campbell C, Garven A, Pulsifer K, Mayer M, Simunovic N, Duong A, Robinson D, Levy D, Skelly M, Shanmugaraj A, Howells F, Tough M, Thompson P, Metcalfe A, Asplin L, Dube A, Clarkson L, Brown J, Bolsover A, Bradshaw C, Belgrove L, Millan F, Turner S, Verdugo S, Lowe J, Dunne D, McGowan K, Suddens CM, Declercq G, Vuylsteke K, Van Haver M. Association of Ligamentous Laxity, Male Sex, Chronicity, Meniscal Injury, and Posterior Tibial Slope With a High-Grade Preoperative Pivot Shift: A Post Hoc Analysis of the STABILITY Study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Apr 6;9(4):23259671211000038. doi: 10.1177/23259671211000038. eCollection 2021 Apr.
PubMed 33889648Sonnery-Cottet B, Daggett M, Fayard JM, Ferretti A, Helito CP, Lind M, Monaco E, de Padua VBC, Thaunat M, Wilson A, Zaffagnini S, Zijl J, Claes S. Anterolateral Ligament Expert Group consensus paper on the management of internal rotation and instability of the anterior cruciate ligament - deficient knee. J Orthop Traumatol. 2017 Jun;18(2):91-106. doi: 10.1007/s10195-017-0449-8.
PubMed 28220268
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Comparison and Motion Analysis of Sports Function Between Combined Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction With Single Bundle and Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06341192
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ALLR / ChangGungMH ALL SB DB
- Keywords
- anterior cruciate ligament, anterolateral ligament, single bundle, double bundle, optical motion capture, graft rupture
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Chang Gung Memorial HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 26 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 2 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test and compare different surgical techniques in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- What are the optimal criteria for selecting between single-bundle ACL reconstruction combined with anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction combined with ALL reconstruction?
- How do these two surgical techniques compare in terms of post-operative knee stability, functional outcomes, and reducing re-tear rates?
Participants will:
- Undergo pre-operative MRI imaging, ligament stability testing, and motion analysis evaluations
- Be randomly assigned to either:
- Single-bundle ACL + ALL reconstruction
- Double-bundle ACL + ALL reconstruction
- Receive the assigned surgical procedure
- Participate in post-operative follow-ups, ligament stability testing, and motion analysis at 6 months and 1 year
Researchers will compare the single-bundle ACL + ALL group and the double-bundle ACL + ALL group to see if one technique demonstrates superior knee stability, functional outcomes (e.g. return to sport ability), and lower ACL re-tear rates.
Detailed description
Anterolateral ligament(ALL) combined with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction(ACL) has become more and more popular in recent years, as ALL could protect the ACL graft in tibial internal rotation, and prevent the ACL graft from rupture. Cottet et al. proposed a minimal invasive method with Y-figure construct of ALL, without acquiring additional graft from the patient. Their data showed significant lower graft re-rupture rate and faster return-to-sport(RTS). There are many different techniques of ACL combined ALL reconstruction. While these methods mostly are single bundle ACL combined ALL reconstruction. Previous cadaver studies told that the anterior cruciate ligament is composed of anteromedial and posterolateral bundle. It had been debated between single bundle and double bundle ACL reconstruction for years. As a result, it is meaningful to compare the clinical outcomes between ALL combined with single bundle or double bundle ACL reconstruction. Our studies included MRI image, arthrometer measurement and optical motion capture system. We hope to compare the clinical outcomes and sports function between A: single bundle ACL combined ALL reconstruction and B: double bundle ACL combined ALL reconstruction.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Single-Bundle ACL + ALL Reconstruction Group: * Patients in this group will undergo reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) using a single-bundle graft technique. * In addition, they will have the anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstructed using a portion of the same graft material. * For the ALL reconstruction, a commonly used technique is the Sonnery-Cottet ALL reconstruction using a split graft. Double-Bundle ACL + ALL Reconstruction Group: * Patients in this group will undergo anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction using two graft bundles to more anatomically replicate the native ACL's anteromedial and posterolateral bundles. * Like the single-bundle group, they will also have supplemental ALL reconstruction performed using a portion of the graft material. * The double-bundle ACL reconstruction aims to better restore the ACL's complex anatomic footprint and bundles' tension patterns.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Double bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstruction | Experimental | Procedure: Double-bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstructionACL reconstruction with triple folded semitendinosus and non folded gracilis and fibertape |
| Single bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstruction | Experimental | Procedure: Single-bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstructionSingle bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstruction |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients plan to receive ACL surgery
- at least 18 years old
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Presented history of the injured leg or congenital abnormality
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Single-bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstructionSingle-Bundle ACL + ALL Reconstruction Group: Patients in this group will undergo reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) using a single-bundle graft technique. In addition, they will have the anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstructed using a portion of the same graft material. The single ACL bundle is typically positioned to replicate the anatomic footprint of the native ACL. For the ALL reconstruction, a commonly used technique is the Sonnery-Cottet ALL reconstruction using a gracilis tendon graft. This combines an intra-articular ACL reconstruction with an extra-articular lateral tenodesis to improve rotational instability. | Procedure or surgery | Single bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstruction |
| Double-bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstructionDouble-Bundle ACL + ALL Reconstruction Group: Patients in this group will undergo anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction using two graft bundles to more anatomically replicate the native ACL\'s anteromedial and posterolateral bundles. Like the single-bundle group, they will also have supplemental ALL reconstruction performed using a portion of the graft material. The double-bundle ACL reconstruction aims to better restore the ACL\'s complex anatomic footprint and bundles\' tension patterns. | Procedure or surgery | Double bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstruction |
Primary outcome
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
Time frame: Preoperative, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score. The IKDC is a patient-completed tool, which contains sections on knee symptoms (7 items), function (2 items), and sports activities (2 items). Scores range from 0 points (lowest level of function or highest level of symptoms) to 100 points (highest level of function and lowest level of symptoms).
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
Time frame: Preoperative, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year
Marx's activity score;The Marx Scale consists of four questions concerning four activities or actions: running, cutting, deceleration, and pivoting. The patient or survey respondent is asked to report on the frequency with which they performed the activity in their healthiest state within the past year. From 0 point(the worst) to 16 points(the best).
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
Time frame: Preoperative, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year
SANE score, The Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) is a patient rating from 0-100. Patients rate their current illness score in relation to their pre-injury baseline
Knee ligament stability:
Time frame: Preoperative, 6 months, 1 year
Anterior tibial translation measured using a ligament arthrometer (GNRB) to objectively quantify anteroposterior knee laxity
Knee ligament stability clinical evaluation
Time frame: Preoperative, 6 months, 1 year
Lachman test
Knee ligament stability clinical evaluation
Time frame: Preoperative, 6 months, 1 year
pivot shift test
Knee ligament stability clinical evaluation
Time frame: Preoperative, 6 months, 1 year
Anterior drawer test
Functional performance and return to sport
Time frame: Preoperative, 6 months, 1 year
Lower limb muscle strength
Functional performance and return to sport
Time frame: Preoperative, 6 months, 1 year
Lower limb symmetry index
Imaging
Time frame: Preoperative, 1 year
Pre- and post-operative X-ray analysis to assess bone tunnels position
Imaging
Time frame: Preoperative, 1 year
Pre- and post-operative MRI analysis to assess graft ligamentization.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Sep 2025.
- Background: PubMed 35706554Cameron KL, Peck KY, Davi SM, Owens CRBD, Svoboda CRSJ, DiStefano LJ, Marshall SW, de la Motte SJ, Beutler CRAI, Padua DA. Association Between Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) Items and the Incidence Rate of Lower Extremity Stress Fracture. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Jun 9;10(6):23259671221100790. doi: 10.1177/23259671221100790. eCollection 2022 Jun.
- Background: PubMed 27324971Helito CP, Helito PVP, Costa HP, Demange MK, Bordalo-Rodrigues M. Assessment of the Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Acute Injuries of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament. Arthroscopy. 2017 Jan;33(1):140-146. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.05.009. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
- Background: PubMed 25740835Sonnery-Cottet B, Thaunat M, Freychet B, Pupim BH, Murphy CG, Claes S. Outcome of a Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Technique With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1598-605. doi: 10.1177/0363546515571571. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
- Background: PubMed 33889648Batty LM, Firth A, Moatshe G, Bryant DM, Heard M, McCormack RG, Rezansoff A, Peterson DC, Bardana D, MacDonald PB, Verdonk PCM, Spalding T, Getgood AMJ; STABILITY Study Group; Willits K, Birmingham T, Hewison C, Wanlin S, Firth A, Pinto R, Martindale A, O'Neill L, Jennings M, Daniluk M, Boyer D, Zomar M, Moon K, Pritchett R, Payne K, Fan B, Mohan B, Buchko GM, Hiemstra LA, Kerslake S, Tynedal J, Stranges G, Mcrae S, Gullett L, Brown H, Legary A, Longo A, Christian M, Ferguson C, Mohtadi N, Barber R, Chan D, Campbell C, Garven A, Pulsifer K, Mayer M, Simunovic N, Duong A, Robinson D, Levy D, Skelly M, Shanmugaraj A, Howells F, Tough M, Thompson P, Metcalfe A, Asplin L, Dube A, Clarkson L, Brown J, Bolsover A, Bradshaw C, Belgrove L, Millan F, Turner S, Verdugo S, Lowe J, Dunne D, McGowan K, Suddens CM, Declercq G, Vuylsteke K, Van Haver M. Association of Ligamentous Laxity, Male Sex, Chronicity, Meniscal Injury, and Posterior Tibial Slope With a High-Grade Preoperative Pivot Shift: A Post Hoc Analysis of the STABILITY Study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Apr 6;9(4):23259671211000038. doi: 10.1177/23259671211000038. eCollection 2021 Apr.
- Background: PubMed 28220268Sonnery-Cottet B, Daggett M, Fayard JM, Ferretti A, Helito CP, Lind M, Monaco E, de Padua VBC, Thaunat M, Wilson A, Zaffagnini S, Zijl J, Claes S. Anterolateral Ligament Expert Group consensus paper on the management of internal rotation and instability of the anterior cruciate ligament - deficient knee. J Orthop Traumatol. 2017 Jun;18(2):91-106. doi: 10.1007/s10195-017-0449-8.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. 1. Protection of participant privacy and confidentiality is paramount in this study involving sensitive medical data and procedures. Sharing identifiable IPD could breach the trust and privacy of these patients undergoing knee surgeries. 2. The informed consent process likely did not explicitly state or obtain approval from participants to share their individual-level data, including medical images, functional assessments, and clinical outcomes, with third parties outside the research team.
Related trials for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Extended Post-Operative Oral Tranexamic Acid Dosing After ACL Reconstruction
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
RecruitingObservational study
BioBrace® Augmentation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Procedures
ACL Tears
RecruitingPhase 2
Preventing Injured Knees From osteoArthritis: Severity Outcomes
Osteoarthritis, Knee, Post-traumatic Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruiting
Supporting Athletes' Return to Sports After ACL Reconstruction: A Study of a Psychological Readiness Program
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of the Correlation Between Bone Tunnel Projection Placement and Clinical Outcomes in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury, Tunneling Technique
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Cheng-Pang Dr. Yang principal investigator
Cheng Gung memorial hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Single-bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstruction and Double-bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstruction in people with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, run by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Cheng-Pang Dr. Yang (886-3-3281200 ext. 2163, ronnie80097@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (time frame: Preoperative, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year). The study lists 11 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06341192, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Sep 2025.